How come?

How come /tg/ doesn't discuss boardgames?

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Boardgames have a incredibly short lifespan, literally within a couple of weeks all interest is usually gone and nobody is playing it any more, this makes general discussion impossible.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I dunno.
      We play Zombiecide quite often.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Have you ever searched the catalogue?

    [...]

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      because they're gay
      see

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    There's no lore for secondaries to argue over or constant updates to gossip about

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >constant updates to gossip about
      The trolls in /bgg b***hing and anons taking the bait about spirit island, root , wingspan, kemet, board game geek, scythe, various publishers and designers, says otherwise

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        What's wrong with Spirit Island, Kemet or Scythe?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Hang around and find out what the clowns say

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Personally i think spirit island plays better as a video game. They put an automated version of it up on steam and its much more enjoyable to not have to do any of the maintenance. Cool game still

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >What's wrong with Spirit Island
          It's a shitty, sóy ridden game for shitty, sóy ridden gamers.
          >a-at least the gameplay is good
          "No!" The gameplay is dreadful; the game was terrible. As I played, I noticed that every time a minor power was played, the player did it for the symbols instead of an interesting effect.

          I began marking on the back of an envelope every time a card was played for symbols only. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Reuss' mind is so governed by bland effects and thinly veiled set collection that he has no other style of gameplay. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Spirit Island by the same Kenneth Johnson. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these manchildren are playing Spirit Island at 31 or 32, then when they get older they will go on to play Phase 10." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you play "Spirit Island" you are, in fact, trained to play Phase 10.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Sorry, bro. This is the D&D and 40k containment board.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >bored games
    Answered yourself, op

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Alright, I'll give my thoughts on House. The idea is very enjoyable and the game is for the most part functional for a few rounds. Unfortunately beyond that it becomes boring. Major issues include:
    >An overwhelming number of the haunts share the same mechanics to the point where there's only a few unique ones while the rest are archetypes
    >Haunt balance is a mess that's further compounded by issues due to random exploration phase duration and some players getting screwed over beforehand
    >Most room events are just save or fail so you'll often have at least one player enter a downward spiral
    >Random rooms only being single tiles usually results in boring layouts
    >Combat/rolls are so volatile that most games will end with one side getting fricked by bad rolls rather than strategy
    My group eventually tried to implement some self balancing at the start of a haunt to try and improve the evenness of games. It did help make it more fun though obviously not everyone would like such a solution.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Because 95% of users have never ever played a tabletop game and just come here to armchair lawyer about things they have never played. They don't play pen and paper why would they splurge for a full board game?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      this 100%
      You can easily tell by how many threads are just very very vague "what if" scenarios about hypothetical world settings, parties and characters.
      Anyone who actually plays tgs has at least one group of real friends to talk about this and would only come here for specific info on a particular game (and provide such), not spend hours and hours wasting time speculating what female dwarves might look like in a homebrew setting for no particular system that will never see an actual table ever.
      Thus, these people are incredibly far away from playing a physical board game.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Anyone who actually plays tgs has at least one group of real friends to talk about this
        Not necessarily true. I've been playing for 15 years but my group(s) suck ass at just sitting and shooting the shit with when it comes to general /tg/ topics or hypotheticals or discussions on systemics. Unless it concerns guns.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Unless it concerns guns.
          based

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Unless it concerns guns.
          based

          I had to ban gun talk at my old RPG group because it would intrude on game time.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Really, you think 95 percent of people haven't played a board game ever? You're fricking moronic, man.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Welcome to /tg/.
    The name is misleading because over 90% of the people on this board do not play games. This place consists of people reading rules in pirated PDFs and b***hing about imaginary scenarios they are convinced must happen in every game.
    Board games are unique in that you can straight up tell who has not played them very quickly by their comments, so pirate morons cannot post quasi-believable content about them meaning they are rarely discussed outside their general thread.

    That said, I got close to 200 of them in just about every flavor. What are you looking to discuss?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I just want to talk about cool games like Dominant Species: Marine, Forbidden Desert, Betrayal, Wingspan, Palm Island, Villainous, random wargaming systems or campaigns like Angola. I just want random threads as if it were Ganker like "Tell me /tg/ what did I think about Alien: Fate of the Nostromo" or Unmatched w/e.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >I just want random threads as if it were Ganker like "Tell me /tg/ what did I think about Alien: Fate of the Nostromo" or Unmatched w/e.
        Then make them.
        We have had threads on root and twilight imperium stay up for days with dozens on posters.
        Be the change you want to see in the world.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Because anons in the third world can't afford them lol

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    board games are way too simple compared to rpgs/wargaming. the rules are easy to optimize in your first 2 or 3 games and beyond "lol look how bad my dice were" there's nothing to really talk about. they also don't generate greentexts for redditors to screenshot and gays to narrate on youtube. the game in the OP is a notable exception though, great game.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I like Betrayal, the whole mechanic of building the layout of the house as you go is always a lot of fun

    Also dead of winter is a lot of fun, we only played that a couple times and it was hard as hell

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Spirit Island murdered dead of winter in my playgroup.
      We found the traitor mechanic poorly implemented (traitor winning without even sabotaging or sabotaging with zero chance of recovery due to turn order) and so we switched to pure coop, which was pretty boring even on hard mode.
      SI comes along and btfos our other coop games. Sold DoW soon after that.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >what if Battleship……… BUT RANDOM?
    Half the fun is setting up your ships and getting assmad your opponent guessed them. Why would I give a shit you picked a random card?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Out of curiosity I looked up the rules for this and it legit sounds like fun.
      >You still decide where your ships are in a grid of cards on the table, there's still the mind-game of where they are
      >The different red peg cards are attack strength, and white peg cards to probe locations
      >There are non-peg action cards you can play on your turn instead, like a shield that can grant a revealed ship ablative health
      >When a ship has been found, but before it's destroyed, it has a passive ability (e.g., subs are only hurt by white pegs, 2 health PT boats can remove red peg cards from ships)

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Out of curiosity I looked up the rules for this and it legit sounds like fun.
      >You still decide where your ships are in a grid of cards on the table, there's still the mind-game of where they are
      >The different red peg cards are attack strength, and white peg cards to probe locations
      >There are non-peg action cards you can play on your turn instead, like a shield that can grant a revealed ship ablative health
      >When a ship has been found, but before it's destroyed, it has a passive ability (e.g., subs are only hurt by white pegs, 2 health PT boats can remove red peg cards from ships)

      >>You still decide where your ships are in a grid of cards on the table, there's still the mind-game of where they are
      Wait, no, just realized I misread it: you shuffle it, so you *don't* actually decide where they are. That's less fun, but it still doesn't sound terrible.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *