RUMOR.
What you think anons?
Would you buy it?
What new mechanics and patches do you want for R2?
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
10th anniversary Alexander DLC for R2 Total War
Lads, the bloody CAtrannies have already begun their campaign of shameless self promotion and shilling! Let’s beat them back with the cheekiest banter and the dankest memes we have!
>tfw can't tell this is finally smart false flagging or some Total War Playing Troon being too terminally online
It is the p*land shitposter, he posts like this in the Espiocracy thread.
it's bizzarre that this board has 5 posters and 3 of them are schizoposters
It's even weirder that he initiated this trolling to cover for Victoria 3
praise kek mein bruder the discord troons were running interference for that fricking woke three buttoned piece of goyslop all along
Everything you said is accurate. Just because you said it in a cringey way doesn’t make it any less true doe.
>le trannies are personally targeting me
Mental illness
Kys triphomosexual
Lads, looks like we have a live troony here!
Would be kino but I doubt it. CA is too busy with troonyhammer and the battle royale trash.
I'd rather have a bronze age DLC or maybe another period that isn't covered very often.
>bronze age DLC
Why pay when you can have it free as mod (modders >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CA devs).
there is already one for rome OG and one being worked on and hopefully wont be abandoned for Rome RR.
No,because I think that Rome 2 is a terrible game with terrible battles and an even worse campaign.I tried DeI recently and the battles were still shit with hoplites standing in front of each other doing nothing while a dozen or so soldiers break formation to fights duels.I also don't understand the absolute visceral hatred soldiers in R2 have for shields.They keep hiting them over and over even when they could just easily kill the guy behind it.
Come back when they update atilla for modern systems with improved performance like rome2.
only nordcels think he was blonde with blue eyes
Take your meds brown butt hurt schizo, no one asked.
CA is not about to dig up R2 to make another DLC. Especially when Warhammer paypigs will shill 20 bucks for a reskinned faction.
Only if they introduce new stuff into the base game. Also new maps or modding tools for mod mapping
But anyway, I doubt it, they prefer their fantasoy fanbase
>Only if they introduce new stuff into the base game. Also new maps or modding tools for mod mapping.
THIS, literally THIS. But sadly is not gonna happen.
Amen, I thought I was the only one that doesn't like DEI and see it as the most overrated mod or one of the most overrateds of all gaming history. I don't see in it any real change or """overhaul""" improvement.
it just makes the battles slower and less tactical.
Update Attila and then we talk.
Nobody cares about CA's games. /vst/ is an Attila board.
>Nobody cares about CA's games.
Highly doubt, but ok anon.
Historical Total war is dead. It's been nearly a decade since the last actually historical total war. Let it die.
Never. I am waiting for Medieval III
Fantasy frickers need to die. Fantasy destroyed Total War
Agree
Thrones of Britannia came out in 2018, anon
Wasn't the last time they tried an Alexander DLC the worst DLC they ever made? It's not like you can make a real TW-style campaign out of his conquests, you either play as Alexander who has all the content or who, the Indians? Darius III? Sparta just sitting afk?
>the worst DLC they ever made
Certainly wasn't great
Look at that Greek Peninsula holy shit
look at the crimea
>greek peninsula
Yeah it was pretty bad. It was a paid patch (or DLC as we call them now) and the campaign was a tacked on mess probably made in a few weeks. It also was initially digital purchase only through the Total War website and back in the mid-00's that meant navigating obtuse payment processes.
That said the game mechanics the Alexander expansion brought were pretty good and are widely used by a lot of RTW mods now.
>MFW when discord troons try and shill their globohomosexual CA Goyslop but cheeky /vst/ bantz from based anons makes them seethe and 42%.
>MFW when I get here and the lads are already taking the piss out of the CA troony shilling his "remastered" edition of Rome Total War DLC
>MFW when it's probably packed with "features" such as ahistorical gollywog and Paki hoplites and a gay sex minigame for pandering to today's woke historical revisionists, depicting Alexander as a pansexual troony poof
Sodding kek, anons! The banter couldn't be even cheekier!
