/leftypol/ demoralization
These people don’t win shit, all they do is destroy and they’re useful idiots who have shitty lives living in small apartments with dead end jobs due to having a shitty father or no father at all. Once the people in power don’t need them they’ll be easily thrown off the bus.
Nah, I definitely hate homosexuals more than I hate white dudes.
There are white dudes I can get along with, there are no homosexuals I can get along with nowadays.
This is the one thing I will never get >America is a racist xenophobic shithole, chud >nyooooo I must come and settle down in this racist xenophobic shithole!
Frick you op for even reposting his useless tweets. Imagine ever using Twitter. I'm glad Elon is destroying it and putting half its employees out of work. With any hope they will all starve.
>Twitter has slowly been noticing that gay men are actually the most consistently misogynistic and transphobic group on the planet
It's pretty funny to watch, if conservative morons weren't constantly hogging the limelight there'd be a much funnier fight starting by now.
Libtards will destroy the narratives they can't control or produce themselves. You don't seem to understand there's a war being waged against you and articles like this are the bullet.
Anon, get this through your poorly developed brain: there is no double standard. The writers do not give a shit about the stance, they care about engagement. They will write whatever generates the most clicks, which is going to be whatever generates the most outrage in their readers. You are perpetuating this behaviour by spreading whatever plague they write.
From now on, ignore it. Let it be and in time this type of "journalism" will disappear, to be replaced by whatever else works to generate clicks.
This can be applied to any thing that generates money from attention: celebrities, pundits, politicians, products and companies.
There was a rebuttal. You can't understand it because you are stupid. Or I am stupid for responding as if you aren't trolling. In either case, continuing this would clearly be stupid.
>complaining is actually counter-productive! >silence actually changes things! >spreading info does no good, it's better to be ignorant! >this can be applied to anything- don't care about what people do or say, just consume and be silent and shut the frick up! this is genuis! i'm so incredibly intelligant and everyone is so dubm!
The problem with this line of thinking is illustrated by the replies. We could very well solve issued like this by not engaging, but not enough people will get on board. Anons feel as their righteous indignation is more valuable than a click on the article. It isn't.
describe, in detail, how consumers ignoring journalists pushing certain agendas, and being lockstep in tune with corporate higher-ups, would solve said issues of corporations pushing certain agendas.
You can't, because what you promote is conformity, censorship, and moronic complacency until the solidification has been made complete. Consumer's speaking their voices matter and only moronic dumbshits think encouraging consumer silence is an actually legitimate answer to solving cross-sectional agenda collaborations
you and your kind are dogs trying to control and herd consumers as though consumers were animals to be corralled and directed
consumer awareness spreads social change because consumers can change their habits and/or show support to other auxiliaries and/or spread memetic influences
whereas consumer ignorance only perpetuates the problem by encouraging silence in the face of objective moronation and cannot circumvent a problem it allows journalists to fester and preach its totally-not-a-religion-but-you're-a-bigot-aka-a-sinner-if-you-disagree without any criticism whatsoever
the first pursuit allows conceptual battling, whereas the second approach allows literal corporate shills and journalist preachers to spread their Holy Word of Modern Sensibilities
now it's your turn to >describe, in detail, how consumers ignoring journalists pushing certain agendas, and being lockstep in tune with corporate higher-ups, would solve said issues of corporations pushing certain agendas
You can be aware of something bad and still recognize that the best to fight it is to change the channel, and not hand it out to all your friends so you can complain about it. It is brain pollution, and since you do not have the power to delete it (i.e. clean it up) the most responsible thing you can do is to not multiply it.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>don't complain because knowledge about corporate interests are brain pollution
the disease is within submission and acceptance, not within criticism, for complaining exists as a form of consumer resistance and memetic structural objectification. pushing silence enforces the destruction of consumer preferences as non-criticized corporate manifestations become common-place and established.
10 months ago
Anonymous
I was going to get angry at your post because I thought you were messing with me, but then I thought "heh, this sounds like a Deus Ex NPC" which is cool and brought my mind back to vidya, so thanks anon. Perhaps you are right.
>consumer awareness spreads social change because consumers can change their habits and/or show support to other auxiliaries and/or spread memetic influences
Normalgay cattle that form the vast majority of the consumer wallet voting bloc do not, in fact, browse Ganker. They continue to buy new thing and get excited for next new thing irrespective of these threads. Most Gankerirgins are brownoid pirates who won't buy anything regardless of whether they're based or woke
not that anon but pointing at something and sharing it all over and saying "Look at this! I can't believe it! Isn't this an outrage?!" is not resisting anything, it's signal boosting. And I will criticize leftists on Twitter who do the same thing, by digging up something old and racist, spreading it around to as many people as possible, most of whom would have never heard of it otherwise, and then saying "my goodness we have to stop this filth from proliferating!"
>signal boosting is bad
How is spreading news of journalistic influences collaborating with corporations trying to create sociocultural change a bad thing? >bringing partisan crap into this
don't be fricking moronic, you homosexual ass Black person
>just let preachers spread their word, what harm can be done?
let's just ignore history what happens every time borderline religious journalists continue to push their propaganda
>generic tough guy image
All you do is make it easier to be discredited because what is happening is you get people lashing out at every little thing no matter how minor and it turns into a cried wolf type situation where nobody takes anyone seriously anymore because it's all just constant noise.
that's the issue here, anon
these journalists are lockstep with corporate interests, they write articles which criticize thing that company is removing and fans are complaining about and then promote things which are moreorless the same thing they previously removed but this time for homosexuals and queers
pushing for ignorance and silence further normalizes things like pic related because without any form of resistance, companies are free to push whatever agenda they desire without zero consumer pushback whatsoever.
[...]
[...]
/leftypol/ demoralization
These people don’t win shit, all they do is destroy and they’re useful idiots who have shitty lives living in small apartments with dead end jobs due to having a shitty father or no father at all. Once the people in power don’t need them they’ll be easily thrown off the bus.
>Ganker criticizing double standards after it spent 1 month seething about BG3
lmao
Go back to r/gamingcirclejerk
10 months ago
Anonymous
>journalists are useful idiots >so therefore ignore them and go to a place more censorious than this shithole
delete your twatter
>I shitposted on Ganker, I'm part of THE RESISTANCE!
the absolute state of Ganker
10 months ago
Anonymous
>consumer criticism is not a valid form of resistance to corporate ideas, it's moronic and useless!
the absolute state of newshitter tourists
10 months ago
Anonymous
>we're gonna take down the system.... by shitposting on Ganker!!!!! >societal culture nosedives in record time
bravo you brave culture warrior you
10 months ago
Anonymous
>if you criticize company thing, it's a cultural war >if you accept it, it's not cultural
how is consumer resistance cultural, while acceptance and submission like a little b***h, which is what you preach, is not cultural?
10 months ago
Anonymous
>newshitter tourists >won't say newbie >is under the illusion Ganker actually has any reach >calls others tourists
lol
lmao, maybe
10 months ago
Anonymous
you're a homosexual through and through, matters not whether you're firstly acknowledged as a newhomosexual or a shitter
10 months ago
Anonymous
if you don't like something, just don't buy it bro. it's that simple. vote with your wallet.
10 months ago
Anonymous
until warlords like The Finkle swoops in, which is why consumer silence entirely benefits economic and journalist collaborations which are pushing corporate interests
without any sort of consumer resistance whatsoever, consumer education about corporate decisions becomes about being unironic paypiggie whales, rather than memetic support for certain ideals which have a staying power within a given franchise or product which has a certain sense of identity within a given community.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>muh Blackrock
yawn. conspiracy theorists are so lazy nowadays.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Debunk it.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>we're gonna take down the system.... by shitposting on Ganker!!!!! >societal culture nosedives in record time
bravo you brave culture warrior you
>newshitter tourists >won't say newbie >is under the illusion Ganker actually has any reach >calls others tourists
lol
lmao, maybe
NTA, but where else are you even allowed to talk openly about these things anyway.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Fair point. Anon just seems to be under the illusion that it's more than talking and is actually accomplishing anything.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Well don't underestimate the reach of this place, if this truly was no more than some backwaters shithole out on the far reaches of the clear net there would be no need to shill or, or raid here, or even come here at all.
10 months ago
Anonymous
see
if you don't like something, just don't buy it bro. it's that simple. vote with your wallet.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Haven't bought a single piece of western media in over a decade now. That still doesn't answer the question.
10 months ago
Anonymous
because it's a moronic question, "talking about these things", on Ganker or elsewhere, won't accomplish anything. you can't stop progress.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Than what you said has nothing to do with what I said.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>here or elsewhere
so talking about issues never solves issues? what the frick?
And whose progress?
that's the major problem with anons like you, you push moronic ideas like "it's progress" without realizing you're essentially pushing a form of idpol
10 months ago
Anonymous
>so talking about issues never solves issues?
when your opinion is objectively wrong, no.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Just like yours?
10 months ago
Anonymous
All of my opinions are objectively correct, though.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Well, in your head.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Good, my head is the only important one.
10 months ago
Anonymous
yo, this dude is a walking god his shit is fire fr fr no cap
hey jesus 2.0! when you gonna reset the earth and wipe out all the unbelievers and establish your eternal kingdom? >tfw playing gnostic vidya
10 months ago
Anonymous
If he's a walking god we'll have to team up on him, the Demiurge can't keep us trapped forever
10 months ago
Anonymous
We will smash the Demiurge and his false reality and free the divine shards within the clayborn and humanity shall become truly great
10 months ago
Anonymous
Honestly, I'm pretty interested in Gnostic religion but don't know a whole lot about it, do you have any pointers on where to start?
10 months ago
Anonymous
>objectively wrong
to the journalists?
so be silent because corporate interests are right and journies cannot be wrong?
10 months ago
Anonymous
10 months ago
Anonymous
Couldn't you do this with most cartoon women and get a similar result?
10 months ago
Anonymous
with leftists cartoons, yes
the left only knows how to hate beauty because they are ugly themselves
10 months ago
Anonymous
No
Male and female characters are supposed to be drawn differently
This is a leftist thing.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>women can't be strong so you make her a man instead
Now that's what I call empowerment.
10 months ago
Anonymous
thats my problem with the thing. a strong women needs to be a women. i think in Tremors 1990 they did the strong women perfectly, where she's a seismologist, witty, courageous and not some bimbo while still having a female appeal or the opposite, a strong man in women getup
10 months ago
Anonymous
Looks like Ed Wuncler from The Boondocks.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>so talking about issues never solves issues?
What issue? "There aren't enough sexy women in mainstream video games"?
10 months ago
Anonymous
if "too many sexy female characters in video games" can be an issue, then it's perfectly reasonable for "not enough sexy female characters in video games" to be an issue as well.
10 months ago
Anonymous
"noooo I can't fap to this character, she's not sexy enough!!!" is not "an issue".
Not to mention that there are still plenty of games with sexy female characters.
10 months ago
Anonymous
then "noooooo this female is too sexy it's making me take mental damage" is not an issue either.
10 months ago
Anonymous
One thing has meaningful real life consequences, the other thing doesn't.
10 months ago
Anonymous
how is having a sexy woman available damaging to your mental health?
imagine being so fragile about genuine heterosexuals loving aspects of biological females that you propose censorship because men shouldn't lust after women or some homosexual shit
10 months ago
Anonymous
No it doesn't.
10 months ago
Anonymous
if "nooo i can't fap" is not an issue then "yaaay straight men can fap" is also not an issue yet, unsurprisingly, the second is almost always an issue
10 months ago
Anonymous
just buy porn games if you want to fap?
10 months ago
Anonymous
>Why have sexy stuff in vidya?
JUST WATCH PORN LOL >Why have violence in vidya?
JUST WATCH LIVELEAK LMAO >Why have mature adult concepts?
JUST WATCH A DOCUMENTARY HAHA >Why have a game with spirituality?
JUST GO TO CHURCH LEL >Why have a game with critical thinking and puzzle-solving?
JUST READ A BOOK KEK >Why have a game with realism?
JUST STEP OUTSIDE HEHEHE >Why have a game with fantasy?
JUST PLAY WITH REAL THINGS LUL
10 months ago
Anonymous
amazing, 7 comparisons and yet they're all completely moronic.
10 months ago
Anonymous
He's exactly right tho? You've created a false dichotomy that he should go and do something else instead of enjoy entertainment in the way he's chosen. It's literally on-the-nose to the "go watch porn" bullshit you threw in his face.
10 months ago
Anonymous
I didn't say "Go watch porn", I said "Go buy porn video games". The difference should be obvious.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Porn games are vastly under-developed compared to triple-A games that just contain fanservice. You won't find porn games on the same budget precisely because sexuality is demonized and reaches a much smaller audience.
10 months ago
Anonymous
...which is why you should buy porn video games, if you want porn video games with a higher budget? >sexuality is demonized and reaches a much smaller audience.
Are you really saying that pornography is a niche thing that very few people consume?
10 months ago
Anonymous
>Are you really saying that pornography is a niche thing that very few people consume?
Pornography GAMES absolutely are. They obviously, observably are. Why are you so dishonest?
10 months ago
Anonymous
>sexuality is demonized, but ONLY in video games
Do you really believe this?
10 months ago
Anonymous
Another incredible misquote. Sex content has to slide under a certain bar to get their movies in the average theater too. Broadcast TV and radio obviously won't just air anything either. You can obviously buy porn movies, but think about how much easier it is to record two people having sex than it is to develop a game from scratch that does the same thing. That requires a substantial budget where porn videos do not.
10 months ago
Anonymous
So what? We're just going back to what I said, which is, "if you want porn video games with a higher budget, buy more porn video games". I've never said that porn games weren't niche, I just said that it wasn't because "sexuality is demonized". Ton of people watch porn. It's a multi-billion dollar industry. Porn video games are even allowed on Steam nowadays. If porn video games are not successful, it's not for some moronic reason like "sexuality is demonized".
10 months ago
Anonymous
I'm not really interested in your argument beyond your original assertion anon should just go buy porn if he wants fanservice. Which is of course bullshit. If you just want more people to buy porn games and get them bigger budgets, fine. But nobody should be forced to do that if they want to see attractive females in games.
10 months ago
Anonymous
I could have said "buy video games with fansevice in them if you want more video games with fanservice in them" and my argument would have been the same. These games undeniably still exist. Porn was just an example, idk why it is so hard to understand this.
I'm just saying that Ganker should stop whining when some video game doesn't appeal to them (e.g. doesn't have enough fanservice) and just buy video games that do appeal to them.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Sadly there's a total lack of anything good lately with such content. There's nothing good at all for that matter. Everything is shit.
10 months ago
Anonymous
"Vote with your wallet" only works when the industry isn't scared stiff of putting attractive women in their games. Even doing this gets them labeled "chuds" these days.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>sexuality is demonized
it use to be but since people driving this mentality is dying out and getting old and it is trendy to be sexual deviant with 10 different genders it sure as shit ceases to be demonized.
10 months ago
Anonymous
That's how it used to be but since bg3 came out, now it is completly acceptable fill you AAA games with as much degeneracy as possible, as long as women are ugly and there is homosexual sex.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Because they suck as actual games and are even worse at being games than movie games.
