He was right.
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
He was right.
He was right.
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
But was he left?
what a stupid fricking show
>he doesnt enjoy bunraku wuxia made by one of the greats
imagine being this filtered.
well, sorry not sorry
I just prefer THUNDERBOLT FANTASY
This is rad as frick, what is it called?
Thunderbolt Fantasy.
And yes, it is fricking rad as hell.
Forced puppeteering
>But was he left?
I'd say so, finding new ways to frick kids seems to align with modern leftists.
cope rightoids statistically rape children far more than anyone on the left
Well leftist don't have access to children because they're all ugly & creepy
Didnt know israelites were right-wing.
what about Protestant pastors of all major denominations
still behind blacks and all types of teachers
this has more jump cuts than that fricking Seagal movie where he kicks a dude out of a window.
It has the excuse of being marionettes, unlike Seagal who is a walking upright boar
WU LIN
WU LIN
WARRIORS
>open shitpost thread
>get treated with puppet kino
fpbp
SOUL.
FPBP, this bait thread is now puppet show thread
when is the next ThunderboltKINO coming out broes?
>Posting the image without the sound
puppetKINO
how many more threads with this image are you gonna make moron
holy kino
BROKEN
MIND
AND
SOUL
If he was right, why did he get banned?
if Jesus was right why did they crucify him?
cause he was israeli!
He wasn't "right" at the time.
He was made right after hundreds of years of historical revisionism and social engineering through religion.
you're a shoot fricking moron
Jesus is God, and he has always been right.
Wrong. it was all revised later
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Christology/The-Arian-controversy
>jesus existed
NGMI
He did exist, just not the way that is being presented to you.
He was just some dude with some "new" ideas. Basically a commie.
>long hair and beard
>basically a jobless hobo
>preached love and peace
>everyone that didn't agree with him was literally satan
You're right.
because he was right
It's literally explained in the picture dummy
>they hated him because he told the truth
Only a consummate liar would say that.
Was, is and will be.
(You)
Being right or having a strong point that the powers that be disagree with and don't want to argue is one of the leading causes of bans anywhere in history.
After being insufferable and thick headed after legitimately being proven wrong.
Every prophet is destined to solitude.
not an argument
Brain Broken Shazam troony
but enough about baldur gay 3 fans
Won't it have the same hash if multiple people downloaded the same image?
He is right. Also, e-girlcon, e-girl mods and bestiality mods are not wrong. It does not hurt real child or animals. They are just pixels.
t. Sonic modder
And yet when there's a black guy or a fictional woman, you lose your fricking mind, hypocrite.
Because Black folk are objectively shit content.
What kind of fantasy women do you have in mind?
>objectively shit content
So are e-girl trash. Annoying little brats, absolute waste of a character slot that could've been occupied by some sexy chick instead.
>e-girls are trash
Objectively wrong
It's always the same boring character trope of a smug e-girl or a shy "cutesie" e-girl. They always get mad about being pointed out that they are flat too. i've seen it like 1000 times at this point I think.
It's boring as frick.
>trope
Opinion discarded
>Posting one of the worst e-girl of all time
I was so happy when she died
Careful there champ, we wouldn't want to dull that edge there now would we
HAH HAH HAA
>can't object so he starts nitpicking words
Every single character in japanese media is a walking stereotype. All japanese writing consists of the same 10 or so Tropes arranged in different permutations.
Those are simple facts. if you had enough experience with it' you'd have noticed it too by now.
Accurate as frick. By all means if someone enjoys those rehashings or they are done with sufficient style, it can work, but denying the staple character tropes that are used over and over is just idiocy.
I mean frick, they even have specific words for generic character types.
>they even have specific words for generic character types.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archetypal_literary_criticism
Yes....what's your point? Its obvious. Its obviously obvious. Why even post that?
How is saying they (the Japanese) have words for those tropes implying to you that I am unaware of basic archetypes?
Shouldn't it kind of imply they are taken for granted?
You sound like a Kotaku article. You should start tripgayging so I can filter you.
You conceded to him.
And you sound like you have no argument.
i can categories the character you posted into a trope and name 10 other characters like it.
You just can't accept that simple fact and think it's some dunk on anime, when the reason people like anime is because it has those constant, safe tropes you can rely on.
Every piece of media ever made can be broken down into "tropes" if you're a boring homosexual who doesn't want to honestly engage with anything
You are an illiterate psuedo-intellectual moron if you think basic character archetypes and cast dynamics is something that only applies to Japanese media because you learned what a "tsundere" is
The Japanese have words for common archetypes in their media just like we have words for common archetypes in ours. The Hero, the Everyman, the Chick, the Black Best Friend, the Nerd, etc etc.
Pointing this out is not a form of media criticism nor is it saying anything of value at all. Western TV shows and games can be broken down to their basis just like Japanese ones. You're just particularly critical about Japanese media because you have an ignorant and shallow depth of knowledge relating to it and you have no other reference point for non-American(ized) media.
>yes it's all true but stop pointing it out because it makes me mad
Again, what is your point with this post? You're both confirming what I said and at the same time trying to sound defensive and deflective.
>uhh you're right but why are you mad bro?
Please tell me what point you were trying to make with
>Every single character in japanese media is a walking stereotype. All japanese writing consists of the same 10 or so Tropes arranged in different permutations.
if you can say the exact same thing about Western media and media in general.
If you believed in what you said, and were not embarrassingly wrong and ignorant, there would be no reason to specify "Japanese" writing.
Once again, you sound like a game "journalist" who irrationally hates foreign media because you feel some kind of leech-like nationalist pride over your own culture's slop
>huur duur you just hate anime
If you are just going to keep repeating this like some breainted bot, despite me already pointing out that I absolutely don't hate anime, just e-girl shit trope, this conversation is over.
>there would be no reason to specify "Japanese" writing.
There is no e-girl trope equivalent in western writing.
yes, I know that the entire concept of e-girl came from western writing, but it was a one and done.
It was actually unique when it was first made.
Now it's just boring trash.
its almost like e-girlcon is so moronic, even the west is above it
>There is no e-girl trope equivalent in western writing.
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FilleFatale
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Jail%20Bait
It's not a trope, it's an outlier.
Matilda was written that way because Luc Besson himself groomed and married an underage girl.
Basically a pedo projecting.
>it's not a trope because i say so
good job, you really showed how your brain works here
now no one has to engage with you for the rest of the thread
It's not a trope because it's not a trope.
Show me any mainstream media with jailbait.
No, children shows made for teenage girls that you perverted old fricks watch doesn't count.
>Show me any mainstream media with jailbait.
holy shit you're actually serious lmao
Again another one and outlier done show that was treated like that exactly because it was unique.
There's absolutely nothing unique about japanese e-girl when it's literally in every other show.
If at least 2/3 the shows airing don't contain jailbait on purpose, it doesn't count.
I said no one has to engage with you anymore, so shut the frick up and go do something else you idiot
How do you not know Brooke Shields and Jennifer Connelly?
>Note that, in real life, children who exhibit sexualized behavior have often been the victims of sexual abuse. This is rarely addressed in fiction.
And not just in fiction apparently.
I wonder if that could be because all sexual behavior by children is forcibly suppressed by parents and other adults.
Lmao you have no idea what you're talking about. Western story telling also consists of tropes, if only you learned a little about the subject you'd see how bad it really is. You just hate japanese media because it can be colorful and cute, not because of muh heckin tropes. Typical, dare I say you're a walking trope lmao.
>Western story telling also consists of tropes
Ok and?
>You just hate japanese media
When did I ever said that, you dumb homosexual?
Are you living in some kind of bubble impenetrable to facts? I never said tropes were bad, I just said that of all the Jap tropes, e-girl is one of the worst.
>KYAAAAAAAAAA
>NO DON'T LOOK AT ME IN MY UNDERWEAR
>ANON-CHAN LOOK AT MY SEXY BIKINI
>EHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
>It can't be helped.
>B-B-B-B-BAKA
UMI DA
>It can't be helped
This unironically makes me mad
>This unironically makes me mad
shikatta ga helpimasen
>This unironically makes me mad
Guess it couldn't be helped
cliched writing deserves a cliched translation
This is why I make only demon and goth e-girl. Annoying is when their victims don't squirm. 🙁
>i've seen it like 1000 times
Name 1000 (good) games with e-girl then
FFIX Eiko
Sayaka from Ape Escape 3
Remi&Flan from Touhou
Isn't most Japanese stuff considered "tranime" by Ganker? I see it spammed a lot lile wojaks which are also popular
>Isn't most Japanese stuff considered "tranime" by Ganker?
If by Ganker you mean tourists, then yes
Perhaps you're too old for any & everything
Uuuoooooh! Annoying little brats! Wasting adult character slots! Needs correction...
objectively false
as long as a character is well wrought or has pleasing demeanor or presentation, nothing else really matters
see tomb raider, the cast of San Andreas, boondock saints, afro samurai, aeon flux, most anime with women
however, making a show or game centre focus on presenting the sexual or racial aspects of characters is boring and bandwagon tier writing, which is why it's hated
>as long as a character is well wrought or has pleasing demeanor or presentation, nothing else really matters
Except you never get to that part because you instantly sperg out over a trailer and pretend like you know everything about the game, hypocrite.
Furry porn and e-girl porn is just softcore beastiality and softcore cp. You literally can't prove me wrong.
>softcore beastiality
yes, always
>softcore cp
not always
Wdym not always? e-girlporn, which is anime kids being fricked porn. How is that not derivative of real CP
Ah I didn't see the e-girl shit.
I thought you meant Fury porns being both bestiality and cp.
Yes, it's basically the same shit.
We're on the same page then shawlg.
>You literally can't prove me wrong.
Of course I can. Words mean things. Read a book, or even better read some case law on the subject.
>How is that not derivative of real CP
Because it factually is not. Child porn is illegal because creating it necessarily involves taking advantage of and exploiting a child who cannot consent to the abuse of their body and likeness.
e-girl/shota porn is not illegal because this does not apply to it. No real child needs to be involved to draw a picture. If there is no harm, it's simply another form of artistic expression and constitutionally protected under the First Amendment.
Equating harmless drawings with real and harmful depictions of one of the most heinous crimes imaginable causes further harm to real children. Countless man-hours are wasted pursuing false reports of non-actionable material that protection agencies and law enforcement would have otherwise spent protecting real children.
The website you are using right now openly and knowingly hosts e-girl porn and has done so for almost 20 years, through multiple and ongoing periods of cooperation with federal law enforcement. It is not illegal or morally comparable to actual depictions of real children being harmed or exploited. If you still think it is, why are you still here?
>Read case law on the subject.
Mothergayget really out here trying to act like laws are more imperative than morality. Judicial system fails people every fricking day. Nevermind the actual braindead laws there are in many countries. You can borderline frick a child if you travel to another country, you can frick some sheep if you move to Germany. You spastic homosexual, mothersucka is writing a whole essay in defense of degenerate pornography.
Please explain how something that doesn't hurt anyone is immoral.
But stop talking like a hoodrat first.
Immoral imagery leads to fantasy which leads to action. Pretty simple bro. Maybe your frontal lobe is shrunk like many pedophiles who lack empathy for others because you can't seem to grasp this simple concept. Fricking toad human. Actual parasite.
Literally violence in video games causes the youths to be violent.
explain crusades, vikings, slave trade, Mongolians raping chinese, and previous global/interstate wars if vidya is what causes violence within the youth
Uh, he's saying the opposite
He was being sarcastic, moron.
Maybe some type of games like fps which I can agree with. But I don't see your point. What a strange cognitive bias you have bro. Hurrrr durrrr because this bad, this bad too. Like, what's your fricking point. You sperg
It definitely normalizes it and shit like modern mortal kombat for example is very unhealthy fetishization
moron
And that's a good thing!
remember that everyone related to this game and their fricking dogs are pro-trans activists or trannies themselves
I know the game has religious themes but they are chastised as frick because the devs are cucks. Shame, cause the games are fun.
And that's a good thing too!
You were replying to a bot
>Immoral imagery leads to fantasy which leads to action
There is literally no evidence to support this
In fact, there is evidence to the contrary with the consistent finding that access to pornography reduces the rate of sexual crime
There's zero long term studies on the effects pornography has on young minds. But ok. Also I meant really immoral imagery not just basic porn but furry and e-girl shit.
>the effects pornography has on young minds
Nobody's talking about kids looking at porn
>Again another one and outlier done show
You're a zoomer homosexual and you have no clue what you're talking about
I'm 33.
It's an outlier show.
>Brittany Spears was an outlier
>Aaliyah was an outlier
>Shakira was an outlier
>Melissa Joan Hart was an outlier
>Christina Applegate was an outlier
>Tatu was an outlier
I could go on with all the horror movies starring high schoolers with their breasts out, movies from the mid 80s to early 00s, late night show hosts fawning over 15 year olds, or all of MTV when they still played music.
Jailbait was the goddamn norm until like 2005-10 then it was all the girls from the Disney Channel shows like Miley Cyrus.
Didn't know singers were writing tropes but whatever you say.
Singers who all acted in movies and television shows.
Were you locked in a box before 2014 or something?
Fricking Christina Applegate was the loose chick in Married with Children when she was fricking 15, suck a dick.
lol why do you keep replying to this gay? it's either a troll or someone wanting to moral grandstand by writing a couple of dismissive posts. either way they don't care about children or they reality at hand
Did you forget it all started because some sperg got triggered I called e-girl trope trash? Not because of "muh children" but because it's just prre, boring trash.
He then successfully deflected the argument to some completely irrelevant stuff and now you're all on it.
>it was all the girls from the Disney Channel shows like Miley Cyrus
still can't get over that wrecking ball shit, she let herself go big time
Zoomers really are denying this shit ever happened or was completely mainstream lmao
zoomers have this weird pride thing where they completely reject any information the year before they were born. The revisionist history on video games pre-2007 has been wild.
>fantasizing about thing leads towards action
Do you or your friends, family or acquaintances play anything remotely violent?
how many people have you murdered? do you know how many people your friends or family have killed? how many of your friends, family or acquaintances have been revealed as serial killers?
Every time I'm personally done with a session of GTA, I grab my bat and pipe, head outside, kill about sixteen people, steal a few cars, burn a few people into charcoal, stab a few more, then I shoot at buses and use helicopters to blow up pedestrians, then, finally, I head to my bunker and start randomly sending satellite missile-based strikes against various parts of the world
for fun!
just the other day I kicked a feminist right her pussy!
Selective perception but alright champ.
Nice essay.
>Immoral imagery leads to fantasy which leads to action.
>only sexual though not violence that would be silly
>N-NO YOU'RE THE ONE WITH BIAS
>Child porn is illegal because creating it necessarily involves taking advantage of and exploiting a child who cannot consent to the abuse of their body and likeness.
This is not why child porn is illegal. It's not even true. A self-made recording of a 17 year old jerking off is classified as child porn, even though no one was taken advantage of and no one was exploited.
>This is not why child porn is illegal.
It very explicitly is.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_v._Ferber
>It's not a trope, it's an outlier.
lol
>It very explicitly is.
Read the rest of the post Mr. Anon.
>Distribution of visual depictions of children engaged in sexual activity is intrinsically related to the sexual abuse of children. The images serve as a permanent reminder of the abuse, and it is necessary for government to regulate the channels of distributing such images if it is to be able to eliminate the production of child pornography.
"The child consented to sharing pictures of themself" isn't the argument you think it is
Can you please explain where is the abuse in a 17 year old recording themselves jerking off? I'm very interested in how you're going to twist that into sexual abuse. Unless you're Christian and think jerking off is self-abuse.
Why don't you share your theories about ethical child porn with your local police office?
Not an argument.
So you don't actually have any counterargument and thus implicitly admit that anon is correct that laws and morality don't always inherently perfectly match, which shouldn't even be something that anyone needs to bother arguing about because it's obviously true on its face. Laws (usually) attempt to enforce morality, but they are often flawed (and there are plenty of outright corrupt laws on the books as well) and so a knowledge of the law is very little use when it comes to discussions of actual morality.
>admit that anon is correct that laws and morality don't always inherently perfectly match
I never argued against that and the discussion wasn't about that. I told anon why child porn was illegal, he provided a counterexample questioning the given rationale, and I provided case law answering his claim.
It is the interest of the government and the public to criminalize distribution of child porn, even in cases where the subject may not feel victimized. I agree that the law may be applied to harshly in some cases, labeling a child a sex offender for taking pictures of their body is absurd, but that wasn't the issue being discussed.
I'm actually a police officer and share e-girl with my co-workers regulary
The police does not legislate. They merely enforce existing laws.
NTA but let me give you some perspective
There's a certain arbitrary element to laws. You have to put a hard line down for certain things, otherwise they can be difficult to enforce.
Generally speaking, if the intent of the law is to protect children who are unable to consent or can be easily manipulated to ensure abusive CP doesn't slip between the cracks, then the law is not going to discriminate. The intent is to ensure that a 17 year old who is coerced into jerking off on camera is protected, therefore a 17 year old who is doing it of her own free will and ought to know the law is going to get caught in that wide net.
These sorts of things happen with all laws and can only be avoided by dumping infinite resources into all cases, which can't be done.
That may or may not be the case. I personally disagree with it, the whole point of trials is to figure out these sorts of things. But that was never my point. Anon (and indeed the law) said that child pornography "necessarily" involves taking advantage of and exploiting a child. This is not true.
But it is true. You don't have to agree with the specific age limit, but there does have to be some arbitrary cutoff because there is no other way to measure someone's ability to consent. Bringing it down to 16 wouldn't change the argument because you could make the same argument about a 15 year old jerking off on camera.
The point is that CP law casts a wide net to protect children against abuse, and due to flaws in the justice system there are going to be people caught in said net where there is no actual abuse.
Trials are ideal, but because there is a cutoff point and people ought to know the law, and because there are no objective methods to measure someone's ability to consent, 17 year olds willingly recording pornography of themselves are breaking the law. You certainly don't have to agree to it, and if you would like to propose a different solution that protects these people I would be interested to hear it, but I don't see a real solution.
I disagree.
What do you disagree with?
>due to flaws in the justice system there are going to be people caught in said net where there is no actual abuse.
Then the system is broken and corrupt.
Imagine if we occasionally threw innocent people in jail for murder, and then rationalized it away as oh just this silly flaw that sends the wrong people to death row sometimes.
That isn't what I said. I said the 17 year old making porn of herself has broken the law. The net is cast wide, but it's also clear how old you have to be to make porn and the concequenses of doing so below the legal age are clear and available to everyone.
What I'm saying is, even if a 17 year and 364 day old person could mindfully consent to porn, the law says they can't, and that means that people who can consent but are below 18 are breaking the law. I didn't say they would be wrongfully convicted.
His post is right though
>a 17 year old who is doing it of her own free will and ought to know the law is going to get caught in that wide net.
Hold on a second, I thought 17 year olds lacked the mental maturity to comprehend the effects of their actions.
It should be noted that while a 17 year old taking nude videos of themselves might qualify as child porn, a prosecutor will usually decline to bring charges in that kind of situation. There IS some discretion allowed in enforcing the law, precisely because sometimes enforcing the letter of the law does not serve the spirit of said law.
Why are conservatives always disengenous groomers?
I promise I'm more liberal than you are.
Because they're Liberals at heart
>even though no one was taken advantage of and no one was exploited
American teens aren't self-aware, can't consent or make their own, informed decisions right until the microsecond they turn 18. Known fact.
Americans are never self aware and can never think. Americans are all subhuman.
No one cares about your dogshit constitution, you obese homosexual.
But you're right.
That's right and that's why they're ok.
>softcore bestiality
What is xenophilia? Now stfu and leave me and my waifur alone.
it’s not wrong but you’re still a pedo, just admit it
Dragoniran died for our sins.
>someone screencapped my post
Ayyy!
You were right!
That was mine you filthy Black person. Don't believe this guy, please.
That applies to men claiming to be women too, by the way.
funny how lefties don't even try to refute this, they just screech in bewilderment
The only refutation you need is "you're moronic"
Sex with animals is wrong.
*right
humans are animals
I don't think that will hold up in court, Anon.
Are you a lawyer?
And humans are capable of explicit verbal consent while other beasts aren't
>dog starts fricking a girl
Humans are sapient
Humans are homos
Proof?
Me
Yeah, you
Then there is no problem fricking a bear for the rest of us, you can be a sapien for all I care
I'd say most aren't.
i'd say a vast majority aren't
Nobody said it's not wrong, but the scene was meant as a joke. Making up the scenario "what if this was child porn" isn't a good argument because we both know you're actually jerking off at it instead of laughing at it like everyone did at the bear frick scene.
See? That could have been condensed to "you're moronic" or more accurately "you're being disengenous." Any cope replying to this post from this point on is undoubtedly going to be disengenous too.
