>matchmaking keeps setting you against scrubs you've beaten time and time again

>matchmaking keeps setting you against scrubs you've beaten time and time again
>quit the match and refuse to play until you get new opponents

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Ganker is my news source.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    How far up his own ass is this boy?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I agree with that statement. He's already rich so if he doesn't actually like playing World Championship matches he shouldn't have to.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >#1 STD. Rank
      My dude has jungle fever.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I would be up my own ass to if I was one of the greatest chess player to ever exist.

      On a sidenote, it's funny I recently began thinking about chess and have been seeing more and more related stuff on Ganker. I still need improve more at fighting games and especially RTS, though. Then I think I'll learn about chess and tetris. I've become increasingly fascinated by the competitive scene of these games for some reason.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You'll never be amazing at chess if you didnt start young and had an affinity for it.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Not amazing, just competent and to be able to understand what exactly is going on when I watch a match. If I get even above average skill in 3 other completely different competitive games like I did with FGs in a couple of years time, I'll be more than satisfied.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          This isn't a bullshit post. There's a critical period for getting patterns down like the pros and your brain no longer has the elasticity to make all the memorization required second nature.
          You can still be a terror on the chessboard don't get me wrong, but you're very highly unlikely to get to SGM level

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      He has been dominating since he was a little boy. When you are that undeniably skilled at something you can afford to have an ego.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        As a chess player anon.
        That's not something that's translatable into ..anything?
        It's not like he's good at esports, RTS games with his superior tactics and memorisation.
        It's not like he's won medals at the olympics representing his country.

        He's good at chess, the best in fact.
        But that's all he's the best at and it's like a "wow that's cool" kind of achievement, it's not like you can playfully offer a match.
        A chess player isn't going to be rolling down red carpets and attending premiers are they?

        He's reached the highest point of the only mountain he knows how to climb amazingly well.
        But it's not like he can jump to another moutain is it?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          this sounds like jealousy

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It sounds like you are projecting your aspirations onto him. I haven't kept up with professional chess for awhile and honestly never really followed it that closely to begin with but so many chess players aren't looking for fame. Maybe recognition but probably not red carpets.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I have no aspirations when it comes to chess anon, like I have no aspirations for most things that I see no reason to do; same as everyone else.
            Chess players aren't meant to be globally recognised in honesty, but then again neither are actors. Sadly, recognistion is literally an actors resume; not with chess players. There's no need or reason for a chess player to have an ego about how good they are at chess.

            this sounds like jealousy

            Easy to say that isn't it?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >There's no need or reason for a chess player to have an ego about how good they are at chess
              Maybe not for you. You haven't dedicated your life to it. It is recognition of your hard work and skill. Not sure what makes you say chess players aren't supposed to be recognized globally either. It sounds like you just have a low opinion of it. Maybe not low but certainly not high. People excel in many different fields. When you are the very best at something I would say you deserve global recognition.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >Chess players aren't meant to be globally recognised in honesty
              This is true but not for the reasons you understand however. Chess had a warranted reputation as an intellectual game hundred years in the past because you had to invest both genuine talent and insurmountable amount of theoretical study to actually be competent at it.
              Since the period of cold war, the chess as a game is standing on the shoulders of giants. Entire teams coaching national competitors, libraries worth of books on theory and now computer engines. Chess, at least classical chess, has turned into a game emphasizing preparation and memorization rather than improvisation and Fischer accurately pointed out all the problems with it more than 30 years ago.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      he's probably the most unpretentious high-level chess player around tbh

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    he's been strong armed by the israelites into giving up the title so that one of their israelite boys can get it instead
    you hate to see it happen
    he probably refuse to participate in a fixed match

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >matchmaking puts you on the other side of the world

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *