It's time to admit "insert pokemon doesn't look like it lives in the wild" Is a dumb statement

It's time to admit "insert pokemon doesn't look like it lives in the wild" Is a dumb statement

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    it's only an argument used by redditors when they're desperate to b***h about starters while they simultaneously call sinnoh the peak when 50% of the game is just random encounters of lizard men wearing wrestling belts

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Not sound like a butthole but I think the whole starter argument is forced same points same corny jokes same outcome

  2. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    ^mindbroken

  3. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's not a dumb statement, because it goes counter to the original philosophy of the franchise.
    Pokemon were designed with the line of logic "how does this thing exist/live"
    Now, there are surely cases where idiots will make a claim like that and be moronic about it.
    Like Genesect here. Of course it doesn't look like it lives in the wild. It doesn't, it's at least partially man-made.
    Most normal Pokemon though are supposed to live in the wild, and that's when you start to need to look at these things.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Touchè for the most part

  4. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Could this exist in the wild?

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      How about this?

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        And this?

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          This is a Pokemon that is the result of holding a man-made item while being traded (a man-made electronic process).

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      How about this?

      And this?

      yes

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes

      How about this?

      Yes that just skin and the belt is scavenge for

      And this?

      Yes from pokehell

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >fairy creature
      Yes

      How about this?

      >Humans in costumes
      No

      And this?

      >Weird rock monster
      Yes

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      In france

      How about this?

      These are tiger schuulmans

      And this?

      Its just rhydon with more rocks

  5. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >"I-It's not realistic!"
    Nothing about a fantasy world filled with fantasy creatures should be realistic your boringgay c**t!

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Agreed someone need to jug their imaginations

  6. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    This feels like a dumb thing to argue when whoever wins your argument won't change the fact that unrealistic things just look worse to everyone.

    so whether it makes sense or not is irreleveant

  7. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Pokemongays when the fantasy creature is unrealistic VS other monster games fans when the fantasy creature is unrealistic

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Oh monster hunter is a GOD AWFUL example of your arguement since the devs go out of their way to make sure to explain why they work in the wild and even how they behave in it. You could have pick literally ANY other game and it'd help.

  8. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's a stupid complaint because every Pokemon is conceived with an idea of how it lives in the wild.
    They literally do not approve of designs if they can't explain how the Pokemon lives or eats.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      This some people refuse to read and would rather make half baked assumptions or repeat other's opinions

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      way too many people have the headcanon that the pokedex is bullshit at this point

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *