Nintendo Switch to another hardware immediately
https://x.com/gameriotarmy/status/1730220672108892351?s=46&t=V0Y9Pnoo38LPvCm2jflrAQ
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Nintendo Switch to another hardware immediately
Nintendo Switch to another hardware immediately
https://x.com/gameriotarmy/status/1730220672108892351?s=46&t=V0Y9Pnoo38LPvCm2jflrAQ
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
|
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Ayo what this ohio ass twitter? Y'all mean X?
SEND THIS GOON TO THE SKIBIDI TOILET AND HAVE HIS RIZZ CONFISCATED IMMEDIATELY!
almost but its ahh not ass not
I still can't get over how stupid X.com sounds.
4troon isn't culturally productive and is downstream from X.
I cannot reasonably believe that someone made this image expecting it to be read in full.
Why would try and express a concept like this when you're clearly an ESL. This shit is complete nonsense.
This is just "Death of a hobby" comic except much less readable
anyone with a switch isn't dumb enough to think arkham knight would operate well on it
You'd be surprised
Looks like it runs a lot better than it did on PC at launch.
>uh uhhhhh it ran like shit on pc until they patched it!!
this isn't the win you think it is sis
snoy homosexual
didn't realize sony makes pcs now
That's not really saying much
im trans btw
Ok white boy
Lazy port that devs didn't bother to optimize
That's 99% of Switch ports.
and PS5 ports
Many games drop to 15 FPS or so on Switch. A bad PS5 port can reach mid 20s but they're much rarer. But it's comparing a device weaker than mobile phones to a mediocre midrange PC from 2 years ago.
>Many games drop to 15 FPS or so on Switch
they do? like what?
Just recently? This, the MGS collection, Fate/Samurai Remnant, and MK1.
Maybe is because I don't have a point of comparison (haven't played the Arkham games) but is this supposed to be unplayable?
This is why you only get nintendo for their first party and nothing else.
Maybe one day we will get to a point in technology where even when Nintendo holds their hardware back we can still get good quality running frames and resolution stuff.
The old reptilian japanese dinosaurs in suits are slow to adapt to everything.
>This is why you only get nintendo for their first party and nothing else.
90% of my Switch library is third-party, although primarily Japanese and indies. Rarely had any problem.
Batman Arkham Asylum and City are apparently good enough on Switch, the problem lies with Knight but I also recall the game itself was met with mixed opinions.
Shut up loser
You play games in 30 fps 720p
Opinion discarded
I care about games being entertaining to play firstmost, regardless I play them on Switch or Steam Deck second.
Even the base PS4 could struggle on games such as EDF5 where late-end missions ran at a single digit under all the spider bukkake and air bombardments
No I don't
You sound stupid and clearly make poor decisions
Witcher 3 was great
When I got Knight on the PC it ran so fricking bad that they offered refunds even if you played it long enough. I would never buy it for the fricking switch and I own one. Looks like the Knight devs didn't fricking learn.
aren't these 360/ps3 games? switch is twice as powerful as those systems and has multiple times the memory. why are devs so incompetent nowadays?
isn't arkham knigh ps4? I could understand that one running like shit but asylum and city running bad is another story since those are ps3 games.
asylum and city are 360/ps3, but knight which is the one with the biggest performance issues on Switch is xbox one/ps4
>switch is twice as powerful as ps3/360
come the frick on, you don’t seriously believe this do you? It is MAYBE comparable to those two consoles in power but not even close to twice the power. But honestly, I would still expect the switch to be weaker than either of those.
>But honestly, I would still expect the switch to be weaker than either of those.
Then you are moronic.
He's right, otherwise how do you explain the entire crysis trilogy running and looking better on switch. Remember, a 1440x900p resolution is higher than a 1152x720 resolution.
The Switch has a weaker GPU than the PS3/360 while undocked but the GPU is better than those old consoles while docked. The GPU isn't twice as strong while docked but the Switch has more RAM. The RAM makes a gigantic fricking difference so it ends up being stronger. It can run PS3/360 games, the issue is those games get remastered for devices stronger than the Switch and it gets fricked over from that. The PS4/PS5 is often the baseline, it's the main platform that developers target first and then everything is either upgraded or downgraded from there. Whatever console is the leader ends up being the baseline like that, the 360 was the baseline during its generation. A game aimed at a Switch/PC only release would most likely have the Switch as the main platform, PC is usually the afterthought with some exceptions like BG3 and Cyberpunk 2077.
tendies are already accustomed to silky smooth 24 fps, a few stutterings here and there won't bother them
This is fricking embarrassing. Mortal Kombat and now this.
Switch 2 when?
>woooooow PS5 looks better than mobile hardware from 2002
still embarrassing
Right looks better. Left is muddy and blurry
https://www.nintendolife.com/news/2018/10/indie_dev_says_switch_is_easiest_console_to_work_with_nintendo_has_done_a_complete_180
>/indie_dev_says
so nobody
Read the article, he means support from Nintendo, not the hardware.
You mean a console that came out 3 years after the switch looks better. I would hope it achieved that however the PS5 version's of batman looks like he is soaked in Vaseline so the switches batman looks slightly better outside 1-2 odd textures they could have easily fixed if they was not lazy.
Switch fanboys will never accept that the hardware is garbage if this is isn’t “unplayable” idk what is
Ah yes another Twitter thread
>Gankerpass
I can see the argument for porting Asylum and City, since those were originally PS3/360 games. That being said, Arkham Knight running like shit was a given from the start.
how does city run? is the only one I care
According to the guy in OP's picture:
>So Arkham Knight I would stay away from (as least until its patched)
>Arkham Asylum is pretty solid. But still not ideal. FPS drops in combat
>Arkham City is actually pretty good and would recommend picking it up 🙂
thats nice for city, considering it got a wii u port it's not surprising that is the one that runs the best.
If what the twitter guys says is true. How in the absolute frick did arkham asylum get FPS drops in combat when arkham city, which is much more heavy on the PS3/360 managed to run better on the switch?
More well coded to begin with maybe
>Arkham Knight port is dogshit and doesnt work
Amazing. I have flashbacks to how PC port was lol
How do you even sell a product like this jesus christ
>arkham knight
i remember this game performance are really bad on my r9 380x it dip like 20fps at 1080p, that was back in 2016.
it's a miracle the switch can even just launch Knight
>Nintendo Switch to another hardware immediately
Try again, Rajesh
They really should have waited for the New Switch 2 for Arkham Knight.
It looks like it was tweaked and downgraded like those videos showing modern games running on ancient hardware and still runs bad.
60 bucks for getting a free migrane from the jumpy inconsistent framerate.
Like MK1 skipping 8th gen but coming to Switch, I can only hope the plan is to dump it for idiots then patch it for Switch 2 to be playable.
They want the money from 140 million people
Holy kek reminds me of the footage of all the hispanics in steam reviews trying to run this game with a DDR3 GT 1030.
Soul
at least they released it for Christmas
sad to think some poor kid will get this trash for Christmas. hopefully he doesn’t murder his parents in their sleep
Why does the batmobile sound like an RC car?
I get that Knight is a downgrade but what about Asylum and City, those 2 can actually make the collection worth buying but only if they run a d look good
Speaking of the Bamham games, why is Arkham Knight playable on the Steam Deck but City, Origins, and Asylum aren't? Same with Dark Souls 3 and Sekiro being playable but Dark Souls and Dark Souls 2 aren't.
It seems so random why certain games in a series are playable and others aren't.
It doesn't seem random in the slightest bit.
Valve's big Linux push was in 2013.
Old games are expected to just werk because of how efficient Proton has gotten, so Valve focuses on the newer stuff for manual verification. All those games are playable.
What are you talking about, all those games work on the deck.
do nintendies really?
>x.com
ain't clicking xcom
Instead of posting twitter screncap bullshit how about you just post a fricking webm? Cancerous piece of shit go the frick back.
THE ABSOLUTE STATE
maybe I just played a lot of games from the 90s and 2000s, but this looks fine to me
Looks fine to me?
That shit is, let's say, still somewhat playable. Look at this shit
A fricking 1 second freeze in the middle of "action", it's incredible how anyone could deem this to be acceptable
>those comments that think it runs fine
Tendies will have their minds blown if nintendo ever releases a console that isn‘t 2 generations behind in terms of specs
>the frames randomly taking 133ms
lmfao this is so bad. I feel for the devs who were forced to work with this ancient hardware and perform a miracle
Perfectly playable to me, I'm old I can take shit framerates.
Multiplayer perfect dark is around my limit, this is smooth as frick compared to that.
This freezing and stuttering was on the PC version too.
It's a texture streaming issue, modders fixed it, why can't the devs?
>on the PC version too.
Rocksteady patched it, not modders.
>Rocksteady patched it
Bullshit, it's still not possible to maintain a solid 60 fps without it dropping especially when using the batmobile.
Modders fixed the actual issue as usual.
>Even after a row of update patches, the game did not run quite decently on many mid-range PCs, with players reporting frame pacing and major stuttering issues. However, if you're still playing the game (or are looking to revisit the franchise) and want to smooth out your experience, here is a fan-made fix that you'll want to check out.
>The fix comes from a modder that goes by the name SherielFarouk, who has managed to fix the texture streaming system that was responsible for causing stuttering in the game. Although I am not a coding expert, the modder also creating something that's called a texture pool on top of D3D11, which allows textures to be reused (I have no idea what that means).
>Here is what SherielFarouk had to say about the fix. "I grabbed the source for ReShade (to use the API hooking/interception) and implemented a texture pool on top of D3D11, so the game remains unaware it exists yet gets the performance benefits from the texture reuse," the modder said. "It seemed to fix the issue for me and now I get a mostly locked 60 FPS game, so here's hoping it works for other people."
>Bullshit, it's still not possible to maintain a solid 60 fps without it dropping especially when using the batmobile.
Anon...I run Knight on a solid 90fps
>the game did not run quite decently on many mid-range PCs
So people with toasters from 2015. Stop being poor.
>Anon...I run Knight on a solid 90fps
No, you don't.
I don't care about the framerate, but why is there so much garbage on the screen?
Arkham Knight is a gorgeous looking game, even now, on PC at least.
The resolution on the Switch is so low, the textures are so paired back, and the crazy amount of aliasing makes it look like a visual mess.
Sad as it is to say, still runs better than it does on my PC.
this is bad??? fricking botw and totk run worse and look 999999x worse
shits on BoTW in terms of visual density and runs about the same.
Nintendies are just braindead manchildren who will slurp anything. Its not the devs fault Nintendo uses 1990s hardware.
Looks like a Switch game alright.
I've played through this game like 5 times and yeah this is, at least to me and what I'm used to, unplayable. The frame rate, draw distance and textures are too poor.
IS THAT....29 FRAMES PER SECOND??
AAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA SAVE ME Black person MAN
any game on Switch is unplayable
>nth "lazy porting of an old game, but let's blame the Fischer-Price tablet for its faults" thread
>nth "lazy porting of an old game, but let's blame the Fischer-Price tablet for its faults" thread
Honestly, I didn't mind the Switch being weak because it is mobile ARM hardware made in 2015 and launched in 2017. For what we got back then, it was just great to be able to run games even the Vita would shit itself on like Borderlands 2.
However it has been 6 years and 8 months and no new console or even pro version. You need a lot of optimization to put modernish games on it and that often just means lower res, blurring, quality drops and long load time.
Year 4 or 5 is when they should have released a successor we are now rapidly approaching year 7 and there is no device or date. It doesn't really bother me personally because I mostly play 2D games at 60fps and have a Deck for heavier stuff but still... it's overdue.
BESPOKE 30 FPS (with drops)
>bamham knight was notorious for having absolute shit performance even on top of the line PCs at the time
>put it on a console that's like half a generation behind even that in terms of hardware
>runs like shit
Wow that's crazy
>arkham knight needed a year for a patch to make it actually playable on pc
yeah, in 2015, that was 7 fricking years ago
What's wrong with you homosexuals? Switch is much weaker than PS4
It's already a miracle that this game runs on a 2015 tablet
yeah cool, hey dont sell a barely functional piece of software for 60 dollars, noone is impressed
Don't buy it? People who are fine with how it runs will get it and enjoy it.
>dont buy it
I wont, and I will continue shitting on you for being a skeezy israelite
You should also stop projecting
>early 00s graphics
>lags
Do consolets really?
Calm down vegan
I dont get it, what is the problem? Looks more like the moron is bad at playing the game.
you consoleBlack folk are absolutely hopeless
Witcher 3,Alien Isolation,Hellblade,Divinity original sin 2, Doome eternal,Ni no kuni 2,Nier Automata etc all ran fairly well on the Switch maybe the devs are incompetent?
doom eternal on switch looks like its failed to load the proper textures, its like youre running around the inside of a colon
Nier and Ni No Kuni aren't exactly graphically intense games.
