Tendies always compare nu Zelda to games in different genres. You better believe they would have compared Totk to Spiderman 2 and Starfield if BG3 didn't put them in their place.
>TotK is a "buy the standard edition once and just play without extra logins" kind of game
"eh, that's how it usually is" >BG3 is a "buy the standard edition once and just play without extra logins" kind of game
"WOW LARIAN IS REALLY CHALLENGING THE STATUS QUO OF THE GAMING INDUSTRY #stunningandbrave 100 100 100 100!!!"
>that'll be 70$ for a dlc expac for a game that released on the Wii u 6 years ago
"Epic! So soulful!" >that'll be 60$ for a entirely new game from a genre that's been stagant for nearly 2 decades.
"FRICKING TRANNIES! HOW DARE THEY!"
TotK is a DLC marketed as a full game. It's everything wrong with the industry. Take a look at the developer reactions. Devs were creaming their pants over TotK because they realized they could sell lazy asset flips at full price. Devs are coping and seething about BG3 because Larian actually put effort into a game and they don't want to be held to the same standard.
There's no way you're fricking serious.
Devs were creaming their pants because on top of the chemistry engine they couldn't emulate 6 years ago, here comes another mechanic that would take insane amounts of work hours to debug and make work perfectly. Meanwhile the hubbub around BG3 was around bear sex and wiener length, while journos invented devs being starstruck by BG3's "gaming practices" as if ER and TOTK didn't do the same thing. No DLC no extra microtransactions.
>Devs were creaming their pants because on top of the chemistry engine they couldn't emulate 6 years ago, here comes another mechanic that would take insane amounts of work hours to debug and make work perfectly
KYS tendie, 5 moronic devs impressed by physic don't transform your game into anything other than a big $70 DLC.
SHUT UP. Just shut. The frick. Up. Holy FRICK this is a board of brainwashed NPCs. Never in my life have I seen such a transparent astroturfing attempt. You think you're special or unique? You're a fricking sheep.
FACT: The general populace are morons. There has literally never been anything that has been popular on a widespread scale that has been of genuine quality. Why do you think gatekeeping exists? If people had taste and didn't ruin franchises with their preferences, there'd be no GATE TO KEEP.
Have some respect for yourselves! You're no better than normies and their FOMO; "oh, my feed is full of this game, better play it so I can be part of the newest trend!" You vapid, vapid c**ts.
Everywhere I turn it's Shitdur's Gate this, Baldumb's Gay that. Who even the frick is Baldur anyway? Nobody gave a crap the first two times his gate opened. I feel like this is a gigantic psyop.
It's like the shitty Barbie movie which nobody was actually interested in but a combination of pandering and social media saturation created a social obligation to go and see it. I still haven't actually spoken to anyone in real life who's seen it, and I expect this game will be the same.
So stop fricking posting about it. 10-20 threads on every sodding platform I use. Evidently purchased.
Shall I be playing? I think not. I'll be sticking to my backlog of actual good games, thanks (I.e. things I've cultivated an interest for myself and not things the internet has told me to like.)
>ha, only 4 reviews , the score will go down >ha, only 10 reviews , the score will go down >ha, only 15 reviews , the score will go down >ha, only 25 reviews , the score will go down
I have to say, seeing the cope from the numbers of review was hilarious, shazamBlack folk really are the joke of Ganker
No fricking way a game with a 12 lv cap should be this high. No fricking way a game with spells per day should get any critic score above 60. I can be the most polished crpg ever but being a dnd based crpg is a massive liability. It probably the same 'critics' who say RE4 demake or elden roll spam are any good also gave this kusoge a good score. Gamers standards are in the fricking toilet
mfw
israelite critics always review bomb or applaud shit that pushes their agenda. just look at rotten tomatoes
Its better than Totk and that's all I wanted.
>Its better than Totk and that's all I wanted.
? They are not even the same kind of games wtf
Tendies always compare nu Zelda to games in different genres. You better believe they would have compared Totk to Spiderman 2 and Starfield if BG3 didn't put them in their place.
Anything that makes nintendoids seethe and slit their wrists is good with me
What's a BG3?
never gonna play that piece of shit but if it gets a higher score than nintendo ubishit goyslop they just released thats a victory
Zelda was supposed to win goty, this isn't fair
Critics must love big bearded breasted dwarf wiener
I think I will post an incomprehensible schizophrenic rant about how it's israeli propaganda
good for them, unfortunately it isn't a sub-genre i enjoy so i am just sitting at the sidelines on this one.
didn't like Dragon Age games either.
Why should I care about Metacritic when sales are all that matter? shit sold less than FF16 b
>game with white, heterosexual, male protagonist gets worse reviews than pansexual multiracial sodomistic orgy
hmmmmmm
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
> white, heterosexual, male protagonist
Wtf game are you talking about? Not zelda obviously.
The combat is very boring and the game wants to be so cinematic that everything takes 10x longer than it should.
The combat would be great if you could speed up or skip watching enemy turns. As is it's a painfully slow game sometimes. Still loving it though.
