NTA, but the problem is the way the Civilization treats science is really simplistic. It shouldn't be overly complicated, but I think Stellaris does it much better by splitting it into three different categories.
When we strategy gamers take over the business world due to our leet organizational abilities and autism, we're going to need to have a shibboleth so as to identify each other.
I suggest "Sneed."
Or "Black person."
I wrote a paper before, it's an art of bullshitting your way out of a given problem that benefits no one. Much like gaming, actually.
Is management like that?
Just tried civ 6 again on King and god the AI is brainless. Doesn't build ANY defences whatsoever. Amazingly, as if it werent bad enough on pc moving 1 unit per tile is even more tedious on console, great game design there
>NOOOOO I DON'T KNOW HOW TO FIGHT A STACK, ARMIES IRL DID NOT CONCENTRATED HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF UNITS IN THE SAME PROVINCE TO FIGHT GIGANTIC BATTLES, GIB ME 1UPT AND A INCOMPENTENT AI AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH
>Spam "Science" buildings
>Make tanks
>Win
Nice "Game"
only the case if you're playing against the AI. and it's easy to win all victory types against the AI anyway.
I love tanks okay?
>scientific advancement is a hack!
t. Chang
NTA, but the problem is the way the Civilization treats science is really simplistic. It shouldn't be overly complicated, but I think Stellaris does it much better by splitting it into three different categories.
GAMERS RISE UP
to middle management positions!
When we strategy gamers take over the business world due to our leet organizational abilities and autism, we're going to need to have a shibboleth so as to identify each other.
I suggest "Sneed."
Or "Black person."
We already have one, newbie
Just start talking about RTT and we'll know you're from here.
>you have spent years pressing the button for fun
>now you press the button for profit
Finally, all those years of playing videogames in the dark will pay off
I wrote a paper before, it's an art of bullshitting your way out of a given problem that benefits no one. Much like gaming, actually.
Is management like that?
>civ is a totalitarian shithole using everything up to snipe wonder-builder shitters
>welcome to amazon
Just tried civ 6 again on King and god the AI is brainless. Doesn't build ANY defences whatsoever. Amazingly, as if it werent bad enough on pc moving 1 unit per tile is even more tedious on console, great game design there
Shit boardgame
Civ 4's combat was the absolute worst.
uh oh watch out they'll hear you
Worst combat is objectively V.
agreed, i've heard people praise but i don't understand what sort of brain worms do they have
>NOOOOO I DON'T KNOW HOW TO FIGHT A STACK, ARMIES IRL DID NOT CONCENTRATED HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF UNITS IN THE SAME PROVINCE TO FIGHT GIGANTIC BATTLES, GIB ME 1UPT AND A INCOMPENTENT AI AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH
I HATE 5/6 BABIES
>I want realism
Oh boy, will you not like it when you'll play any strategy video game
Then just called it a fantasy game and be done with it.
Do the needful and learned english sir ok?
>learned
It's learn and not "learned" try to perfect your English before correcting others sir