>but the scene was meant as a joke
haha
>because we both know you're actually jerking off at it instead of laughing at it like everyone did at the bear frick scene.
Nah, lots of people especially women jerk offd to the bear scene
True. When are you going vegan?
holy fricking kek
eg okayge
>when you can no longer tell what is real or parody
This is an allegory on how members of the LGBTQFAQBBCCIAFBI++++= comunity are opressed.
The image is literally screaming "free our wieners!" symbolizing how they want to be free in who they are instead of being systematically oppressed all the time and are literally being a second away from getting brutally murdered each day.
Such a powerful message.
FRICKING SLAVES
motte & bailey fallacy nobody want's to rape kids it's the fallacy of labeling grown adult women with big breast as e-girl you intelectual coward
How can one bear be so based and make millions of people seethe?
With the current "Politics as religion" mindset the average tad/misc/ and others of their ilk retain to this day, it really doesn't take much of anything to set them off. It's not the idea of fricking a bear that upsets them, it's that it's gay. If the bear was a woman, these same screeching morons would be praising the studio for allowing you to frick your bearwife. The point of contention is their all-consuming aversion to anything LGBTXXAC+R, and that's all it takes for them to spend several months straight crying about a joke cutscene.
>he defends homosexuals
ISHYGDDT
>he tries to fit in on an anonymous french baguette forum
>he lacks self awareness
>It's not the idea of fricking a bear that upsets them, it's that it's gay.
Holy based
For a second i though it's actual book cover. Such a letdown.
Tbh I wouldn't mind this having an canine penis too
XXAC+R
kek, clever
To be fair they did lose their minds over Bridget being a girl now, when 20 years ago people would lose their minds over Bridget being a boy.
People didn't lose their minds over Bridget being a girl, they lost their minds because they changed his character. He was groomed into dressing and acting like a girl, but identifying correctly as a boy. Now, to match the current political climate, he identifies as a girl and is happy about it. He's become canonically trans. The implications of this, and the implications that so many people think this is a step forward, is that grooming kids to be trans is good.
Daisuke wanted Bridget to be trans from the start, but before recently it was exclusively done as a punchline, whereas traps had been around for a while
if he always wanted it from the start and did not do so, then he has always been a homosexual ass little b***h coward, and sycophants which kiss his ass are likewise gay homosexual bandwagon shitters that push their idpol homosexualry and then cry when people shit on their propaganda and then do a 360 and call others who shit on their moronation "political" for laughing at their own idpol shit which they shove through vidya
trannies and homosexuals are political
have a nice day you homosexual ass moronic nut licking queer
>least deranged /misc/tard
>Daisuke wanted Bridget to be trans from the start
Did he say that in the le interview?
Daisuke is likely lying about that, considering how he and others wrote Bridget for 20 years.
>OOOGA BOOGA P-POL
>why yes anyone saying all lives matter is racist
have a nice day
Nobody mentioned Any type of life mattering you news media consuming moron.
But if you didn't watch shit information constantly you would lose your purpose in life which is to be outraged over anything 24/7
Imagen getting triggerd by all lives matter because that's what triggers onions leftoids
All lives DON'T matter.
>election tourist doubles down with buzzword
Nobody in this thread or any other has said "all lives matter" in any context, but you wouldn't be looking for that shadow on the wall if you didn't have a /misc/-shaped hole in your brain.
>brings up irrelevant shit to form his imaginary argument
go back election tourist
>brings up irrelevant shit to form his imaginary argument
you mean like this guy
>If the bear was a woman, these same screeching morons would be praising the studio for allowing you to frick your bearwife
Correction, the bearwife would be ugly butch and would been equally hated
>It's not the idea of fricking a bear that upsets them, it's that it's gay. If the bear was a woman, these same screeching morons would be praising the studio for allowing you to frick your bearwife.
Then why falseflag about it being animal sex instead of same sex?
Same sex is old news
Bear sex is novel
>put political statements in all media
>you can't talk about politics
Oh no a bone nobody sees!
>b-b-but I'm 1000 years...
Does not affect them now does it?
>ze doesn't know
?
educate yourself necromorph
/misc/ runs this site and owns ~~*YOU*~~, don't you ever fricking forget that
bump
Pedobear based little kids belong on big bear wiener
I DONT FRICKING CARE ABOUT e-girlS YOU moronS THEY CUT HALF THE CONTENT OF THIS GAME
holy damn, child sex in western games in 2025
Yes he's right, it's what he's implying that is wrong.
Even if he takes the form of a child, the druid is still an adult, with a fully developped brain, capable of giving consent, so, of course it wouldn't be child abuse.
But I have a hard time believing that anyone here can't understand the obvious difference between a bear and a child used in joke sex scene in a video game.
Pretty sure you are ignoring that difference because it doesn't help your ideology.
>child does not belong in a joke sex scene
But... funny...
He's just saying that most people defending the bear scene are inconsistent and moronic in my opinion. The argument that the bear scene is okay because you're okay with beastiality is fine. But you can't pretend it's not beastiality while taking a moral high ground on e-girl.
People are just moronic and throwing a fit because there are real world consequences for pedo shit, but there are no consequences for bestiality. So even if technically it's the same argument, they don't give a shit about bestiality other than "wow weird".
>but there are no consequences for bestiality
Canadian?
>but there are no consequences for bestiality
Beastiliatity is illegal in a significant amount of the world and I don't think most a majority of animals like to be raped.
Yes, and a lot of it being "illegal" boils down to a simple fine.
You/they were arguing there's no consequences, not how severe the consequences are. In any case, there's still the potential to be imprisoned for up to 1-10 years in some parts of the world and once that's on your record, people won't treat you all that different than they're treat any other diddler.
> The argument that the bear scene is okay because you're okay with beastiality is fine.
I don't think so. There's a reason they chose a bear and not a smaller, weaker animal, like a sheep or a dog. It's so there isn't any real life parallel that we could possibly make.
Fricking wild bears or letting one frick you is not something that happens and causes real harm and suffering in the real world. It would, if it happened, but only for the guy trying to do it, not for the animal.
It's ridiculous, that's why they used that as a joke. It's really weird to see that as beastiality and even more to immediately think about children. A druid transformed into a child, or a child who's actually a 2000 years old vampire is not a similar situation at all.
But there is a parallel PC can be a child hench the BG3 pedobear meme
I will now buy your game (once mods come out)
>Fricking wild bears or letting one frick you is not something that causes real harm and suffering
You try fricking a wild bear and tell me how it went then, eh?
no one needs to defend it because there’s nothing to defend, it’s just a joke scene and anyone clutching their pearls over it is a moron. Also why do pedophiles call children “e-girl?” you’re not japanese and you never will be.
So a 10000 year old dragon is not a child
Yes.
Correct.
Squirtle
Charmander
These are the people who are trying to call you a hypocrite for laughing at a bear scene while also being disgusted and appalled at images of little girls walking around in a prostitute outfit.
They're trying to use a popular game to push their agenda just like Peta and Feminists Organizations do.
Yes. It's hypocricital that you are only able to distinguish reality from fiction in the former case and not the latter.
>bearsissies are samegayging again
BG3 is pure cringe
Child sex
ok
Saw a 14ish yr old downtown wearing revealing clothing with the most perfect midriff I've ever seen.
It ruined my day as I know I will never be allowed to have that.
>It ruined my day as I know I will never be allowed to have that.
skill issue
Druids can't transform into children
his point is correct though
Yes they can
btw but “creature” seems like a keyword that does not include human/elves/etc
I meant to write “nta”
In D&D parlance a 'creature' is understood to mean anything that could be considered alive. Beasts, humanoids, and monsters would all be considered creatures.
Ah.
I just looked it up, and while it’s somewhat unclear, it seems there is unanimous agreement that what you say is true.
Using True Polymorph you could permanently transform yourself into a e-girl b***h with a fat ass
What challenge rating are brown big tiddied mesugakis?
If you're a talented enough shapeshifter, you should be able to transform into anything.
They 100% can
Even if they can't deage themselves they can change into something like kender with little difficulty which are explicitly like small children
i just simply think all anglos and israelites should be violently murdered
Here, Mr. EU officer.
This is the post that threatened violence.
You guys don't realize the sheer boldness to say such things on the steam forums. Fricking developers can rule the forums to their games if they want. So people like the one in the OP go in to their domain and still say these things showcase how fearless they really are. And on top of all of this, they can get banned at any moment for their speech. This is why I will always respect people who speak their minds on the steam forums.
Go on guys, talk about the gameplay for once.
I love the orgy sex pussy part
No no... THE gameplay.
holy shit the UI in this game is terrible
frick off, moron
fricking armchair UI/UX designer
I enjoy murdering every homosexual character in this video game. Doesn't matter of dark urge or not. I just insert my everburning blade into their bodies with a holy smite guaranteed crit power.
Sir, you're on Ganker.
If you want to talk gameplay, you have to at least go to Gankerg, although even that is becoming a rare thing over there.
Basically you need to go to another board and somehow start an off topic discussion about the game if you want to discuss gameplay.
I also can't talk about anime and manga in Ganker. Is it safe to talk about in Ganker?
Alright then, the gameplay is just clicking mouse and choosing actions and dialog options and that's that RPGs aren't for the gameplay it's for the story & porn/sex scene
How come the game isn't banned from steam yet?
They allow beasty?
Yes, that's correct
It'd be pretty embarrassing to take issue with a freaky sex scene in a video game because you thought it was somehow morally wrong, and not because the journos celebrating it were massive hypocrites
so this is what it feels like to be screencapped... it's nice
That's pretty obviously correct; they still have an adult human brain, and that's what counts morally.
most women do not mentally develop past the age of 14.
but fricking a 14 year old doesn't make you a pedo
liking/fricking under 25 ones is still considered a crime.
>v goes on a riot over censored panty shots of a fake underaged girl in skull girls going off how censorship and bad and muh morals
>v freaks out over fake bear sex and acts like some moral crusaders and wants the gsme censored.
Still hammering the same shitty gotcha, huh?
You're seething so hard you can't even type right
>muh typing.
You're b***hing that a game labled for adults has adult themes in it and you're on a site one ckick away from boarderline cp and constant gore and animal abuse threads. You're fine with that but fake video game bear is to much? You're just like the gayots thinking violent moves and games will lead to mass shootings.
And yet non of these adult rated games dare to give there female charecters bigger boobs or make them pretty
BG3 should remove it's cringy sex scenes and lower it's age rating it's embarrassing to play it front of a family
>can strip down female party members full frontal nudity
>b-but the breasts don't clip through the armor
>v supports light degeneracy
>v doesn't support hardcore zoophilia
Is that something weird? 17 is fine, 7 yo or an animal are not
>7 yo or an animal are not
Lol, go back. Says who?
Normalgay, why are you even here?
>Ganker is full of reactionary contrarians
>Ganker likes little anime girls more than furgays
Any other nuggets of wisdom you want to share with us?
That wasn't Ganker freaking out about bear sex, that was /misc/ raiders
proof is that when they left, Ganker kept having multiple daily 500+ post BG3 threads, there's one up right now at
.
Yeah, go ahead and see what's actually going on in those threads though.
wrong, we're mad that they have degenerate double standards and root for their gay bear sex while shaming cute and sexy lewd anime girls
notice the difference between outright sex and ecchi
They who?
You're a hypocrite, typica
l
This ha nothing to do with contrarians you hypocrite and every thing to do with your kin's double-stantards
And /misc/ revealt what degenerate hypocrite you all are shame on you
personally, i entirely and wholly despise the fact that homoerotism, cuckoldry, submissiveness beneath a mommy dom, small tiddies as an industry standard, censorship of heterosexual elements, eternal LGBTQIAPPA++ pandering, and mandatory ugliness are not only standards but expectations which are encouraged by journalists colluding with entertainment to shape sociocultural interests and desires vis a vis censorship, humiliation, depersonalization, and state-enforced homosexualry masquerading as a necessary quasi-religious moral issue which all must embrace or be labeled as an evil sinful heretic
humanity is underneath a constant global assault by oligarchical ideologues in an attempt to control our functional growth, but simpletons like you reduce it to mere political factions while you bury your head in the sand in the face of blatant corporate double-standards and social engineering
most schizo post of all time
but also most true post
>Ganker champions apples, but won't stop complaining about oranges. What hypocrites! They're both fruits!
You're the fruit
>Ganker is one person who thinks raping animals is weird
>Ganker is one other person who thinks grooming humans is inevitable
????
A child is immature, while the bear is characterized as someone mature
Does anyone here have a working brain?
What if it's a bear cub?
he doesnt transform into a bear cub
If it was a bear cub then itd be weirdo-city
what if shes a 10000 year old dragon?
>e-girl porn bad
>But don't mind me shoving this dog wiener replica up my ass
>Yes I own a dog too, what of it!?
A degenerate is a degenerate, no matter what.
>child rape is ok
>wtf you get turned on by a drawing of a human looking animal???
>when the only thing in the game that doesn't require a dice roll is whether you get the gay hairy prolapsed parasite ridden shit encrusted anal sex scene
e-girlbabas are incredibly funny with how hard busybodies have to cope and admit that they never cared about mental development to make it seem bad.
So if I have sex with a consenting 50 year old bear, im the freak
Do you want me to have sex with children instead?
We want you do not have sex at all castraed you're self
I don't get why what he said was so controversial. Fictional CP is straight-out allowed in Japan and no one bats an eye
Based, but only because a druid polymorphing into a bear is indeed bestiliaty & the latter is indeed child abuse.
Total degen death when
I have determined that these threads should be nuke on sight. Everyone that attempts to argue over this is fricking moronic, intentionally moronic, or fighting for their team.
He's literally correct was the ban for that post, or something else?
If facts don't matter and a man can identify as a woman, including a child, why can't a child just identify as an adult?
Do you actually want an answer? Cause I can give you one bit you might not like it or understand it.
Let me guess you can't make distinguish reality from fiction unless it's convenient for you
Let me guess you think gender and sex are the same thing?
i don't
it's "their" word, they can keep it
He is right though, otherwise midget porn would be considered CP
If your brain it's fully developed then it's ok
Or are you saying gnomes or people with dormant pituitary glands should refrain from sex??
games where e-girl is can fricked?????
Any shitty RPGM hentai game.
wtf
every single japanese game in existence
America is the extreme outlier on this issue anyways.
This is straight fricking wrong no matter how many stupid homosexuals repeat it. The US isn't just California and Florida, there is no federal age of consent and in more than 30 states it's only 16.
It's true
ssheeeesh
The issue was never the bear sex, but the hypocrisy.
It's ok as long as it's ugly.
pretty much the western motto
BG3 characters aren't ugly though
They're not pretty either chump
Ok
Proving my point, thanks for the example
Should've told me you were gay, beforehand.
Nah, he's right.
Lmao westerns are pathetic
*westerners
One 9/11 wasn't enough, only fires can purge the homosexualry.
YWNBAJ
I will never be a JS, thanks for reminding me v_v
I'll never be a israelite? Cool.
Stop exaggerating Nordic features. Longfaced girls can still be cute.
Yet you posted an ugly one.
NTA but:
>god tier
>good tier
>everyone needs to looks up to my arbitrary beauty standard because they just have too
Beauty standards are objective. It's literally math.
Post selfie
Basically. Western games are basically becoming WEGs. Sexualized and fetishized to hell and back but absolutely fricking disgusting. Like troonypunk 2069, The Last of Dykes, Ball's Gay 3 etc.
I had to mod out troonypunk billboards to make it more bearable.
i mean, yes, but also i don't think they can do that.
It's funny how fast le moral outrage turned out to just be pedos seething.
It's not child abuse but it is pedophilia
Also who said fricking a bear isn't bestiality?
You agree with him
There are a lot of people who say that the bear scene isn't bestiality because it's an intelligent human transformed into a bear.
The point of the thread is that if they want to say that they also have to say that if the guy transformed into a child it wouldn't be pedophilia or else they're hypocrites.
someone said you can't even have sex in the game with all the races that are essentially 'smaller people'
e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl e-girl
Sex with e-girl is bad.
It should have been a loose bearess. The fact that it was gay sex is what sucks ass.
I wonder where are all the morons that argue that e-girl is a "body type"
This b***h is four foot seven and thirty one years old.
4'7" / 1.45 m
March 27, 1992 / age 31 years
Sorry. You are a pedo for liking her.
Now, whatever you do, don't post pics of her plump ass.
Petite adult women DON'T exist. You are a PEDO if you like women with small breasts.
>so what if she's 12, I just like small boobs
This. Adult women cannot have small boobs.
>he keeps being """ironic"" further proving my point
You're not a e-girlcon, moron.
I'm not. But nigs keep calling me that because I like petite adult women.
I fricking wish. I'm sick of all the ironic pedos who can't admit e-girl is being the same as being attracted to children. Get some integrity for fricks sake.
my brother's gf looks like she's 15 or something. She's like 150cm tall and weighs like fifty kg. Barely eats and is flat as a board and thin as a stick.
that said she is also riddled with illnesses like reflux, asthma and allergies, and she is literally incapable of ever giving birth. We went jogging together once and she could not last for two hunder fricking meters. She utterly lost the genetic lottery.
>reflux
>asthma and allergies
>cant give birth
She's a child confirmed.
she really doesn't like being called a child and she's twenty-something.
e-girl IS a body type. The girl in this pic is 23 years old.
So in your mind, there's no difference between a 10 year old with the same body and a 23 year old?
You're a fricking leech, hijacking definitions and appropriating them to yourself.
>So in your mind, there's no difference between a 10 year old with the same body and a 23 year old?
No, I never said that. You're just putting words in my mouth. Frick off with your strawmanning, homosexual.
Funny because e-girl is by definition an underage , you dumb frick.
You're not a e-girlcon. e-girl is not a body type, you dumb frick.
You're literally proving my original point
>the 1000 year old vampire e-girl trope doesn't exist
moron.
>b-but she's 1000 years old trust me
Yeah typical cope lmao
yeah, liking immortal vampire/druids hags gets you to be arrested ayy
Yes, she is. That's literally written into her character bio.
Yeah, sure.
am i misremembering? I could have sworn she had full nip in this scene
On the TV broadcast, no. On the Bluray, yes.
Ah yes, because whats appealing about e-girls is the thousand wiener stare and several pounds of makeup.
>a twink and a bear
>not seeing the irony in that
I lol’d rather than have a panic attack.
Sound pedophilic
Druids cant wild shape into children though
Fricking a bear is funny and played for laughs, this guy's just a sicko
Fricking a e-girl might be funny and full of laughs. What more so, the e-girl might love it and laugh too and even have the time of her life.
But that would make the roast beef mad so we have to virtue signal how any adult-child relationship is bad, of course.
>what is veganal prolapse
>grooming is bad unless I do it, the post
Anon, there's more to sex than penis into vegana
And all the others are wrong
I have to admit I enjoy knowing how much my irrevocably aging roast beef exes would seethe if they knew how much I prefer eternally ageless e-girls to their flaps
Guys, what if this was a child instead? Think of the children!
Think of the bear
>Polar bear
Don't feel sorry for this murderous piece of shit.
>hunts humans for sport
Frick these guys and the horse they rode in on.
do outie buttholes like that actually exist?
yeah but they're grosser looking as they're buttholes that have prolapsed before
But the adult turning into a child isn't a real child, who doesn't have the mind of an adult
You're not fricking a real bear, it's no different from furries. If fapping to 2D children isn't real child porn than fapping to video game bears isn't real animal porn.
dicky. That is all
BASED
how come
the left wants a e-girl with the mentality of a hag
the right wants a endowed bawd with the innocence of a child
both preach the opposite
I want a cute, single digit age little girl.
Because you’re talking to degenerates that think they’re above other degenerated by being different flavors of degenerates. Homos, pedos(e-girl and shota), and beast(furry/pony) gays will back pedal on animal or historic comparisons on why it’s right and wrong and all of them will act better for both being the other.
Why do people care about things that don't hurt children, as opposed to things that do? Everyone is always angry until you bring human trafficking up and then nobody knows shit.
>Everyone is always angry until you bring human trafficking up and then nobody knows shit.
Hey cool it with the anti-semitism
>prepare for kidnapping
how is that illegal?
>we've reached a point where Furries are justifying people's dislike of them not because they're animal frickers but because they're gay
They're really reaching at this point.
>violence in videogames doesn't make you more violent or damage your brain in any way, chud
>attractive or underage women in videogames frick your brain up and literally kill women irl, chud
It should be legal just to throw all pedos and pedo sympathizers into a deep pit where they could never get out.
What’s kinda interesting is that chuds have a more pedo inclined worldview (need muh fresh eggs to make gorillions of babies to save the huwhyte race / want more docile/virgin woman) but they don’t ever really make rigorous or explicit arguments in favor of it. The only people that have made serious attempts at arguing for legal pedophilia are basically extreme left culture warrior iconoclast types who have an axe to grind with ideals like purity. But more generally their worldview is more opposed to age gap relationships because they hate power imbalances, biological standards like the aforementioned egg quality stuff etc etc. That said I haven’t seen any evidence that either side of the spectrum is more pedophilic in practice, basically every internet extremist community is flooded with anime consooming e-girlcons
I support free market capitalism and I think all age of consent laws should be abolished.
at least the bear is a consenting adult
>B-but mentally they're an adult!
Uhhh guys, what if this was a child instead of a dolphin? Not very funny now is it?
Indeed, he is correct
Well, I opened YT just now, and this was the first recommended video. Turns out I am an enthusiast, enough for YT to catch on.
?si=Htn-RHNtpht8tWpK
>[REDACTED]
He's fricking right tho.
The post that buck broke BG3.
druids can only change into non human forms tho
>he
>Hehe, let's include adult and pervy stuff in our games
>NOOOOO TALKING ABOUT IT IS AGAINST THE RULES!
It reminds me of idubbbz gf who was bragging about having an OF but banned a midget that joked about paying for it.
I love playing BG3 but the gay shit is distractingly egregious.
The way the stoic angel girl, who endured a literal 100 years of torture and isolation suddenly turns into a spunky carpet munching dyke the second you kill Thorm took me out of my immersion completely.
I suspect this will be the last good game Larian makes, they will be like CDPR and take the ESG money and then completely fall into the realm of slop.
Cyberpunk was good and the expansion is going to be even better.
Cope and seethe.
I pity you
I pity (You)
I pirated it, played it, had my fun and moved on, while you keep seething 3 years later at the mere mention of the name while being completely mindbroken because you wasted your money thinking you're getting some imaginary version of a game that never existed anywhere but your head because you fell for the oldest marketing trick in the book.
If you aren't a pirate you shouldn't be allowed to post an opinion, because it will always be biased.
I don't know why people pretend that any "opposite side" has any kind of consistency, morals, or logic. the name of the game is enforcing the shit they agree with and shitting on what they don't. Trying to point out hypocrisy, double think, or whatever is literally a waste of time
Well, if you think in terms of "sides" then you'll obviously find discrepancies all over. While some people may agree on a specific topic they might disagree on others, but it's much easier to put everybody on one of two boxes and that way you can try to discredit them when you disagree with them on something by addressing things that they didn't even mention.
have you read this thread or the op thread or the origin of the op thread? It is literally no baseline consistency with "my side right, your side wrong." That is how most discourse is about anything
Makes sense to me. The ethical problem with either one is that they cannot consent. DnD/BG3 shapeshifting leaves one’s mental statistics unaffected, so one can still consent and thus there is no victim. I would say he is right from a purely theoretical perspective.
He was also probably not banned for that post.
>freaks can't tell the difference between an animal joke and pedophilia
and you wonder why you're a loveless virgin on a downward spiral
Change of a furry abusing a kid: 100%
lets be honest, anon, furries and more degen that e-girl posters because most of them are gay and gays have a much higher per capita of pedophiles so they abuse kids and animals for their sexual gratification.
i honesty don't understand what issues you people are having
i just kill all the other companions and have not had forced gay sex pushed upon me on my solo tac Durge run
>I don't understand the issue with having to go out of your way to not have homosexual shit forced upon you in the game.
You're part of the problem moron.
Or you can just say no you fricking triggered snowflake.
i just killed them though before i they even talked to me, very RP friendly to Druge
you sound like the triggered one
Yeah nice excuses homosexual.
You deliberately went out of your way to see who is going to be "gay" so you could kill them before you even played the game yourself.
Peak pathetic.
Are we now pedo goalposting here? Really?
I really want to see all those pedo e-girlgays try to explain how "it's not real children" to their parents.
It's nice to want.
who the frick explains their fetishes to their parents?
>not balloons mom it's inflation
I can explain my porn easily.
You can't.
The point is pedo e-girl shit is just as degenerate and you know it. It's a sick fetish, just like all pedos are sick in the head.
all porn is degenerate you fricking moron. What are we doing
The point is, if I ever get caught, it's understandable, because it's just mature women.
if you pedos ever get caught, nobody is ever going to buy your moronic "b-but it's n-not real children" arguments. You're instantly going to be a degenerate.
Female bears do not count as "women"
lmao that's the best you got?
Absolutely pathetic try
you are literally arguing about what kind of porn is acceptable for your parents to catch you with on the video games section of a chinese cartoons forum
No, I'm saying that your pedo shit is degenerate and no amount of excuses will ever change that.
Says a lot more about your relationship with your parents than anything else. I guess when you still live at home and don't pay rent you need to care about them kicking you out huh?
>ever get caught
Wait, you still live with your parents?
homie get your own spot, I got so many frick holes and pounds of ass that people might think I'm into dismembered women.
Why would you ever want to reveal your fetishes to anyone? Some things should stay unknown.
>t. enjoys girls pissing themselves
This Anon's right
Don't fricking reveal your fetishes you autists
1. I don't give a frick about what normies think of my fetishes. It's none of their fricking business what they think of my fetishes, but I don't broadcast them to the world either because I'm not an obnoxious homosexual like Larian's devs or the freaks that march at Pride Month parades.
2. I'm 31 years old and I moved out of my parents place, so I can jerk off to whatever the frick I want. Even when I was living with my parents back then, I never got caught jerking off even once.
So piss off, kid.
Don't worry pedo, sooner or later you'll get the rope.
Drawings aren't criminalized and never will be criminalized. Enjoy screeching into the void like the autist you are for the next 60+ years until you die, homosexual.
They already are criminalized in mantly places.
Women showing their ankles is criminalized by Muslims too. Does that mean that no women should show hers?
>defending prostitutedom
Black person I'm defending cheeseburgers, like any true American.
How are cheeseburgers even allowed in Burgerland if it's not kosher?
Seeing as you started off ypur comment reminding everyone of blacks, you are indeed the quintessential american.
You fool! I AM the blacks!
It isn't criminalized in the US or any of the G7, or any of the nations that rank high on the freedom index, so not my problem.
It is in the US if it's obscene. It is in Canada and the UK, too. Even if it's not prosecuted often, those laws exist.
Then how come there isn't a single person in the US who's ever been arrested, tried, and sent to prison for jerking off to 2D e-girls? The answer is because the courts recognize that becuase it's not real, it's a complete waste of their time when they should instead be going after actual pedophiles.
Christopher Handley
>it's ok to be a pedo if there are no reprecaustions.
Also sooner or later you'll have a wife and kids and they will find out about how you're a degenerate freak.
If you aren't going to have any, then it's a punishment fitting enough for someone like you.
>passwords on computers and incognito mode don't exist
moron.
I like how you guys harp on the criminalization and legality of e-girl, when majority are repulsed by the fact that you get off to and are aroused by the depiction of children being in sexual situations to begin with. It doesn't matter that the scenario of a 8 year old getting their ass-blasted by 6 dudes in an orgy is not real.
You feeling any kind of arousal from it is the thing that's subhuman and what people are repulsed by. Because, you know, getting off to stuff like that is bad.
This.
It's hilarious how they will claim "it doesn't matter, it's not real" and they aren't pedos, but if you suggest they jack off to yaoi porn or something they will claim they aren't gay.
>short and petite girls over the age of 18 don't exist IRL
moron.
Yeah because you go around and check the DOB of all the character in all the e-girl porn you watch.
Also petite isn't e-girl, not matter how much you try to claim, e-girlcon secondary.
>Yeah because you go around and check the DOB of all the character in all the e-girl porn you watch.
Of course I don't because it's not real so I don't care.
So which one is it homosexual? Are you attracted to children bodies or are you attracted to flat chested over 18 women?
I'm attracted to 2D anime e-girls and I'm attracted to flat chested 18+ year old women. Both are legal. Kiss my ass.
Why did you even bother with your moronic post in the first place then if you don't care which is which??
Looks like i won again, pedo.
>still fails to prove exactly how fapping to fictional 2D anime e-girls is equivalent to pedophilia
>"Looks like i won again, pedo."
Doesn't work that way moron.
>replied to post explained how it's pedophilia with irrelevant shit exactly proving my point
>huur duur you failed to prove anything
Nice try, pedo.
to post explained how it's pedophilia
It didn't explain how it's pedophilia. 2D drawings aren't real children, moron.
If you can't distinguish reality from fiction, then that's your problem.
>still fails to prove exactly how fapping to fictional 2D anime e-girls is equivalent to pedophilia
Not him but because you jerk off to and are aroused by depictions of children in sexual situations. The only people who would do so are pedophiles. And no, them being drawn, digital, whatever doesn't matter.
>The only people who would do so are pedophiles.
Literally untrue, the majority of child molesters aren't even pedophiles
>And no, them being drawn, digital, whatever doesn't matter.
Better start arresting all the mass murdering GTA players
Nice try my guy, but anime isn't for pedos, e-girls are for pedos.
Does your dick only get hard after you see her birth certificate and it confirms she's 18+?
Oddly specific scenario that you're giving anon. Are you speaking from experience?
> if you suggest they jack off to yaoi porn or something they will claim they aren't gay.
I've jerked off to yaoi link but id never frick a man irl
Sorry to tell you this, but you are gay, at best you're bi.
Why would I give a frick what you or normies think? If me liking anime e-girls is legal, then why should you care?
I don't care, i just want you to stop making excuse and just admit you're a pedophile so we can all move on.
I just want you to say who's the victim in this crime.
Society, because you are part of it
Also just because you're too afraid to act on it irl because there are consequences doesn't change anything.
Cute and hypocritical considering you're harming "society" with your own pathetic life.
>no u
And there it is, the final concession
>name the victim
>i can't
I accept your confetti 🙂
>nah u are
and here's the first Confession, and it's denied.
Pedophile just means being attracted to underage/pre-pubescent humans. It doesn't mean raping or assaulting people. When people say you're a pedo they're not saying you're a rapist.
>When people say you're a pedo they're not saying you're a rapist.
Connotation vs. Denotation
Nobody irl has ever called anyone a pedo who hasn't raped some child.
People only care about semantics like that on online debates and that's just so they can call people pedos since homosexual, moron, and Black person will get you banned on most sites.
Nice deflection.
But you can be a pedo for just inappropriately looking and touching someone without the act of rape.
You can be a pedo for just having cp on you.
So yeah, but no.
I won't admit it because I'm not. I'm only attracted to 2D anime e-girls. But feel free to seethe about it for eternity since you apparently can't move on from it, homosexual.
>Because, you know, getting off to stuff like that is bad.
Do you have an ounce of proof for that claim?
This really is the best scene that anime has ever produced
IT'S NOT GAY, IT'S CHICKS WITH DICKS
>>not balloons mom it's inflation
The Dobson Defense is a recognized legal strategy in United States courts.
>actually laughed till my stomach hurt
Good fricking post anon.
The whole idea of "coming out" to your family is so fricking disgusting. I've heard of LGBT types ruining their relationships with their family because of it.
I just tell them they're based off real children and they understand.
Do YOU talk about your porn fetishes with your parents?
they dont care
they understand the difference between fiction and reality
my mom would unironically be more ok with e-girl than anything not straight, but I already know her position of porn being evil so I'm not even gonna bother
You gonna explain the gay bear sex to your parents? And all the other freak shit in BG3 that somehow gets a pass like diddling Cthulhu?
*shows a picture of kuro*
>mom, is this what real children look like?
woooow, that simple
its almost like people like idealized anime girls in a totally different way than real ones because theyre aesthetically completely different
Well if you aren't showing the sex act and just implying it like the bear and everyone else is judging you like the squirrel, you can have a scene like that. But that is not what you want, right you fricking degenerate?
ENTER
>"people who fap to gay porn are more likely to be gay"
>Ganker: true
>"people who fap to furry porn are more likely to be into bestiality"
>Ganker: makes sense
>"people who fap to e-girl porn are more likely to be pedophiles"
>Ganker: UMMM, ACTUALLY...
Why is it like this?
>>"people who fap to gay porn are more likely to be gay
stopped right there
Yes. No matter how much you cope, jerking off and feeling aroused by depictions of males engaging in sexual activities with each other or otherwise is homosexual. No straight normal man does that.
Did you really just pretend gay hentai/drawn porn doesn't exist?
>No straight normal man does that
that's not what the data says
>Did you really just pretend gay hentai/drawn porn doesn't exist?
If drawn shit correlated with people's actual desires then there'd be way more people who are into irl troonys, tentacles, and rape.
Because gay porn has real men and e-girl has cartoon children.
For the comparison to be equal it would need to be gay porn and cp.
Who is the schizo quoting?
What game?
https://www.dlsite.com/maniax/work/=/product_id/RJ274236.html
it's the 2023 version of traps are not gay if the penis is feminine
Indeed, there is nothing wrong with having sex with children.
Why are e-girlgays so easy to bait?
I'm sure they have seen the same weak bait hundreds of time yet they still bother to reply.
My mother had me when she was 14, father 22. AMA
When will people learn the difference between offense and harm? All e-girl/shota/furry/violence pearl clutching comes down to that.
C
I walk into a room with three women all watching different hentai: rape, NTR, and guro. I ask first one if she wants to be raped. She freaks out, says no. I ask second if shed love to cheat on her BF. She cries, says no. I ask third if shed love to be delimbed. Pure silence.
i could be playing video game sright now
>fap to lesbian porn
>suddenly a lesbian now
All men who aren't homosexuals are just male lesbians
Yes, you like women so you're a lesbian, moron.
many people would agree creating visceral images of gore and torture and murder would warrant serious concern. personally you should just be locked up since you're obviously mentally ill. ergo people who consume large quantities of underaged children's content like e-girl are the same way. mentally ill people who should be locked up forever
The problem these people who like e-girl don't seem to understand is that people's perspective on the matter is so wildly different from there own. That can't detatch the notion of "normality" to it in the way normal people can.
>don't seem to understand is that people's perspective on the matter is so wildly different from there own
I understand their moronic ass opinion just fine.