"cater to everyone/lowest common denominator" has always been terrible for art. there's a reason the original version of blade runner was panned on release, yet the versions without the studio mandated narration are held up as some of the best films of all time. you want to turn this into some culture war bullshit, but the fact of the matter is what people really hate is quota filling and corporate fluffing, to make it seem like they are "inclusive and for everybody," despite mass layoffs, shitty working conditions, racial/gendered turmoil within the companies, etc. no one likes a liar and all this bullshit is seen as very dishonest. the number of people who saw a female lead in the 00's or the 90s and went "UUGH this feminine bullshit is ruining EVERYTHING" was incredibly low, something changed in the last 10-15 years.
"Everyone" didn't build the industry with their support and money when gaming was considered a loser geek hobbie, why the frick should the original audience be alienated for a microscopic demographic that doesn't buy shit?
All of us who have played videogames for the last thirty years, male or female, black or white, gay or straight, liked them the way they were, developers are disowning us to appeal to people who five years ago called us neckbeard incels for liking games, in other words, they're tossing aside not just the main straight male demo, but also the real girl and homosexual gamers.
Idk, advanced modding, better versions of the games on PC that aren't hot garbage like the original ports, boobs, etc.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>better versions of the games on PC that aren't hot garbage like the original ports
we have that already with mods >advanced modding >boobs
Why do you even play silent hill games? You want video game equivalent of ever-growing cancer.
"lets just add more random shit to a perfectly good and complete work. because we can"
>even a fricking 8yo child is now a double-chin lardface
yeah I guess this is more relateable to 2020s' zoomer Mutts, but did they "forget" that the game is set in the 1980s??
it looks great >angela's eyebrows are too thick and she looks fat in this one frame! >you can't see maria's midriff in the remake! >the weird lighting in this one frame of this scene makes it look like laura has a double chin!
you guys will whine about anything
Left look like a dancer from stripclub.
Right looks like an oldie who went to the nightclub but couldn't find the right wardrobe and got fired on day 1, and she remains clueless as to why she got fired.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>Left look like a dancer from stripclub
Because she's a dancer from a stripclub
No, this is not "fine" on any level.
Stop bending the knee and enabling literal sub-par downgrades. She is literally meant to be a sex symbol prostitute, not your neighbor's little school girl.
I love how the lazy way to design female characters is replace their original outfits with a leather jacket or a tank top (usually having them wear both). Claire in original re2 was wearing a red denim vest with black compression shirt but the "modern" sesign is tanktop and leather jacket.
I get that it looks cleaner, more digestible in a way but it's so bland. I don't think Maria's design in sh2 was supposed to be cool or stylish, it was supposed to seem almost inappropriate and outlandish, I mean even her little bit of belly fat makes her look out of place. She is the unconscious desire of James to sexualize his wife but when it's manifested in silent hill itself, she's uncanny and off-putting. She's not supposed to look like a hot girl at a club shew supposed to be a fricking tulpa tormenting the main character.
the fact a “game dev” said this awful re-design was the result of too many men in the dev team is just the cherry on top of this shit ice cream, I hope the industry crashes on these morons hard
I think character design looks ok but everything about the gameplay looks like shit. Janky animations, shitty combat feel and overall it looks like a game from two generations ago but with better graphics. This game isnt gonna suck because "muh maria isnt hot and laura looks fat" but it will suck because of everything else.
Marie is the blonde chick. She's the physical manifestation of James' sexual frustration, and thus, is dressed kind of like a hooker. Angela is the abuse victim.
Way to out yourself as having never played the original.
Angela's always been odd since she's meant to be a teenager but looks like a 30-something. New Angela looks like a frumpy early 20's slightly autistic woman.
>meant to be a teenager
Can someone please tell me where exactly in the original it's being said? Without using silent hill wiki. I have a feeling that this bullshit was added in the books or promotional materials after the release of the game and now reatards act like the original devs somehow fricked up and now brave and daring bloober team are fixing the mistakes of the original team
In the Making Of video. They explain why she acts and looks the way she is.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
[...]
It also says in the original Instruction Manual that she ran away after graduating highschool. She is probably closer to 19 or 20. Still young.
So it's promotional material after all. I checked it and funny enough they say that her being played by a way older actress was intentional as well. So in the end even though she is a teenager she's never supposed to look like one
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
Correct. She is meant to look older than she is due to years of stress and abuse. I always thought they made her look too much older in the original- yet it comes off effective for her character and mannerisms.
Ackhually, it is a little bit open to interpretation. I see Maria as more of what James wants Mary to be replaced with (including being alive and walking around). She is kind of his wish fulfilment, thus the 'Born from a Wish' story. It is more complicated than that but yes.
She looks worse, but seems fine.
I think they should have made her dress patterned with the pink leopard pattern or gave her more israeliteelry. Her outfit needs a bit more flare somewhere.
Do anyone actually care about this? Why do people get excited over remakes, just replay the original if you like the game.
It's being made by a different team, for a different audience and in a different time, no shit it's not going to be as good as the original. Why would anyone want a remake?
i'm hyped for it. was one of my absolute favorites as a kid and haven't played it in 20 years.
can't wait to play a modern game with akira yamaoka ost.
Bloober knows their game is dead on arrival, that is why they are trying to squeeze as much money from it as possible.
That is the reason why it is sweetbabyfied. They want Blackrock's money
NEVER and I mean NEVER give your money to any entertainment public company, every single one will forcefully include DEI/ESG policies into their games.
It's over. I hate this gay earth, same happened with code Veronica, 4 got a remake but code Veronica needed one. Sh2 gets a remake but sh1 needed one, mgs3 gets a remake but mgs1 needed one. Normgroids are moronic
How do you think it will do? The October release will help things but the general impression I get from fans of the series is negative. What do you think Konami expects this to do?
>Assets look great >The few rewrites we've seen smooth over unintentionally odd moments in the original, emphasizing the actually weird stuff >Core game is untouched
However >Animations are ass >Facial performances are ass >A lot of stuff misses the point of what it's copying >Tone is ass >The sound direction is abysmal
It feels like Bloober almost had it for once. I wish they had just made their own Silent Hill instead. It might have ended up decent.
So these homosexuals are on sega too? No wonder Amy Rose panties are censored now and she is a strong woman instead of a wiener hungry moron....
Frick this..
Both versions on the top look bad. If there wasn't an objectively worse one on the left, people would shit on the right these days. That jawline gets criticized in tons of other games.
Why do devs PAY "consulting firms" to tell them their main character isn't ugly enough? There is no fricking way that's all these "companies" do. Consulting is the oldest doublespeak ruse in the book
>anyone who's excited for this goyslop has only played SH2 through video essays.
nah i played it when it came out.
i'm just not a jaded negative nancy.
Japanese have been honorary westoids for the past 6 years. If you buy anything from them instead of pirating or better yet saving your time not playing shit games, it's all on you.
THE ORIGINAL GAME CHARACTERS NEVER WERE HOT MODELS >NEVER HAD MAKE UP
THE ORIGINAL GAME CHARACTERS NEVER WERE HOT MODELS >NEVER HAD MAKE UP
THE ORIGINAL GAME CHARACTERS NEVER WERE HOT MODELS >NEVER HAD MAKE UP
THE ORIGINAL GAME CHARACTERS NEVER WERE HOT MODELS >NEVER HAD MAKE UP
This. The proportions are off. The outfit for Maria needs some work too.
I think the faces themselves are okay, not horrible. They definetly dont look like the originals.
I would bet money they scaled the heads up due to facial motion capture.
I had some hope, but I knew they were never going to be able to capture the tone of the original. The stiff and awkward -still can't tell if it's on purpose or not- facial expressions and dialogue are one of a kind and add so much to the game.
So far James' new voice actor sounds too innocent and genuinely curious about Silent Hill, it's the same problem the awful Troy Baker redub had. Guy's original James performance to me was perfect, it gives off >I know what I've done deep down but I'm lying to myself and others
The fact that they've cleary whiffed on other fronts like changing and desexualising Maria's outfit (which was very purposeful in the original to the point they've done whole interviews about how and why they designed it that way) shows me they just don't get it.
> ermmm, you don't like the female?.... YOU FRICKING INCEL CHUD!
If you think that Silent Hill has any hope as a franchise, you're dead wrong.
The big proportion of its audience is like this (women and trannies), it's over.
And youd think the remake of a game about a sexually disturbing man confronting his guilt and demons wouldnt chicken out of showing sexuality in a manner that is appropriate to the themes.
Here's the thing which chuds don't seem to realize.
The problem with the cutscene wasn't Angela being "fat."
What was actually wrong was the lack of fog, trailing effects, or any of the atmosphere of the original scene. In fact, the voice acting and cinematography was also worse.
By voicing your concern for how one female model looks in one very unflattering angle (she's literally not even heavyset) you lose people. By making it out like SBI caused Bloober to delete the fog and make everything look like a B-movie, you just end up alienating normies.
This same exact thing happened with RE4 Remake. Instead of focusing on the lack of environmental ambience or poor acting, chuds focused on how Capcom removed a panty shot which didn't need to exist in the first place.
It makes me so happy knowing lgbt and overall more representation will be added to videogames and you will literally do nothing as you cry and shit your pants in your mothers basement. You are an evil person and your only hobby will be taken away from you. Just end yourself.
I fricking hate that sweet baby is working on my favorite game's remake and I have to not buy it on principle.
I agree that DEI is important today, especially when we have so many non white kids who deserve to enjoy games like I did, but some moron bigot c**t who's comftrable with saying all white people should be aborted shoulden't be the one in charge of making that a reality. I got there's a painful history, but she has shot to work through if she wants to lead the effort of making games more inclusive.
Frick the racist, the anti-racists (who are just as bigoted), and frick that b***h running sweet baby games. Frick OP too. In fact, frick Ganker.
>silent hill was always about aborting all white babies and not hiring white people >it had nothing to do the personal hell created by guilt stemming from sexual frustration and how it gave a broken man the fuel to murder his sick wife
have a nice day you stupid fricking moron. I hope someone beats your moronic ass into a wheelchair. Please PLEASE blow your own fricking brains out. Bigoted motherfricker.
I fricking hate that sweet baby is working on my favorite game's remake and I have to not buy it on principle.
I agree that DEI is important today, especially when we have so many non white kids who deserve to enjoy games like I did, but some moron bigot c**t who's comftrable with saying all white people should be aborted shoulden't be the one in charge of making that a reality. I got there's a painful history, but she has shot to work through if she wants to lead the effort of making games more inclusive.
Frick the racist, the anti-racists (who are just as bigoted), and frick that b***h running sweet baby games. Frick OP too. In fact, frick Ganker.
Again, please make the world a better place and have a nice day.
I'm not sure what I am looking at. Top right is remake? Top left is same character but, I'm not sure, in the old game? Bottom left is, I think, remake, and bottom right is an actress? I am not sure what the pictures at trying to tell me and how they relate to the text on the right.
The new models look ok in this comparison. The women are indeed ugly, but I don't think they were meant to be pretty in the original.
That said, furryBlack person here
Here's the thing which chuds don't seem to realize.
The problem with the cutscene wasn't Angela being "fat."
What was actually wrong was the lack of fog, trailing effects, or any of the atmosphere of the original scene. In fact, the voice acting and cinematography was also worse.
By voicing your concern for how one female model looks in one very unflattering angle (she's literally not even heavyset) you lose people. By making it out like SBI caused Bloober to delete the fog and make everything look like a B-movie, you just end up alienating normies.
This same exact thing happened with RE4 Remake. Instead of focusing on the lack of environmental ambience or poor acting, chuds focused on how Capcom removed a panty shot which didn't need to exist in the first place.
is right, nailing the atmosphere is more important than the character models, and it's not looking good.
Poisoning the well. You have no evidenve they wanna frick kids. You just want people complaining that they're pedos with no evidence instead of complaining that they're hiring people who have showed outright bigotry against white people and said they want to see all israelites exterminated.
>Too deep for you.
It's been a while since I've seen someone stupid enough to use this not as a joke to defend surface level symbolism. You remind me of the kind of idiots who think Eva was ever deep.
I now believe you're stupid enough to actually think the dogshit that was signalis was deep.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
It's okay bro, not everyone can get something as basic as symbolism in art. Comic books are fun too, I'm sure.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
The things you like are painfully shallow and wear all their themes out on their sleeves. You, like a lot of teenagers who just got into anime, thinks some dark visuals and melodrama somehow makes things inherently deeper. You'll grow out of that phase unless you have a learning disability.
Chuds will pretend Bloober wasn't making abysmal dogshit prior to hiring some literally whos
>Leave the hecking DEI consultants alone
homosexual
What is wrong with making inclusive games for everyone?
"cater to everyone/lowest common denominator" has always been terrible for art. there's a reason the original version of blade runner was panned on release, yet the versions without the studio mandated narration are held up as some of the best films of all time. you want to turn this into some culture war bullshit, but the fact of the matter is what people really hate is quota filling and corporate fluffing, to make it seem like they are "inclusive and for everybody," despite mass layoffs, shitty working conditions, racial/gendered turmoil within the companies, etc. no one likes a liar and all this bullshit is seen as very dishonest. the number of people who saw a female lead in the 00's or the 90s and went "UUGH this feminine bullshit is ruining EVERYTHING" was incredibly low, something changed in the last 10-15 years.
>inclusive games for everyone
the people that actually play games never asked for it and gays and dykes ruin everything.
"Everyone" didn't build the industry with their support and money when gaming was considered a loser geek hobbie, why the frick should the original audience be alienated for a microscopic demographic that doesn't buy shit?
All of us who have played videogames for the last thirty years, male or female, black or white, gay or straight, liked them the way they were, developers are disowning us to appeal to people who five years ago called us neckbeard incels for liking games, in other words, they're tossing aside not just the main straight male demo, but also the real girl and homosexual gamers.
Eileen shaving
>shaves on the bed
What a dirty woman. I am no longer a fan of Eileen.
>shaves on the bed
What a dirty woman. That's why I'm a fan of Eileen.
>Eileen shaving
Eileen shaving
Reminder to grab the OG SH1-4 for PC before israelitenami starts cracking down the DL links and mods:
https://pastebin.com/uf5XhyXz
Hopefully the originals can be decompiled like they're doing to N64 games.
...homie what?
You do understand that these are LEGIT PC PORTS, that were OFFICIALLY released over 20 years ago??
Only SH1 is still a Snoy exclusive, and that one's been piss easy to emulate since the early 2000s.
But a PC port is still just a bunch of binaries. Decompilation tools basically turn things into open-source projects.
What the frick would you want that for? moron
Idk, advanced modding, better versions of the games on PC that aren't hot garbage like the original ports, boobs, etc.
>better versions of the games on PC that aren't hot garbage like the original ports
we have that already with mods
>advanced modding
>boobs
Why do you even play silent hill games? You want video game equivalent of ever-growing cancer.
"lets just add more random shit to a perfectly good and complete work. because we can"
I thought the PC ports were the terrible remasters. am i wrong?
The remasters were only on console.
The PC ports were awful. 2 was improved by fans but 4 is still missing shit and 3 is still dogshit (pc port wise)
There is fortunately a decompilation of SH1 in progress.
>2 years without changes
>adds random PR
>now 3 weeks without changes
it's dead sadly
PS2 emulator is faster
Thanks Lori.
>even a fricking 8yo child is now a double-chin lardface
yeah I guess this is more relateable to 2020s' zoomer Mutts, but did they "forget" that the game is set in the 1980s??
it looks great
>angela's eyebrows are too thick and she looks fat in this one frame!
>you can't see maria's midriff in the remake!
>the weird lighting in this one frame of this scene makes it look like laura has a double chin!
you guys will whine about anything
Angela is fricking awful, but everything else is fine.
frick no
She looks worse, but seems fine.
does she really though?
The entire point of Maria is to make a sexy version of Mary. Is there a new hand fetish that I don't know about or did they miss the point?
Missing the exposed midriff is a real mistake in design.
I thought the point of maria was to be sexually appealing to the protagonist, so she was designed like a prostitute
nice bait but you are not fooling anyone
Aren't the world models and cinematic models pretty different in the original?
Left look like a dancer from stripclub.
Right looks like an oldie who went to the nightclub but couldn't find the right wardrobe and got fired on day 1, and she remains clueless as to why she got fired.
>Left look like a dancer from stripclub
Because she's a dancer from a stripclub
No tummy = trash
I want a 7ft tall gf with big shoulders
No, this is not "fine" on any level.
Stop bending the knee and enabling literal sub-par downgrades. She is literally meant to be a sex symbol prostitute, not your neighbor's little school girl.
In the cutscenes she looks like prime Cameron Diaz though.