You're problem is you're a midwit.
So if I was as dumb as you I’d enjoy the same running animation for the 500th time? I guess that makes sense.
What kind of moron shoots a criticism like "the walking animations loop" no wonder you can't comprehend a basic situation.
The walking animations become a huge part of the game time because every fight has a billion enemies in it. That’s the problem.
Doesn't literally every game recycle the same running animations over the course of a game?
>TotK is a "buy the standard edition once and just play without extra logins" kind of game
"eh, that's how it usually is"
>BG3 is a "buy the standard edition once and just play without extra logins" kind of game
"WOW LARIAN IS REALLY CHALLENGING THE STATUS QUO OF THE GAMING INDUSTRY #stunningandbrave 100 100 100 100!!!"
>that'll be 70$ for a dlc expac for a game that released on the Wii u 6 years ago
"Epic! So soulful!"
>that'll be 60$ for a entirely new game from a genre that's been stagant for nearly 2 decades.
"FRICKING TRANNIES! HOW DARE THEY!"
TotK is a DLC marketed as a full game. It's everything wrong with the industry. Take a look at the developer reactions. Devs were creaming their pants over TotK because they realized they could sell lazy asset flips at full price. Devs are coping and seething about BG3 because Larian actually put effort into a game and they don't want to be held to the same standard.
totk will most likely end up having an expansion pass like botw did too
At this point I doubt it. Nintendo always announces dlc before release.
People thought Odyssey dlc was a guarantee, but nothing ever happened.
There's no way you're fricking serious.
Devs were creaming their pants because on top of the chemistry engine they couldn't emulate 6 years ago, here comes another mechanic that would take insane amounts of work hours to debug and make work perfectly. Meanwhile the hubbub around BG3 was around bear sex and wiener length, while journos invented devs being starstruck by BG3's "gaming practices" as if ER and TOTK didn't do the same thing. No DLC no extra microtransactions.
>Devs were creaming their pants because on top of the chemistry engine they couldn't emulate 6 years ago, here comes another mechanic that would take insane amounts of work hours to debug and make work perfectly
KYS tendie, 5 moronic devs impressed by physic don't transform your game into anything other than a big $70 DLC.
>Metagoy scores matter now
I wish this board wasnt mostly zoomers holy shit
Cope
stop spamming your shit across the board troon
They matter because you homosexuals spam them to tortanic every game you don’t like that comes out. You made it this way
>LOL hey, so I've been playing Baldur's Ga-
SHUT UP. Just shut. The frick. Up. Holy FRICK this is a board of brainwashed NPCs. Never in my life have I seen such a transparent astroturfing attempt. You think you're special or unique? You're a fricking sheep.
FACT: The general populace are morons. There has literally never been anything that has been popular on a widespread scale that has been of genuine quality. Why do you think gatekeeping exists? If people had taste and didn't ruin franchises with their preferences, there'd be no GATE TO KEEP.
Have some respect for yourselves! You're no better than normies and their FOMO; "oh, my feed is full of this game, better play it so I can be part of the newest trend!" You vapid, vapid c**ts.
Everywhere I turn it's Shitdur's Gate this, Baldumb's Gay that. Who even the frick is Baldur anyway? Nobody gave a crap the first two times his gate opened. I feel like this is a gigantic psyop.
It's like the shitty Barbie movie which nobody was actually interested in but a combination of pandering and social media saturation created a social obligation to go and see it. I still haven't actually spoken to anyone in real life who's seen it, and I expect this game will be the same.
So stop fricking posting about it. 10-20 threads on every sodding platform I use. Evidently purchased.
Shall I be playing? I think not. I'll be sticking to my backlog of actual good games, thanks (I.e. things I've cultivated an interest for myself and not things the internet has told me to like.)
Grow a spine, you twats. Just say no.
Most overrated game I've ever played. Makes fallout 4 look well written
all I know is that I will never play this homosexual game made by homosexuals for homosexuals. and honestly, thats all that matters.
I don't play games rated higher than 89 on metacritic
who gives a frick what they think and frankly you should other things with your time than bait
It's not a Nintendo game so Ganker automatically hates it.
>ha, only 4 reviews , the score will go down
>ha, only 10 reviews , the score will go down
>ha, only 15 reviews , the score will go down
>ha, only 25 reviews , the score will go down
I have to say, seeing the cope from the numbers of review was hilarious, shazamBlack folk really are the joke of Ganker
Current chud cope is that it’s “not that woke” and “the non woke parts are good” yes they are this buck broken
>another blatant flamewar thread that won't get deleted
No fricking way a game with a 12 lv cap should be this high. No fricking way a game with spells per day should get any critic score above 60. I can be the most polished crpg ever but being a dnd based crpg is a massive liability. It probably the same 'critics' who say RE4 demake or elden roll spam are any good also gave this kusoge a good score. Gamers standards are in the fricking toilet
Is it worth playing, guys? So much damn shitposting about woke shit, I can’t even tell if it’s fun or not.