ZAMN......DS2 looks like THAT????
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
ZAMN......DS2 looks like THAT????
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
It's a rough diamond and a hell of a lot more fun than elden ring.
You lost. Elden Ring won. have a nice day contrarian homosexual.
>Game better because of sales
Elden Ring sucks, you moron. The so-hard mystique of From and ooooooooo memes dazzled normies -- like you -- into loving it before anybody knew what it was like.
I'm sorry, sales? I also mean reviews. Reception. Elden Ring WAS game of the year 2022. No arguments. It's a darling with the media. It's a darling with the fans. It's popular and played in droves even a year later.
You. Lost. COMPLETELY.
I didn't lose. You, like the mainstream reviewers, let yourself be hypnotized into gobbling moldy leftovers with a big dumb smile on your face, and then you asked for more.
>N- no... I can't be wrong!
>It's critics!
>It's the audiences!
>THEY'RE WRONG!
>Elden Ring is bad... because... BECAUSE IT JUST IS, OKAY??
But it is. People screeched about how great and wonderful and just the war in Iraq and Afghanistan was too. Could anyone believe that now? I didn't then and still don't. The vast majority of people are stupid and media "luminaries" are corrupt.
Yeah, and Elden Ring is a lot of garbage. A LOT. Eat your garbage, son. It's good for you. Gamespot says so!
>People screeched about how great and wonderful and just the war in Iraq and Afghanistan was too
You were having a real giggle when you wrote this.
Nope. Just illustrating that argument from popularity is no argument at all.
So goyslop is now good because it sells? kek ok bieber fan
I bet you are the type of homosexual who looks up a movie on rotten tomatoes before he watches it. Rope, now.
The waifugaygery was what gave away the normalhomosexualry of Elden Ring. Don't even have a problem with the game, but god that fanbase.
People were simping for the green maidens feet from DS2 from day one, you revisionist history nostalgiagay, kys
There was always some simping, but it was an incredibly small part then no one really cared about. Now half the posts in Elden Ring threads are literally waifu wars, probably half the images posted are of Ranni as well. It's completely out of control and you have to be dishonest to truly compare it to the occasional gay posting he wants to frick a fire keeper or the emerald herald.
People simp for Fia and Plain Doll. Waifuhomosexualry is nothing new for From.
Just like everyone loved Cyber Punk at release...
Your logic makes no sense at all, if anything the insane amounts of hype would have made it worse if the game was actually bad
> It's been almost a year and DS2 gays still can't accept that Elden Ring did everything their shitty spin-off game tried and failed to do
>spin-off
Elder Ring babies will never not be funny
and your game will never be fun
I enjoyed it and that's all that matters.
>your game
Also it's not "my" game, what kind of low IQ tribalistic mentality is this lmao.
>it's not "my" game
so you don't own the game?
No, steam does
i just played it and it wasn't fun. what gives?
Well, there's no accounting for taste.
objectively speaking, i think the game had some pretty cool ideas and miyazaki was way too quick to throw them away because of the games problems or reception, whatever, but it does have some pretty bad ones too which the other games don't.
what ideas?
special rewards for beating the game without dying/using bonfires, the invader that trolls the player and pretends to be a phantom, new invaders and enemies in NG+, weapons with unique effects like the curved nil greatsword and some other things but i cant remember them. im glad moronic shit like agility disappears though.
Duke's Dear Freja will attack you earlier in the level with a unique bossfight during NG+ and will retain any damage you can get on her before she runs away to her real boss room.
Ya for all of DS2's faults the NG+ system was easily the best in 2 and im very sad that future games seem to have dropped it.
The thing it did best was how it handled NG+ with additional enemies and invaders, as well as exclusive items only available in NG+.
Miyazaki was just a supervisor for DaS2
>It's a rough diamond and a hell of a lot more fun than Elden Ring
Agreed. I hope one day it gets ported over into the DS3 engine and some of the levels are refined.
I'm still so fricking pissed how linear dark souls 3 is. it makes that game boring as frick.
you have a mental disability if that is your criticism
Most people think that. It's the worst part about the game besides the swamps and spammy gameplay.
>linear bad
lol no
>ds fans jerk off to how locations are interconnected
>ds3 spits them in the face by making you teleport to the high wall of lothric without even need to visit the place
never got why they did that
It's a pretty low standard. Elden Ring more like Ubiring. Anything is more fun than this hot garbage.
>b-b-but elden
ds2 will never be better than anything im sorry but you really need to accept that
Elden Ring is DS2 but improved
I wish Elden Ring was half as fun as DS2. Still better than DS3 at least.
Not lol. I don't dislike the game at all though
it isn't though
One of the reason is dislike Elden Ring is because it reminds me too much to DS2
its over
DS2 is objectively the worst from souls game.
So why did I drop DS2 at the poison windmill and have 150+ hours in Elden ring?
>a lot more fun than elden ring.
unfortunately i have to agree, even though 2 previously was my left played souls game. Elden Ring took its place.
have a nice day, moron.
no it's not. and it's not more fun than ER
stop being contrarian so hard, it doesn't make you look cool
Yes it is
>everything i disagree with is contrarian
No you're just autistic or 12
What a terrible fricking game. I have no idea how this got such good reviews despite how shit it is.
In every poll, review, or ranking I’ve ever seen, DS2 is ranked the lowest souls game. But despite its flaws and terrible graphics, it’s a really good game.
>it’s a really good game.
lol
I enjoyed it. I’m not delusional like most people on Ganker that think it’s better than 3 and elden ring, but it was a fun game with a lot of good pvp.
But it is better then those game if you value souls fundamentals and not rolly polly spam and anime bada bing
3 is a rushed piece of shit.
its the black sheep of the franchise because you cant rollspam your way to victory form the get go, the game expects you to use proper positioning and if theres anything i learned about binge watching souls streamers fight malenia its that most actually dont learn proper positioning techniques like directional rolling or spacing enemies they just spam dodge at the right time and chug potions when they get hit. Dark souls 2 is way harder than 1 if you play it like that and thats why souls people didnt like it, they unironically got filtered.
they got filtered by the combat being shitty and the slowest of any game
See this is where you're an idiot because it's faster then DS1. Compare a DS1 character at 26% equip load to a DS2 character at 26%. Big difference in mobility.
>stand directly in front of enemy
>get hit
What is this webm supposed to illustrate?
That anon is a fricking contrarian moron who will eat shit, just because it "filters normies".
the first half is difficult for the tile guy, because he's fixated on those patterns and getting worked up over it. DS 1 doesn't have textures like that.
>file name
hehehe
so naughty
>Has to put his irrational "shitty" first because without it he realized he actually just got filtered by slow combat.
LMAO
>the game expects you to use proper positioning
yea better position myself properly against these bosses that literally do not attack you
I finished playing DS2 recently. It was fine but it's so fricking funny to see threads about it here because there are some sincerely delusional people.
Like this guy lmao, this game is so fricking piss easy I would be extremely surprised if I died more than 50 times, enemies move and swing like they're covered in fricking molasses barring Pursuer and maybe 5 other guys. It did a lot of things that were very interesting and there were some very good visual setpieces but it's almost impossible to talk about them because if you do not worship DS2 like it is the be all end all of video games they'll post some fricking webm or screenshot from 1 or 3. I haven't even played 3.
The worst Souls game is better than any nintendo or weeb shit.
critics were giving the game the praise the original dark souls deserved. it happens a lot
You know what I just noticed today?
Bloodborne came out the same time as DK2. Same year.
This ->
Critics realized they 'got it wrong' with DS1 and overcorrected with DS2.
it's very likely that the original lighting engine made it so that part of the building wasn't clearly visible
soul
but dark
Of the people who like this game, they fall into one of two categories. Contrarians who like it because it is the least popular and they think it makes them look cool. And the sad folk who happened to pick this one first.
Imagine DS2 being your first souls game
>DS1 was your first souls game
>press circle
>enemy weapon magically phases through your character
do soulsgays really?
It was and I loved every minute of it
Lol that's embarrassing
Yes enjoying a video game was very embarrassing
It was mine, and because I was underage and living out in the sticks at the time, I wasn't able to download any updates or patches for the game, so I played day 1 Dark Souls 2 original release from beginning to end. It's a wonder I stuck with the series.
Same as this anon, I went NG+5 and everything. When I went back and played DeS and DaS1 afterwards I was blown away by how much better they were. I've never even played SotFS
I like the game and started off with the first dark souls. Though I don't really have an opinion about Elden Ring since I haven't played it.
Wrong Black person. I played and enjoyed DS1, liked DS2 more, DS3 the least, and currently playing through and loving elden ring
Yeh, youre in the first category.
> lowest possible graphics setting
"SEE! YOUR GAME LOOKS BAD TOO!!!!
You realize OP is actually fake, right?
It's not bad for a N64 game
No it doesn't. How much brighter and greener are you going to keep making this?
that zone has literally zero redeeming qualities. Absolute shit zone
it's not even that bad. chill. Why does DS2 bring such derangement?
what the frick were they thinking with the poison statue area
Black Gulch? If you're not a little pansy ass homosexual you can literally run through the entire area basically unscathed. It's basically one big green corridor when you get down to it.
>people don't want the same poison swamp over and over again, lets try something else
I hate Dark Souls 3 so fricking much
Worst souls game
We all do, anon.
Same, only redeeming quality are dlc weapons and Vilhelm's set.
While I like this image, most ds2 threads on Ganker fellate the frick out of that game and take huge shits on ds3.
I like Dark Souls 2 a lot now after all the updates and Scholar edition, but I was here on day 1 of vanilla DaS2 and that was an abortion. Soul Memory is the worst thing that completely fricks your early co-op experience. I bought both the PS3 and 360 versions so I could play with different groups of friends, and finding out what SM was after I had already beaten a few bosses was so depressing.
you must be new here, the positivity is only recent because ER is such a stinker
>ER is such a stinker
You got broken. You got beaten. You got overwhelmed in every capacity. You. Lost.
DS2gays like scholar and their favorite game most of the time is DS1. Then there is an incredibly small minority of schizos that obsessively like DS2 vanilla and only that.
Is it Hbomberguy? The guy who sperged out against Matthewmatosis, and obsessed strictly over DSII Vanilla?
I played through all of ds2, but only a small chunk of scholar. Is the difference between the two thst big?
It's really not, and that's the problem. Scholar for the most part is just DS2 with all the expansions, better graphics, and some extra content exclusive to it as well as some tweaks in placements and the like. There is zero reason to prefer vanilla over it.
>tweaks in placements and the like
But that's the biggest part you moron. It's a more cohesive and complete game. Buying and playing scholar as is, I had no idea what all the hate towards it was about. But I can definitely see why people would feel burned paying full price for vanilla DS2 and having to pay for the 3 best parts of the game separately
The "hate" is like 2 people who dont shut the frick up. People who like Scholar dont feel the need to remind everyone all the time vanilla is shit and they're talking about Scholar when they talk about DS2. Where as you can guarantee a vanilla truther will never stfu about some 'x' enemy in this one room that wasn't there before which TOTALLY ruins the game..or something.
Literally no one except one autist like DS2. It's pure trash on all levels.
Their iframes being taken away buckbreak the fanbase hard and exposed muh git gud'ers as being npc casuals all along.
>exposed muh git gud'ers as being npc casuals all along.
This, it revealed how a lot of them are just spastics that spam dodge attack and hope for the best.
Yeah, because blocking with a high stability shield takes way more skill.
You must realize that looks much better than the OP image, right?
I like all of the games friends let's get along 🙂
>
I get this is a throwaway area and everything, but why didnt they add some of those shrub monsters to Seath’s garden? Or maybe some of those two headed snakes, or the giant black cats? They had appropriate enemies they just didnt use them for some reason
There's no real greenery left in Seath's garden. It's just a passageway to the crystal cave which is why those giants are there, but, I never understood the placement either. Unless they're supposed to be guarding the golden one that has Seigmeyer's daughter or something.
Strange that DaS2 is the best looking and the worst looking at the same time depending on the area and dynamic lightning
Still the best tho. Soul to the max.
It has the best lighting of all the souls games but was held back by the ps360.
It's good, but the original version they would show in play tests was even better. You can tell just how differently the game runs because of the true dynamic lighting they had planned. Such a shame.
DS3 always cracks me up
>round earth vs. flat earth
Remember the windmill in Dark Souls II? The windmill you need to set on fire with a torch? The windmill made of metal?
weird webm, why not show one of the ds2 caves with the shadow casting stalagmites to make your point?
DS2gays just post screenshots/webms of other Souls games. They don't understand why people make fun of the DaS2 screenshots in the first place
It's because you're still buttdevastated by a bullshot E3 trailer from 10 years ago
I wonder how much of DS2 will forever be tainted by expectations falling flat. Those trailers combined with everyone thinking DS1 was the greatest game ever really doomed DS2 to be screwed huh? I actually prefer DS2 to 1 and I have to say it is a very very ugly game.
>I-it may look like a PS2 game, but at least it has nice shadows
That area in ds2 is utter dog shit and it's a shame.that can be said like 10 times by individual players.
filtered
I am not sure what's the point with those two. Are you trying to showcase how bad you are at the game?
He's showing how he caught on fire because he was standing next to a fire as he got doused in oil it's a cool detail
Didnt know you could move those.
>that little exploding homie waltzing through the fire
worst souls game by far all the threads were shitting on it for months at launch only shitposters try to say its good. I LOVE SOUL MEMORY I LOVE MY WEAPON BREAKING FOR TOO MUCH FPS I LOVE MY UNCONNECTED WORLD I LOVE SHIT MOB PLACEMENT THAT FRICKS OVER THE PLAYER THANKS TO "MUH HARD" ADVERTISING THANK YOU B TEAM
>THANKS TO "MUH HARD" ADVERTISING THANK YOU B TEAM
>LOVE SHIT MOB PLACEMENT THAT FRICKS OVER THE PLAYER THANKS TO "MUH HARD" ADVERTISING
ie filtered. It takes a while for it to come out but these are the people telling you 2 is bad
>filtered
nah nibba i got tired of reloading my save making low level meme pvp builds. ng+ mob placement was done just to be annoying plenty of people were shitting on it for that and the insane tracking that made mobs spin in place to hit you.
2/10 try better next reply
I don't remember SotFS looking like this the last time I played it
it doesn't it's from a pre-release upgraded gameplay demo
i know not many reading now were on Ganker when this game came out but everyone hated it, and the trash graphics didn't help the dogshit and rehashed video game
but yeah, fifa and ubisoft is bad guys
>fifa and ubisoft is bad guys
They are. DaS2 eventually became a good game at least.
>DaS2 eventually became a good game at least.
no it didn't SOTFS made the game worse by spamming enemies everywhere. actual dogshit video game worse than Assassin's Creed and Far Cry
no, it didn't get better because a video essay some troony made that you watched
use youtube dumbc**t
ie filtered. It takes a while but it eventually reveals itself
reveals itself to be dogshit worse than any ubishit fifashit trash
you guys have to understand the only videos that get views and worth watching are ones that go against the popular opinion, that's why you mindbroken morons exist
0 argument, kys troony, nobody cares
i finished both vanilla and sotfs both trash games
>he wants a measured response to belligerent seething
lmao
>i finished both vanilla and sotfs both trash games
That's not what I asked, but alright.
>seething so hard he can't just forget about the game and move on
>actively trying to change the minds of people that disagree with xim
>probably knocks on doors telling people about the evils of DS2
>reddit spacing
lol
>see argument you can't counter
>rattle off as many adhoms as you can think of
the smartest DaS2 fan
What essays are you even talking about? The only ones prevalent are the ones admonishing the game for the sorry state it launched in, which are completely valid.
muh imaginary secret pre-release demo only i have my hands on! Woah you cracked it. No actually I think your mind is just contaminated by low res ps3 compressed screenshots with the brightness cranked all the way up
why is every enemy huge, have infinite stamina and can't be stunned reeeeeee
They dont. Enemies have large openings after attacking. And unless it's an obviously tanky slow enemy they have poise and can be staggered. No DS3 black knights in this game.
ENTER
ummmm... das2sisters?? our response? should we talk about spamrolls again???
You wouldn't expect to stagger these guys. Late game enemy.
People don't realize the original lighting engine is still in the game., but now it only activates when "triggered" by things like torches or spells.
>frick up lighting engine
>game looks fricked up
woah.................
Why do people hate DS2? I played it when it came out and thoroughly enjoyed it. I don't remember anyone disliking it. Feels like only recently people have started hating it.
I havent touched that game in years, but from my memory:
Soul memory was a huge problem, kept people from doing low lvl invasions
The covenant system was fricked up, I cant remember why, but It just felt really tacked on like the designers didn't actually want invasions to happen, but at the same time felt compelled to include it.
Some stats did seemingly nothing. I think adp was one? Poise felt bad imo.
Spells seemed absurd in the beginning.
The world wasn't as interconnected as DS1, the whole warping to bonfires rustled some jimmies.
Oh yeah I forgot the biggest one, the stealth removal of dynamic lighting.
Holy hell did that piss me off. I wanted to gank and fight in pitch black.
>Some stats did seemingly nothing. I think adp was one?
You dumb frick
>The covenant system was fricked up, I cant remember why, but It just felt really tacked on like the designers didn't actually want invasions to happen, but at the same time felt compelled to include it.
Its covenants are the best in the series imo. It feels like it really picked up what DS1 put down: pretty much every one actually does something, versus DS1 where half of them aren't really anything and DS3 which is just fricking nothing. DS2 covenants seem a lot more varied and each of them actually has some NPCs and interactable stuff.
obligatory
>But that's the biggest part you moron
Biggest part of what?
>But I can definitely see why people would feel burned paying full price for vanilla DS2 and having to pay for the 3 best parts of the game separately
The critique is that they prefer the placements in DS2 (lol). This was never about having to buy scholar of the last sin again with them. They prefer the actual vanilla game, they are not fricking protesting lmao. Literally irrelevant.
DS2 is way worse than DS1 but at least tried something new. DS3 is just fanservice and a bad ending to the trilogy.
I don't remember much of DS2 but I remember that nearly any connection to the first game was pure coincidence or completely changed and bastardized from the passage of time. Going into DS3 felt real strange because they dropped that idea nearly entirely and was full of fanservice wanking the old characters.
>goty
>this was the best 2023 had to offer
it's so fricking over
*2022
Why are Soulsgays graphicsgays but only for 2?
The first game is sacred, doesn't matter.
Why do soulsgays always shill 2's graphics despite Bloodborne and Elden Ring being objectively better looking games?
DS2 is a ps3 game. BB runs at 15 frames a second and ER just came out. Still doesn't have dynamic lighting.
>ds2 gays shill for the most broken game in the series
>other games don't have the same lighting system
>LITERALLY UNPLAYABLE
The older game has better light maps than the newer one
DS2:
>can exploit the shit out of the game using the broken backstep system that gives i-frames
Every other souls game:
>backsteps are used to setup combos
>DS2:
>Has a high skill ceiling
>Every other souls game:
>doesn't
true.
>>Has a high skill ceiling
>>>>
>waht do you mean i'm not invincible during the whole roll!? l-le-leeee BROKEN
>BB runs at 15 frames a second
You realize there's ways to uncap the framerate now, right?
It's infighting between fans of DeS, 1, 2, and 3.
I wounder why they changed this.
consoles
If I loved DS1, and thoroughly enjoyed DS3 ( except the DLC areas, they were pretty shit ), would you homosexuals recommend DS2 or Elden Ring?
Can you please stop spamming this everywhere. I actually like talking about all the games and you're in every thread spraying this shit all over the place. It's boring, move the frick on.
dont you know DS1 is borderline devil may cry or ninja gaiden? Its so heckinn fast! That's what i play souls game for.
Woah I use my advanced movement and ultra fast positioning techniques to get the upper hand on this super fast aggressive enemy. Unlike that dark souls 2 shieeet
Is this molded? Something about his movement seems different
boot up the game and see for yourself. He's a janky enemy
Non-DS2 souls games are nu-hard. DS2 is the only hard souls game, that's why it filters bads from liking it. /thread
What's the point of obvious falseflag posts like this?
Name one non-DS2 Souls game, and I will tell you why it's actually not hard but nu-hard.
>another stealth discord divide-and-conquer thread
yawn
what the frick are you talking about? take your meds.
Holy frick you are right, they immediately responded
i'm moreso confused as to why people would need to collaborate on a divide and conquer tactic for fricking souls games of all things. what's there to accomplish? it just sounds like schizo babble.
>for fricking souls games
Souls is the medium, not the goal
okay, so what's the goal? i'm not following you here.
didnt have a console so never played demon or dark souls, that means dark souls 2 was my first hands on experience with the series. and I loved it, and must've spent over 1k hours fricking around and replaying the game. but you cant really compare 2 to the other games, its very much its own thing.
Dont blink or else you might miss the blistering fast DS1 gameplay.
Thats like one of the first enemies you encounter after tutorial island
only if you have master key, thank god I didn't find that door at the start
>king's field 4
>dark souls 2
>demon's souls
peak ludo.
>DSP levels of moronation
what happened?
In the kings field games they tend to put a gatcha insta kill at the very very start of the game. What your seeing is straight up the first 5 seconds of the game. They expect you to walk straight at the green thing that sticks out and insta die. The point is to teach you to expect shit like that and be wary of your surroundings but im sure alot of people close the game at that.
asiatics and their lizard brains
do they think games are skinner boxes and their players rats?
>insert 90 paragraph backstory on wiki about why 2 crystal golems are hanging out together
bravo nolan
DS2gays are on the same level of people that suck The Last Jedi off, and EXCLUSIVELY The Last Jedi. They're in it for the contrarianism.
>DS2 haters are scat wars manchildren
lmao
Here comes the Discord.
>insults fans of a game for no reason
>"wtf why did I get replies?!"