Anyone who says this never played the original
Maria is the one character whose design should not have been touched
she looks way too pretty in the remale to be Maria
THIS OUTFIT MEANS THEY MISSED THE ENTIRE FRICKING POINT OF MARIA
MARIA IS -SUPPOSED- TO LOOK LIKE A CHEAP bawd
she still looks like a hooker
Bloober not understanding SH
seriously, are you surprised
I love how the lazy way to design female characters is replace their original outfits with a leather jacket or a tank top (usually having them wear both). Claire in original re2 was wearing a red denim vest with black compression shirt but the "modern" sesign is tanktop and leather jacket.
I get that it looks cleaner, more digestible in a way but it's so bland. I don't think Maria's design in sh2 was supposed to be cool or stylish, it was supposed to seem almost inappropriate and outlandish, I mean even her little bit of belly fat makes her look out of place. She is the unconscious desire of James to sexualize his wife but when it's manifested in silent hill itself, she's uncanny and off-putting. She's not supposed to look like a hot girl at a club shew supposed to be a fricking tulpa tormenting the main character.
the fact a “game dev” said this awful re-design was the result of too many men in the dev team is just the cherry on top of this shit ice cream, I hope the industry crashes on these morons hard
I think character design looks ok but everything about the gameplay looks like shit. Janky animations, shitty combat feel and overall it looks like a game from two generations ago but with better graphics. This game isnt gonna suck because "muh maria isnt hot and laura looks fat" but it will suck because of everything else.
>in this one frame!
you disingenuous piece of shit
What are you talking about? right looks better.
>why doesn't the traumatized abuse victim have her breasts out???
Marie is the blonde chick. She's the physical manifestation of James' sexual frustration, and thus, is dressed kind of like a hooker. Angela is the abuse victim.
Way to out yourself as having never played the original.
Angela looks the same as she did in the original. Maria in the remake looks timid and mousy. That's the frick up here.
Angela's always been odd since she's meant to be a teenager but looks like a 30-something. New Angela looks like a frumpy early 20's slightly autistic woman.
>meant to be a teenager
Can someone please tell me where exactly in the original it's being said? Without using silent hill wiki. I have a feeling that this bullshit was added in the books or promotional materials after the release of the game and now reatards act like the original devs somehow fricked up and now brave and daring bloober team are fixing the mistakes of the original team
In the Making Of video. They explain why she acts and looks the way she is.
So it's promotional material after all. I checked it and funny enough they say that her being played by a way older actress was intentional as well. So in the end even though she is a teenager she's never supposed to look like one
Correct. She is meant to look older than she is due to years of stress and abuse. I always thought they made her look too much older in the original- yet it comes off effective for her character and mannerisms.
It also says in the original Instruction Manual that she ran away after graduating highschool. She is probably closer to 19 or 20. Still young.
Ackhually, it is a little bit open to interpretation. I see Maria as more of what James wants Mary to be replaced with (including being alive and walking around). She is kind of his wish fulfilment, thus the 'Born from a Wish' story. It is more complicated than that but yes.
I think they should have made her dress patterned with the pink leopard pattern or gave her more israeliteelry. Her outfit needs a bit more flare somewhere.
Goddammit...
Reminds me of Foam Adventure.
b***h made the chernobyl elephants foot in her living room
Hahahaha!
>"upcycling"
Now replace the chair with society, and the makeover with giving them the right to vote.
I was expecting something bad but NOT that bad
Holy frick
It was all predictable. The important new sh game is higurashi hill set in Japan, not this western troonygger trash.
Silent Troon 2
Do anyone actually care about this? Why do people get excited over remakes, just replay the original if you like the game.
It's being made by a different team, for a different audience and in a different time, no shit it's not going to be as good as the original. Why would anyone want a remake?
i'm hyped for it. was one of my absolute favorites as a kid and haven't played it in 20 years.
can't wait to play a modern game with akira yamaoka ost.
>it's one of my favorite games
>I haven't played it in over 20 years
fricking kek
whats dei mean
You lost the culture war
Bloober knows their game is dead on arrival, that is why they are trying to squeeze as much money from it as possible.
That is the reason why it is sweetbabyfied. They want Blackrock's money
NEVER and I mean NEVER give your money to any entertainment public company, every single one will forcefully include DEI/ESG policies into their games.
>those eyebrows
(Real?) women are so ugly that they're making 2024 games look like they belong in the 2006 shovelware era
Where's the silent hill 1 remake (aka the game in the series most in need of one)
Same story for mgs
Not marketable enough.
It's over. I hate this gay earth, same happened with code Veronica, 4 got a remake but code Veronica needed one. Sh2 gets a remake but sh1 needed one, mgs3 gets a remake but mgs1 needed one. Normgroids are moronic
if this does well in sales i can see them doing SH1 so they can do SH3
they had to do this one first because pyramid head is the face of silent hill
she can be all sultry and stuff without dressing like a moronic person
How do you think it will do? The October release will help things but the general impression I get from fans of the series is negative. What do you think Konami expects this to do?
No she really can't. James isn't a good man with complex sexual desires. The nurses had bubble breasts for a reason
She's literally meant to be the prostitute to James' madonna-prostitute complex about his wife. Stop shilling this garbage.
GamerGate lost
SJWs now control the industry and everyone takes them seriously
Enjoy your ESG slop for the next few decades
Ofc they did. The more organized and ruthless minority will always win out over the less organized majority.
>its important that she looks like a cheap prostitute because...... because of the plot
literally yes
way to out yourself
It literally is. She's a representation of James' sexual frustration.
Grifter chud thread
Cry more
If anyone had hopes for this remake to be good in the first place then they're simply mentally ill lmao no other way to put it
Literal men.
>Assets look great
>The few rewrites we've seen smooth over unintentionally odd moments in the original, emphasizing the actually weird stuff
>Core game is untouched
However
>Animations are ass
>Facial performances are ass
>A lot of stuff misses the point of what it's copying
>Tone is ass
>The sound direction is abysmal
It feels like Bloober almost had it for once. I wish they had just made their own Silent Hill instead. It might have ended up decent.
>Facial performances are ass
i wholly disagree, laura looked so realistic it was freaking me out.
>Core game is untouched
we saw the same trailer?
>Assets look great
>Core game is untouched
They thicken Angela's eyebrow and her face ahahaha
That sad looking face and no revealing stomach doesn't fit Maria occupation as a dancer.
So these homosexuals are on sega too? No wonder Amy Rose panties are censored now and she is a strong woman instead of a wiener hungry moron....
Frick this..
>SEGA
no wonder the newer Yakuza games feel like they were made for the moronic american twitter audience
how many stars of david and saturn hexagons are hidden in that logo
Called it
>s-she's fine
disassociation is not a good coping mechanism, stop it.
Most media is just surivivng off the creativity and goodwill of the creators from 20+ years ago
>they kept the armless "grab" in the game
why
>uses skull emoji
>complains about modern audience
YOU DIPSHIT YOU ARE SAID MODERN AUDIENCE YOU moronic ZOOMER homosexual
just hire fans lol
Both look like shit, amazing.
not ugly enough
>traumatized rape victim looking that good
Yeah no
That is not the “Fix” you think it is.
Try better next time!
You Have To Force Behaviors
how was the gameplay footage they showed off?
Remake looks better than original. seethe, cope and dilate
I hold a principled anti-remake stance and don't care about this piece of shit, but Maria/Mary always looked weird in SH2. Her lips are fricked.
Why in the world would anyone want to pay for an inferior ESG stamped pooland version when the original can be played in high definition.
Is bottom left the same girl as top left?
Do people complain bottom left? She looks fine to me
Silent Hill died with P.T
Both versions on the top look bad. If there wasn't an objectively worse one on the left, people would shit on the right these days. That jawline gets criticized in tons of other games.
Why do devs PAY "consulting firms" to tell them their main character isn't ugly enough? There is no fricking way that's all these "companies" do. Consulting is the oldest doublespeak ruse in the book
anon you make it sound like they're just moving money around with their friends
nuAngela actually looks like a sad sack that would be abused by her family
you should complain about the slop camera instead, it's the major issue
>remake turns it into a third-person shooter
>no more unique camera angles
yep pretty bad
I think that Angela looking like a fat slob could work in a way of making herself unattractive.
But this is some revisionist "vision of this remake" bullshit and anyone who's excited for this goyslop has only played SH2 through video essays.
Even the movie appears to have more respect for the source material.
>anyone who's excited for this goyslop has only played SH2 through video essays.
nah i played it when it came out.
i'm just not a jaded negative nancy.
you werent even born when it came out
i'm almost 40 though
They're going to turn her into a lesbian aren't they?
Japanese have been honorary westoids for the past 6 years. If you buy anything from them instead of pirating or better yet saving your time not playing shit games, it's all on you.
THE ORIGINAL GAME CHARACTERS NEVER WERE HOT MODELS
>NEVER HAD MAKE UP
THE ORIGINAL GAME CHARACTERS NEVER WERE HOT MODELS
>NEVER HAD MAKE UP
THE ORIGINAL GAME CHARACTERS NEVER WERE HOT MODELS
>NEVER HAD MAKE UP
THE ORIGINAL GAME CHARACTERS NEVER WERE HOT MODELS
>NEVER HAD MAKE UP
Maria did have lipstick on from what I can tell.
angela has the face of a woman who ways 170 pounds, with a body of a woman that weighs 120
maria has a huge head that in some cutscenes looks like an adult head on a toddlers body
its not even sensitivity issues, its just really poorly done art and gamemaking, as also shown by all the other gameplay footage.
This. The proportions are off. The outfit for Maria needs some work too.
I think the faces themselves are okay, not horrible. They definetly dont look like the originals.
I would bet money they scaled the heads up due to facial motion capture.
Maria looks like a detective in the remake. Strong STEM womyn is definitely in scope of the Reddit Hill 2 meme.
why is the west afraid of attractive women? jesus christ
2 second edit: at least it is basically the same character
Giant ass head
it's literally the same except she didn't eat 100 big macs like the remake model.
She isn't supposed to look attractive either. She's supposed to look average and sickly. None of the girls are particularly hot looking
>when you break out of sweet baby inc offices
>remake
If you already have the original, then a remake isn't necessary. 100% of the time it is always a cash grab.
I had some hope, but I knew they were never going to be able to capture the tone of the original. The stiff and awkward -still can't tell if it's on purpose or not- facial expressions and dialogue are one of a kind and add so much to the game.
So far James' new voice actor sounds too innocent and genuinely curious about Silent Hill, it's the same problem the awful Troy Baker redub had. Guy's original James performance to me was perfect, it gives off
>I know what I've done deep down but I'm lying to myself and others
The fact that they've cleary whiffed on other fronts like changing and desexualising Maria's outfit (which was very purposeful in the original to the point they've done whole interviews about how and why they designed it that way) shows me they just don't get it.
they look too polish, like shit. simple as that
> ermmm, you don't like the female?.... YOU FRICKING INCEL CHUD!
If you think that Silent Hill has any hope as a franchise, you're dead wrong.
The big proportion of its audience is like this (women and trannies), it's over.
>why would a game about sexual dysfunction attract sexually dysfunctional people
And youd think the remake of a game about a sexually disturbing man confronting his guilt and demons wouldnt chicken out of showing sexuality in a manner that is appropriate to the themes.
Here's the thing which chuds don't seem to realize.
The problem with the cutscene wasn't Angela being "fat."
What was actually wrong was the lack of fog, trailing effects, or any of the atmosphere of the original scene. In fact, the voice acting and cinematography was also worse.
By voicing your concern for how one female model looks in one very unflattering angle (she's literally not even heavyset) you lose people. By making it out like SBI caused Bloober to delete the fog and make everything look like a B-movie, you just end up alienating normies.
This same exact thing happened with RE4 Remake. Instead of focusing on the lack of environmental ambience or poor acting, chuds focused on how Capcom removed a panty shot which didn't need to exist in the first place.
Compared to RE4's remake, this time around I'm actually seeing people say it looks overall worse.
This sucks but every company is basically esg slave now, enjoy our next meaningless life
the game has bigger problems with its gameplay changes.
>we want the TLOU and RE remake audience
REmakes 2 and 4 don't have magnetizing and animation snapping that bad, or an iframes button for slides like that. They're just third person shooters.
Why does it look so sterile, tho?
Part of the Silent Hill visual appeal is the grime but the game just looks and SOUNDS sterile as frick.
they didn't show the otherworld yet
The people behind it are mediocre devs who don't get at all what made the original games great. Simple as.
?si=_6CNno_DgyVi3Lfr
Every time!
It makes me so happy knowing lgbt and overall more representation will be added to videogames and you will literally do nothing as you cry and shit your pants in your mothers basement. You are an evil person and your only hobby will be taken away from you. Just end yourself.
do people who talk like this ever have a flicker of self-awareness that they are acting worse than their enemies?
>if you don't think all whites should be exterminated, you are evil
Y'all caused slavery in America
Y'all killed almost all the native americans
Y'all took over Mexicans lands
Y'all caused World Wars 1 and 2
So yeah actually I think you should be killed
Shit bait.
I hope that you can overcome your fear and hatred of white people
>You are an evil person
>Just end yourself.
holy projection.
I fricking hate that sweet baby is working on my favorite game's remake and I have to not buy it on principle.
I agree that DEI is important today, especially when we have so many non white kids who deserve to enjoy games like I did, but some moron bigot c**t who's comftrable with saying all white people should be aborted shoulden't be the one in charge of making that a reality. I got there's a painful history, but she has shot to work through if she wants to lead the effort of making games more inclusive.
Frick the racist, the anti-racists (who are just as bigoted), and frick that b***h running sweet baby games. Frick OP too. In fact, frick Ganker.
Oh thank god. Can't risk a psychological horror game making someone uncomfortable.
>silent hill was always about aborting all white babies and not hiring white people
>it had nothing to do the personal hell created by guilt stemming from sexual frustration and how it gave a broken man the fuel to murder his sick wife
have a nice day you stupid fricking moron. I hope someone beats your moronic ass into a wheelchair. Please PLEASE blow your own fricking brains out. Bigoted motherfricker.
i don't think the silent hill 2 remake is about aborting all white babies and not hiring white people
Sweet baby is you disingenious fricking moron.
Again, please make the world a better place and have a nice day.
What level of schizo is this?
Are you fricking moronic? You don't understand the reason people hate sweet baby is that the CEO said all white people should be killed?
remember, Bloober has always been garbage
WHY THE FRICK YOU LYING?
"remade in the original vision" doesn't mean it's going to be a 1:1 game.
the original game is only 8 hours long.
That's just mouth-speak to ease unrest and scepticism, which didn't matter when they released the latest trailer anyway.
What are the four pics on the left? Which is from which medium?
true, it looks like it would be a comparison but the left and right columns don't have anything in common
I'm not sure what I am looking at. Top right is remake? Top left is same character but, I'm not sure, in the old game? Bottom left is, I think, remake, and bottom right is an actress? I am not sure what the pictures at trying to tell me and how they relate to the text on the right.
still buying it
Massive Upgrade
Massive Upgrade
Sidegrade? Seems to depend on angle.
Upgrade
The new models look ok in this comparison. The women are indeed ugly, but I don't think they were meant to be pretty in the original.
That said, furryBlack person here
is right, nailing the atmosphere is more important than the character models, and it's not looking good.
they just need to reduce her eyebrows
then she'd look fine
Her in game model had pretty thick eyebrows too
imagine the thick pubes and leg hair
Why does Bloober team use a pedophile symbol?
Silent hill is a franchise that is so far down the dumpster I am willing to entertain the thought of anyone but konami trying a hand at it
Is that why they shrunk the nurses breasts?
Homecoming was a different time. A bet-
...nah, it was just a different time.
Poisoning the well. You have no evidenve they wanna frick kids. You just want people complaining that they're pedos with no evidence instead of complaining that they're hiring people who have showed outright bigotry against white people and said they want to see all israelites exterminated.
but ugly people are scary, this might actually work. sweet baby is doing us a favor.
>SILENT HILL 2 RE-RELEASE SUCKS!
>AGAIN!
I'm used to it. Thankfully we get great games developed by actual Silent Hill fans for Silent Hill fans.
Signalis was dogshit that only mentally ill yurigays pretended was any good.
>tard can't into symbolism
Too deep for you.
>Too deep for you.
It's been a while since I've seen someone stupid enough to use this not as a joke to defend surface level symbolism. You remind me of the kind of idiots who think Eva was ever deep.
>even Evangelion was too deep for him
Stick to CoD and harem animes, bro
I now believe you're stupid enough to actually think the dogshit that was signalis was deep.
It's okay bro, not everyone can get something as basic as symbolism in art. Comic books are fun too, I'm sure.
The things you like are painfully shallow and wear all their themes out on their sleeves. You, like a lot of teenagers who just got into anime, thinks some dark visuals and melodrama somehow makes things inherently deeper. You'll grow out of that phase unless you have a learning disability.
I NEED a menage a trois with Elster and Ariane
Good, the more Silent Hill fails, the more Lonami will leave it alone and nor make stupid remake shit.
>Another fricking confirmed demake.
When will it stop?
Whelp frick that game.