Ok?

Ok Ganker put your hand in front of you and wave it around. What do you see ? 240+fps ? Frick no you don't, it's more like 60-90 fps at most. So remind me again why you drop $2k on a gaming pc when most of the fps are never seen by anyone ? No I'm not going fricking away

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >it's more like 60-90 fps at most.

    Maybe if you're sitting under artificial lightning all day

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    human eyes don't see fps moron.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      You have to turn it on in steam or fraps consolegay

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I dropped more than 2k on my pc for the simple reason that I can easily afford it without having to plan or budget for it, I'm just using pocket change to partake in one of my hobbies
    PC gaming is not for everybody, that's the core reason consoles exist

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Jesus Christ, this.
      Why is this so hard for everybody? This anon likes PC Gaming. He chooses to spend more money to get better graphics and fps. Good for him, I’m glad he is enjoying himself.
      I prefer playing on consoles. I used to play on PC, but over time grew to appreciate the simplicity of consoles, so I choose to spend my money playing where I know I’ll enjoy it the most.

      It’s that simple.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Human eyes don't see in FPS, they see in persistence of motion. They see one continuous stream of light, not in lots of still frames per second.
    If an image flips between black and white, humans can still see each individual frame well up to 500+ FPS. But at the same time a film running at 24 FPS looks smooth enough that it's hard to pick out individual frames.

    That being said, there is a clear difference between 30 and 60 fps and between 60 and 144 fps. I've not seen above this but I can easily tell the difference.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Stop believing everything you read in books... try to think for yourself and test you theories

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        ???

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        The fact that footage recorded in high framerate has no motion blur is your evidence right there, you moron.
        Go back to school.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I don read books theyre too slow for me

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >They see one continuous stream of light
      Cones/rods or whatever need a certain amount of photon to be excited ( I think it's around 9 or 12 ), they have activation times and relapse time where they can't get excited again until your body feed it some new fuel (I think it's some vitamins or some shit)
      You've got about 100 million per eyes and they all fire on and off in some weird pattern. So it's not technically true that you see continuous streams of light.
      Anyway point being there used to be an forum post on blur busters and a study posted there said something along the line that people would discern increase in smoothness from displays every time the framerate was doubled up to 10 000 FPS.
      So yeah there's no real upper bound in how much you can physically see but there might be one with how fast your brain can process everything

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >he can only see up to 60 fps

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >he can see

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >things get blurrier when they move faster
    you know what that means, right?
    >higher frame rate monitors are blurrier because the pixels change too fast

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Frick no you don't
    You do, but I'd like to understand the morons that have a mental breakdown if they have to use a 60hz monitor again. I'm running 3 144hz monitors that I constantly switch between my desktop and my college laptop which can only do 60hz with all 3 connected, and honestly I wouldn't bat an eye if I switched my desktop back to 60.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      it's to stuttery, simple as

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      60hz has too much motion blur

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >real life runs at frames
    I want to kill whoever pushed the "human eyes can't see beyond 30fps" meme

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Don't do that

    Imagine all the frames God has to animate

    You frick

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    ok eyelet. bet you have to use glasses too because your eyes are such genetic failures

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    G-GUYS I CAN'T BELIEVE IT.
    SOMEHOW I CAN NOTICE LAG IRL.
    WHAT DO?

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    OP has a flickering light like a fluorescent tube or a PWM monitor in his room and he hasn't been outside for so long that he thinks it's an intrinsic property of reality

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Bait thread or not here's an actual explanation about motion on displays.
    https://blurbusters.com/blur-busters-law-amazing-journey-to-future-1000hz-displays-with-blurfree-sample-and-hold/

    Red pill : Read it and learn that even your 240hz lcd is crap
    Blue pill : Don't and live happy forever with your trashy 60hz lcd

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *