Should I play city builders or RTS?
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Should I play city builders or RTS?
Should I play city builders or RTS?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Depends what you hope to get out of them.
Each time I play one I just wish I was playing the other
>play rts
>wish i was playing a comfy city builder without all this aggression and intensity
>play city builder
>wish i was playing something with more intensity and a more action
Play an RTS until you stop wanting city builders, or get a real job and use city builders to relax.
somebody should make a city builder RTS if they haven't already. Maybe make a city builder that is focused on missions or something. Random city with random issues that need fixing.
Would need to have very tight mechanics though, maybe even go back to 2D sprite based game. Would be tricky to do without being boring or glitchy.
check out against the storm anons, its a city builder with 2-3 hour long runs. rather ball gripping on max difficulty and genuine kino
against the storm
its a "roguelite" citybuilder. i assumed i would hate it. boring art. 1-3 hours per city. its actually really good and i had to delete it after playing 30 hrs a week for 2 weeks.
rise of nations is one the comfiest RTS ever, used to play coop with my pal aginst AI via LAN and a single game could last to 3-4 hours
I'd like to try an Anno game, but it seems like every single one has some glaring issue like needing an ubishit account.
I own 1800 on ubishit launcher but don't want to buy it again on steam. Also there is a million dlc and I hate the central trading mechanic, I just want to build self sufficient islands.
yeah its a shame what happened to 1800, it's like a buying a civ game now, you have to wait for 3 years of dlc for it to be finished.
I don't understand this complaint, Anno is perfectly playable without any DLC.
I'd say that there is too much dlc and the extra content makes the game lose focus and makes it actually worse.
to be fair with Crown Falls and the new New World island, you can practically become self sufficient. Anno late game was always a pain and about process optimization
The DLC were never planned and just an addition to the game. The Game works perfectly fine without any DLC, even when there are some DLC that you should have like bright harvest
all the old ones are on gog
Which one would you recommend?
1404
Generals Zero Hour is the last good RTS
What are some good city builders?
>games aren't even released these days
>assets with the promise of being finished via early access or a game with %95 of its content being dlc to be sold back is the standard
>if you express any disapproval of this practice you get redditors going "um yikes my guy games aren't for you anymore"
Are the original CnCs worth playing? Should I just play remastered?
>not playing both at the same time
knave!
Wood needed
RTS if you want to git gud and play competitive multiplayer, city builder if you want comf
Impression games (Emperor rise of the middle kingdom, pharaoh, zeus master of olympus) or Anno games (1404) are top tier.
My favourite RTS is supreme commander forged alliance and nothing has topped it yet.
Crusader is clearly a RTS and a good one.
To be fair, nothing has come close to Supreme Commander in terms of technical accomplishment and scale for years in the RTS genre.
Does Crossfire Legion suck?
you should play modded simcity 4 :3
Wasn't SimCity 4 absolute garbage and didn't even let you name your town whatever you want? Or was that a later one?
No that was SimCity
SC4 is too fricking basic and light. If you're going to play a city builder then do CS with its literally thousands of mods.
Is it me or is AoE 4 just really bad and tedious?
City builders because all RTS are asiaticclick these days.
Awful post