HAHAHA wait a fricking second!
A 7 year old tablet costing 300 at launch looks much worse then a 1.5k pc? Hahahhahah WHAT?!
Who could have seen this coming? Hahahah lmao!
People know the switch version would look like and perform like shit compared to modern hardware, nobody is shocked
i have zero interest in buying or playing shitty pozzed games regardless of their performance. only a pc redditor looks at a terrible game and feels compelled to download it
nta and I don't actually give a shit about Hogwarts (I just stupidly like comparison photos of game differences), but if the intent is to play it portably, it makes perfect sense. If the intent is just to play it at home, and the Switch isn't the only thing you have, then yeah, it's foolish.
OP here, forgot to mention that they world is not interconnected on Switch version. They had to basically slice parts of the world and add in loading screens to different areas of the game.
When you go to Hogsmeade you have to LOAD INTO Hogsmeade, you can't just walk into it like on PC and console. It's the same for other areas across the game, AND you also have to LOAD INTO EVERY BUILDING in Hogsmeade, can't just fricking walk into the store. You have to LOAD INTO IT, and we're talking a 30-50 second load time for every building/area.
OP here, forgot to mention that they world is not interconnected on Switch version. They had to basically slice parts of the world and add in loading screens to different areas of the game.
When you go to Hogsmeade you have to LOAD INTO Hogsmeade, you can't just walk into it like on PC and console. It's the same for other areas across the game, AND you also have to LOAD INTO EVERY BUILDING in Hogsmeade, can't just fricking walk into the store. You have to LOAD INTO IT, and we're talking a 30-50 second load time for every building/area.
Because publishers know Nintendo fans are like Apple loyalists and will buy it out of brand loyalty. They'd buy a bag of mulch if it had a Nintendo logo on it.
JIMMY HOPKINS!
Why is he still using the old version of trdrop?
HAHAHA wait a fricking second!
A 7 year old tablet costing 300 at launch looks much worse then a 1.5k pc? Hahahhahah WHAT?!
Who could have seen this coming? Hahahah lmao!
People know the switch version would look like and perform like shit compared to modern hardware, nobody is shocked
>Seething Nintendo fanboy
Go ahead and justify spending $60 for such a downgraded and stripped game.
>downgraded and stripped game.
It plays exactly the same and has exactly the same content
>30 FPS cap instead of 60+ FPS
>Removed assets
>Downgraded textures, lighting, and visuals.
>Completely different experience and atmosphere.
i have zero interest in buying or playing shitty pozzed games regardless of their performance. only a pc redditor looks at a terrible game and feels compelled to download it
nta and I don't actually give a shit about Hogwarts (I just stupidly like comparison photos of game differences), but if the intent is to play it portably, it makes perfect sense. If the intent is just to play it at home, and the Switch isn't the only thing you have, then yeah, it's foolish.
An iPhone can run Resident Evil 4 remake.
How much is an iPhone 15 MAX?
Not the point.
Like absolute shit.
>METALFX
Isn't that like upscaling? It's not even true 720p.
Pretty much, although everything I've seen of it at least looks better than FSR/XeSS.
that will be $1500 + tip
cope
the people planning to play this shit game on switch will be CHILDREN so I dont think thats gonnna matter much you fricking pussy
>Children
Yeah, MANCHILDREN, as in 21-35 year olds.
nice PS2 game
does the switch version require downloading the rest of the game, just like the PS4/5 versions?
(the only reason i refuse to buy the PS4/5 version)
>troon bartender from hogsmead removed
based nintendo
REALLY
Amazing
OP here, forgot to mention that they world is not interconnected on Switch version. They had to basically slice parts of the world and add in loading screens to different areas of the game.
When you go to Hogsmeade you have to LOAD INTO Hogsmeade, you can't just walk into it like on PC and console. It's the same for other areas across the game, AND you also have to LOAD INTO EVERY BUILDING in Hogsmeade, can't just fricking walk into the store. You have to LOAD INTO IT, and we're talking a 30-50 second load time for every building/area.
expected for how underpowered the switch is. I'm impressed they even get a stripped down version to run at 30fps
lol, this is fricking embarrassing. Why even bother? Might as well port it to the fricking PSP.
Because publishers know Nintendo fans are like Apple loyalists and will buy it out of brand loyalty. They'd buy a bag of mulch if it had a Nintendo logo on it.
Don’t care can play in bed at any angle.
U ez.
>CAN LE PLAY IN BED DON'T CARE IF IT'S 30 FPS SLOP THAT LOOKS LIKE A PS2 GAME CAN PLAY IN BED!
Kek cope
Didn't mind waiting in Starfield, won't mind waiting here. Switchchads, WE FRICKING WON
>snitch
still looks phenomenal for a 8yo handheld, cope more you homosexual
forget it, the real reason it won't work is because it wouldn't have the best mods