>if you kill him you'll be just like him
why are people like this?
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
>if you kill him you'll be just like him
>if you kill him you'll be just like him
why are people like this?
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
|
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
I do not remember any games or stories where this happens
Last of Us 2
The Last Of Us 2 doesn't actually do that. It's 2 people mutually agreeing that they've done enough damage and revenge on each other.
The newest Tales Of game
This one was one of the worst offender since the party NEEDED to kill that b***h anyway.
>party is on a quest to kill all the lords and have already killed 2
>Introduce a new lord who just killed over 100 civilians in front of the party
>party member who already wanted her dead due to her past crimes tries to kill her
>another party member literally runs to block the spell from hitting the villain
>NOOOOO YOU CAN'T KILL THE PERSON THAT KILLED YOUR PARENTS AND WIPED OUT YOUR ENTIRE CLAN IN THE PAST YOU'LL BE JUST LIKE HER
>villain escapes
>OK NOW LETS GO FIND HER AND KILL HER
>find her after slaughtering her henchmen
>previous party member has a change of heart
>IF I KILL YOU I'LL BE JUST LIKE YOU
>party lets her go AGAIN
>bigger and badder villain immediately appears to kill her anyway
How about Infamous, does that count?
Which part of infamous? I could have sworn both the beast and kessler die in both endings of both games
Which one? Pretty sure Cole kills the actual bad guys, he only optionally spares thugs and mooks if he's Good which is the exact opposite of this moronic trope ("kill everyone but spare the leader")
spileter cell
persona 5
uncharted 2
undertale
Eh, other than flowey fricking with you, killing is treated as self defense unless you're genociding the monsters.
aren't greed and envy the same sin
>I want more shit I don't need
vs.
>Why do they get to have things I don't have!?
I think of the sins as reasons people surrender their self-control over to nature. It's not that you're doing something, it's why you're doing it so there's the physical act and the true act which is both intention and action.
The seven virtues work the same way to where you can commit good acts but what really matters is that they are genuine in that you are doing them for their own sake when necessary.
Read Nietzsche, and stop mystyfying psychological phenomenons which have a history as to how they came to be.
By the very merit of evolution, history, hereditarity, culture, social engineering and propaganda, every universally known or aknowledged concept has a history of causes and effects behind it. It evolved over time.
This is true for both personal and mass psychology, or psychology and sociology, as we like to differentiate and intertwine them depending on the subject matter.
If you like chewing gum, asking yourself "Why do I like chewing gum?" will only give you a partial, subjective answer.
terrible advice , nietzsche was a israelite catching syphillis takeing cocaine and haveing mommy issues relateing everything to sex.
never read anything israelites write.
>author with a know beef with JUDEO-chistian values
>some random clueless moron calls him a israelite in the internet
Sup jidf, still using the trick of calling every perceived enemy of yours a israelite?
What I said is basically how you could separate actions from what they mean and derive categories from that.
If someone rapes animals how do we separate that action from someone that saves animals from rapists without basing our ideas on what other people think because they both could be compatible with a society where those are both neutral or okay actions.
It also separates good actions done in private from ones that are filmed and shown to as many people as possible.
greed desires to have stuff
envy doesnt care, just hates others for having shit, will probably pull a "if i cant have it, then nobody will"
Greed
>i want more stuff
Envy
>i want what my neighbor has
If anything gluttony is closer to greed
Only Justin Treadeu said this.
He actually never did.
>kill a killer
>you become a miller yourself
woooow
>if you kill a miller the number of millers stays exactly the same if you take over his mill
What did batman mean by this?
You do realize in your image isn't don't kill him because you will be like him and is don't kill him out of emotion because you are going to lead a country
Morals. It's fricking moronic.
>people say this shit
>after the same people help you murder lots of mooks and lieutenants doing their job
I hate this hypocritical shit.
People who is ignorant about the just war theory.
Yes.
>says he'll kill the evil bigbad
>~~*subconsciously*~~ actually holds back 98% of his power and doesnt kill
>thousands die
>still holds back
>millions dies
>"ok I'll actually kill now"
>still holds back
>world dies
>"ok now really mean it"
>everything is evil in one's eye and everything is good in another's
Godfrickigdamnit
It's dumb concept. The Last of Us 2 made me realize that there are people that just need to be killed.
Name a time in your life where you have both taken revenge on someone AND it fixed something other than momentarily making you feel better
It's not about that. For every action an opposite and equal reaction. You wrong me and I'm going to wrong you. That is the natural order of things.
>completely missed the point
fricking moron, the others offered to kill Envy for Mustang, it wasn't about sparing him, it was about not letting your emotions take over if you want to be a ruler
But anon, this is literally the only good implementation of that plot point since they literally emphasize that the FMA world goes through cycles of violence inspired by previous acts of revenge. Envy getting killed would've made mustang harsher and more prone to violence
Blame comics. They needed to come up with an excuse to let the villains live so that the can reuse them.
Also, leftism. Rugged individualism is their biggest enemy, and that especially includes people killing criminals in self-defense.
because they are Batman