So basically this game is the Witcher 3 but for people who care about having good gameplay
![]() |
![]() UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
![]() |
So basically this game is the Witcher 3 but for people who care about having good gameplay
![]() |
![]() UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
![]() |
No, it's much more like Gothic than Witcher.
if only that were true.
sad that we're never going to get another kino witcher now that cdpr has taken the poz in the neg hole.
goblins™, gotta be
It's pure gameplay kino but it doesn't come close to Witcher 3 in terms of writing.
>Witcher writing
>good
pick one
polish dub is better than english.
Gotta whip out that contrarian card every chance you get huh.
>NOOOOO PLEASE NOOOOO WITCHER 3 HAS GOOD WRITING PLEEAAAASE DON'T TAKE THAT AWAY FROM US TOOOOO WE ACCEPT THE GAMEPLAY SUCKS STAAAAHHPP NOOOOOOOO AAAAAHHHHH
kek Witcher 3 fans are SO PATHETIC
Who are you quoting little guy?
You are SO PATHETIC DUDE HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
literal spergout holy shit lmao
Another assmad Bedshitter 3 fan joins the discussion
i dont like either one of these games i just find your literal spergout to be mildly humorous
>I... I don't like the Witcher 3... please... believe me.... please... leave alone *crying*
lol ok, bedshitter
do you homosexuals only play hentai combat sins here?
Come on man, no games have good writing.
HoS and blood & wine do, also most of Witcher 3's side quests.
still doesn't compare to actually good novels, though.
you can disagree all you want but Gaunter alone btfos dragon's dogma's whole story
>le reddit marvel superhero writing is le good
Both have very different strengths and weaknesses. Shit flinging between them is stupid
Can you point to an instance of W3 having Marvel writing? Cant think of a single example personally
Can you post a particularly good scene from the Witcher 3?
Gaunter O'Dimm's entrance when you get the option to sacrifice Olgeird
Most of HoS was pretty great honestly
can u post a vid or something
No
See
So Witcher 3 has good writing but you won't post a single vid to back up your claim
>claims to hate it
>wants to watch it
Frick off, witcher lover.
You disgust me
Look it up yourself homosexual
Or if you own the game just play HoS to get a better experience than a video
I tried many times to play Witcher 3 and every time I get filtered by how boring it is.
Like every year I redownload it to give it another shot and it doesn't take long for me to delet again.
I dunno what to tell ya then. You probably wouldnt enjoy watching cutscenes much more either
Next time just choose the New Game option that starts you at HoS content
>Gaunter O'Dimm
We want the Loki fangirl audience
Tom Hiddleston is attractive though
Gaunter is an ugly old bastard
>wants to watch scenes from the game
>claims to hate it
I bet you weren't even tricked into buying it, you wanted to buy it
the scene where Geralt chases underage children around in his underwear because the brothel closed down.
Geralt wouldn't have any second thoughts about beheading pedophiles
He literally slept with a 17 year old Shani in the books
>muh books
as if if life was long enough for me to read sapkowski's YA slop
W3 geralt =/= this virtue signalling perverted old freak's pedophilic self insert and freaks like you who compile the points in his stories where children are ogled or molested, pedophile.
SHE WAS ONLY 17 YEARS AND 364 DAYS OLD YOU SICK FRICK
And a 16 year old in the first chapter of the first book
He admired Adda's 13 year old Breasts
So he really is Captain Reddit.
>NOOOOO SHE'S ONLY IN HER PRIME BREEDING AGE HOW DARE YOOOOUUUU
>teens
>prime breeding age
not sure if pedos can't into common sense or if they actually do but just peddle this horseshit around because they think it'll enable them
Just have a nice day now you kissless virgin
I'll kiss my girlfriend good night while you continue acting macho behind a keyboard and screen on Ganker like a good little virgin.
Just because you put a man in a wig doesn't make him your "girlfriend" homosexual.
I don't use a wig on him
gaunter isnt written like a "marvel superhero" and you know it, stop buzzing like a drone
Im not gonna deny, Gaunter and Ciri were fire parts of the game and were really well done, but thats like what 5% of the game? the 95% rest suck donkey dick and witcher 3 is the most overrated game of all time
Hold on, you actually played that piece of shit?
Lol, how much money did you lose?
I got tricked into buying Witcher 3. Paid 25 bucks for it. But I can confidently shit on it now, so in a way I did get my money's worth.
>tricked into buying
This is what we call a skill issue
I admit it that I got fooled into it. My irl friend kept talking it up and I finally said frick it and I bought it.
Are you really saying this in a DD2 thread?
Why is the writing attacked in DD2? At least it has decent pacing unlike Witcher 3's snoozefest of a story.
If by decent pacing you mean that you accidentally finish the game too early because the story is so fricking short, then yeah
>accidentally finish the game
literally a skill issue. 90 hours into the game and I just finished Ulrika and Wilhelmina's questlines. I've got a dozen more quests in my questlog and probably a bunch of quests I've never found which I will scour the lands for.
Point being that the main quest in DD2 sucks ass though, even compared to the first game which wasn't amazing
Walking around and exploring the world is good fun and undoubtedly leagues above Witcher 3, but writing and atmosphere is just something Witcher does infinitely better
I haven't finished the main quest in DD2 yet so I'll hold my opinion till I finish it, but Witcher 3 is just plain boring mate.
Wrong because I enjoyed W3's campaign more and I beat both
They also frick up the Grigori fight
Yeah but maybe you're dumb and your opinion is gay.
it's Ganker
we're all gay here
Nah I'm sorry dude it's just you
>BotW has a tiny main quest. Most people spend hours fricking around with sidequests and exploring
>ER has a short main quest. Most people spend hours fricking around with catacombs and caves
>DD2 has a short main quest. morons blitz it and then complain
Why is this? Is it because the main story isn't vague enough and gives you too much direction so people just follow the quest markers? Or is it because the game didn't explicitly tell you to "go explore you dumb frick" like BotW did?
Both BoTW and ER's tutorial ends with you being released into the world to roam. DD2's tutorial is you following an npc in a tiny camp and then getting a quest to kill some harpies. To drive this point home even further, BoTW and ER give you a large view of the landscape once you leave their tutorial cave, which naturally piques a player's interest. DD2 is you walking out of an enclosed camp into a dense forest after receiving a timed quest.
DD2's main quest railroads you way harder, for starters, and is super anticlimactic, especially if you've played DD1 and are expecting a twist as you hunt this game's equivalent of the Elysion. Instead, that's when the game reaches its irreversible end point.
now that's just silly.
You were psyop'd into believing Witcher 3 had a good story. It's actually boring and worthless.
found the unhinged weeb. have a nice day social reject waste of oxygen.
>SHE WAS KEKOLDING ME!
yes. the witcher 3 was great.
Witcher 3 is fricking boring. Even the story and the writing. The pacing is awful and Geralt is basically how redditors imagine themselves in their heads.
>making fun of redditors
>on Ganker
Not really something to be bragging about
Ganker is half cringe but it also half based, so yes, it is far above reddit.
No, but I bet you do since you are so easily impressed with the Witcher 3.
Who are you replying to, schizo?
You need to buy the Ganker pass to see the secret hidden posts
Fricking schizo, there's no one there
>he doesn't have the Ganker pass
Get out, peasant.
>https://www.k5learning.com/reading-comprehension-worksheets
I'm not going to do your homework for you, little buddy.
Ah yes, I see the similarity.
>Knackers, Nekkers, Black folk
What did they mean by this?
honestly, despite the somewhat shallow moveset, nothing really stopped Witcher 3 from having great combat compared to stuff like DD, contemporany elder scrolls, etc
The issue is that the enemy design is fricking boring dogshit.
Theres almost no interesting enemies, but the very few interesting DLC ones make surprisingly nice fights. Almost all bosses are copypasted dogshit or stuff that disables 9/10 your abilities other than generic sword slashes and dodges, yet im pretty sure most people had some degree of fun fighting Dettlaff, all it would need is no autoaim and a more engaging generic vampire melee phase.
The problem with Witcher (and it's the same problem with games like Horizon Zero Dawn) is there isn't a lot of variety in the gameplay. Geralt cannot pick up an axe or a spear or become a bowman. I know he canonically uses his two swords but you're telling me he isn't proficient in the use of all armaments? You're telling me he can't pick up a spear or maybe an even bigger sword like a zweihander and use for a bit? Same thing in Horizon, Alloy generally just uses her bow and sets some traps, but it gets boring when you are doing the same thing over and over again. These are really long games, but the gameplay never evolves, it never changes, even the stats and the upgrades are generic ("your swing does more damage") no extra moves or anything. After like 7-8 hours the gameplay dries up and it's finished.
In games like Monster Hunter and Dragon's Dogma and Dark Souls, you have so many weapons and spells to play around with. That's how these games easily get 150+ hours of gameplay from people.
He can use an axe, a shovel, a war hammer, a mace and a poker, they just all behave like a sword
Yeah CPDR didn't really want to bother with animations too much so anything that could fit the mold of Geralt's swords were put in too, but it doesn't change the gameplay.
Oh, and a pickaxe(still behaves like a longsword)
sorry sweaty but witcher 3 is good and popular so we HATE IT
>japanese cumguzzling weebs ITT thinking japs can worldbuild and write decent stories
Lmao lol
But witcher ronin is coming out?
>Good gameplay
>Hit thing 20 times, deplete 1 bar to hit it 20 more times
Hmmm...
More like
>knock over enemy
>do big move on weak area that obliterated 2 entire health bars
learn2play
>Pls sars, do the needful meta, play only certain way!!
>meta
I play as a Warrior which, although has its strengths, is not meta at all
Witcher 3 is a game that is still talked about 9 years after its release and still ranks high on all time greats lists.
DD2 will be lucky if its still remembered by the end of this year, lmao.
>Witcher 3 is a game that is still talked about 9 years after its release and still ranks high on all time greats lists
holy reddit
>Witcher 3 is a game that is still talked about 9 years after its release
Talked about for how boring and shitty it is. Not even kidding. That's why people bring it up, to discuss why the frick it was ever held in such high-esteem and how terribly boring the game is.
Maybe in your dreams lmao.
That's why Witcher 3 tends to be brought up nowadays
>"Was it actually any good?"
Yeah dude...sure thing.
NTA but you literally got no arguments same as every witchergay in this thread, the game is literally the most overrated game of all time, the story sucks donkey balls, the main villains other than Gaunter are all really shit and underwhelming, most characters are complete npcs other than Ciri and maybe Vesemir, not gonna start on the VN coombait witches, most sidequests are formulaic and the same shit, open world is more of a chore than exploration, and the combat + gameplay is so horseshit I swear I literally got sleepy multiple times playing the game wondering to myself "tf am I doing"
>you literally got no arguments
Arguments for what? are you stupid?
Lmao
Arguments for what? did you even read what did i say? you guys are very stupid, its hilarious. lol
>Arguments for what
You are a moron, and I wont waste my time with you, have a nice weekend
>Makes a dumb comment
>Calls others dumb
You have no legs to stand on idiot, what i posted was a fact, you started seething because you are inferior monkey, and now you want me to put arguments, arguments for what? for stating a fact? are you actually mentally handicapped?
And the vomit you wrote is just your opinion, i can easily make arguments to show you how stupid you are but its futile because its clear what your intention is.
tldr: stay mad.
DD2 is not fit to lick the boots of Skyrim and Witcher 3 and no matter how much you hype this trash series it will always be inferior to the good stuff.
Now seethe more please, reply to me.
>DD2 is not fit to lick the boots of Skyrim and Witcher 3
DD2 is better than both of these games lmao
poor mans monster hunter with dogshit story. sure buddy.
dd > mh
Skyrim is dogshit. Imagine liking bethesdaslop
Alright sure esl, I got nothing else to do anyways so ill bite
>arguments for what
You had no argument against the guy you originally pinged, and now you have nothing to say on your shitty beloved little game. Like I said, you are a moron.
>And the vomit you wrote is just your opinion, i can easily make arguments to show you how stupid you are but its futile because its clear what your intention is.
Sure you can homosexual LMAO I'd like to see you try, go ahead, you witchergays always shill it as one of the "greatest games of all time" or whatever but in reality is overrated mediocre slop. Reply properly or btfo
Good dog, you replied.
I dont need to make arguments when i present facts.
Fact is W3 is still being talked about years later, for all reasons, praise, criticism or critical analysis its all there, this is a FACT
W3 still ranks high on all time greats lists
This is a FACT
Now him seething and being delusional about it and claiming its only talked about for how bad it is, is the actual NO argument, since he failed to prove it, pro-tip: he cant prove it because the material is out there.
The fact that new games are still being compared to it is a testament to that, why didnt they compare it to Dragon Age inquisition? why not to Elex, why not to Horizon?
Because Witcher 3 is still one of the gold standards for open world fantasy RPGs.
Get rekt
And i already said i dont want to give you my arguments for why what you wrote is vomit, why would i break my word (like you did)?
Now get rekt again
If its so fantastic and so memorable why cant you actually defend it homosexual? Lmao
>And i already said i dont want to give you my arguments for why what you wrote is vomit, why would i break my word (like you did)?
Everything I said is truth, plain and simple, you have only ad hominem's and no defense, sit down and shut the frick up esl
You lost this debate hombre, i will leave you to tend to your wounds.
Next time read what people say before you open your mouth and spew your vomit.
Because I will not engage with one who is in bending in his beliefs
Popularity means nothing, shit like GTA 5 is famous amongst the normies because they blindly consume it, now again;
>no counter argument to my original post & point
Concession accepted witchergays, bye bye
Bye, lets go play a real man's game
Polish dub, boy
>the main villains other than Gaunter are all really shit and underwhelming
Djkstra was pretty based
>good gameplay
You dont say?
bugged
>ha look at this part where the dragon glitched for a bit and didn't move while I hit it!
You know what's really funny? Whatever is going on in that webm still looks 100x more fun than anything in Witcher 3 hahahaahahaha
>yooo this gameplay fire fr fr ong
Even when it glitches out it's still better than Witcher 3 hahahahahaha
cope lmao
is there a more obvious sign of bait than an all caps "hahaha"
>He's baiting you guys... just... just ignore him. Check your discord troonysisters. We'll regroup and reassess our strategy there.
The gameplay is ruined by being too easy and repetitive. Every fight feels pretty much identical other than where an enemies weak point is. It's fun for a while but could have been way better.
Just play with your main pawn and not the other two. That's the game's difficulty modes basically. I find the game to be well balanced when it's just you and the one pawn.
I mean, even then it's not hard, but it feels better.
Even then it's unbalanced by the fact that you can't really play certain vocations if you get aggro. I just wish the game had hardier boss monsters with more method required to beat them, that coupled with more dynamic spawns or wandering monsters would have made the game way more satisfying
Calm
This is the only song that started getting on my nerves, they really should have put more variety when on the main island
Music in the Witcher 3 is pretty good. I will say that much. For DD2 what I ended up doing for a while was I turned the game music off and put on LOTR and GOT soundtracks on the background while I played. Was fricking kino.
In DD2, I like the song that plays whenever you fight drakes but outside of that... meh.
her quest was so fricking random
>hey help me murder this guy
>even though you're supposed to be the honorable arisen
>oh btw I'm a ninja??
>oh btw I'm half beastren but all I got was this edgy cat eye
like wtf were they high when they wrote this?
He's a friend of your enemy (Empress Disa) and he's a ruthless murderer. Brant didn't want to kill him not because Allard wasn't a piece of shit that wasn't deserving of it but because he's extremely high up in ranking and killing him would be extremely destabilizing.
yeah, but she's like "I've been following him for 10 years! but I'll give you 72 hours to find dirt on him" like wth was she doing those past 10 years.. it just happens way too fast, from "lets murder him" to "he's dead" within 1 or 2 days is just awkward pacing and too many different ways it should or could have gone
I'm not sure what the point of the time limit was, seemed more like a gameplay thing. If you want to look at it through the lens of the story then maybe Wilhelmina wanted to put pressure on you to do it. That's not outside her character.
But in general I'm not a fan of fricking around and wasting time. Get the fricking point in a story. Witcher 3's pacing is terrible. This guy who was set up in the story as a corrupt piece of shit also happened to murder Wilhemina's parents when she was a little girl. And here is the thing... you don't have to kill him. That's the big thing you are neglecting. There are multiple points in the quest you are allowed to walk away. Even Wilhelmina asks you if you want to continue helping her after you deliver her the proof of his crimes.
From the Arisen's point of view, you either killed him because you agreed with Wilhelmina or you simply wanted to get in her half-beastren pants.
You can speed run it in less than 3 hours, anon
>You can speed run it in less than 3 hours, anon
And what is the problem with that? How fricking long should a sidequest last? Fricking kek.
Brother, I am saying witcher 3's pacing is slow because you make it slow, less than 3 hours you're done with the main quest if you apply yourself
Oh, well I don't care. The game is boring. I'm not going to bother speedrunning a game I find boring.
I commented correcting his misinformation and things he would of know if he played the game longer, even agreeing on some bad points. Bro deleted my comment for being "hateful." Thinking bros a little thin-skinned.
kek I played this back in the day and I enjoyed it.
no one is playing this piece of shit
>57 thousand
>no one
not that im complaining. The game series was always a niche one anyway, and i never expected the mainstream to really understand it to begin with.
I'm kind of out of the loop on this stuff. Is 57,000 people playing a game on steam a low amount? What should it be? What would be considered a high amount or a good amount?
>less than all 8 billion people on the planet playing it simultaneously
It's dead Jim
yup, capcom knows how to make ludo
if I want a TV show, I'll just watch the witcher on netflix tbh
>people think dd2 has better story/writing than witcher 3
you are fricking insane if you actually believe this
Fromtrannies or Kojimadrones
Bet
MGSV and Bloodborne > Witcher 3
Don't care what critics say.
It's okay to be wrong.
Yes, that is a healthy way to look at critics and whatever the popular consensus may be.
True. Look at how many people got baited into buying an unfinished mess like Dragon's Dogma 2
I think the game is pretty finished.
Play with a Gamepad. It's so much better.
>Do this chick's quest and romance
>She fricking disappears afterwards
>She fricking disappears afterwards
She does not.
>dogmashills already needing to use better games as bait to keep threads alive
HAVING A BLAST
>So basically this game is the Witcher 3
no. there's not even half the endings for quests. story is pretty small and down on the narrow. the few story characters aren't compelling or memorable.
>pic rel is an optional side quest in witcher 3 to decide the fate of a minor character you meet in Velen
there's multiple quests like that in DD2 you moron and they don't hand hold you to endings either, you can get just random advice from talking to someone or maybe the whole quest changes from talking to someone else
>there's multiple quests like that in DD2 you moron
not really. there's multiple endings for most quests, but most of them are pretty generic stuff. there's also very few dilemmas, mostly just failstates. not surprising since the only option you'd have in 90% of quests is the "accept / decline (for now" prompt when taking on the quest. DD2 also has a tiny number of quests (relative to TW3 which is a 100+ hour game despite having free fast travel unlike DD2). not slagging on DD2 just saying there's a lot of dissimilarities.
you need to play NG+ more then, the witcher quests are binary, you can go talk to people during quests for DD2 that aren't "baked in" and it will change the whole dynamic
Less endings than Hugo in DD2. Honestly TW3 was huge downgrade from 2 in terms of choice actually mattering an impacting gamplay.
BORING
it's Elden Ring but without being pussies about it
Witcher 3 has good writing and characters, though the base game story is dull. DLC stories are good. Gameplay is really mediocre even for how generic it is.
Both it and DD2 are some of my favorites ever. DD2 easily takes the cake gameplay wise, not even close
You would love DD1
Thanks for sharing your opinion anon.
Have a nice day.
I'm going to go to bed now.
Just finished Dragon's Dogma a 6/10 I heavily mark it down because of zero memorable characters, quests and the main story is shit and rushed which is one of the main selling points in an RPG.
You didn't even play it.
Women? More like Womeme
they are completely different games, dragons dogma 2 is a sandbox with actual wacky shit happening with normal gameplay not structured setpieces like the witcher.
the witcher 3 is a good monster HUNTER game
monster hunter is a good monster KILLING game
dragon's dogma 2 succeed at neither tbh but that's not really the point of the game anyway since it's an action-jrpg
it's all about the journey with your pawns
>journey with your pawns
lmao people give a shit about skyrim tier npcs?
want a journey with companions play Dragon Age origins, if you have the attention span that is.
The Witcher 3 with a bunch of stupid secret mechanics that ruin everything.
Modded TW3 has better gameplay.
>CDPR try to talk shit on DD2 for its microtransactions and rehash of the first game's systesms
>after CP77
I am completely done with that company. The Witcher 3 was good until the baron plot ended, and the dlc was sweet, but overall was a generic slop experience. CP77 was actual cancer to its core. Whatever they do next is going to be another gross abomination of all the latest, trendiest misguided western game development practices
only this time it will be a functioning release so everyone on earth will praise them as the second coming of christ
>So basically this game is the Witcher 3 but for people who care about having good gameplay
Witcher 3 has just good graphics, good lines
And ddda2 is just utter shit for pajeetchinkBlack persontroony like you
>types like an esl
>accuses others other being jeetBlack personchinks
Ok, jeetBlack personchinky.
Yeah fricking have a nice day spicpajeetchinkBlack persontroony
no u israelite