>game has aggressive occlusion culling
>things sometimes disappear at the edge of your screen and you're not sure if you're crazy
![]() It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
![]() Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
![]() It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
>game has aggressive occlusion culling
>things sometimes disappear at the edge of your screen and you're not sure if you're crazy
![]() It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
![]() Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
![]() It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
>Redditbob
Go back
>game culls out a room at a certain distance
>you can still see the infinite void
Thank Quake for VVIS
Bloodborne is particularly bad about this, every time you swing your camera around a wall or pillar you get a flash of the skybox before the objects behind the wall appear
is this the thread?
I don't know what is going on but i will lurk to see what's going to happen
It's the quantum thingie where its possibilities collapse upon being observed
how do they know the distribution of particles without "observing" it?
you know how when you grill a steak there are grill marks on it?
it's something like that but with light
Damn
What the frick how???
You slay a light bison and use its meat for observerless observation.
if you measure which slit the particle goes through, then the pattern goes away.
if you don't measure which slit the particle goes through you get the pattern
wow, almost like the calculations are wrong but scientists are so full of themselves they rather come up with some bullshit explenation than admitting that the math they've been practicing for decades is full of errors.
Photo paper.
>find video a hoping it will explain to me how you can get two different things when looking and not looking
>guy explaining doesn't even know
It's because you aren't just looking or not looking. The two lines is when you put a detector in the slits to determine which slit a photon went through. You're actually changing the course of the photon, because in order for the detector to see it, it has to hit the photon with a particle. Really all this shows is that looking at things changes their state, which makes perfect sense considering that looking at things requires you to hit them with light so the light can bounce back from it into your eyes.
Implying light is being used for detection.
Implying Light is my favorite game
Any form of detection requires hitting a thing with another thing.
>You're actually changing the course of the photon, because in order for the detector to see it, it has to hit the photon with a particle
Is this how they came up with the crazy bullshit of Cyclops's lasers coming from the punch dimension?
isnt the logic that the test uses light, and to ``observe it`` you need to shine another light on it, and this 2nd light changes the pattern of the first?
Stop spreading misleading implications
It's the specific methods scientists use for the observation what interferes with the results (which are simply the only way you can observe this phenomenon), not you as a person simply "seeing" the result
Did somebody scare a bunch of zommers again?
>reddit "science"
>drive on a hot road
>it looks like there are larges puddles of water somehow
>they disappear when you reach them
Wtf, is Black personman here ?
air get hotter closer to road
light go faster through hotter air
light bend when going from slow air to fast air
you are looking at the sky, not puddles
>light go faster through hotter air
who knew all we needed to break the speed of light was some hot asphalt...
Occam's razor moron. The draw distance is slower on hot sunny days.
Reminder that to "observe" something on a particle level is impossible without interacting with it, and this is what is meant when people say that observing the experiment changes the result.
fricking hate that pop sci never made that distinction in the first place
whole generations inculcated to the belief that it requires a sentient human observer to alter quantum phenomena. no, homosexual, your brain works on chemistry, thousands of times above the quantum scale, and is remains purely deterministic
>thousands of times
kek
almost managed to convince us you aren't a brainlet
>WOOOOOW WHAT DO YOU MEAN MEASURING SOMETHING BY PHYSICALLY DISRUPTING IT CAUSES THE WAVE FUNCTION TO COLLAPSE WHOAAA ISNT SCIENCE LE HECCIN COOL
>YOUR BRIAM IS LIKE A LE WAVE COLLAPSER FOR MERELY OBSERVING SOMETHING, THATS SO FRICKING LE COOL, LE HOGGIN DELAYED CHOICE ERASER IS LE SPOOKY
peak midwit reddit reasoning
This. There is no "particle-wave duality". That's a load of dogshit. There are ONLY waves. The perceived particles are merely the densest regions of each waveform as they travel, compress, and expand repeatedly. Similarly, atomic valence shells work the way they do because the solid center of the atom functionally "broadcasts" electrical pressure that other similar pressures can fill, just like the drain in a bathtub or a tornado.
>t. autist
you seeing things is not a 100% uninvolved process