>starts calling everyone a discordgay even though he likes stat wars
Kek
DS2gay here. I can't appreciate SW films anymore
>anymore
How could you ever? They're infantile dreck.
DS2haters are lolcows. They make DS2 hate threads and ignore everyones posts to recieve (You)'s from kind samaritans.
Stop spamming your fricking shit, you spoil every fricking Dark Souls thread who just want to talk about all the games.
So make a real thread. OP contaminated any potential discussion.
He will just do the same in that thread. This spam has been going on for months, it's fricking cancer for anyone who just wants to talk about the games.
You dont get to talk about the games anymore. Sorry.
its okay when elden ring does it
>buffed enemy
>spam r1
>die
>WoW ThiS gAmE is SOOOOOOOO BAAAAADDDDD
lol
ok, this is bad..
>put graphic settings on low
>>"ok, this is bad.."
DS2babbies seething
why does ds3 live rent free inside the head of so many ds2 fans? literally no one ITT argued it was better than ds2 and yet this guy keeps spamming his pics like he's trying to counterpoint a strawman
>it's not the half a dozen ds2 seethe threads that's been happening for 10 years that's evidence of rent free. It's actually ughhh bad ds3 webms...p-please stahhp
did you somehow miss the thousands of ds2 circle jerk threads that are posted multiple times every day?
You're supposed to talk about games you like. Not seethe for 10 years like a deranged lunatic.
Why would you even put vanilla DS2 in this lmao
Because it's the superior version of the game. Scholar is fan tier garbage with no rhyme or reason to any of its changes other than HECKIN HARD ENEMIES EVERYWHERE SO HARD PREPARE TO DIE.
It completely destroyed the flow of the game
it's not that hard dude. chill
There's no way people who say this are for real. I 100%'d them both and barely noticed the differences.
The Aldia stuff is pretty hard to ignore. But outside of the Pursuer being in more locations and the spell/weapon adjustments the changes aren't that significant outside of the QoL stuff. Oh, and the graphics being a lot more stable if you played on PC and then next gen.
nice ceiling
Never had a problem here.
t. pyromancer
>Ds3 is just nostalgia pand-
Ds3 had the decency to giver their dragonslayer new armour, weapons and a new moveset.
?
LOL
bottom screencap is kino, frick you gays!
lol wtf..
no bro, the fire is fading, don't you see??? That's why everything is DARK, because the fire fades bro, please watch this vaati vidya 40 minute explanation bro, pls
checkmate 2chuds! You said our game has no color but that sure looks like blue to me!
>boss arena
vs
>some random corner in the middle of the level
cmon now
this one is a more fair comparison
they're as much in common you biased fanboy
pic on the right is right beside a bonfire, plus there's a covenant NPC there, it's a place you'll return often.
pic on the left is a room with a lift you'll use once.
same thing here. pic on the left is close to a bonfire with multiple lifts to multiple plaths. pic on the right is a random corner you'll traverse once to grab one item.
ok so this ds3 room with a bonfire in it next to this ds2 room with no bonfire. Whats your theory for 3 looking so shit?
now THIS is a fair comparison. ds3 looks like shit in that pic.
but the pic on the right has the benefit of being a DLC area. still, the point stands.
pic on the left* is DLC
they were all fair comparisons you Black person. about as fair as any other 2 baaad shitpost meme but you got no problem with that
>they were all fair comparisons
i pointed out why they weren't, not stop whining post more
No you cope'd with made up excuses and exposed your favoritism bias
here's a screencap i took myself to prove that the ds2 spammer is not just some schizo.
ds3 is flawed, that's true enough, but if you're going to compare it to other games at least make it a fair comparison. otherwise, YOUR bias will be showing
>but
>that one doesnt count
>unfair
lole
fair comparison. there's nothing wrong with your pic.
got any more?
yikes dont wanna ever hear from 3 gays again lmao
Serious non-meme answer? It's because Dark Souls 3 uses the same ugly grey shader on everything in the game. Animations are also jank as frick. Never look at your character's wrists.
you guys like my minecraft mod?
I like it so much I ported it to my favorite game!
its one of my favourite games too!
woah omg is that a brick wall! this cant be happening
Why don't DaS3 or ER have decent lighting?
>decent lighting
>character looks chroma keyed into the environment
2.5 d game
these ds2 homies really like staring off ledges. crazy how their suicidal ideation even comes across in their screenshots
omg...look at it oh nonono
I'm playing DS1 first time ever (for some reason DS2 worked on my old machine okay, but neither PotD nor Remastered would function with any degree of playability), currently going through Catacombs, wanna do everything before actually going to Sens, and so far I feel like whatever people in those threads b***h about related to DS2, DS1 did just as well.
>many areas that look like shit (and also so much green moss everywhere)
>areas where it's easy to get gangbanged
>bullshit enemies
>some bosses are super easy
So far only thing DS1 has over DS2 in objective department is that world is super connected (or rather, it's all very tightly grouped together), and no lakes of fire high in the sky. Although the constant lighting changes feel somewhat eh. I'm feeling like DS2 had areas separate from one another specifically to address how it's day at Shrine, night at Garden, morning in Basin, and so on.
Both games are fun though, despite some bullshit here and there really grinding my gears.
Just wanted to say good on ya for being non-biased.
Whoa... such a sense of scale... amazing...
lol the thing in the background looks like a boob.
Are the server still up in DS2 (not sotfs)? And DLC creampieable?
Unplayable pos, just like the first death stranding.
Post your dinner and say your favorite souls game.
Darksouls 2
Round 2
All done
ENTER
C R I S P Y
Please tell me your finger is allright.
>MUH DARK ROLLS
>MUH OLDEN THING
>MUH MITSUKI
Back in my day, game protagonists didn't roll non stop like a fricking homosexual when faced with danger unless they were an 'edgehog.
If we were lucky, we 'ad 3 lives and after that, you were reet back to square 1 for being a shitty bastard.
ds2sisters report this! we can stop these haters!
Insert cope here
Something doesn't have to be real world inspired. Especially for a fantasy game. There's no real world 100 foot tall bull statue. Dragon's Aerie or Brume Tower aren't real places. And that's fine. But if you wanted to look for some you could still find it. Like those pyramids in shulva are probably Mayan influenced. I could also take screenshots of walls and corners in the other games too.
das2 bros... not like this...
The director of King's Field 4 worked on the DLCs for DS2
Is it supposed to be a problem that you can do this in an RPG or something?
I remember going to the Titanfall launch for this game
I think I was the only one there who asked for Dark Souls 2 instead of that game
>DS2sisters have resorted to torchposting to save face
Buck broken
ds2 is like if darksouls was made when from was still making kings field which is to say it sucks but is pretty impressive in that context
Imagine not being able to like a game because the internet told you to.
You can hate it all you want but at least DS2 still gets talked about. For every DS1 or 3 threads I see like frickin 12 DS2 threads. Frick it might even outnumber elden ring threads at the moment.
Is elden ring the only game where enemies cast spells backwards?
She didn't cast the spell backwards dumbass. That spell puts homing swords above you that track the enemy when they go off, spells that behave in this way have always existed.
This isn't the only boss that does this, spells have different tracking than the boss, like two separate AI
Yes, when players cast that spell it behaves in the exact same way
No? Bosses can be aggroed on an AI and charge magic and then it shoots at you while they're still fighting the other AI. At best sometimes they'll re-aggro to you as the magic comes after you, but sometimes they ignore it like a fart
Watch your own video again dude, the boss is looking at you and targeting you when she casts the spell. The swords have a delay before they fire, but they will always fire at their initial target. This isn't rocket science.
This isn't the only boss that does this. The point is that it was looking at the AI when it shot the magic backwards. Sometimes bosses will cast magic while fighting AI and it will shoot backwards at you
I don't know how I can make this any clearer for you. That is a spell players can use, it functions in the exact same manner when a player uses it. If I cast it while targeting you, then turn around, it will still fire at you. The spell will always fire at it's initial target, even if she swapped aggro after the cast. You were the target of her initial casting of the spell, you can see that clearly in the video.
this isn't the only boss that does this with different spells
All of them function in an identical manner. The casting of the spell is when she puts the swords above her head, not when they fire. They fire on their own and at whoever she was targeting when she cast it.
this specific spell isn't used by every boss that does this
There are a plethora of different spells that function in the exact same manner, it doesn't have to be that exact spell
then that's pretty stupid for a boss to be fighting something, not even look at you, cast the spell, then fire it backwards
The boss isn't casting the spell while not looking at you. She casted the spell WHILE looking at you, you can see that clearly in the video. The spell will always fire at you regardless of if she turned away or not because she cast it at you.
>The boss isn't casting the spell while not looking at you.
Yeah they do, all the time, then it shoots at you anyway. Have you even tried playing with summons? It's ridiculous how terrible the boss AI is
Anon. Watch your own webm. Tell me where Loretta is looking when she puts the swords above her head.
Other bosses do it too any they're not even looking at you
Do you mind showing me a webm of this happening anon? Because we both know it doesn't happen in the one you posted
okay yeah, fight red wolf of radagon with summons, or radahn
they shoot magic at you when they're not even looking at you
radahn gets so confused by summons he shoots his shockwaves backwards sometimes
Anon, Red Wolf of Radagon casts the exact same spell at Loretta. He is looking at you when he casts it, then changes aggro, and the spell he already casted at you continues to fire at you normally. Radahn's meteors functions in the exact same way.
Nope, he also casts the charged magic from his mouth and he doesn't even need to be aggroed onto you when he initiates the cast
the AI is programmed to at random target the host/player with magic even if they're not fighting them regardless of range
Your own webm proved that wasn't true. Would you like to post a new one to try to prove your point?
That's not how the phalanx spells work for the player, they never shoot backwards
you're a liar
Anon, I want you to again tell me, where is Loretta facing when she is casting her spell. Answer that question. If you would like to post another webm that actually demonstrates your point go ahead.
Show me the phalanx spell shooting backwards for the player
Anon answer the question. Where is Loretta facing when she casts the spell
so the phalanx spell doesn't actually shoot backwards like it does for the boss
Anon, you are claiming that the bosses cast spells at the player randomly while they aren't facing you. Now tell me, where is Loretta facing when she cast the spell
why did you say that phalanx spells shoot backwards for the player? to cope with bosses shooting spells backwards?
Anon I am going to present you with two different options since you keep dodging the question like a coward.
>Option A: The boss will always fire the spell at their initial target, it will always fire at the exact same moment with 100% consistency
>Option B: The boss will always the fire spell at their initial target only if the target is in front of the boss. If the boss happens to turn their character model even slightly towards you while fighting the AI summons, it will fire without warning or consistency.
Do you want to tell me which of these sounds better to you anon?
Why did you say spells behave in a way they don't when shown a bug with the bosses?
This isn't a bug anon. Where was Loretta facing when she cast her spell. Pick an option between A or B or you are conceding that you're a fricking moron.
Bosses shooting spells backwards while aggroed on summons is a bug
Every boss in the entire game functions in this exact same manner. The spell will always cast on it's initial target. This is consistent throughout the entire game. You have failed to provide evidence of it happening in any other way. Answer the two questions or I will take it as you conceding that you're an autistic sperg.
every boss shoots spells backwards when aggroed on summons?
what a shitty game
I accept your concession
Okay I concede that bosses shoot spells backwards sometimes in elden ring and it's a bug with every boss with magic when you summon
I am home
DS2 always felt more like a King's Field game, and it probably should have been, honestly. Just change the gameplay to be focused on first person but keep all the maps, that would've been awesome. But too bad this piece of shit company has been obsessed with making rollspam simulators for more than ten fricking years now. Hopefully armored core sells well enough that they stop being scared of making things other than souls shit and maybe then we'll get a new king's field game.
The actual state when DS1 is too slow to be considered souls shit anymore lmao
>not once mention of Zombies Ate My Neighbors
Zoomers
Ah yes another Dark Souls 2 thread with 300+ replies.
Worst dlc
what would you change about DS1
nothing
remove durability, it doesn't really do anything
replace the horde of dragon asses in izalith with new enemies
DS3 backstabs, complete movesets for left-handed weapons.
remove iframes
I would have bonfires be slightly closer together, or make it easier somehow to get back to merchants from any area.
DaS1 is basically a dungeon crawler - slow, methodical clearing out of rooms to move forward - but because of that, dying to 3 dogs surrounding you or dying because your weapon bounced off a wall in a 2 foot wide corridor feels awful. It feels awful because the only way forward is to do all that slow and methodical clearing out AGAIN. I beat O&S for the first time yesterday and having to do a 2 minute walk each time to get to the boss was awful, especially since they're a bit of a difficulty spike and took me multiple runs.
Keep it together anon, you are really close to getting filtered here but good job so far.
i'm fully aware i'm getting filtered tbh, i haven't enjoyed Ds1 very much. World design atmosphere and characters are top notch but the rest of the game is very frustrating. Not even sure I'm going to continue playing since everyone says post-Anor Londo is the worst part of the game.
When everyone says post-Anor Londo is bad, what they mean is that Lost Izalith is bad, and they didn't personally enjoy the atmospheric kino that is Tomb of the Giants.
Dark Souls 2 is pure kino unlike the other games
Took this today.
DS3 next gen graphics right here.
man i love all 3 dark souls games, i had so much fun!