Why does Nintendo not sue blatant rip-offs like Coromon or Nexomon into the ground?

Why does Nintendo not sue blatant rip-offs like Coromon or Nexomon into the ground? Why are these homosexuals allowed to make shitty cash grabs stealing everything from Pokemon and they get away with it? Frick these uncreative fricks and their shitty Pokemon clones.

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Even they realize that Gen 5 is the peak Pokemon aesthetic, something GameFreak still hasn't come to terms with.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That looks more like Gen 4 than Gen 5.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Even they realize that Gen 5 is the peak Pokemon aesthetic, something GameFreak still hasn't come to terms with.

        Looks like none of them. Gen 4 and 5 look like dogshit compared to this.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      gen 5 looks like dogshit compared to the game in the OP.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why does Nintendo not sue blatant rip-offs like Sonic the Hedgehog or Shovel Knight into the ground? Why are these homosexuals allowed to make shitty cash grabs stealing everything from Super Mario and they get away with it? Frick these uncreative fricks and their shitty Super Mario clones.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Why does Nintendo not sue blatant rip-offs like Ori and the Blind Forest or Hollow Knight into the ground? Why are these homosexuals allowed to make shitty cash grabs stealing everything from Metroid and they get away with it? Frick these uncreative fricks and their shitty Metroid clones.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Why does Nintendo not sue blatant rip-offs like Ori and the Blind Forest or Hollow Knight into the ground? Why are these homosexuals allowed to make shitty cash grabs stealing everything from Metroid and they get away with it? Frick these uncreative fricks and their shitty Metroid clones.

      Why does Rare/Microsoft not sue blatant rip-offs like Yooka Laylee or a Hat in Time into the ground? Why are these homosexuals allowed to make shitty cash grabs stealing everything from Banjo and Kazooie and they get away with it? Frick these uncreative fricks and their shitty BnK clones.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Was this a stealth shill thread to get people to play Coromon? Because that looks tremendously better than every Pokemon game
    Still not giving israelites money though, frick off

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    That’s like asking why Acitvision doesn’t sue other companies for making FPS games. You ever hear of a thing called “genres”?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >You ever hear of a thing called “genres”?
      Pokemon isn't a genre. Other people can't make Pokemon games, only GF can.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why didn't Enix use Pokemon for ripping off Dragon Quest?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Not comparable. While Pokemon took heavy inspiration from DQ, it's not a straight up clone like Nexomon or Coromon is to Pokemon.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      yeah... why didnt it??? i mean
      the games are not similar at all lmao

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Please tell me, is there any pokemon clone that has NO troony PRONOUNSHIT LIKE TEM-TEM AND MONSTER CROWN?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Grow up homosexual

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        ISIS won, you will never get rid of Heroin from your streets Burgerclapper

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Because neither Coromon nor Nexomon are using intellectual property of TPC in any way so you can keep shitting yourself.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >crying about shitty cash grabs
    Have you seen the current state of Pokemon?

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Why do the rights holders of one of the most successful franchises in human history not use a tool to punish copyright infringement take down insignificant, no name, derivative knock offs that use legally distinct terms, characters etc and could never realistically affect them in any way to destroy them?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The Tetris precedent means they could sue and would win.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >B-BOG CORPORATION AND FRANCHISE GET EM

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >implying pokemon is the first monster taming game
    >implying nintento owns pixel style
    >implying nintendo doesn't already sue anything that looks like their IP

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Believe me, if Nintendo thought they could win any case against them, they would sue in an instant. "Ripping off" something isn't the same thing as copyright infringement. You can't copyright "video game where you tame creatures to battle other creatures."

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Same reason that Atlus doesn't sue Nintendo for blatant rip-offs like Pokemon

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    you cant copyright game mechanics or genres, the only way they could sue if they used pokemon designs or names.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why does Ganker not sue blatant rip-offs like Reddit or Twitter into the ground? Why are these homosexuals allowed to make shitty cash grabs stealing everything from Ganker and they get away with it? Frick these uncreative fricks and their shitty Ganker clones.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      We need them to exist to pull off some of th userbase.
      Ganker is still too crowded.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >gamefreak owns the suffix -mon
    >implying pokemon isn't already a ripoff of smt

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *