>"Baby mice mature and can give birth two month after they are born" >"You picked up one of these (...) the day after it was born"
It isn't, for the purposes of this problem.
depends on if the cats decide to take a nap after catching a mouse or not, no cat is gonna be back to back knocking mice the frick back
so it's sure as hell not 5
It's one. If 5 cats can catch 5 mice in 5 minutes, it stands to reason that this is possible because 1 cat catches 1 mouse in 1 minute. This misdirection is further implied by the fact that the question says "5 mice CAN catch 5 mice in 5 minutes". Not "5 mice is the absolute minimum required to catch 5 mice in 5 minutes".
In fact it doesn't make any sense at all that 5 cats would be the minimum, unless the 5 cats are using some elite rainbow siege squad tactics that only work with a group of 5, and so 1 cat couldn't do the same at a smaller scale of 1 mouse. So the answer is one. One cat catches one mouse every minute for 100 minutes
>5 cats
You can tell that some people here have never worked on group projects before. Half the cats start being lazy halfway through, another cat doesn't show up at all and the remaining 1.5 cats work for 80 minutes nonstop, decide to take a quick nap and then oversleep and miss the deadline.
You can tell the other posters are project managers too, clearly hiring an additional one thousand nine hundred and ninety five cats will get the project finished even faster! Never mind that the original cats were simply blocked by not being allowed out to hunt.
Uhhhh... wouldn't that sort of impact fracture the bell and, if not breaking it completelly, at least leave telltale marks that differ from "perfect order"?
Oh shit Imm sorry, I did not realize the bell ringer had an explosive force comparable to the detonation of a .50 bmg sniper round. Man that guy must have some guns
>u can’t couldnt a phone book from a bookstore or borrow it from a library
Says who? I’m sure there were a few redneck bookstores/library where you could acquire a phone book from. Shit riddle.
Mouse breeding aside, what our your hopes for New World of Steam? I saw the gameplay reveal but I'm still skeptical as to how well the mechanics will translate. The touchscreen was intrinsic to the experience.
I'm gonna be honest bros... I really wanted to get into Layton but I don't think it's the series for me. I played all the way through Curious Village 100% but I left disappointed. A lot of the puzzles are neat and make you feel smart, but a bunch are also utter bullshit. Also more importantly, I was disappointed at how little sense the main plot made. Like ok yeah one dude just finagled together an entire city of fully autonomous robots out of some random metal and steampower or whatever the frick. And there's an overarching anti-Layton badguy who just shows up to frick shit up because just because he hates Layton, for some unexplained reason. All this shit was set up as a big mystery novel story set vaguely in the late 1800s or early 1900s or whatever, and somehow at the last minute it turns into some incomprehensible anime nonsense.
I don't want to put you off the games because it's a fun series but if you can't suspend your disbelief for Curious Village then it might not be the series for you. Generally just gets more whacky. From most whacky to least whacky >Azran Legacy >Pandora's Box/Diabolical Box >Lost Future/Unwound Future >Spectre's Call/Last Specter >Curious Village >Miracle Mask
There are a lot of name changes between the US and UK versions. What's up with that?
So how did no one notice this place being built right under London?
Also it clearly has a nuclear power plant, how did the reactor not go critical when the Mobile Fortress exploded?
0 ,because you brought the single baby mouse on the day it was born meaning it's still furless and now that it's without a mother it's going to die of starvation 1 day in, you fricking monster.
a single mouse can't breed...
What if it was already pregnant
bout' 3.50
GODDAMN LOCH NESS MONSTA!
I AIN'T GIVIN' YOU NO TREE FIDDY!
I gave the Loch Ness Monsta a mouse.
>"Baby mice mature and can give birth two month after they are born"
>"You picked up one of these (...) the day after it was born"
It isn't, for the purposes of this problem.
It astounds me how much dumber I am than shit-flinging morons on the internet
It's a baby mouse, meaning it has not yet matured and cannot become pregnant
The question does become a lot more interesting in your version, though
he's literally me
Yeah that's where I cum in
*unzips pants*
YOUR the one that's supposed to breed with it, morons
Almost 11 months later and I still don't get why this shit is an acual thing...
also Diives fricked-up big time by making Leon a dog in his vid
None because you only bought one
If mice live less than 10 months, none. Otherwise one.
1 since you only picked up one, you need 2 to multiply
0
you only got 1
>game's puzzles defy all rational logic
five
i am so smart
5 cats
or is it 1 cat? idk i cant do math
1 cat catches 1 mouse per minute
you mean per five minutes?
No.
Five cats could catch five mice in the time allotted, which would make one mouse each.
That's each cat catching one mouse per five minutes.
5 / 5 / 5 = 0,2
0,2 * 100 * 100 = 2.000
You need two thousand cats
R E T A R D
He's actually right. You're the moron
>it takes 2000 cats to catch 100 mice in an hour and fourty minutes
listen to yourself.
Who are you? Sir Issac Newton? You crunch the numbers then genius.
>american education
>double moron
you fricking moron.
epic answer, I'm glad we have anons like you to crunch the numbers for us
Let's say theoretically I have 100 mice in my house that I want dead. Where the frick do I get 2000 cats from to get rid of the mice?
People throw bags of cats in the trash all the time
LMAO
2KCAT
great pull anon, thanks for the laugh.
>Venezuelan math
get back to grinding gold in Runescape
5 mice / 5 cats / 5 minutes = 100 mice / 5 cats / 100 minutes
impressive
depends on if the cats decide to take a nap after catching a mouse or not, no cat is gonna be back to back knocking mice the frick back
so it's sure as hell not 5
It's one. If 5 cats can catch 5 mice in 5 minutes, it stands to reason that this is possible because 1 cat catches 1 mouse in 1 minute. This misdirection is further implied by the fact that the question says "5 mice CAN catch 5 mice in 5 minutes". Not "5 mice is the absolute minimum required to catch 5 mice in 5 minutes".
In fact it doesn't make any sense at all that 5 cats would be the minimum, unless the 5 cats are using some elite rainbow siege squad tactics that only work with a group of 5, and so 1 cat couldn't do the same at a smaller scale of 1 mouse. So the answer is one. One cat catches one mouse every minute for 100 minutes
It's sad to see how public education has failed some people.
100 cats
>baby mice mature and can give birth two months after they are born
Is this a real thing?
>tfw you turn 2 months old and it's time to frick your mom
One.
sex with gadget.
5 cats catch 5 mice in 5 minutes
Divide cats and Mice by 5 (Time does not reduce)
1 cat catches 1 mouse in 5 minutes.
If this cat spent 100 minutes catching mice, it would catch 20.
Therefore, to catch 100 mice in the same time, we would need 5 cats.
>5 cats
You can tell that some people here have never worked on group projects before. Half the cats start being lazy halfway through, another cat doesn't show up at all and the remaining 1.5 cats work for 80 minutes nonstop, decide to take a quick nap and then oversleep and miss the deadline.
You can tell the other posters are project managers too, clearly hiring an additional one thousand nine hundred and ninety five cats will get the project finished even faster! Never mind that the original cats were simply blocked by not being allowed out to hunt.
It's clear that 5 cats will not kill 100 mice in 100 minutes. They will get tired and bored and the output will drop.
2000 cats will guarantee that the 100 mice are killed in 100 minutes.
You can't just Elon Musk everything
Like half of those "puzzles" are the same.
Hey guys
i heff tvelve matchsteek
You should be able to solve this
Praise the Great Horned Rat!
each strike took 5 minutes so it reached 1 again?
All wrong
Ah, yes, of course. They never said the Joker wasn't involved.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
I'm GOING INSANE!!!!!!!!
what the FRICK
what an unsatisfying answer
I guessed this answer because I am reading The Black Swan right now
Uhhhh... wouldn't that sort of impact fracture the bell and, if not breaking it completelly, at least leave telltale marks that differ from "perfect order"?
>Uhhhh... wouldn't that sort of impact fracture the bell
It withstands being smacked around with a large metal ball on a daily basis so I doubt it.
Oh shit Imm sorry, I did not realize the bell ringer had an explosive force comparable to the detonation of a .50 bmg sniper round. Man that guy must have some guns
>Oh shit Imm sorry,
Sorry for what?
Don't mind Carlos, newbie.
The clock takes so long to strike 12 times that it was 1 AM by the time it finished
The clock probably worked fine, he should have checked the bells mechanism.
This book is full of bullshit riddles.
chequebook
Phonebook? How old is this?
Correct!
>How old is this?
Published in 1994.
I was right but not for the reasons I thought I was.
>u can’t couldnt a phone book from a bookstore or borrow it from a library
Says who? I’m sure there were a few redneck bookstores/library where you could acquire a phone book from. Shit riddle.
A phonebook
ez pz
Phone book
i'm sure there's a movie where this happens, something to do with the echo of the clock, it's someone's alibi? help me out
What is that from? It's not Layton.
I HEFF TVELVE MATCHSTEEK
FRICK YOU
403309
1 mouse because one mouse can't give birth
A bit a shame that's the answer, I kinda would have liked to do the math otherwise
Would.
Mouse breeding aside, what our your hopes for New World of Steam? I saw the gameplay reveal but I'm still skeptical as to how well the mechanics will translate. The touchscreen was intrinsic to the experience.
1
I'm gonna be honest bros... I really wanted to get into Layton but I don't think it's the series for me. I played all the way through Curious Village 100% but I left disappointed. A lot of the puzzles are neat and make you feel smart, but a bunch are also utter bullshit. Also more importantly, I was disappointed at how little sense the main plot made. Like ok yeah one dude just finagled together an entire city of fully autonomous robots out of some random metal and steampower or whatever the frick. And there's an overarching anti-Layton badguy who just shows up to frick shit up because just because he hates Layton, for some unexplained reason. All this shit was set up as a big mystery novel story set vaguely in the late 1800s or early 1900s or whatever, and somehow at the last minute it turns into some incomprehensible anime nonsense.
Are the other games better at this or not
the batshit insane plottwists are a feature.
You have to enjoy the humor of the game playing little tricks on you. And not get mad at "bullshit"
I don't want to put you off the games because it's a fun series but if you can't suspend your disbelief for Curious Village then it might not be the series for you. Generally just gets more whacky. From most whacky to least whacky
>Azran Legacy
>Pandora's Box/Diabolical Box
>Lost Future/Unwound Future
>Spectre's Call/Last Specter
>Curious Village
>Miracle Mask
There are a lot of name changes between the US and UK versions. What's up with that?
So how did no one notice this place being built right under London?
Also it clearly has a nuclear power plant, how did the reactor not go critical when the Mobile Fortress exploded?
Use Paint to answer this!
Remove one match from each pair of legs and put them on top so it looks like a spread eagle dog from above
Another puzzle solved!
Jesus, professor.
?
0 ,because you brought the single baby mouse on the day it was born meaning it's still furless and now that it's without a mother it's going to die of starvation 1 day in, you fricking monster.
Easy peasy
0 just slide them around on the table
Good job!
How about this one?
water
Penis.
W A T E R
ez
mouth
you suck the ball out
Hi there judy
1, pour the middle drink to the middle empty cup I crave stronger riddles Luke, STRONGER
1. Pour the second into the fifth.
Anyone have that one with the bell ringing 13 times?
you're not part of the 95% right Ganker?
it's not that I can't solve it, it's more that I refuse to do it
This looks like fibonacci sequence with base=12 or a shitty trick question.
>12^0 + 12^1 + 12^2 + ... 12^n