NOBODY gives justification for bikini armor besides maybe morons like Kojima.
NOBODY gives a shit because it doesn't even try pretending to be realistic.
If your setting is over the top I don't give a shit what you add, if your setting is supposed to be down to earth then I will absolutely judge you for putting in shit that has no logical sense.
The irony is that you can tell from the way the artist drew the sexualized woman that there's definitely an "alt account" somewhere that takes porn commissions for a living. Remember kids: sexualizing females is wrong unless WE do it to pay for student loans and hormone treatments.
>Here haue I cause, in men iust blame to find, >That in their proper prayse too partiall bee, >And not indifferent to woman kind, >To whom no share in armes and cheualrie >They do impart, ne maken memorie >Of their braue gestes and prowesse martiall; >Scarse do they spare to one or two or three, >Rowme in their writs; yet the same writing small >Does all their deeds deface, and dims their glories all.
>But by record of antique times I find, >That women wont in warres to beare most sway, >And to all great exploits them selues inclind: >Of which they still the girlond bore away, >Till enuious Men fearing their rules decay, >Gan coyne streight lawes to curb their liberty; >Yet sith they warlike armes haue layd away: >They haue exceld in artes and pollicy, >That now we foolish men that prayse gin eke t'enuy.
I've literally never heard anyone try to make the second argument. But if you cannot see why people would be amenable to something that is asthetically appealing albeit nonsensical vs something that is not asthetically appealing and does nothing to break immersion then you proba lt rode the shortbus to school.
I mean hell I guarantee you half the people who b***h about nogs being put in Medieval European settings where it makes no sense would care a lot less if you made them look nice and gave them likable character traits. For some reason women and blacks always have to be as ugly and insufferable as possible though, because apparently that's what "modern audiences" want according to the people making this shit.
There were always black characters in Medieval European settings. What happened was the Witcher 3 and KC:D controversy created by games journalists, which led to their readers believing pseudohistory that black people were everywhere around the world, and saying otherwise is as offensive to them as claiming the Earth was flat. This led them to analyze every single piece of media to if there is a black person in it, in addition to the "whiteness" pattern they had been trained to recognize.
>people want to look at appealing and attractive characters in their games >troons and their pathetic neckbeard gay orbiters still can't wrap their heads around this
Except bottom never claimed to be realistic or historically accurate. Leftists can't argue against real people, so they have to argue against a strawman.
I think the difference is in intent. Like if you want to give an authentic feeling to something but make your medieval fantasy setting look like urban new york with swords and castles it comes off extremely tacky.
When it comes to sexualization I think you just add what people lile instead of censoring things they don't like. I don't think girls like looking at guys the same way guys look at girls, but you can still give them some service somehow. Maybe make a companion character a tall brooding handsome guy with a dark past but a heart of gold who kidnaps you as part of his quest but is also a werewolf vampire mafia member
Both are correct.
>words words words
back to r/gamingcirclejerk with you
Yep, that's literally me.
NOBODY gives justification for bikini armor besides maybe morons like Kojima.
NOBODY gives a shit because it doesn't even try pretending to be realistic.
If your setting is over the top I don't give a shit what you add, if your setting is supposed to be down to earth then I will absolutely judge you for putting in shit that has no logical sense.
You guys made it so taboo to just simply and clearly say I fricking hate women it's not his fault.
The irony is that you can tell from the way the artist drew the sexualized woman that there's definitely an "alt account" somewhere that takes porn commissions for a living. Remember kids: sexualizing females is wrong unless WE do it to pay for student loans and hormone treatments.
kek this, I think I've seen some of that artist's porn on r34
It’s drawn by some Polish feminist.
It's more that there's a time and place for it. There's a good reason why fetish shit gets noticed and criticized in games.
Women in plate armor is a fetish anon.
t. person with fetish
MILK!!!! MOMMY MILKERS!!!
But the "leftist boogeyman" staunchly defended BG3
>Here haue I cause, in men iust blame to find,
>That in their proper prayse too partiall bee,
>And not indifferent to woman kind,
>To whom no share in armes and cheualrie
>They do impart, ne maken memorie
>Of their braue gestes and prowesse martiall;
>Scarse do they spare to one or two or three,
>Rowme in their writs; yet the same writing small
>Does all their deeds deface, and dims their glories all.
>But by record of antique times I find,
>That women wont in warres to beare most sway,
>And to all great exploits them selues inclind:
>Of which they still the girlond bore away,
>Till enuious Men fearing their rules decay,
>Gan coyne streight lawes to curb their liberty;
>Yet sith they warlike armes haue layd away:
>They haue exceld in artes and pollicy,
>That now we foolish men that prayse gin eke t'enuy.
people who dislike the top one also dislike the bottom one
Bikini armor complaining came first, therefore the bikini armor complainers are the original hypocrites.
Thomas Gamer: I just wanted to see breasts
I've literally never heard anyone try to make the second argument. But if you cannot see why people would be amenable to something that is asthetically appealing albeit nonsensical vs something that is not asthetically appealing and does nothing to break immersion then you proba lt rode the shortbus to school.
I mean hell I guarantee you half the people who b***h about nogs being put in Medieval European settings where it makes no sense would care a lot less if you made them look nice and gave them likable character traits. For some reason women and blacks always have to be as ugly and insufferable as possible though, because apparently that's what "modern audiences" want according to the people making this shit.
There were always black characters in Medieval European settings. What happened was the Witcher 3 and KC:D controversy created by games journalists, which led to their readers believing pseudohistory that black people were everywhere around the world, and saying otherwise is as offensive to them as claiming the Earth was flat. This led them to analyze every single piece of media to if there is a black person in it, in addition to the "whiteness" pattern they had been trained to recognize.
>gamingcirclejerk thread
>people want to look at appealing and attractive characters in their games
>troons and their pathetic neckbeard gay orbiters still can't wrap their heads around this
the one on the bottom is clearly not trying to be historically accurate
I'd like to get on her bottom if you know what I'm saying
The bottom panel never happens.
homie i will never defend boobie mods as necessary I just do not care about you being a b***h
Except bottom never claimed to be realistic or historically accurate. Leftists can't argue against real people, so they have to argue against a strawman.
I think the difference is in intent. Like if you want to give an authentic feeling to something but make your medieval fantasy setting look like urban new york with swords and castles it comes off extremely tacky.
When it comes to sexualization I think you just add what people lile instead of censoring things they don't like. I don't think girls like looking at guys the same way guys look at girls, but you can still give them some service somehow. Maybe make a companion character a tall brooding handsome guy with a dark past but a heart of gold who kidnaps you as part of his quest but is also a werewolf vampire mafia member
I've never heard someone defend chainmail bikinis as legitimate on Ganker.