Spore is fun, but the creature combat is spammy and minimally strategic, and you should be able to omnivore without being so specific in the cell stage. DNA should be obtainable more variously. The world should be more diverse and deep.
For Honor has one of the best combat systems available. It's still a lobby game, which is repetitive while players want to live in a world.
Assassin's Creed has some of the best mobility in games. Better combat and roles multiplayer would be fantastic.
Shadow of Mordor came up with the Nemesis system. It could technically be used in place of losing equipment for a slightly more shallow way to gain status in open world multiplayer (how would players become powerful in the first place; could it still function economically if characters are mostly getting buffs to alter their playstyle; why not simply have it be equipment?).
>Mirror's Edge >Dead Space >Battlefield >The Sims >Mass Effect >Dragon Age
>Shit >Shit >Shit >fricking shit >shit >crap
is that all?
Mirror's Edge parkour would be fantastic in a character action or shooter iteration.
Dead Space is at least a functional "linear story" while having horror notions.
Battlefield was really fun in BC2, and basically every iteration since is too similar and mediocre to be reasonably played each (mobility; recoil; class design; map design), but environmental and building destruction is exciting and strategic.
The Sims doesn't have an alternative; it's fun (the music is nice; the character fantasy is varied and deep).
Mass Effect has aliens and could explore a lot more of the universe in a fantasy-meets-reality way.
Dragon Age is an RPG with entertaining gameplay and would be way better without pause, with better melee, and with a competitive multiplayer world.
I feel sad because I had an awful childhood. No, I didn't have abusive parents or financial/academic troubles. I was just really, really lonely but I didn't realize it until I was an adult
I remember a time when Blizzard was great, R* was good and Ubisoft wasn't Ubishit, but there was literally never a time that EA wasn't absolute asscancer. Just because you liked a couple of their games when you were a tasteless child doesn't excuse them from inventing and/or perpetuating most of the shittiest aspects of the vidya industry.
>ubisoft
literally when
Assassin's Creed II and Brotherhood
That was Ubisoft's peak.
Far Cry 3 was
There isn't a single good asscreed game
Far Cry 4 and 5 are basically the exact same game as 3 but with better settings, and thus are better games.
You mean 2
These companies published good games prior to the 2007 casualization of the industry.
Prince of Persia? Splinter Cell? Stupid zoomer.
When they had their old logo
newbies
i'm replaying it right now
the combat is literally asscreed tier
it's not as good as i remembered
Who the frick is nostalgic for EA or Ubisoft games?
newbies
>Mirror's Edge
>Dead Space
>Battlefield
>The Sims
>Mass Effect
>Dragon Age
>forgetting about spore
EA's frick up of spore is what killed Maxis and Ruined Will Wrights desire to make anymore games.
Frick Spore
Spore is fun, but the creature combat is spammy and minimally strategic, and you should be able to omnivore without being so specific in the cell stage. DNA should be obtainable more variously. The world should be more diverse and deep.
>Shit
>Shit
>Shit
>fricking shit
>shit
>crap
is that all?
I liked battlefield bad company and prince of persia
For Honor has one of the best combat systems available. It's still a lobby game, which is repetitive while players want to live in a world.
Assassin's Creed has some of the best mobility in games. Better combat and roles multiplayer would be fantastic.
Shadow of Mordor came up with the Nemesis system. It could technically be used in place of losing equipment for a slightly more shallow way to gain status in open world multiplayer (how would players become powerful in the first place; could it still function economically if characters are mostly getting buffs to alter their playstyle; why not simply have it be equipment?).
Mirror's Edge parkour would be fantastic in a character action or shooter iteration.
Dead Space is at least a functional "linear story" while having horror notions.
Battlefield was really fun in BC2, and basically every iteration since is too similar and mediocre to be reasonably played each (mobility; recoil; class design; map design), but environmental and building destruction is exciting and strategic.
The Sims doesn't have an alternative; it's fun (the music is nice; the character fantasy is varied and deep).
Mass Effect has aliens and could explore a lot more of the universe in a fantasy-meets-reality way.
Dragon Age is an RPG with entertaining gameplay and would be way better without pause, with better melee, and with a competitive multiplayer world.
I am, but only for the prehistoric era when they were Electronic Arts.
Dead space is my favourite game of all time and it sadly comes from EA
this may surprise you but they used to put out games before gen 7
system shock 2 and rayman come to mind (these were made before you were born)
People that grew up on xbox 360s as their first console. Its a crowd probably 5-10 years younger than you complaining about being old now
It lead to him being fricking obese.
blizzard never made a good game
>b-but some asiatics like starcraft
they also eat dog meat and drink fermented feces
God I fricking love corporations!
>blizzard not the one jerking off
Ubisoft was always shit.
EA went to shit in 2010s.
>Settlers
>rayman
>og rainbow six
>og ghost recon
>splinter cell
Fricking zoomers
rockstar is the only company featured in that comic that wasnt complete dogshit back in the day
>rockstar is the only company featured in that comic that wasnt complete dogshit back in the day
>hunted down every SA multiplayer server
no.
All of these companies have been shit literally since the beginning.
There's commented code in EA games from 1988 talking about how shit they are to work for.
Ubisoft literally invented the modern free-to-play model in 1999.
All the shit Blizzard is in right now is specifically *because* of bullshit they did in the office since 1998
Rockstar was actually alright, I guess.
They're the least bad, even with the bullshit they pull these days
EA has been corrupted since the early 90s
I feel sad because I had an awful childhood. No, I didn't have abusive parents or financial/academic troubles. I was just really, really lonely but I didn't realize it until I was an adult
I remember a time when Blizzard was great, R* was good and Ubisoft wasn't Ubishit, but there was literally never a time that EA wasn't absolute asscancer. Just because you liked a couple of their games when you were a tasteless child doesn't excuse them from inventing and/or perpetuating most of the shittiest aspects of the vidya industry.
EA, Ubisoft and Blizzard were always trash. Not a fan of Rockstar but they were alright.
you are completely wrong