>Yeah I liked XY and gen 6 but
>Uoooooohhh the difficulty I couldnt stand the difficulty being so easy!
If you used the Exp. Share in XY, you did NOT beat the game.
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
>Yeah I liked XY and gen 6 but
>Uoooooohhh the difficulty I couldnt stand the difficulty being so easy!
If you used the Exp. Share in XY, you did NOT beat the game.
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
The game was braindead easy even without the XP Share.
You didnt beat the game.
So if you used XP Share, you didn't beat the game. And if you DIDN'T use XP Share, you still didn't beat the game? How do you beat the game then?
>he doesnt know
It sure is summer here.
If I don't know then fricking tell me weirdo
If you run the maths, you'd get 100% + 50%x5 = 350% XP the moment you activate xp share
In conclusion, if you didnt raise a total of 6x3.5 = 21 pokemon in XY, you most definitely did NOT beat the game.
this. Just like every pokemon game outside of gen 7
I can only beat the game by using a Darmanitan named Darak?
monkey name derek
>hehe.... gotta remind people of my obsession with Gen 5
Okay buddy, time for your daily dose.
>says the guy who most likely used Mega Charizard X
Reminder that if you didn't use an entire team of shitmons and avoid all optional trainers, you didn't really beat the game.
b a s e d
a
s
e
d
All the shitposting aside this interview really upsets me now since Gamefreak had a good reason for reinventing the exp share, to make rasing multiple in game Pokemon easier, but also knew some fans wouldn't enjoy it so they made it an option. Now they just kind of reply "Tough shit it's always on" when the question comes up. Feels bad.
>play with exp share
>game is easy
>play without exp share
>game is still easy but now it's also literally pointless to use more than 1 or 2 pokemon
the exp share b***hing is the most pointless shit I've ever seen.
>but now it's also literally pointless to use more than 1 or 2 pokemon
Because. It's fricking. Balanced around it. Holy shit.
the game is balanced around using 1 or 2 pokemon? Sure doesn't seem like it.
No. It's about the balance of either you:
>use 1 Pokemon, get overleveled and get owned by mons to which you are disandvantaged (see Bayleef vs gyms in HGSS)
>use more Pokemon, have more coverage (and fun), but you're underleveled/around the level of the opponents
>see Bayleef vs gyms in HGSS
? my bayleef doesn't seem very disadvantaged here....
>hurr I'll just solo the game with my starter then!
Jesus christ how fricking moronic can you be
Why would I use other Pokemon when the game doesn't give me any incentive to use them?
there's a reason every modern RPG in existence has shared exp.
And you still aren't incentivized to use anything except Gift Pokemon because the game is still curbstomped with your starter alone.
>Exp Share was optional
>Affection was a reward for feeding your mons
Why did they make these automatic again?
Affection should be going back to normal for SV since the leaked picnic feature will be the Amie/Refresh/Camp of the game. It seems the automatic crap was just for the spinoffs.
>dude LOL I grinded for 4 hours straight and overlevelled my starter on purpose, ez game!!!!!
Meds
>fighting each trainer once is grinding
????
Btw Ive seen you before on Ganker. Youre the Expshizo. I hope you get doxxed one day.