It's fine but worse than the original. The knife stuff is great. The awful weapon sway/bloom and inconsistent staggering, especially the fricking knee stagger, is trash.
Made by people who were embarrassed over the original.
I knew it would be shit the moment I saw Ashley's ears were covered up, because the only reason to make that decision is if you're embarrassed over people making fun of Ashley's monkey ears. And you can't make good creative decisions if you're afraid that someone somewhere will laugh at you. Everything you create will be entirely stale and soulless as a result. And you can see it throughout the game. Nearly every choice they made was based on fear of even the slightest hint of negative reaction.
The funny thing is that this results in more issues than the original, because they didn't actually pay attention to why things were done a certain way in the original. The scene where Saddler possesses Ashley is the best example. In the original, Saddler doesn't kill Leon because he explicitly wants Leon to kill Krauser and then serve as his brainwashed guard. In the remake, they missed this and thought it was a problem that Saddler lets Leon live, so they had him make Ashley pathetically try to kill him... then just give up for no reason when it would be piss easy to kill him some other way while he's still partially under Saddler's control in that scene. They also 'fix' the trap scene by having Ashley get possessed instead, but create further problems by never bringing up that power again.
It's a shitshow caused entirely by the devs' inability to focus on the game itself rather than speculate about audience reaction.
>shitty aiming mechanics >sluggish animations >forced Souls aesthetics >UI copypasted from TLOU >downgraded cutscenes >cut memorable gameplay sections >added padding and even more crafting
They should have just added modern controls and rebalanced the enemies without reworking every single art asset. But they wouldn't be able to charge full price for that without backlash. Maybe rework the bosses, but nothing else needed major changes.
>cut content >shittier level design >no destructible doors >shittier cut-scenes compared to original >shitty Ada VA >shitty Ashley model >stronk wyman BS >no skirt for Ashley / Pantyshot removal >garbage collector simulator >microtransactions few days after the release and reviews >Excelletnt SOUL/SOULLESS example
Honestly no idea how anyone who played original can enjoy this trash demake
>less content than the original >the campaign is literally significantly longer
I beat Re4 in 12 hours, re4 remake in 15.5, there's more content than at least the gamecube original. The PS2 release of RE4 which came out later did have the Ada missions, which would be a nice addition but the base game of re4 remake is about 5x better than the original and it's just a much more engaging experience.
Literally only ppl who think the original is bette, like you, seem to be 30+ and are upset they can't look up a child's skirt. You're old, re4 is old, re4 remake is an improvement in most ways except arguably VA and certain sound effects which are definitely more iconic in the original.
They cut some content and replaced it with new content,
cry more
The re3 remake was bad, and had far less content than the original, and it didn't understand what made the original good for its time but that was made by different people within Capcom. RE4 remake basically replaces the original in my eyes, can't imagine going back to the original after playing it.
>it's longer therefore better
It has fewer game modes, fewer bosses, aka less MEANINGFUL content, with more time-wasting Sony patented "hold forward on the stick while your character slowly shuffles forward because we need to pretend this cutscene is gameplay" shit. >Literally only ppl who think the original is bette, like you, seem to be 30+ and are upset they can't look up a child's skirt.
So you've admitted to not being willing to concede that any arguments are valid, so why are you pretending to care? The game could be legitimately unplayable and you would still say "the only people who don't like it are pedos". If you're so offended by being around us Facebook and Twitter are just a click away, go hang out there.
it both has less content and manages to be longer with meaningless fluff that doesn't go with the gameplay
the original is nothing but gameplay, everything that's not action can be skipped with the select button, you can't skip the BS in turdmake
You're really that moronic that you use how long to beat to determine content? That shit is using achievement runs as content. Demake objectively has less content than the og. No assignment ada, no mercs at launch, and cut content.
nothing it makes the original look like dog shit by comparison.
Take off your nostalgia goggles gay. You're old and decrepit and so is RE4, I played it for the first time 4 years ago and it does not hold up in pretty much any way. The original sucks at horror, it had awful combat too, the levels were hyper linear with very few interconnected paths/creative level designs like the remake.
The remake improves the combat by actually making close encounters engaging and giving players risk/reward decisions rather than just backing up or quick turning when people get close or mashing the knife button to see that goofy unsatisfying animation. It improves the level design by making it not as much of a giant hallway but still keeps the pacing intact. It actually has a few genuinely tense moments which the original totally lacks.
There is 0 reason to play the original anymore, it's aged like fricking dirt.
>Don't like what they did with Salazar and Saddler and miss all the cheesy shittalking with them. >Gatcha cancer in the shooting gallery >Where the frick is U3?
nice game otherwise
Nothing, it was a good game and I had fun playing it
boat controls
controller stick deadzone issue, otherwise its a 9/10
RE4 didn't need a remake
It's better than the original.
japanese people made it
no raid mode no cqc shitty mercenaries shitty movement awful balance
why the frick are re6 and revelations 1 still the peak?
It's fine but worse than the original. The knife stuff is great. The awful weapon sway/bloom and inconsistent staggering, especially the fricking knee stagger, is trash.
The sway is okay since it was in the original too, but the bloom is so fricking stupid.
Made by people who were embarrassed over the original.
I knew it would be shit the moment I saw Ashley's ears were covered up, because the only reason to make that decision is if you're embarrassed over people making fun of Ashley's monkey ears. And you can't make good creative decisions if you're afraid that someone somewhere will laugh at you. Everything you create will be entirely stale and soulless as a result. And you can see it throughout the game. Nearly every choice they made was based on fear of even the slightest hint of negative reaction.
The funny thing is that this results in more issues than the original, because they didn't actually pay attention to why things were done a certain way in the original. The scene where Saddler possesses Ashley is the best example. In the original, Saddler doesn't kill Leon because he explicitly wants Leon to kill Krauser and then serve as his brainwashed guard. In the remake, they missed this and thought it was a problem that Saddler lets Leon live, so they had him make Ashley pathetically try to kill him... then just give up for no reason when it would be piss easy to kill him some other way while he's still partially under Saddler's control in that scene. They also 'fix' the trap scene by having Ashley get possessed instead, but create further problems by never bringing up that power again.
It's a shitshow caused entirely by the devs' inability to focus on the game itself rather than speculate about audience reaction.
>shitty aiming mechanics
>sluggish animations
>forced Souls aesthetics
>UI copypasted from TLOU
>downgraded cutscenes
>cut memorable gameplay sections
>added padding and even more crafting
They should have just added modern controls and rebalanced the enemies without reworking every single art asset. But they wouldn't be able to charge full price for that without backlash. Maybe rework the bosses, but nothing else needed major changes.
Some of my least favorite segments from the original they somehow managed to make worse ie the mincart section and del lago.
>cut content
>shittier level design
>no destructible doors
>shittier cut-scenes compared to original
>shitty Ada VA
>shitty Ashley model
>stronk wyman BS
>no skirt for Ashley / Pantyshot removal
>garbage collector simulator
>microtransactions few days after the release and reviews
>Excelletnt SOUL/SOULLESS example
Honestly no idea how anyone who played original can enjoy this trash demake
The ada va being worse is the only valid point you made,
nice
good to know that the people hating the remake are pedos who are upset they can't look up children's skirts anymore.
>a remake having less content than the original isn't a valid point
what the frick makes something "valid" in your eyes then?
>less content than the original
>the campaign is literally significantly longer
I beat Re4 in 12 hours, re4 remake in 15.5, there's more content than at least the gamecube original. The PS2 release of RE4 which came out later did have the Ada missions, which would be a nice addition but the base game of re4 remake is about 5x better than the original and it's just a much more engaging experience.
Literally only ppl who think the original is bette, like you, seem to be 30+ and are upset they can't look up a child's skirt. You're old, re4 is old, re4 remake is an improvement in most ways except arguably VA and certain sound effects which are definitely more iconic in the original.
They cut some content and replaced it with new content,
cry more
The re3 remake was bad, and had far less content than the original, and it didn't understand what made the original good for its time but that was made by different people within Capcom. RE4 remake basically replaces the original in my eyes, can't imagine going back to the original after playing it.
>it's longer therefore better
It has fewer game modes, fewer bosses, aka less MEANINGFUL content, with more time-wasting Sony patented "hold forward on the stick while your character slowly shuffles forward because we need to pretend this cutscene is gameplay" shit.
>Literally only ppl who think the original is bette, like you, seem to be 30+ and are upset they can't look up a child's skirt.
So you've admitted to not being willing to concede that any arguments are valid, so why are you pretending to care? The game could be legitimately unplayable and you would still say "the only people who don't like it are pedos". If you're so offended by being around us Facebook and Twitter are just a click away, go hang out there.
youre arguing with a shizo
>more time-wasting Sony patented "hold forward on the stick while your character slowly shuffles forward
You didn‘t play the game
>child's skirt
Ashley is a grown adult in college. Are you moronic? They even put the sorority she attended on her phone.
>less content than the original
meanwhile:
Also judging quantity over quality is moronic. The level of quality in re4 remake makes the original look like literal dog shit.
it both has less content and manages to be longer with meaningless fluff that doesn't go with the gameplay
the original is nothing but gameplay, everything that's not action can be skipped with the select button, you can't skip the BS in turdmake
You're really that moronic that you use how long to beat to determine content? That shit is using achievement runs as content. Demake objectively has less content than the og. No assignment ada, no mercs at launch, and cut content.
nothing it makes the original look like dog shit by comparison.
Take off your nostalgia goggles gay. You're old and decrepit and so is RE4, I played it for the first time 4 years ago and it does not hold up in pretty much any way. The original sucks at horror, it had awful combat too, the levels were hyper linear with very few interconnected paths/creative level designs like the remake.
The remake improves the combat by actually making close encounters engaging and giving players risk/reward decisions rather than just backing up or quick turning when people get close or mashing the knife button to see that goofy unsatisfying animation. It improves the level design by making it not as much of a giant hallway but still keeps the pacing intact. It actually has a few genuinely tense moments which the original totally lacks.
There is 0 reason to play the original anymore, it's aged like fricking dirt.
The original is dogshit. Janky ass controls.
It was pretty good
Headshot stagger and the writing
Otherwise it's an amazing game
what went so wrong?
They tried so hard to preserve the feel of the original RE4 game. Only problem is that game was shit in the first place.
>Don't like what they did with Salazar and Saddler and miss all the cheesy shittalking with them.
>Gatcha cancer in the shooting gallery
>Where the frick is U3?
nice game otherwise
U3 is likely getting saved for Separate Ways.
I dropped it very early when I didn't like any of the direction or writing.
Literally only the bald unplayers in this shithole think RE4 R went wrong
It didn't need a remake
soulless, bullshit controls and combat.
also cut content.
modern control
Shilled garbage, just like Elden Ring and BG3.
nothing, the game is great
although the og is better