Games for that chernobyl show feel?
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Games for that chernobyl show feel?
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Gonna sound obvious, but Metro Exodus: The Two Colonels DLC. It encaptures a lingering feel of dread that the show also has. If you'll play the DLC, obviously, play the main game first
Does Exodus run well on a 1070?
Singularity
In some ways I am envious of the people at chernobyl like Boris and Legasov.
It must be liberating, despite the horrible situation, to be able to just drop literally everything and go at a disaster like this.
Are you saying you find more peace in an incalculable disaster as opposed to your normal day to day life?
You'll have to forgive that anon's ignorance. It's coming from the same place as those who think an zombie outbreak or similar collapse of society would somehow end the boredom of their day-to-day lives when the reality of such a situation is a horrible death in both situations. Either by gruesome acute injury/sickness or a long drawn out process of starvation and dehydration.
>collapse of society would somehow end the boredom of their day-to-day lives
It will. Everyone who went through war remembers that for the rest of their lives. It's not a great experience but it sure is a memorable one and that can't be said about your life, or mine. Our days are not worth remembering no matter how comfy they are
in the sense you would just fricking die in the first week
Maybe, maybe not. As you can see I'm not at war so I also chose safety just like you. But at least I know I'm a pussy
It's almost certain that you'd fricking die without a source of clean potable water. Modern water and sewerage systems are one of the aspects of modern society that really go unappreciated because once our domestic water supply goes down it'll leave most people without access to a proper well next to no source of drinking water.
Sure, you can think of making a distillation setup, but the reality of those is they just don't generate the quantities of water that you'd need them to.
>wateeeeeeeeeeeer waaaaaaaaaater
>It's not a great experience but it sure is a memorable
why the frick would you want that? just get raped by a pack of nogs and have that bad experience...
People like having a strong sense of purpose and prefer that to wageslaving in order to buy a new sofa. That's what those ex-Soviets who miss the Soviet Union miss the most. A sense of working together to achieve something legendary rather than just waging to consooooom more which is all that capitalism has to offer to a normal person
>just create something legendary under capitalism
One in a million does that, the other 999999 just wage for money and don't feel like they're contributing to anything at all
so join the military or something
A lot of people do, others are too old or just have a different skillset. Just because you're not a soldier doesn't mean you want to have a meaningless life of consumption
>A sense of working together to achieve something legendary
Yeah, slaving inside a coal mine and starving to death sounds really legendary anon
It is if you think you're doing something legendary like building a dam that will power an entire region. In Soviet Union the best worker of the month was a local hero, they paraded workers on TV as celebs. People actually aspired to be a great worker who does great work on some great project. Not to consooom but because they wanted to be that epic hero that everyone admired
How fricking bored are you?
>who needs food when you can be Hero of the Soviet Union!
>back to coal mines now, Sergey. Enjoy your single extra potato.
and nobody in the current years knows who those people are, I'd rather have a normal life than slaving away only to be remembered for a short time
Third world thinking. Problems caused by corrupt and ill functioning institutions are burdened on some random martyr's shoulders like Legasov. Then wait for another disaster, many lives lost and a person hailed as hero has to fix everything. Rinse and repeat. Whereas in a properly working country there are no "martyrs" or "heroes" who sacrifice their life or health to save the country from negligent disasters because the institutions which are tasked with preventing them are tightly regulated and competent. Prevention and proactiveness represents competence. Heroism and reactiveness represents incompetence.
>It is if you think you're doing something legendary like building a dam that will power an entire region.
We made the Hoover Dam, anon. You don't need Soviet style communism to build great feats of engineering to help your society.
>In Soviet Union the best worker of the month was a local hero, they paraded workers on TV as celebs
yet these workers got absolutely fricking nothing aside of list of acknowledgment. And those who outdone working plan? Their result becomes next norm, everyone works to absolute exhaustion or left without salary. Go tell about great commie times to someone else, Black person tankie
I just want to work in order to fund my hobbies. Why would I sacrifice my remaining life on being a part of something than spending that on things I like? Yes, you might be a part of it but at the end of the day people wouldn't even notice what you contributed.
You can't even name one VFX artist who worked on Marvel for 11 years at the end credits because you are more interested at the post credit scene.
>if you work really really hard, you can get really rich like Mr Schlomo!
>if you work really really hard, you can get really really famous like our great leader!
What's the difference you brainlet homosexual?
Boy it would surely be fun to slowly and horribly burn from the inside out and die a painful, agonizing death
You picked literally the only disaster that being on the ground for slowly kills you
based moron
this anon is delirious.
also someone watch this rbmk reactor i have to go take a shit.
Chernobyl Liquidators Simulator
STALKER
Real life now
Russians did nothing wrong here, it wasnt their fault
>designed and built the reactor
>refused to listen to other Russians who said they were cruisin for a bruisin
>refused to acknowledge the evidence in front of their own fricking face that there was a huge frickup
I'd say they did plenty wrong
Don't forget that they had partial meltdown at one of their other RBMK reactors (Leningrad Unit 1) but redacted/silenced the reports due to secrecy so the issues brought to light by those incidents never got to the people running Chernobyl.
oh yeah ?
Unsecure reactors, and badly managed crue.
A piece of media about non anglos featuring anglocuck accents? Kingdom Come Deliverance
Of all the things to have a problem with, why this? Is it bait?
That SFM urban explorer game
Is it called Infra? Something like that
*Source Engine explorer game
Infra is a good game.
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare
Reminder that this is anti-nuclear propaganda (probably unintentionally)
Chernobyl really only killed <1000 people over 40 years
>bridge of death? Never happened
>boosted cancer rates? Nope
>boosted birth mutations? Nope
>radiation cloud? Nope
Nuclear power is incredibly safe and efficient. It is the most environmentally-friendly power source in existence. It does not "explode" and cannot be easily turned into nuclear weapons. Nuclear safety protocols are the most rigorous ever devised.
Just a few decades later, you can go right now as a tourist to the site of "the worst nuclear disaster in history" - do you think you could do that if it was actually as bad as people incorrectly believe it was?
>chernobyl was a really good drama though for sure
>Just a few decades later, you can go right now as a tourist to the site of "the worst nuclear disaster in history"
On a guided tour, briefly, sure. Could you stay there?
t.
while I agree on your point on nuclear energy being relatively safe, don't downplay chernobyl. It was a masive catastrophe that could be easily avoided. Why people afraid of planes more than cars, despite cars having bigger body count? Cause when plane fells, it's usually ~100 dead at one time. It horrifies people because of one-time deaths. Same with nuclear catastrophes. One Chernobyl overshadows all the work-related deaths on coal/oil/etc powerplants
also you can't just go as a tourist - you need a guide, a permission, and always stay on the trail. Theres places in the zone that can give you ray disease in matter of minutes to this day. Even when I was on a tour there, walking on safe paths, one step left or right and your geiger counter produces trap beat
actually pathologic 2, setting is different but suffocating hopeless feel is there
Black Mesa/Half-Life for the first episode.
Black Mesa has the superior disaster presentation, but seriously drops the ball later on.
INFRA
Daily reminder that the people who hate the Soviet Union the most are the ones too young to remember it.
Why don't you post your moronic shit on twitter and reddit? There's a lot more impressionable children at those places
Ganker is far more impressionable than any other website on the internet
shame we can't ask any of the 50 million people that starved to death what they thought, it could really go both ways.
A small price to pay for the rapid industrialization that saved the world from the Nazis.
It was the greatest nation in the history of mankind, strangled by Capitalists who hated the threat it posed to their global hegemony.
>daily reminder that people who hate World war 2 the most are the ones too young to remember it
it was a disaster. case closed
I mean, if you want to drill into that nuclear reactor scare feeling, then Factorio with the Realistic Reactors mod goes some way towards it. In the vanilla game they're fairly safe but the mod makes it so they can melt down if they exceed 1000 degrees temp, so you have to build a fairly complex cooling system/auto-scram etc.
Death stranding, unironically.
I thought this was a thinly veiled stalker screenshot thread. I guess we just don't have those anymore.
Anyway I only have a handful but post some fricking stalker screenshots.