Piece of advice kid, stop parroting what you hear from your friends or media, eventually it will lead you to either alcoholic or drug addiction because you get so used to repeating whatever you see it becomes a habit. That's how you become a drone with fat wife and two kids who hate you.
Please wake up.
>my coolaid is better than yours
seeing shills everywhere is another form of being under influence of shills
question is which shills are controlling you.
the best thing about the game is the panam gf simulator
in real life i am ugly as FRICK and 5'7 so i'm physically unable to get a qt brown gf like her so i use the game as a fantasy
>Don't be fat, get a good haircut, maybe get buff
Damn bro, that's totally enough to counteract the rampant hypergamy in industrial society, you sure are a modern day Socrates.
Never played it, I appreciate the art and the overall feel they were going for when it came to interacting with characters, but apart from that it seems like a pretty big let down especially since there seems to be no updates, and their plans for multiplayer got axed. Completely mismanaged. Could have been a game to remember for more than it's abysmal launch had anything even gone slightly right behind the scenes.
yea and Martin Scorsese is Martin fricking Scorsese, he's got the name and he's got the wealth. I would agree however that people play up height and appearance too much.
>Don't be fat, get a good haircut, maybe get buff
Damn bro, that's totally enough to counteract the rampant hypergamy in industrial society, you sure are a modern day Socrates.
Get off dating apps, find people naturally through real life events or hobbyist class shit or just generally going about your business in some social area like a park or something. The longer you're around someone the more they'll come around to your appearance and personality even if you're an ogre. The game is rigged against you, but it's not impossible, and Chad will certainly have his harem, but remember Chad feels for you so there's always something he won't lay his almighty hands on. Now getting a long term relationship where both parties are faithful? Good fricking luck.
You are a completely fricking delusional soiboy. Why the frick would I go out and do some pigeon dance to attract a female when women shouldn't even have any agency in the mating market to begin with? So I can get some pussy in return for living like a fricking jester? Grow some balls you low test homosexual.
Seems like someone is a b***h ass homie lmao. If you’re soft enough to unironically get offended by tate’s obviously played up videos then you legitimately deserve to stay on reddit, as unhappy as ever.
moron, i suggest Nomad for first playtrough. It fits the best for someone playing the game for the first time since both you(the person playing) and the Nomad archetype have no idea about what is in Night City. Nomad and Corpo have been already living in Night City so they feel best for a second playtrough once you're familiar with the setting.
Alright thanks man, I guess I'll just do it in the order that they appear on screen, left to right
I'm guessing that the different lifestyles also change the main quest and side quests?
No, the different lifestyles have unique interactions, can change some quest solutions and have a small unique questline to each of them but the overall the game is the same. Still the amount of flavol added can really change the way you interact with characters. >the romantic rebel Nomad >the wienery ass Street Kid >the scumbag Corpo
Also i'd say the different endings fit the different backstories the best. Begginning as a Nomad and at the end leaving Night City with the Nomads felt super natural. The Legend ending felt the most fitting for the Street Kid and the Corpo is the one for the ARASAKA ending since you start as an ARASAKA goon.
What lifestyle would I choose if I wanted to be Ryan Gosling from Drive? I'm guessing Corpo is out of the picture but would Nomad or Streetkid work better
Don't listen to this [...] moron, i suggest Nomad for first playtrough. It fits the best for someone playing the game for the first time since both you(the person playing) and the Nomad archetype have no idea about what is in Night City. Nomad and Corpo have been already living in Night City so they feel best for a second playtrough once you're familiar with the setting.
moron, pick whatever attracts you the most, it makes 0 difference past the intro. There are like 2 unique lines per background in the entire game but the rest of the time V acts like a street kid so don't make a corpo or it'll feel wrong. There is absolutely not a single drop of flavor anywhere.
t. played corpo on first playthrough.
And the endings aren't really tied to your background at all. The bgs all follow the same story so in the end the endings all feel natural. It's pure autism on his part.
the best thing about the game is the panam gf simulator
in real life i am ugly as FRICK and 5'7 so i'm physically unable to get a qt brown gf like her so i use the game as a fantasy
Panam is a c**t, and the other girl is a dike you can't romance. They even failed the free points part on purpose.
PC players didn't have problem with it.
Console players on the other hand
It deserves all of the hate it got for its console ports being shit but playing it on PC at launch was pretty good. It had its issues but the random pedestrian AI being shit isnt that huge of a deal. Didnt run into any major glitches in my playthrough.
Everyone on a console should have gotten a refund though.
As usual making diversion by blaming all the critics on the bugs. I'm a PC player, didn't get any game-breaking bug (mostly fun ones) and I hate the game for various reasons.
It deserves all of the hate it got for its console ports being shit but playing it on PC at launch was pretty good. It had its issues but the random pedestrian AI being shit isnt that huge of a deal. Didnt run into any major glitches in my playthrough.
Everyone on a console should have gotten a refund though.
it's been happening for like 10 years. it's moronic
also game journalists do it now too for clickbait then normies take it as fact even though they'll happily buy any bethesda game full of exactly the same kind of bugs
feel the same way, like they are trapped mentally or financially to play on under powered console. the game is hard to run but even with a good pc from 2016, it plays the game fine. And every pc component released after that has only gotten better and by a lot.
just look how dead it is. >NIGHT CITY >NIGHT >MOTHERFRICKING >CITY >DRIVE AROUND AT NIGHT >COMPLETELY FRICKING DESERTED, DEAD, EMPTY >NIGHT CITY
the obvious state of being 15% finished just killed the game for me, i just couldnt get into it, it felt like playing a fricked up indie game that only managed to finish building textures and just released the game.
>It changes heavily with the time of day.
this. certain times and locations get absolutely packed with npcs and cars
not sure why they don't turn up the baseline crowd settings
no its not.
the whole world of NIGHT CITY goes dead AT NIGHT.
also the graphics look horrible.
>look at the plastic cars and plastic road
even GTA 4 looked better than this.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You're coping hard rn
2 years ago
Anonymous
lmao this looks fricking horrible.
2 years ago
Anonymous
What's the key visual flaw in your opinion?
2 years ago
Anonymous
yeah, I wish this game looked as good as GTA4
2 years ago
Anonymous
>photo mode snapchat filters
2 years ago
Anonymous
Whatever helps u cope anon
The biggest mistake was the Keanu stuff. It locked you into such a limited story in the end where there is nearly zero replay value. Having so much of the game revolve around him was bad design.
It gave the game direction but the pacing didn't really fit. Starts coming off the rails when you're a little further along and can spend 3 weeks doing side missions like its no big deal.
Is this modded? If not where the hell do I get that bike?
It's modded. That's jackie's bike, I used a mod to give it a glowing rim, but the kusanagi bike in the game also has a glowing rim by default
2 years ago
Anonymous
yeah while we're talking about coping, post screenshots without snapchat filters, eh?
2 years ago
Anonymous
There's no snapchat filters, it's literally just regular ass photomode with depth of field blur and sometimes cropping
2 years ago
Anonymous
>no filters >just with depth of field blur and sometimes cropping
2 years ago
Anonymous
I’ve bought the kusanagi in multiple playthroughs and it as not once had glowing rims in vanilla. What are you talking about?
2 years ago
Anonymous
I think you have to turn it on by honking the horn
2 years ago
Anonymous
You haven’t played GTA IV in over 10 years, game looks like compressed vomit
2 years ago
Anonymous
ok
2 years ago
Anonymous
is this a mod for new vegas or something?
You haven’t played GTA IV in over 10 years, game looks like compressed vomit
no it doesnt.
GTA 5, then.
looks way better.
What's the key visual flaw in your opinion?
these plastic textures remind me of a PS3 game.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Honestly don't know what you mean about the textures, this is easily one of the most impressive games I've ever played in a purely technical sense.
2 years ago
Anonymous
is this a screenshot from Fallout 4?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Post a screenshot from a game with superior graphics technically, I genuinely want a good comparison because I've been trying to push my new PC to the limit
2 years ago
Anonymous
>I've been trying to push my new PC to the limit
if you want to give your PC a solid beating, try Warhammer Total War 2 battle with several players.
I guarantee your PC will e smoke.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>B LOW >D CK
Very subliminal CDPR.
2 years ago
Anonymous
It always looks blurry as shit on my PC no matter what I do.
2 years ago
Anonymous
if youre talking about photomode, turn off depth of field in its own tab.
if the game is blurry while playing normally, you might have a resolution problem with windows or your graphics card. Or are using some automatic settings, that are turning on FSR or DLSS on a performance setting.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Game is unplayable without dlss since I'm 4k, but even trying to lower res or graphics settings without dlss looks blurry. Warzone looks sharp as hell with dlss so idk about this game
2 years ago
Anonymous
turn off clouds
turn off screen space reflections, you wont notice this one.
ambient occlusion to low
lowest fog resolution
those are the most demanding settings
can remove distant shadows too
but it shouldnt look blurry unless you have something screwed up somewhere or using AMD or Nvidia performance tricks.
The biggest mistake was the Keanu stuff. It locked you into such a limited story in the end where there is nearly zero replay value. Having so much of the game revolve around him was bad design.
[...]
It gave the game direction but the pacing didn't really fit. Starts coming off the rails when you're a little further along and can spend 3 weeks doing side missions like its no big deal.
[...]
It's modded. That's jackie's bike, I used a mod to give it a glowing rim, but the kusanagi bike in the game also has a glowing rim by default
>V YOU GONNA DIE HOLY SHIT >I GOT LIKE A MOMENT LEFT TO LIVE >YEAH LETS SPEND THE NEXT MONTH DOING RANDOM SHIT FOR PEOPLE I PASSED ON THE STREET
Yeah, I was hyped they were gonna let me explore the city and just be myself, and then, bam: you're fricked, you're gonna die, and take these meds lmao.
The game would have genuinely gone from a flawed 7 to a 10 if they hadn't gone for the moronic open world GTA shit and instead focused on hubs. Imagine if you just had several hubs that were each decently but not excessively big. Each and every space can be extremely rich with detail, alternative paths, things to discover, and generally just content that really immerses you into the world. The game's biggest strengths already were its audio-visuals and atmosphere, those were pretty 10/10 already even though the gameplay depth and mechanics were lacking. So imagine those aspects somewhere they can really shine.
The way I see it, you'd set it primarily in hubs like a mega-block in the main city, an open market or ghetto favela area by pacifica, a richer corpo area, and some specific buildings and locations you wind up doing raids on or otherwise going to one-off, something like that. It obviously still ends with a raid on Arasaka tower, but instead of just going around a huge city that exposes the shortcomings of the AI and the inexperience of the dev team with driving and making such huge cities, you'd just be overwhelmed by the depth of each hub and the characters in them, with a carefully crafted *facade* of a dystopian mega-city surrounding you.
While not 100% how I'd do it, I would point out how intensely immersive and soulful something like VTMB is with exactly that sort of hub formula, and it has you actually returning to hubs rather than shit like Deus Ex where it's basically one-off for most of them. Sure, you can walk and hit the walls of reality without too much effort, but it's like a big stage play. You get to play the role of protagonist mostly however you choose, and a world that's very alive, you just have to stay confined to the general predetermined plot points that you're anyway interested in seeing through to their end.
I thought the open world thing would be a mistake but it's honestly not terrible like I was expecting. Being an open world mostly works. It's definitely missing /something/ but I'm still not really sure what it is. I don't think it's needing a hub design though.
>no filters >just with depth of field blur and sometimes cropping
I guess you have absolutely no clue what a snapchat filter is
depth of field: not a filter
cropping: not a filter
sepia tone: yes that's a filter
If you're going to use the english language, use it properly
>DOES THE GAME LOOK DIFFERENTLY WHEN IN PHOTO MODE, WHEN COMPARED TO NON-PHOTO MODE?
It doesn't look different; Depth of field exists in the regular game and you can disable it in graphics settings if you want. Photomode just takes what you're already seeing and compose it better
Nah, it totally needs hubs. The ways the open world works are mostly in just seeing this massive city in such detail, and all the people in it. But then you take a close look at anything other than the scenery basically, and it tends to fall apart. Hubs would fix that by allowing lots of refinement to a smaller area, while still keeping the "feel" of being in a huge city by merit of being surrounded by it and still visiting different locales.
Cyberpunk's best moments are almost all in parts of the early game where you're super restricted where you can go, and in Johnny's memories of 2013 and 2020... when you're again similarly restricted. It totally needed to focus on even more of that, not try to be an open world where wow i can drive 4 miles away through almost non-existent traffic before i reach the end of the world anyway. At least with a hub you have a more manageable start to the herculean task you have before you in game dev, while still offering plenty of player freedom compared to purely linear design.
This game is both incredibly overrated and overrated; it has a lot of flaws and a lot of value but I think its biggest failing was simply that it built up more hype than it could pay out. It's far from perfect but if it hadn't been so much of a letdown I think it could've stood on its own as a very fun and pretty game.
Assuming people would still magically know it at least exists, I think better. A more solid look on what the game would be from the start might've helped too, it felt like both the marketing and the fan hype were riding on aesthetic alone most of the time.
people would likely forgive any hiccups they ran into, because they would be to prideful for finding a hidden gem. playing and underdog game. kinda like how little games blow up over night. cdpr's marketing caused people to dream about a game that reality can never match. then released a pc game on consoles, during a supply shortage and cryptomining boom making gpus unafforable.
with no marketing and a pretend world where everyone is on a decent pc, people would be fawning over the game.
They didn't build up the hype. That was shazamtrannies.
Can't count the number of times I saw some ridiculous horseshit being posted about the game here, and then two hours later someone taking all of those and making a list saying "wow this thing they didn't talk about won't be in the game"
A whole frickload of things taken out of context, purposefully misconstrued too - take the flying cars for example. There's little to no information about flying cars except they'll be in the game and you probably won't fly them. The game releases, you don't fly them and they're in the game. The shitposts: Wow they added flying cars to the game but you can't even fly them!
That sort of bullshit happened constantly. A lot of people didn't even hear about flying cars being in the game until there was some moron shitposters kicking up a fuss about not being able to fly them - as if it were THE make or break feature for the game.
I got up to the last mission when I bought the game on release then I just... stopped playing. Lost all interest, and from what I've heard CDPR don't give any fricks anymore either.
Finished it last night and even reloaded a save to see another ending. 80 hours for one playthrough and I've not even done everything it has to offer. I fricking loved it lads and I'm glad I waited until it was patched up to play it, honestly it might even be in my top 3.
The highlight is the freedom of riding around on your motorcycle and completing gigs and side quests. Those are the parts of the game that feel most like what it was hyped up to be. The main story is nice most of the time too but the side missions and gigs feel the most satisfying to complete, considering they’re not nearly as heavily scripted and railroaded as the story.
This game is not bad - its painfully mediocre. Which is why this is the worst game ever made. Patches wont save you. NMS-style comeback is not happening.
It's pretty mediocre. I did like Keanu's character and his story line, singlehandedly carries the game. Wouldn't play more than an hour if not for that.
Even then it's funny how he's not really the right guy for the role. also mildly funny how he'll say shit like "really gets my southern blood pumpin'" that comes off really funny from his hapa asian ass, lmoa.
The problem with Ubipunk, besides the bugs, is that it tricks people. Nice graphics, mediocre story, and okay combat which all come to together to make a mediocre game. Its a dime a dozen, a needle in a pile of needles, a turd covered in cake. If you picked up a ubisoft game, you would get the same mediocre experience this game gives. These types of games do the bare minimum to get your neurons fired and people fall for it every time. You basically paid 60 dollars (for some of you even more) on a game you can get anywhere else for almost half the cost and the same replay value. Hell, you could make fallout 4 look just as good as some of the screen shots for all of a shit game it was.
TLDR - Just play any open world game and get the same experience you would get playing cybershit.
I loved it. Snoys be damned.
if shit taste were a crime both your asses would be in jail
Piece of advice kid, stop parroting what you hear from your friends or media, eventually it will lead you to either alcoholic or drug addiction because you get so used to repeating whatever you see it becomes a habit. That's how you become a drone with fat wife and two kids who hate you.
Please wake up.
>if you don't mindlessly consoom my product, here's what's going to happen
ok mr. shill thank you for your wisdom
>my coolaid is better than yours
seeing shills everywhere is another form of being under influence of shills
question is which shills are controlling you.
What's so terrible about it?
based
frick you too
the best thing about the game is the panam gf simulator
in real life i am ugly as FRICK and 5'7 so i'm physically unable to get a qt brown gf like her so i use the game as a fantasy
>ugly as frick
So what. Don't be fat, get a good haircut, maybe get buff if you have the motivation.
>and 5'7
Martin Scorcese is 5'4. Get over it.
>Don't be fat, get a good haircut, maybe get buff
Damn bro, that's totally enough to counteract the rampant hypergamy in industrial society, you sure are a modern day Socrates.
>waaaa excuses waaaa feel sorry for meeeee!!!!
Stay unhappy then.
Never played it, I appreciate the art and the overall feel they were going for when it came to interacting with characters, but apart from that it seems like a pretty big let down especially since there seems to be no updates, and their plans for multiplayer got axed. Completely mismanaged. Could have been a game to remember for more than it's abysmal launch had anything even gone slightly right behind the scenes.
yea and Martin Scorsese is Martin fricking Scorsese, he's got the name and he's got the wealth. I would agree however that people play up height and appearance too much.
Get off dating apps, find people naturally through real life events or hobbyist class shit or just generally going about your business in some social area like a park or something. The longer you're around someone the more they'll come around to your appearance and personality even if you're an ogre. The game is rigged against you, but it's not impossible, and Chad will certainly have his harem, but remember Chad feels for you so there's always something he won't lay his almighty hands on. Now getting a long term relationship where both parties are faithful? Good fricking luck.
You are a completely fricking delusional soiboy. Why the frick would I go out and do some pigeon dance to attract a female when women shouldn't even have any agency in the mating market to begin with? So I can get some pussy in return for living like a fricking jester? Grow some balls you low test homosexual.
please go back to watching andrew tate
I have no idea who that is.
Who?
Chads watch looksmaximus
A fellow dickyseur.
Andrew is based keeep his name out of your b***h ass mouth
Seems like someone is a b***h ass homie lmao. If you’re soft enough to unironically get offended by tate’s obviously played up videos then you legitimately deserve to stay on reddit, as unhappy as ever.
Grow up.
Scorcese is massively successful though. Is that your solution, just be massively successful?
He was 5'4 and still managed to become massively successful, is my point. Doofus.
Most people like it. The people who dislike the game are a vocal minority of schizos.
I'm not gonna lie. I also loved the Panam questline and the feels but there are other great GIGs to play trough. Not just the Nomad storyline.
>Still ctd chance after closing a menu
It's shit
PC players didn't have problem with it.
Console players on the other hand
Gonna play this game in a couple of days when I get a new GPU, should I pick Nomad, Streetkid or Corpo?
It doesn't make any difference
Don't listen to this
moron, i suggest Nomad for first playtrough. It fits the best for someone playing the game for the first time since both you(the person playing) and the Nomad archetype have no idea about what is in Night City. Nomad and Corpo have been already living in Night City so they feel best for a second playtrough once you're familiar with the setting.
Street Kid and Corpo*
Alright thanks man, I guess I'll just do it in the order that they appear on screen, left to right
I'm guessing that the different lifestyles also change the main quest and side quests?
No, the different lifestyles have unique interactions, can change some quest solutions and have a small unique questline to each of them but the overall the game is the same. Still the amount of flavol added can really change the way you interact with characters.
>the romantic rebel Nomad
>the wienery ass Street Kid
>the scumbag Corpo
Also i'd say the different endings fit the different backstories the best. Begginning as a Nomad and at the end leaving Night City with the Nomads felt super natural. The Legend ending felt the most fitting for the Street Kid and the Corpo is the one for the ARASAKA ending since you start as an ARASAKA goon.
What lifestyle would I choose if I wanted to be Ryan Gosling from Drive? I'm guessing Corpo is out of the picture but would Nomad or Streetkid work better
Probably Nomad? Street Kid is the most punk of all the 3. Drive doesn't really have the punk feel that 2077 has. It's more Noir.
Don't listen to this
moron, pick whatever attracts you the most, it makes 0 difference past the intro. There are like 2 unique lines per background in the entire game but the rest of the time V acts like a street kid so don't make a corpo or it'll feel wrong. There is absolutely not a single drop of flavor anywhere.
t. played corpo on first playthrough.
And the endings aren't really tied to your background at all. The bgs all follow the same story so in the end the endings all feel natural. It's pure autism on his part.
Panam is a c**t, and the other girl is a dike you can't romance. They even failed the free points part on purpose.
As usual making diversion by blaming all the critics on the bugs. I'm a PC player, didn't get any game-breaking bug (mostly fun ones) and I hate the game for various reasons.
This is the gayest post i've ever read. Go choke on a wiener gayget.
modding the game is pretty fun
It deserves all of the hate it got for its console ports being shit but playing it on PC at launch was pretty good. It had its issues but the random pedestrian AI being shit isnt that huge of a deal. Didnt run into any major glitches in my playthrough.
Everyone on a console should have gotten a refund though.
Cyberkino is amazing and one of the best games of the gen so far.
I played so much that my qitp 8/10 girlfriend bought me this World Of Cyberpunk Deluxe Edition.
To say thanks I gave her 3-hole dicking and blasted her face with warm cum, just how she likes it.
>gf
>8/10
>cyberpunk is kino
Cyberkino 2077 is fricking based. I love this game. Frick Ganker
Wow that Mad Max rip off desert is really cyberpunk.
Admit it, shazam troony. You have lost.
At this point i'm starting to think that shazamposters are just salty gaygets that can't run the game.
They're just newbies desperate to force a TORtanic for their generation. They did it for Elden Ring and now they're obsessing over Starfield.
it's been happening for like 10 years. it's moronic
also game journalists do it now too for clickbait then normies take it as fact even though they'll happily buy any bethesda game full of exactly the same kind of bugs
feel the same way, like they are trapped mentally or financially to play on under powered console. the game is hard to run but even with a good pc from 2016, it plays the game fine. And every pc component released after that has only gotten better and by a lot.
just look how dead it is.
>NIGHT CITY
>NIGHT
>MOTHERFRICKING
>CITY
>DRIVE AROUND AT NIGHT
>COMPLETELY FRICKING DESERTED, DEAD, EMPTY
>NIGHT CITY
the obvious state of being 15% finished just killed the game for me, i just couldnt get into it, it felt like playing a fricked up indie game that only managed to finish building textures and just released the game.
The game is really dense, that was just a weird time of night in a quieter area. It changes heavily with the time of day.
>It changes heavily with the time of day.
this. certain times and locations get absolutely packed with npcs and cars
not sure why they don't turn up the baseline crowd settings
no its not.
the whole world of NIGHT CITY goes dead AT NIGHT.
also the graphics look horrible.
>look at the plastic cars and plastic road
even GTA 4 looked better than this.
You're coping hard rn
lmao this looks fricking horrible.
What's the key visual flaw in your opinion?
yeah, I wish this game looked as good as GTA4
>photo mode snapchat filters
Whatever helps u cope anon
It gave the game direction but the pacing didn't really fit. Starts coming off the rails when you're a little further along and can spend 3 weeks doing side missions like its no big deal.
It's modded. That's jackie's bike, I used a mod to give it a glowing rim, but the kusanagi bike in the game also has a glowing rim by default
yeah while we're talking about coping, post screenshots without snapchat filters, eh?
There's no snapchat filters, it's literally just regular ass photomode with depth of field blur and sometimes cropping
>no filters
>just with depth of field blur and sometimes cropping
I’ve bought the kusanagi in multiple playthroughs and it as not once had glowing rims in vanilla. What are you talking about?
I think you have to turn it on by honking the horn
You haven’t played GTA IV in over 10 years, game looks like compressed vomit
ok
is this a mod for new vegas or something?
no it doesnt.
GTA 5, then.
looks way better.
these plastic textures remind me of a PS3 game.
Honestly don't know what you mean about the textures, this is easily one of the most impressive games I've ever played in a purely technical sense.
is this a screenshot from Fallout 4?
Post a screenshot from a game with superior graphics technically, I genuinely want a good comparison because I've been trying to push my new PC to the limit
>I've been trying to push my new PC to the limit
if you want to give your PC a solid beating, try Warhammer Total War 2 battle with several players.
I guarantee your PC will e smoke.
>B LOW
>D CK
Very subliminal CDPR.
It always looks blurry as shit on my PC no matter what I do.
if youre talking about photomode, turn off depth of field in its own tab.
if the game is blurry while playing normally, you might have a resolution problem with windows or your graphics card. Or are using some automatic settings, that are turning on FSR or DLSS on a performance setting.
Game is unplayable without dlss since I'm 4k, but even trying to lower res or graphics settings without dlss looks blurry. Warzone looks sharp as hell with dlss so idk about this game
turn off clouds
turn off screen space reflections, you wont notice this one.
ambient occlusion to low
lowest fog resolution
those are the most demanding settings
can remove distant shadows too
but it shouldnt look blurry unless you have something screwed up somewhere or using AMD or Nvidia performance tricks.
Jump in the water, check the bottom of the river
t. console poorgay
its exactly the same on PC, only a homosexual would play a FPS game on a console.
Best parts of this game unironically take place in the desert.
this, shazamtrannies lost
Silverhand was way better than i expected.
Anybody have a link for the flying car mod?
These shrimp fresh?
Cyberpunk is masterpiece and Gankertr00ns are seething over its acclaim and success.
I love this timeline.
Is this modded? If not where the hell do I get that bike?
its understandable, its a great game.
The biggest mistake was the Keanu stuff. It locked you into such a limited story in the end where there is nearly zero replay value. Having so much of the game revolve around him was bad design.
>V YOU GONNA DIE HOLY SHIT
>I GOT LIKE A MOMENT LEFT TO LIVE
>YEAH LETS SPEND THE NEXT MONTH DOING RANDOM SHIT FOR PEOPLE I PASSED ON THE STREET
Extremely stupid game design.
Yeah, I was hyped they were gonna let me explore the city and just be myself, and then, bam: you're fricked, you're gonna die, and take these meds lmao.
>GTA but in the future
Wow
Hell, it's the only game I can play as a troony, 10/10 CD Projekt Red
The game would have genuinely gone from a flawed 7 to a 10 if they hadn't gone for the moronic open world GTA shit and instead focused on hubs. Imagine if you just had several hubs that were each decently but not excessively big. Each and every space can be extremely rich with detail, alternative paths, things to discover, and generally just content that really immerses you into the world. The game's biggest strengths already were its audio-visuals and atmosphere, those were pretty 10/10 already even though the gameplay depth and mechanics were lacking. So imagine those aspects somewhere they can really shine.
The way I see it, you'd set it primarily in hubs like a mega-block in the main city, an open market or ghetto favela area by pacifica, a richer corpo area, and some specific buildings and locations you wind up doing raids on or otherwise going to one-off, something like that. It obviously still ends with a raid on Arasaka tower, but instead of just going around a huge city that exposes the shortcomings of the AI and the inexperience of the dev team with driving and making such huge cities, you'd just be overwhelmed by the depth of each hub and the characters in them, with a carefully crafted *facade* of a dystopian mega-city surrounding you.
While not 100% how I'd do it, I would point out how intensely immersive and soulful something like VTMB is with exactly that sort of hub formula, and it has you actually returning to hubs rather than shit like Deus Ex where it's basically one-off for most of them. Sure, you can walk and hit the walls of reality without too much effort, but it's like a big stage play. You get to play the role of protagonist mostly however you choose, and a world that's very alive, you just have to stay confined to the general predetermined plot points that you're anyway interested in seeing through to their end.
I thought the open world thing would be a mistake but it's honestly not terrible like I was expecting. Being an open world mostly works. It's definitely missing /something/ but I'm still not really sure what it is. I don't think it's needing a hub design though.
I guess you have absolutely no clue what a snapchat filter is
depth of field: not a filter
cropping: not a filter
sepia tone: yes that's a filter
If you're going to use the english language, use it properly
HEY
DOES THE GAME LOOK DIFFERENTLY WHEN IN PHOTO MODE, WHEN COMPARED TO NON-PHOTO MODE?
>YES
OK COOL, THANKS.
>DOES THE GAME LOOK DIFFERENTLY WHEN IN PHOTO MODE, WHEN COMPARED TO NON-PHOTO MODE?
It doesn't look different; Depth of field exists in the regular game and you can disable it in graphics settings if you want. Photomode just takes what you're already seeing and compose it better
Here's an example of first person view without doing anything in photomode
Nah, it totally needs hubs. The ways the open world works are mostly in just seeing this massive city in such detail, and all the people in it. But then you take a close look at anything other than the scenery basically, and it tends to fall apart. Hubs would fix that by allowing lots of refinement to a smaller area, while still keeping the "feel" of being in a huge city by merit of being surrounded by it and still visiting different locales.
Cyberpunk's best moments are almost all in parts of the early game where you're super restricted where you can go, and in Johnny's memories of 2013 and 2020... when you're again similarly restricted. It totally needed to focus on even more of that, not try to be an open world where wow i can drive 4 miles away through almost non-existent traffic before i reach the end of the world anyway. At least with a hub you have a more manageable start to the herculean task you have before you in game dev, while still offering plenty of player freedom compared to purely linear design.
the world is lifeless. I loved the story and side jobs but gigs feel terrible. Very shallow
This game is both incredibly overrated and overrated; it has a lot of flaws and a lot of value but I think its biggest failing was simply that it built up more hype than it could pay out. It's far from perfect but if it hadn't been so much of a letdown I think it could've stood on its own as a very fun and pretty game.
what if they released it with no marketing at all
would it be better or worse
Assuming people would still magically know it at least exists, I think better. A more solid look on what the game would be from the start might've helped too, it felt like both the marketing and the fan hype were riding on aesthetic alone most of the time.
people would likely forgive any hiccups they ran into, because they would be to prideful for finding a hidden gem. playing and underdog game. kinda like how little games blow up over night. cdpr's marketing caused people to dream about a game that reality can never match. then released a pc game on consoles, during a supply shortage and cryptomining boom making gpus unafforable.
with no marketing and a pretend world where everyone is on a decent pc, people would be fawning over the game.
They didn't build up the hype. That was shazamtrannies.
Can't count the number of times I saw some ridiculous horseshit being posted about the game here, and then two hours later someone taking all of those and making a list saying "wow this thing they didn't talk about won't be in the game"
A whole frickload of things taken out of context, purposefully misconstrued too - take the flying cars for example. There's little to no information about flying cars except they'll be in the game and you probably won't fly them. The game releases, you don't fly them and they're in the game. The shitposts: Wow they added flying cars to the game but you can't even fly them!
That sort of bullshit happened constantly. A lot of people didn't even hear about flying cars being in the game until there was some moron shitposters kicking up a fuss about not being able to fly them - as if it were THE make or break feature for the game.
>Shazam
>Posted here
Ganker alone was not the sole source of cyberpunk hype or hate, anon
>WE HEARD YOU TALKING SHIT ABOUT CYBERPUNK2077
>CEASE THIS BEHAVIOR IMMEDIATELY OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES
I got up to the last mission when I bought the game on release then I just... stopped playing. Lost all interest, and from what I've heard CDPR don't give any fricks anymore either.
>Final level
>Trees clip through the floor where you confront the arasaka guy
>Frick you, I liked it.
Finished it last night and even reloaded a save to see another ending. 80 hours for one playthrough and I've not even done everything it has to offer. I fricking loved it lads and I'm glad I waited until it was patched up to play it, honestly it might even be in my top 3.
Yup it's kino and I'm tired of pretending that it isn't.
smeel it
smell it
gtx1080
the last 4core i5
game is beautiful
True anon.
shill:
>is empty
me:
GTX 980
i7-6700k
16gb ram
Will I be able to run it and on what settings?
Yes, on high non raytracing. ~55 FPS 1080p, ~40-45 1440p.
Cool, thanks bro, its a hand me down GPU so I dunno if its a Ti or regular, gonna get it in like 3 days tops
So is there New Game + yet, or what?
Is this shit worth playing now? I'm guessing most of the bugs have been fixed but that was never the biggest problem of the game.
Have they actually added any content or is it still a fake empty "open world" game?
It's eh... it's a piss-weak modern day Deus Ex game at best. Most times it's not even that.
The highlight is the cityscape and that's just about it.
The highlight is the freedom of riding around on your motorcycle and completing gigs and side quests. Those are the parts of the game that feel most like what it was hyped up to be. The main story is nice most of the time too but the side missions and gigs feel the most satisfying to complete, considering they’re not nearly as heavily scripted and railroaded as the story.
It's not good enough.
Cyberpunk is a 10/10 masterpiece.
The only ones disagreeing are seething PS4 tr00ns. As if anyone cares about the screeching on this board.
This game is not bad - its painfully mediocre. Which is why this is the worst game ever made. Patches wont save you. NMS-style comeback is not happening.
"Free dlcs" btw.
Expansion is coming in 2023.
Based.
I'm at the point now where I'm avoiding the last quest. I don't want the game to end so I'm going around doing side quests and gigs.
Can't wait for the dlc.
It's pretty mediocre. I did like Keanu's character and his story line, singlehandedly carries the game. Wouldn't play more than an hour if not for that.
Even then it's funny how he's not really the right guy for the role. also mildly funny how he'll say shit like "really gets my southern blood pumpin'" that comes off really funny from his hapa asian ass, lmoa.
The problem with Ubipunk, besides the bugs, is that it tricks people. Nice graphics, mediocre story, and okay combat which all come to together to make a mediocre game. Its a dime a dozen, a needle in a pile of needles, a turd covered in cake. If you picked up a ubisoft game, you would get the same mediocre experience this game gives. These types of games do the bare minimum to get your neurons fired and people fall for it every time. You basically paid 60 dollars (for some of you even more) on a game you can get anywhere else for almost half the cost and the same replay value. Hell, you could make fallout 4 look just as good as some of the screen shots for all of a shit game it was.
TLDR - Just play any open world game and get the same experience you would get playing cybershit.
Except Cyberpunk is way more fun than any Far Cry or Asscreed game.
Even if that was true, congratz your game passed the bare minimum required to be an open world game.
Enjoy your 10% boost to damage and prepare your anus to consume the next shit open world game.
I'd rather play Cyberpunk. Stay mad and go back to whatever dogshit video games amuses.
You won't even mention what you're playing because you know you'll ridiculed.
Would me posting what i've been playing make any of the flaws i pointed out in your shit game any less obvious?