>Oh, don't mind me, just here being the superior collectible creatures Game
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Don't mind me, just here being the superior collectible creatures game
>Oh, don't mind me, just here being the superior collectible creatures Game
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Yeah, pokemon is so much better
I agree OP sword and shield is superior
SMT doesn't really encourage you to collect demons, or to even bond with them, they're just tools. I can't say SMT is the superior monster catching game based on graphics alone.
Doesn't the games reward you for catching multiple Pokemon lmao
I hate the frick out of ShSw but even that was better than that trash, come on anon. You're getting desperate.
SMTV isn’t out yet, moron
Why the frick are there so many shills on this board now? Is it ironic or are there legitimately people who enjoy and defend SwSh?
>noooooooo why isn't the pokemon board dicksucking smt noooooooo
Because Pokémon fans have shit taste :^)
/thread
All SMT has over Pokemon is the boss fights.
and quality
and gameplay
SMT's gameplay is nothing compared to Pokemon, as I said all SMT has is boss fights. If Pokemon expanded on totems it would mog SMT completely.
t. has never played smt
>admitting to be a shitter in a broad daylight
Wow.
And atmosphere
And world building
And difficulty
And battle system
And side content
And postgame content
And...
>actual boss fights
>actual strategy
>actual thought that needs to be put into teambuilding and movesets
>actually dangerous random encounters that aren't just level spikes that require you to be alert at all times or know what you're getting into
>actual story where the player has agency and impact rather than being a battle puppet for the npcs and their linear stories and character arcs
>doesn't rely exclusively on coombait for characters, they largely save that for the demons
>actual sidequests and general optional content
>isn't obsessed with fellating the best selling title via references and biased treatment towards its demons at every corner
>actually designed with the singleplayer experience in mind and not as an obligation so sperm cells can have a tutorial before they're told "now play online forever because that's the only content we can be assed to give"
>has replay value in NG+ which in of itself opens up even more content or ramps up the difficulty even farther in some places
>>actual strategy
>>actual thought that needs to be put into teambuilding and movesets
This is in Pokemon already. Pokemon has more depth than SMT due to more diverse movesets, abilities, weather, terrain, items, etc. SMT doesn't even have multiplayer. This post just amounts SMT's singleplayer being harder, to which I reiterate all SMT has over Pokemon are the boss fights.
And where in the campaign do ANY of those mechanics get used in Pokemon to a meaningful degree?
GameFreak's too scared of even letting you get into too many fricking Double Battles nowadays because they might freak out the kiddies with being slightly different.
>the singleplayer is too easy therefore those battle mechanics don't exist
Based SMTrannies showing that midwit IQ.
SMT isn't even hard that's the worst part, all bosses can be trivialized by fusion. Bosses in SMT are strong only due to shit balance, not good design.
Pokemon's multiplayer is far superior to SMT in every way.
>those mechanics are matters because muh unnecesary side shitty online pvp (what don't even encourages you to play it) exist
Based pokehomosexuals showing thath midwit IQ.
>Diverse movesets
Don't exist in multiplayer, everyone follows the same few core movesets because they're optimal and what has the highest odds of success. Anything less is worthless due to no competitive viability from low BP, accuracy or novelty function that doesn't do much.
>Abilities
Not as in-depth as you think. Most Pokemon only have one ability worth using ever.
>Weather & Terrain
Nerfed to the ground so they don't overshadow Nuke Button Gimmicks.
>Items
This is the only valid point.
>b-but multiplayer!
based pokemorons admiting the series it's the equivalent of a fricking call of duty update
>muh shitty online
Why are pokegays like this?
t. has never played smt
>all these (You)s
The SMtroony is SCARED.
I have. Your gameplay is mashing weaknesses, spamming buffs/debuffs, and healing. It's adorable how the SMtroony thinks his gameplay is deep when it's just a more shallow version of Pokemon. The SMtroony can't defend the quality of his game's mechanics, only how hard the boss fights are. I once again state all SMT has is boss fights.
>I'm just merely pretending
Nah, you just proved you're an actual moron.
Who said I'm pretending? I'm glad these SMTrannies are so terrified of me. Now return to Gankereddit.
Discord is that way.
Dude literally who is scared of you LMAO
>Your gameplay
And poopkeyman gameplay is just spamming one singular move what is strong enough.
>Muh pvp
Doesn't matter, simply because it is completely optional and unrewrding shit
>p-please ignore the pvp
No
>p-please look at pvp
No
>Doesn't matter, simply because it is completely optional and unrewrding shit
so is playing a "strategy" game where you can only match wits with fricking bots
Then let's cut to the fricking chase and say all video games are a waste of time and we should all be learning how to master Chess, instead.
It's objectively the closest we'll ever come to a perfect game of wits and is held back solely by the fact there's a turn order.
>whataboutism
i play pokemon for the pvp. you can offer all the gameplay improvements in the world in whatever you're shilling, if it doesn't have pvp you might as well be shilling me playstation movie game
If you only care about the PVP, why are you consooming GameFreak's products? Literally just play Showdown and you'll get the exact same experience for free, with an added bonus of less literal toddlers and their "haven't even beaten the first gym" teams.
>Literally just play Showdown
i usually do, but early on-cart metas are the most fun you can possibly have because everyone's still trying to figure out the game.
>Literally just play Showdown
Good point.
Why would I play SMtroony when based Showdown is right there for free?
>playing the game with shitton of creatures in it’s roster just to use 15% of them in his autistic online mode
>paying 60 bucks for that happily
The absolute state of pokehomosexual paypigs
>having fun BAD
boy sure showed me
Well, I guess you have very low standards of what is "fun” for you. For each their own, I guess...
>Well, I guess you have very low standards of what is "fun” for you.
>says the anon content with playing against AI
>singleplayer mode in the game sucks ass so much he needs actual people to have at least some semblance of the challenge
>And it still manages to suck anyway
Pokegays are latent masochists confirmed.
>all we have our boss battles
We know SMTbro
At least the AI will give me more of a challenge than you mouth breathers playing a multiplayer mode that's meant as a crutch for a half baked single player experience :^)
>>t-this game is harder than playing against real people
double digit ELO
>I have no argument so I must insult
I'm a white boy living in South Carolina, but keep embarrassing yourself :^)
>Playing single player games is low standards
Woah, that’s just most cancerous zoomer mindset I ever seen
>playing the shittiest online mode
>actually paying for it
>being proud of it
yikes. pokegays are indeed mentally ill.
And they're too scared of giving Pokémon buffs that are actually meaningful because doing so may destroy Charizard or Pikachu's 's popularity. Can't have Meganium or Typhlosion have actual movepools now can we? Doing so will ruin VGC balancing and turn Cinderace into an untiered shitmon that's not even on the viability rank list for ZU.
>diverse movesets, abilities, weather, terrain, items, etc.
Nothing of that is matter in single player.
>B-but muh pvp!!!
Why even include single player campaign in your game if it is just a snorefest cakewalk with terrible story and gameplay then?
Pokemon is literally at the bottom of bottomless pit if we compare it to literally any other Jrpg, and pvp didn't saving it from being that shit.
Heck, even type advantages are doesn't matter in single player nowdays..
What a shitty fricking game design...
but no pvp... shame
How many collectibles are on the right game? According to Dexcommies it should be over 900
Nice graphics, what's the multiplayer like?
smt has no allister
Yeah. This year is really packed with great monster collecting games.
At this point only shills and bootlickers will buy anything from GF instead.
OPbros...they hate us...back to the drawing board...
As much as I love Shin Megami Tensei, Sword and Shield look better.
People who compare smt to pokemon have never fricking played or play persona 3,4 and 5
In smt the moment a demon can’t get the job done you fuse that b***h into something better and move on there’s no collecting shit your alignment is the only thing that matters
>Creature collecting game where you play as a creature
Novel concept. Shame it looks like shit and will probably be as bad as it looks, just like Sword and Shield were.
We understand there’s only one of you so you need to pretend to be other people, there’s no shame in that
>interest in SMTV is so low they have to try and bait on the Pokemon board
lmao
>interest so low
>hype levels caused SMT4 to skyrocket in price
>in the top 5 Switch preorders since June
Man at least try, this is such low effort bait
I think "monster collecting" RPGs are a specific subgenre of RPGs with a combat system built around multiplayer, not just any RPG where you collect monsters. It's similar to how not every game with platforming is considered a platformer.
The definition's hard to make in the first place because any new life that tries to flow into the subgenre doesn't last long due to "DURR POKEMON RIPOFF/KILLER!!" proclamations.
Only veterans like SMT and Dragon Quest are allowed to thrive, because they not only came before, but also inspired Pokemon's initial creation in the first place.
>built around multiplayer
Why then pokemon have such massive roster overall if there is only small portion of them being used online?
Because it built around collecting in the first place, not really around pvp
OP here, I wanted this thread to be fun but it's just two homosexuals screaming at each other
the so-called smtroony and pokeshitter
How did you expect this thread to go when you fricking START it with a hostile comparison you moron
never stated who was the superior one tho
You're legit moronic.