In Hitman 3, 47 battles a shadowy organization that controls the world from behind the scenes.
Its member families control the banks, media, shipping, and other markets. Their surnames?
> Stuyvesant
> Ingram
> Carlisle
Why was IOI afraid to put down more realistic surnames?
![]() |
![]() Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
![]() |
/misc/ was a mistake and op has never gotten pussy
I just meant the biggest banks are owned by China, Irish and American, what did you think I meant?
white people are socially acceptable targets
they can be the butt of any joke and can be killed in media products with no backlash
There's no bigger joke than the indian bollywood target. Also the only two main black targets are in the same mission and are intensely boring and thankfully not common, we don't need more blacks.
keep crying, tumblr rejects
Shalom
You're not allowed to name the leprechauns running the show
>You're going to Japan for this next mission, 47. Your target... Erich Soders.
>Welcome to Morocco, 47. Your target for this mission... Claus Hugo Strandberg.
>Your next target in Bangkok is... Ken Morgan.
>who is Yuki Yamazaki
>japan also has Yuki Yamazaki
>morocco also has Reza Zaydan
>bangkok's luxury hotel being owned by notRichard Branson and used by his son is perfectly in keeping with expectation
You kill a Morrocan General in Morroco.
Not canon.
The only one that counts is Contracts.
47 appreciates being alive. He does what he's good at.
No story but missions. Targets are bad. But so is everyone.
It's realistic in that they change their surnames.
the first person you need to kill in the trilogy is israeli
Black person the entire trilogy is about the illuminati and all those characters are referenced way back at the beginning, you would know this if you played it.
Not like the story matters though, I really don't like the whole vigilante shithead vibe they got going, 47 works much better as morally ambiguous.
We set up /misc/ as a containment board for shit like this.
>we
You've never done anything in your life. You are just a spectator.
Why do you get so upset when you’re exposed? It’s not like everyone doesn’t know what you’re up to
You need to set up Palestine israelite
to be fair, you do get to kill two Mossad agents.
Diarrhea Mongolis is a Mossad agent? What dialogue did I miss?
It's in her bio before you start the mission.
WHAT? I never even knew they HAD bios you could read. Now I gotta go back. Do they have that for elusive targets & side missions too?
Is that the only time her Mossad connections are mentioned?
Yet another excuse to play more SHITMAN.
>Do they have that for elusive targets & side missions too?
Yes
>Is that the only time her Mossad connections are mentioned?
Sort of, if you meet her at the auction as Tobias Rieper she'll go off and make a phonecall to Ezra Berg to try and ID you because she thinks it's not a real name.
>head of massive spy ring, information broker
>but doesn't notice when you disguise as the guys she personally knows
They kinda did her dirty, how the mission is setup just makes her a stupid jobber. Her being holed up in the top floor means you'll just miss most of her dialogue since you'll just want to kill her and get the frick out, unlike Viktor who has a lot more screentime.
Every pair of targets has the same problem in WoA 1 now that I think about it, one is clearly the star while the other feels like an afterthought. It's much better balanced later.
Yeah, it's pretty clear on most levels that one of the targets is an afterthought that got hastily stuck in to give you some variation. Ken Morgan and Francesca De Santis are probably the worst for this.
Never really got that impression with Dalia, though - she might be stuck out of the way, but the story of Dalia and Viktor really relies on them as a pairing.
Bald Elige anon here. Aside from not knowing bios existed (WOW I MISSED A LOT OF LORE) I think this is why.
It's actually really easy to miss Diarrhea Mongolis' dialogue in the mission unless you play it specifically to listen.
I found starting in the IAGO action allows you to follow and hear what she has to say much easier.
Yeah, you just click on their faces in the pre mission briefing bit. I'm pretty sure even elusive targets get pretty lengthy bios.
I think the Mossad stuff might actually be mentioned elsewhere too. If I remember right, one of the models who works for her mentions that she came up with the idea to use models as spies while she was in Mossad. Might be wrong though.
>If I remember right, one of the models who works for her mentions that she came up with the idea to use models as spies while she was in Mossad
Might be both, but it's also mission intel you get from overhearing Helmut phonecall
It's the usual "international council of evil rich people". It's how conspiracy fiction usually does it. Coding them ethnically would be in bad taste.
She's also pretty clearly based on Ghislaine Maxwell.
Shitman 2016 was released before the Epstein incident anon.
The dealings of the Maxwell family were well known in conspiracy circles well before any of that happened. Robert Maxwell's crimes were well known in the 70s/80s, but it's more of a British thing so it's not too surprising other countries aren't as aware. IOI have lifted a ton of stuff from airport-lit level spy stuff and real world conspiracy. A number of plots and ideas in WoA trilogy are pretty much lifted straight from episodes of Spooks.
People knew that Epstein and Maxwell were running a human trafficking ring since the early 00's.
She's the daughter of a mossad general and worked as an agent performing honeypot traps on people for mossad during her supermodel career. That's where she got the idea for her Sanguine/Iago, and married Novikov to get the cash to start it up.
How did you miss that it's like half the story there. She was trained as a sexy spy.
Happens all the time IRL too..
https://search.brave.com/search?q=eric%20swalwell%20chinese%20spy
>Ayy that Miss Margolis
Imagine the face of this guy once he realises half the targets in Blood Money are white supremacists.
>Half
I can think of maybe 1 to 3 tops depending on how you interpret character motivations
Or are you counting the whole riverboat gang in your consideration?
Only one that counts is the saffer in A House of Cards. The gator gang are probably racist since they're hillbillies from mississippi but unlikely to be "white supremacist". It never really comes up in their case.
Because naming the israelites would cut their funding and destroy there lives too.
Better to just rip off their fans with DLC confusion and run.
There was a whole thing about Blood Money back in the day where there are references to Epstein throughout the game. I don't remember much of it but I do remember thinking it was strangely plausible when I read through all the bullshit. This reminds me of that, maybe the devs are trying to expose stuff, or simply, more revelation of the method.
Epstein was in operation for over 30 years and for 30 years everyone called it a conspiracy theory. But there were millions of people who investigated and knew exactly what was happening. As a company they also simply researched into this topic for the game.
post the references
Man the story in H3 is a big downgrade from the previous two games. The levels are great thought especially the old mansion is awesome. But I mean The Constant couldn't catch them for the entire fricking game and then he magically can all of a sudden? That shit made no sense.
This board is so fricking shit
Calm down rabbi.