Holy moly, I can't wait to see the West finally falling, I'm tired of all this rubish.
https://civilization.fandom.com/wiki/Conquests_of_Alexander_(Civ6)
Talk to me again when Civ franchise has real-time battles like in TW, CoH, World in Conflict...
We already have a DEI campaign for it, just frick off back to your troony shit
Med 3 is gonna suck big dick
he is going to be a black troony
THE SALT LEVELS ARE BLOODY RISING LADS!!!!
>MFW when the jannies delete my banter
>Those bloody trips
This banter is too cheeky for even the jannies, lad!
>What you think anons?
Gonna try it. Hope its like the other R2 DLCs which I liked.
>Would you buy it?
yeah
>What new mechanics and patches do you want for R2?
I would have to play the game again to refresh my memory. Biggest sore spot I can remember right now is probably naval battle bugs and large battles on city walls bugs.
Why would Sega allow CA to make a dlc for a 10 year old game when they started pushing that shitty SAGA spin-off series that Alexander's campaign could fit very well?
This, and just a few days ago a "Total War: Pharaoh was leaked/teased"
LESS GOOO i'd be for it, rather have a bronze age total war like the mod for Rome: Total war tho. Just no anticheat in the game cause I have fun with cheats in singleplayer I don't do multiplayer in games, unless it's like Chiv or MMOs
Shit would be kino. The fact that CA never made an Alexander DLC or a Britannia DLC for Rome 2 is a travesty.
Rome 2 is garbo and it would be better for them to stop all these gay side projects and make a real game like Med III, Shogun 3, Empire 2.
all they do are side games at this point, they should do American civil war, Bronze age shit I guess, or korea if they are needing ideas.
Instead we get Rome re-hash, more Snorehammer shit, and half baked china game.
Rome 2 is good
Post dismissed
>Rome 2 is good
Post dismissed
I just want Attila to be fixed
Considering it's just Rome 2 with some campaign improvements and the same shitty battle system that's a tall order
Make more Attila content instead
Rome 2 is a scam and CA should had re done it.
So they could've ripped us off again?
CA Delenda Est.
CA is just the EA of the strategy genre.
Trash, TW:Phillip of Macedon would be GOAT tier but CA are brainlets. Alexanders campaign can be interesting for a war game if you include all the management aspects of the expedition but this is TW so its not gonna have shit.
A game set at the start of Philip's reign would have
>declining but still capable of doing something Sparta
>declining but militarily strongest in Greece Thebes
>decently powerful Athens dealing with rebellious subjects and moronic internal politics
>the three holy wars over control of the Seer of Delphi
>satrap revolts in Persia
>strong Illyria with the lords of upper Macedonia as its b***hes
>populus but decentralized Paeonia
>the three Thracian kings battling for control of the country
>the brothers of Philip trying to take the throne
>super rich but moronic Chalkidean league
>Philip bum rushing in the first year to consolidate power to fight off four imminent invasions (one of the Thracian kings, the Paeonians, the Illyrians and one of the claimants to the throne with athenian support)
Alexander will only have Macedon Persia and the Indians, and its going to be exactly like the Alexander dlc for RTW
It would be difficult to pin down the scope. You' dneed a pretty detailedMacedonia and Greece as well as the Aegean show have every major player have their support-base/sphere. Besides, you won't be able to capture the essence of the fight between Phillip and Athens - that Phillip was allied with Thebes and at war with Athens while what he wanted was a weakened Thebes and a friendly Athens for its potential naval power for his ultimate Asian campaign. For Athens it was a different - at first they weren't really interested in fighting Phillip and then afterwards they started working against him while nominally bing his allies. In TW this wouls be impossible and wouls just boil down to a stacks-marching-around campaign you've played a dozen times already.
So what exacly does attila do better than rome 2?
better campaign, sieges and battles
and music
/vst/ literally only cares about Attila, the rest of the franchise can crash and burn.