10 months ago
Anonymous
There's no inherent reason why they should be worse than any other game. That's just how it works out because they don't have a budget or a broad audience compared to most retail released games.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Its fundamentally because they always design with porn in mind first and the game part is tacked on low effort shit most of the time and includes infamous situations like missing out on unlocking and seeing stuff when you're actually good at the game because you're meant to lose to see the sex scenes.
10 months ago
Anonymous
There's way more kinds of pornographic games than you're asserting. Not every h-game is a fem mc action platformer with sex on defeat.
10 months ago
Anonymous
what's truly amazing is how selectively moronic your position is, which is precisely what the 7 comparisons pinpoint. You pretend that being selective about what types of games can have straight sexual elements is not a quasi-religious sociopolitical position and outright moralhomosexualry
your arbitration specifies limiting "harmful" straight male sexuality towards pornography, which is somehow magically not harmful, when in other mediums, such as telelvision, the expression of sexuality is not defacto pornography. Simultaneously, you support shoving homosexual shit in a video game is okay and an important issue whereas you think criticism over including sexy females is an unimportant issue
your stance is incredibly moronic and simplistic moralhomosexual b***hing over heterosexual elements within vidya
tldr you're infected with the gay
10 months ago
Anonymous
why are you putting words into my mouth and ranting about schizo bs when I literally just said "if you want more of [x] in your video games, buy video games with [x] in them"? It's that simple. You just have to acknowledge the sad reality that not EVERY video game is forced to appeal to you specifically, and that's ok.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Why do specifically sexual elements have to be in only pornographic games?
10 months ago
Anonymous
When did I say that? I was replying to someone talking about how "reee I can't fap to vidya anymore!!!". If you want to fap to video games, buying porn video games is the most obvious answer.
If you just want video games with fanservice in them, again, feel free to buy video games with fanservice. There are no laws forbidding developers from making them.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Frick off. I'll buy anything I want, including any degree of fanservice short of "porn" I choose.
10 months ago
Anonymous
Ok? Buy it then?
10 months ago
Anonymous
Just go to a pride parade if you want to see gay representation
See, this game is not hard at all
10 months ago
Anonymous
Dishonest liberal hyperbole. All you have is attempting to make people stupid for wanting what they want.
10 months ago
Anonymous
If talking about things don't matter, then you should just follow your own advice and stop posting lmao.
10 months ago
Anonymous
why are you assuming that my intent when posting in this thread is the same as your intent?
10 months ago
Anonymous
Oh, so only talkin about some things matter? What things matter to talk about and what things don't matter to talk about?
10 months ago
Anonymous
>"so only talkin about some things matter?"
i've never said that.
your intent is to convince people that your moronic opinion is right. circlejerking on Ganker (or on some other irrelevant website) obviously won't accomplish that. I have a different reason for posting in this thread.
10 months ago
Anonymous
What do you think you can accomplish by posting in this thread that no one else can?
10 months ago
Anonymous
>What do you think you can accomplish by posting in this thread
Same reason why anyone mentally healthy posts on this shithole:to have fun :^)
10 months ago
Anonymous
So you are now the arbiter of having fun?
10 months ago
Anonymous
If you think circlejerking on Ganker is fun, np. My point was just that you're extremely moronic if you think that it will actually accomplish anything.
>>The writers do not give a shit about the stance, they care about engagement. They will write whatever generates the most clicks >nothing in the thread links to the actual article and nobody is going to seek it out and read it in its entirety >the thread will be gone in 10 minutes tops
You haven't thought this through, have you?
>nobody is going to seek it out and read it in its entirety
very naive assumption anon. this site is not immune to these tactics. if people are sharing and talking about it, it's working.
>The writers do not give a shit about the stance, they care about engagement. They will write whatever generates the most clicks, which is going to be whatever generates the most outrage in their readers
So why they are not making "nazis are actually the good guys" "I want more sexy e-girls" etc articles? That would generate MUCH more outrage and clicks from troons and leftist, aka the majority of social media gays
the sentiment is correct but as you've accidently demonstrated, more than half of people who read this are simply too moronic to follow suit even when told the start, middle and end
The seething replies you are getting basically prove your point. However, ignoring your post would have also proven your point. Is there a middle ground that ignores clickbait while also pointing out how dumb it is?
