this is cringe because there's no juxtaposition between something socially acceptable and not
feet/armpit chad works because these two fetishes are usually frowned upon while chad represents someone with extra leverage in social situation thanks to his physical appearance / personality / fame etc
So are you ace? How do you not get grossed out by dicks or veganas being that close to their pee holes? Ass cheeks are way further from the sphincter that the urethra from the dick or vulva.
Is that 9 out of 10 women (which you are wrong) or women that are 9/10 on the beauty scale (which I find not to be accurate either)? Or you just have stupidly high standards.
RA1 >yeah it's a little campy, but that can't be avoided. we've got no budget
RA2 >it should be a little campy and silly in homage to the first, and lets have the guy from Twin Peaks ham it up, but also include some dark and serious parts
RA3 >DUDE IT'S TIM CURRY AND HE SAYS "SPAAAAAAAACE" LMAO FLYING BEARS ISN'T THIS JUST SO WACKY
Is there a name for the thing where you find the general shape of women's feet aesthetically pleasing (as part of her legs/whole body, not a disembodied foot), but have no interest in fetishy shit and cumming to them?
I was just asking because I remember being in gym class during high school and finding it quite distracting when the girls did stuff on the balance beam either barefoot or in tights, I didn't really feel any desire to jack off to the memory but there was something oddly attractive and beautiful about the way the whole exercise emphasized their feet (and legs) and what they did with them.
Reminder to stop the footgay menace before society is consumed by endless foot related imagery. They won't stop until everything is about feet and you're legally obligated to only be turned on by feet.
Non-footgays exhibit pathological behaviour. Notice their perpetual anger, their idiotic incredulity. No other fetish seems to inspire such devoted hatred, it is not only that “they don’t get it”, but that for some reason they believe that no one should “get it”, they must crusade against it. It is bizarre. All kinds off odd and abject bedroom rituals get a free pass, and yet partialism for a part of the human body, something on literally almost every single person, inspires obsessive, unbridled antipathy. Perhaps the rage is because other people’s healthy desires reminds the anti-footgay of how they are alienated from their own bodies. It is probably a very Western prejudice, an affliction of modernity (even a century ago I notice in proper bourgeois literature references to “pretty” or “handsome” feet, not something that would appear in today’s literature without the connotation of fetishism). Feet are kept out of sight and out of mind. And keeping them bundled up tight in shoes all day is what is responsible for most of their unpleasant characteristics—infection, odour, misshaping; meaning that when the shoes finally do come off most people, presented with their neglected feet, associate them with disgust... the feet themselves are unfairly blamed rather than the conditions forced upon them. Notice the completely disproportionate commodity fetishism built around shoes. I’ve had some “people” remark to me that they prefer the gaudy design of designer label sneakers over the limb you wear them on. Is there a more rotten, insectoid, consumerist and anti-human attitude than that? Preferring literally cheaply made industrial fibre, cynically marketed, a fad, over flesh and skin of an anatomical marvel which has served us for tens of millennia.
COOM = GOOD
DOOM = COOG
Never.
nice feet and legs
why didn't she wash her feet
That's what your tongue is for.
They are a lot cleaner than most. Wtf are you talking about?
>troonyshit
she's cringing. Thats a cringe face
This thing HAS ZERO ASS
>turn phone off
this is cringe because there's no juxtaposition between something socially acceptable and not
feet/armpit chad works because these two fetishes are usually frowned upon while chad represents someone with extra leverage in social situation thanks to his physical appearance / personality / fame etc
the frick are you talking about?
I want to frick those feet
fuggg.....
feet > ass > breasts
Correct
>RA3
>good
RA3 was trash though. They leaned too hard into the sexy girls stuff to make up for the game being mediocre
armpits > feet > breasts >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ass
>armpits
the ironic weeb of fetishes
I really don't get why so many people like shit dispensers
Because we don't like the butthole. We like the pads of fat that feel great ramming your pelvis into.
They're too close to each other for comfort though, they may as well be the same.
So are you ace? How do you not get grossed out by dicks or veganas being that close to their pee holes? Ass cheeks are way further from the sphincter that the urethra from the dick or vulva.
I'm a feet guy though, no gross parts close by, thank god.
Footgay as well but feet can get gross fast. Imagine walking barefoot through a bathroom.
Get feet out of there, weirdo
midriff>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> feet > breasts >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ass
Yes
It sadden me that they never made a post credits "bad ending" for the girls of each faction.
FRICK YA EA! YOU RUINED EVERYTHING!
>still put air warrior 2 on my 3x3
>kesmai one of EA's first victims
>nobody ever puts it in this image
I remember Kesmai.
EA was never good, the devs were the ones who were good
breasts == ass == legs
being a footgay is suffering once you realize 9/10 women have ugly feet
>inb4 3DPD
Is that 9 out of 10 women (which you are wrong) or women that are 9/10 on the beauty scale (which I find not to be accurate either)? Or you just have stupidly high standards.
>9 out of 10 women
this one
that leather studded glove, lmao
Red alert 3 is still shit.
RA1
>yeah it's a little campy, but that can't be avoided. we've got no budget
RA2
>it should be a little campy and silly in homage to the first, and lets have the guy from Twin Peaks ham it up, but also include some dark and serious parts
RA3
>DUDE IT'S TIM CURRY AND HE SAYS "SPAAAAAAAACE" LMAO FLYING BEARS ISN'T THIS JUST SO WACKY
you guys need help lmao
Game?
yeah, help cumming (post more feets)
they knew exactly what they were doing
Sauce?
It's not even a particularly degenerate fetish, it's just moronic
blame the brain, it makes sexuality overly moronic and complicated for no reason
EA was never good.
>what kind of abs you want?
>gimmie that pubic hair look
it's a meme you dip
>typical vanilla gay
I love RA3 and C&C3. Those are the last games I remember that EA had anything to do with.
Last good games*
It's a foot fetish not a scat fetish.
For me, its:
tummy>breasts=armpits>feet=ass>"personality"
Me on the left.
Is there a name for the thing where you find the general shape of women's feet aesthetically pleasing (as part of her legs/whole body, not a disembodied foot), but have no interest in fetishy shit and cumming to them?
being normal?
Light foot fetish. Normal people dont even notice feet.
It's not a fetish if you can't jack off just by it.
Finding something appealing doesn't make it a fetish.
I was just asking because I remember being in gym class during high school and finding it quite distracting when the girls did stuff on the balance beam either barefoot or in tights, I didn't really feel any desire to jack off to the memory but there was something oddly attractive and beautiful about the way the whole exercise emphasized their feet (and legs) and what they did with them.
Most based thread I've seen in some time on this board. Keep it up, fellas.
Reminder to stop the footgay menace before society is consumed by endless foot related imagery. They won't stop until everything is about feet and you're legally obligated to only be turned on by feet.
>deliberately enter a thread about feet through your own free will
>"FOOTgayS ARE OPPRESSING MEEEEEEE"
I won't let you consume the world with foothomosexualry
Non-footgays exhibit pathological behaviour. Notice their perpetual anger, their idiotic incredulity. No other fetish seems to inspire such devoted hatred, it is not only that “they don’t get it”, but that for some reason they believe that no one should “get it”, they must crusade against it. It is bizarre. All kinds off odd and abject bedroom rituals get a free pass, and yet partialism for a part of the human body, something on literally almost every single person, inspires obsessive, unbridled antipathy. Perhaps the rage is because other people’s healthy desires reminds the anti-footgay of how they are alienated from their own bodies. It is probably a very Western prejudice, an affliction of modernity (even a century ago I notice in proper bourgeois literature references to “pretty” or “handsome” feet, not something that would appear in today’s literature without the connotation of fetishism). Feet are kept out of sight and out of mind. And keeping them bundled up tight in shoes all day is what is responsible for most of their unpleasant characteristics—infection, odour, misshaping; meaning that when the shoes finally do come off most people, presented with their neglected feet, associate them with disgust... the feet themselves are unfairly blamed rather than the conditions forced upon them. Notice the completely disproportionate commodity fetishism built around shoes. I’ve had some “people” remark to me that they prefer the gaudy design of designer label sneakers over the limb you wear them on. Is there a more rotten, insectoid, consumerist and anti-human attitude than that? Preferring literally cheaply made industrial fibre, cynically marketed, a fad, over flesh and skin of an anatomical marvel which has served us for tens of millennia.
Them buying Westwood was never good. Frick off Zoomer.
you realize liking feet is only natural if you pay attention to how much women actually play with their feet