Witcher 3 and doom eternal look terrible on switch. Nier automata has horrendous input lag. Can‘t say anything about the others
I just found out if you play Arkham Knight unpatched on a PS5 you get 60fps but if you update you get 30 what's that about?
Its over nintensissies your tablet is worse thabn the pii u and ps3
Buy a deck
>trilogy
But there's only 2 batman arkham games?
>have to butcher modern games so they can work on hardware from 2 generations ago
Seriously why do they do this? Wouldn't people only play their bing bing wahoo games on Switch and if they wanted to play something more intensive go Xbox / PS5 / PC?
My guess is that Nintendo was the one who funded the ports (Like what did with Arkham games on Wii U) The game was supposed to come out in 2021 or so to help market the OLED model when it was new but the game was stuck in development hell trying to figure out how to make it playable on Switch. What we see is the best result they can do with the hardware and now they have to release it to make the profit back
Lol this is a 10 yr old game. Nintentiddlers all get the rope. Gay ass Mario and Zelda shit. My gf was memed into buying a switch and animal Crossing during the pandemic cause of twitter shill campaign and she said it was the gayest thing she ever played. frick nintendo
Or I could just not buy shitty western and westaboo games.
Like I already amn't.
Nier Automata and Doom Eternal play great on Switch. I'm hoping Knight gets a patch to stabilise the framerate for the Batmobile sections as I have been looking forward to playing this.
Why play a multiplat on switch
>Why play a multiplat on switch
Usually it's because they're casuals who only have one game system and own 10 games or they like handhelds, bought a Switch years ago and don't want to blow $400+ Steam on a Deck instead of $30 on a game and play it at 30fps.
Personally I still get lightweight games on the Switch Lite because unlike my Deck I actually take it places beyond the nightstand.
I'm honestly inclined to blame both the Switch/Nintendo AND the devs here.
>the Switch has shown its difficulties for third-party devs more and more with every year, they REALLY need new hardware ASAP because it IS a chore to expect third-parties to put up with architecture roughly on the power equivalent of nearly TWENTY-year-old systems; hell, even Nintendo's own studios are hitting a wall with its power I'm not counting Game Freak here either, they've been hopeless morons from the start
>however, the Switch has also been in dev hands for seven fricking years now and these are not remotely new or particularly technically intense PS4/Xbone games to begin with; they had a WEALTH of time to familiarize themselves with the platform
Maybe Arkham Shart should cut back on the graphics. My favorite indies run well on the Switch, what's their excuse?
>b-but they're pixelshit
And how is that my problem? graphics don't matter.
nice b8 m8
It's not bait. They're right.
There is not and has never been such a thing as a game that cannot be on a platform, only a dev too lazy to make a platform specific version of a game like the did 30 years ago but don't do now because it's easier to slap the same garbage on everything.
Even indies don‘t run well on switch these days
I have the Arkham Trilogy coming in the mail tomorrow and I'm super excited to play them on my Switch
I checked, yeah the cartridge only contains Arkham Asylum. The other games are downloadable, Arkham City is 11gb, Arkham Knight is 27gb
What's the point of owning physical games anymore?
As long as they're not code in a box having to download data is ok, pretty much no game is day one complete 0 patches ever nowadays.
it will sell more than the original release did
all that would prove is there’s a lot of idiots with a switch
exactly
The switch audience would have to be absolutely pants on head moronic for that to happen, so maybe.
>Nintendo Switch to another hardware immediately
Is this ESL or a 'Pokemon GO-to-the-polls' level of joke?
It's hilarious to me that the switch struggles this hard to run games older than it is. Games that had to be specifically neutered just to try and get it to run on that hardware. And they're asking $60 for only 3 decade old games when humble just had a deal on pc that was practically giving all 4 of the batman games and a bunch of other big wb games away.
Normalgays I can understand, they're clueless, but why anyone here has stuck with the switch is beyond me.
The original 2 came out on the 360 and PS3 they can't be any worse on the switch, Arkham Knight would be the problem game.
jesus christ an entire 1 second spike
Why can't Nintendo just make a regular console?
Doesn't even look that bad or unplayable, and I if you want to talk unplayable. I played this shit at launch on PC.