This. This is why you don't see any surprising, new and upcoming games because they're a risk. The industry is no longer about creativity and hasn't been for a long time, now it's just a business like any other. All the good developers, writers and producers etc are either retired, or stepping down, and the generation that are now growing up within the industry lack any talent whatsoever.
Not him, but is there any way to play it where you only play story missions?
I got filtered by not wanting to do side quests and got rekt by enemies.
3 years ago
Anonymous
To be honest, I have no idea. But I remember killing a griffin over twice my level. He could kill me in one hit, but evading is rather easy in TW3.
So, even with higher level enemies you should be fine.
On the other hand, you could at least finish some more interesting quests, otherwise I wouldn't be surprised if you finished the game in like 20 hours. The optional content is really a big part, if not the most, of the game.
3 years ago
Anonymous
Damn, that sucks. That's why I love Mafia 2, zero side content.
>just turn off all the marker and minimap shit that the game was designed around and is literally unplayable without since there is no journal or directions in quest dialogue
Same people that say "just dont fast travel bro" when Oblivion and Skyrim are pure tedium without it since quests were designed with fast travel in mind.
>acting like beast of the white orchard quest is easy when I had to spend 5 hours to solve it.
why would they add in such a difficult quest in white orchard?
Henry wasn't a fed, the chinks were paranoid, pissing off Joe, and since the whole game is fricking based around Vito trying to choose between his frick-up childhood friend, and being loyal to the family, it inevitably ends like it does. It's a bog standard character arc
At the end of the game both Leo and Carlo explicity state that the Chinks killed henry because he was an informant. Are you suggesting both of them lied to us?
Henry is one of the biggest Deus Ex Machinas ever seen in a videogame. There was never any indication he may have been working with the feds. He proposes a moronic business deal to Vito and Joe which of course they accept because the writters really were fishing for a bad ending and didn´t know how to properly write one. And then when the chinks chop him Vito and Joe go out of character and massacre like 180 chinks EVEN THOUGH they were explicitly told not to do that by their superiors and start a war.
Because Henry was their friend, you fricking moron. Same thing happened when they killed Marty.
I wouldn't put it past Leo or Carlo lying to them about Henry just because they want Joe out of the way because he's a wild card.
3 years ago
Anonymous
Yeah. Except your shit theory doesnt work because we know Joe is alive in Mafia 3. And Marty died in the middle of a mission when Joe and Vito´s plan failed. Not in an insanely bad written out of character orgy of rage.
Also. How come the chinks killed Henry without informing the other families leaders they were going to do it? Did every phone in Bay City stop working? that doesn´t seem very plausible Lol.
3 years ago
Anonymous
>A heckin plot holerino
3 years ago
Anonymous
Let's say Henry was a fed then, it doesn't change Vito and Joe's relationship to him at all. It has a whole fricking montage of them becoming friends with him and shit, by the time he gets murdered, they're tight as hell. It doesn't matter if he's a fed or not. >b-but muh mafia 3
Wasn't even made by the same devs.
3 years ago
Anonymous
>Wasn't even made by the same devs.
It is still canon 😉
>they're tight as hell.
So Vito and Joe fricked themselves because they were good friends with Henry? That is interesting. I dont renember Joe screwing up his life when Vito went to Jail. I guess Joe and Vito weren´t such good friends after all LOL.
Just admit it. Mafia´s 2 ending is a fricking failure and it ruined the story. There is no need to go full moron to defend it.
3 years ago
Anonymous
Because everyone b***hed about Joe presumably dying in 2. They didn't have any plans for 3 by then or it wouldn't have been about a fricking Black person.
And did you play the Joe DLC? He did everything to make sure he knew who was responsible for locking Vito up and making them pay. I'm not even defending the ending but you have some characterization of Joe in your head that's just wrong.
Mafia 2 and 3 are dogshit 2 was one of the worst scams in gaming at the time if you werent 9 years old when you played it. One of the biggest let downs in gaming history for sure.
You guys really going to start idolized 2? Even back then I felt ripped off and that feeling was cemented when I learned that they cut a bunch of content with the Plana being that they would sell it back to us as DLC. I think only one major DLC expansion came out, and it wasn't even for the base game, it was new content for a spin off arcade like mode or something. They never released shit afterwards. The game just fricking escalates in the last minute with no build up to it and then the credits roll.
reeeee i want another game set in the 50's america
fine, you'll have it, you'll be a black woman fighting structural racism and the evil goverment, deal?
... i don't want it anymore, meanie
🙁
Sounds like a pretty good premise for a game
2016 gaming must've made you cream ur jeans then.
>no game where you play as kkk lynching Black folk
why even live bros
Kys moron.
Good games don't sell, ubisoft skinnerboxes with copy pasted content and shallow grind progression systems do though.
This. This is why you don't see any surprising, new and upcoming games because they're a risk. The industry is no longer about creativity and hasn't been for a long time, now it's just a business like any other. All the good developers, writers and producers etc are either retired, or stepping down, and the generation that are now growing up within the industry lack any talent whatsoever.
Is this LA Noire?
Mafia ニ
Mafia II
the witcher 3 is good
no, it's shit
turn off the minimap then
250 hours in. 100% the game. it's shit. worst $15 i ever spent.
Damn, for me it's a very solid 8/10 and I only spent 180 hours before getting bored of it. You must've really loved it.
Not him, but is there any way to play it where you only play story missions?
I got filtered by not wanting to do side quests and got rekt by enemies.
To be honest, I have no idea. But I remember killing a griffin over twice my level. He could kill me in one hit, but evading is rather easy in TW3.
So, even with higher level enemies you should be fine.
On the other hand, you could at least finish some more interesting quests, otherwise I wouldn't be surprised if you finished the game in like 20 hours. The optional content is really a big part, if not the most, of the game.
Damn, that sucks. That's why I love Mafia 2, zero side content.
>just turn off all the marker and minimap shit that the game was designed around and is literally unplayable without since there is no journal or directions in quest dialogue
Yeah I love braindead moron comments like this.
Same people that say "just dont fast travel bro" when Oblivion and Skyrim are pure tedium without it since quests were designed with fast travel in mind.
>acting like beast of the white orchard quest is easy when I had to spend 5 hours to solve it.
why would they add in such a difficult quest in white orchard?
1 and 2 were both better. 3 is the size of an ocean, but the depth of a puddle.
>JP2GMD
wypierdalaj
With a car you can go anywhere...
Mafia 2 is pure soul, the atmosphere of that game is superb from the city design to the fricking radio ads from the 40-50s.
Mafia 2 is shit though. The story could have been very good but it ends abruptly, the gameplay is mediocre, and bay city is completly wasted.
>but it ends abruptly
?????????????
it's literally a bookend to the story
>+10 chapters detailing Vito´s rise in the criminal underworld.
2 last chapters:
>AAY Henry was a fed XD (no buildup whatsoever) *bad ending*.
Yeah... not abrupt at all
Henry wasn't a fed, the chinks were paranoid, pissing off Joe, and since the whole game is fricking based around Vito trying to choose between his frick-up childhood friend, and being loyal to the family, it inevitably ends like it does. It's a bog standard character arc
You clearly didn´t put a lot of attention.
At the end of the game both Leo and Carlo explicity state that the Chinks killed henry because he was an informant. Are you suggesting both of them lied to us?
Henry is one of the biggest Deus Ex Machinas ever seen in a videogame. There was never any indication he may have been working with the feds. He proposes a moronic business deal to Vito and Joe which of course they accept because the writters really were fishing for a bad ending and didn´t know how to properly write one. And then when the chinks chop him Vito and Joe go out of character and massacre like 180 chinks EVEN THOUGH they were explicitly told not to do that by their superiors and start a war.
Because Henry was their friend, you fricking moron. Same thing happened when they killed Marty.
I wouldn't put it past Leo or Carlo lying to them about Henry just because they want Joe out of the way because he's a wild card.
Yeah. Except your shit theory doesnt work because we know Joe is alive in Mafia 3. And Marty died in the middle of a mission when Joe and Vito´s plan failed. Not in an insanely bad written out of character orgy of rage.
Also. How come the chinks killed Henry without informing the other families leaders they were going to do it? Did every phone in Bay City stop working? that doesn´t seem very plausible Lol.
>A heckin plot holerino
Let's say Henry was a fed then, it doesn't change Vito and Joe's relationship to him at all. It has a whole fricking montage of them becoming friends with him and shit, by the time he gets murdered, they're tight as hell. It doesn't matter if he's a fed or not.
>b-but muh mafia 3
Wasn't even made by the same devs.
>Wasn't even made by the same devs.
It is still canon 😉
>they're tight as hell.
So Vito and Joe fricked themselves because they were good friends with Henry? That is interesting. I dont renember Joe screwing up his life when Vito went to Jail. I guess Joe and Vito weren´t such good friends after all LOL.
Just admit it. Mafia´s 2 ending is a fricking failure and it ruined the story. There is no need to go full moron to defend it.
Because everyone b***hed about Joe presumably dying in 2. They didn't have any plans for 3 by then or it wouldn't have been about a fricking Black person.
And did you play the Joe DLC? He did everything to make sure he knew who was responsible for locking Vito up and making them pay. I'm not even defending the ending but you have some characterization of Joe in your head that's just wrong.
>Henry wasn't a fed
"So how's your english so good?"
>the whole game is fricking based
So true.
Witcher 2 was good so was W1.
What's your obsession with comparing Mafia 2's opening sequence with Cyberpunk 2077 for some reason?
I play games... and sometimes i enjoy them.
And every time i enjoy them i remember just how much i did not enjoy the shitcher and cyberturd.
rent free
>He painted the Jefferson yellow
Fricking based. I always do that cause pic related
Mafia 2 and 3 are dogshit 2 was one of the worst scams in gaming at the time if you werent 9 years old when you played it. One of the biggest let downs in gaming history for sure.
hehe nice licence plate anon
SOVL
You guys really going to start idolized 2? Even back then I felt ripped off and that feeling was cemented when I learned that they cut a bunch of content with the Plana being that they would sell it back to us as DLC. I think only one major DLC expansion came out, and it wasn't even for the base game, it was new content for a spin off arcade like mode or something. They never released shit afterwards. The game just fricking escalates in the last minute with no build up to it and then the credits roll.
I think I used the gas station maybe once in Mafia II