I hate it when games wank swords when maces are clearly the superior weapon.

I hate it when games wank swords when maces are clearly the superior weapon.

Die For Epstein's Client List Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Die For Epstein's Client List Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    I hate you, stupid anime posting virgin.

  2. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why do you think that when Maces are inferior to Swrod in every single way, except when fighting someone in armour.

    • 3 years ago
      Anonymous

      Because maces:
      >Bypass armor
      >Instantly break bones
      >Easy to use
      >Can put some spikes on them if you want to pierce better
      >Cool aesthetics
      >If you're transported to the stone age you can transfer your knowledge to club skills

      • 3 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Bypass armor
        A mace doesn't bypass armour. It just does more than a sword against it
        >Instantly break bones
        An equal swing with a sword would chop the entire arm off (if wearing armour a mace wouldn't break your bones so easily)
        >Easy to use
        Sure. But it's also a lot slower to strike with than a sword, and has less reach in general.
        >Cool aesthetics
        Not as cool as swords

        • 3 years ago
          Anonymous

          arm-chopping is anime shit. also, how is a mace slower than a sword?

          • 3 years ago
            Anonymous

            >arm-chopping is anime shit
            Not it isn't. A sharp sword you lop off your arm real easy with a good swing
            >how is a mace slower than a sword?
            All the mass of it is on the end of the stick. Grab a hammer by the handle and swing it around
            Then grab the hammer head and swing it. Way faster

        • 3 years ago
          Anonymous

          The idea people have about maces being blunt is mostly wrong. In the late medieval when everyone was wearing heavy armour, the maces are like pick-axes where they can puncture through the armour.

  3. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    The real bullshit is spears not getting any attention. A spear will always win in a sword vs spear fight.

    • 3 years ago
      Anonymous

      lol no

      • 3 years ago
        Anonymous

        Yes it will. The majority of weapons used by soldiers throughout history have been polearms rather than swords. A lot of that was due to the cost of producing weapons, but if swords had offered some radical advantage they would have been used instead.

        • 3 years ago
          Anonymous

          >A lot of that was due to the cost of producing weapons
          If by "a lot" you mean "all" then you might be right.

        • 3 years ago
          Anonymous

          in formation yes, not one on one

        • 3 years ago
          Anonymous

          Romans used swords and mogged a bunch of spear using armies from gallia to greece

  4. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    I agree. It sucks that the best weapon is always a long sword.

  5. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    lmao dumb homosexual
    mace and swords are both mogged by the CHADberd

    • 3 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Enemy holds it still with one arm and bypasses its effective range, stabbing you while you're helpless
      WOOOOOOOW, HOW WAS I SUPPOSED TO KNOW?

      • 3 years ago
        Anonymous

        >trying stop a two-handed thrust with one arm
        enjoy being knocked to the ground and immediately dying moron

      • 3 years ago
        Anonymous

        the only part you'll touch is the steel moving at a very face pace, if you try to grab the pole you have already moved into the swing and you are fricked. seriously try this and you are dead.

    • 3 years ago
      Anonymous

      the problem with the halberd sufficiently injuring someone with a slash takes a lot of strength, and stabbing someone predicates the downtime of dislodging the weapon. halberds or spears are probably best for one-on-one or if your group outnumbers the other.

      • 3 years ago
        Anonymous

        >a lot of strength required to inflict deadly injure on someone with sharp axe head on the end of a pole

      • 3 years ago
        Anonymous

        I can understand thinking this if you've never actually held one. Really long swords and pole weapons aren't super heavy, and are typically well balanced so it's not like swinging a sledgehammer.

    • 3 years ago
      Anonymous

      >jack of all trades
      >chad
      >mogging anything

  6. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Amored enemy
    Hammer
    >Unarmored enemy
    Hammer

  7. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    >*have the real fight while meleetards wave sticks at each other*

  8. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    I only remember that the anime shows the nipples of 2 e-girls and that some anons got mad about the main girl (the one in OPs pic) getting raped in the novel

  9. 3 years ago
    Anonymous

    Stop being homosexuals, put those puny tools away and fistfight

    • 3 years ago
      Anonymous

      fist fighting is for idiots.

      • 3 years ago
        Anonymous

        Arguing which weapon is better is for idiots

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *