Why is Nintendo the only company allowed to get away with stagnation in visuals? And you can't use "same hardware" as an excuse because BOTW was made entirely with the WII U in mind years before being partially developed for the Switch. Games like MGS2 and MGS3 were on the same hardware, and there's a significant noticeable upgrade. TOTK had 5+ years of dedicated development on the Switch, and it looks the exact same in every single way. Even somehow looks worse at times.
SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP
the least insane tendie
死ぬ SNOY.(die snoy)
Because I have nostalgia for them and you're a ZOOMER WAAAAH
Persona one is straight up a lie. P4 came out in 2008 - even that had has a bigger gap to P5.
Won't become more true if you keep reposting it. It will outsell all your goyslop shit. No foreskins for you, kikoid.
Nintendo games are all about the fun. Not the graphics wank you don't understand. Go play CoD or something if you want le pretty graphics but lame uncreative gameplay
It's not just about the graphics though.
literally nothing is creative about gameplay in tendie games for 8 year olds. maybe play something more complex than fisher price toys and expand your pallet
Who said anything about creative. Anon said it is fun. And it is
>lame uncreative gameplay
i know tendies tend to be retarded and mentally stunted but please work on your reading comprehension
Name creative gameplay from the competition. Hint, press X to Atreus is no different from press X to Jason.
>from the competition
Not following this thread's lame attempt to compare Nintendo's creativity exclusively with other AAA goyslop because of console war gayry. Have some actually good games that will flex your brain mooscles.
Baba is You
Factorio
Outer Wilds
Tunic
Noita
Name me a good, adult, game.
>adult
Why are tendies so scared of playing anything that doesn't seem like made out of colorful plastic for 5 year olds
Answer the question.
Ok
Elden Ring
So the same redone Souls game for the 5th time, only with the anime bullshit blown out to 11?
Is it adult because the exact same, "the world is ending, now it's time for you to vaguely do something about it", plot was reused again?
What the fuck the night lasts 6 years in Zelda?
Art style. That's pretty much it. Also the switch is barely stronger than the Wii u
Why not compare to the same timeframe?
lol why are you comparing a port to a new game?
Exactly.
You just prove OP point
who cares?
Once you hit a certain amount of fidelity, increasing it further isn't needed.
BOTW and TOTK don't bother to chase realism, they have an aesthetic that is deliberately stylized and built around flat coloring and fairly low poly counts. That aesthetic is attractive and fairly timeless, it'll look good 10 years from now, just as people can appreciate The Wind Waker today.
The 'fidelity limit' has been passed and people don't need more at a base level to find the game pleasing.
Those other games chased realism at all costs, and aimed to get closer and closer to it. And were expected to keep that up.
MGS1 isn't an ugly game on its own. Hell, the throwback PS1 style games that are popular these days indicate that there is something attractive about the look. But when it was couched in being one of the more visually impressive and realistic games of its time, the expectation was that would be maintained.
If MGS2 was extremely stylized, then the franchise could have broken from that expectation, and later releases wouldn't have surprised anyone at not being high fidelity. Instead the franchise chased that on and on.
le hecking six years
im going insane
Cultural Phenomenons don't need to innovate.
BoTW was more successful than almost the rest of the entire series combined. Think about that, and then notice how it answers your question.
they already sold nintentoddlers the switch. what other games are they going to buy?
The Switch is the only console that has anything worth playing exclusive to it.
The PS5 and X-Box are utter scams.
>he fell for the switch meme
why would you ever buy a console in 2020+3
>Why is Nintendo the only company allowed to get away with stagnation in visuals?
Bethesda?
Ubisoft?
Square Enix?
Gearbox?
Top 3 look the same. Persona is the only noticeable difference. Shit argument.
I thought y'all wanted better gameplay instead of graphics? Now you're bitching about it?
>Games like MGS2 and MGS3 were on the same hardware, and there's a significant noticeable upgrade
to be fair mgs3 has such extremely bad performance that it's borderline unplayable
It's also a worse game because "muh realism" and survivalshit
is there a single honest post in v
not him, but mgs3 is unironically the worst mgs game
bingcels are proper cattle, that's why nintendo's products are overpriced while being low quality. without this herd of obedient cattle this company wouldn't have any right to exist in its current state.
Now compare DS2 and DS3 and see how visually fucked up DS3 is. Also no shadows.
All of those are downgrades
Dude, the entire industry is getting away with stagnating visuals. There's only been gradual improvement since the end of the PS3 era and practically no meaningful difference between this generation and the last. Graphics have been a matter of diminishing terms for a decade.