>guy getting naked and showing ass for a quarter of a second to soak in a sauna and some gaygo liking it is totally the same thing as the camera inappropriately focusing on a character's ass while she's having a serious conversation with the player about her being an artificial creation and then also discussing how she's worried about her sister because of their abusive/controlling father
>uh see, her fully covered ass is focused upon for more than a brief second so it's evil and harmful while a naked guy ass that a journalist got a woody over and salivated over seeing his naked butt so much the journalist pretended it's actually journalism to talk about how much he likes seeing Jin's ass-cheeks is okay and in fact justified
you're a hypocritical gay homosexual
what's new?
OH NO BETTER SHOW MORE MALE PROTAGONISTS BARE ASS CHEEKS IF ANY CAMERA DARES TO LOOK AT A WOMAN'S ASS FOR MORE THAN 10 SECONDS! YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO LOOK AT FEMALE ASSES THIS IS WRONG
BARE NAKED MAN BUTTS ARE THE ONLY THING OKAY
10 months ago
Anonymous
Not him but the camera doesn't deliberately zoom in on the MCs ass in GOT when he's getting ready to get into the sauna. In Mass Effect, it's deliberate with Miranda to make things sexual during something that's not supposed to be sexual nor arousing at all, but a serious emotional conversation. It's pretty sad that you're pretending not to understand nor see the difference.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>doubling down on his disease
NO YOU SEE IT DOESN'T ZOOM IN MAN ASS, IT ONLY SHOWS NAKED MAN ASS SO IT'S GOOD
BUT WHEN IT A FULLY CLOTHED FEMALE ASS IS SHOWN, THEN IT IS BAD AND WRONG AND OBJECTIFYING HOW DARE YOU LOOK AT A WOMAN'S ASS YOU SHOULD ONLY BE CHEERING ON MAN ASS
10 months ago
Anonymous
>I AM SILLY
10 months ago
Anonymous
I THINK NAKED MAN ASS IS OKAY TO SHOW BECAUSE IT'S NOT ZOOMED IN BUT WHEN A FULLY CLOTHED WOMAN HAS AN ASS SHOT THEN IT IS ACTUALLY CREEPY AND DISGUSTING
10 months ago
Anonymous
SHOWING NAKED MAN BUTT IS FINE WHEN HE'S DOING SOMETHING NATURAL
SHOWING FEMALE BUTT IS DEMEANING WHEN SHE'S TALKING
This is why nobody cares about what you think, you argue like a child throwing a tantrum because he isn't getting his way.
10 months ago
Anonymous
NAKED MAN ASS WITH NO ZOOM IS GOOD
FULLY CLOTHED FEMALE ASS SHOT IS EVIL
10 months ago
Anonymous
>NO YOU SEE IT DOESN'T ZOOM IN MAN ASS, IT ONLY SHOWS NAKED MAN ASS
Well yeah. He's getting into a sauna. Him being naked doing so is natural. It's not sexual unless your a coomer who can't see someone nude without wanting to jerk off.
>BUT WHEN IT A FULLY CLOTHED FEMALE ASS IS SHOWN, THEN IT IS BAD AND WRONG AND OBJECTIFYING
When it's done at a time where it's unnecessary and for no reason other than to arouse you at a time when things are supposed to be serious and emotional, sure. Why does there need to be a lingering butt-shot as she's telling someone her tragic story? It just demeans everything.
10 months ago
Anonymous
SHOWING NAKED MAN BUTT IS FINE WHEN HE'S DOING SOMETHING NATURAL
SHOWING FEMALE BUTT IS DEMEANING WHEN SHE'S TALKING
10 months ago
Anonymous
>SHOWING NAKED MAN BUTT IS FINE WHEN HE'S DOING SOMETHING NATURAL
Yes. I don't get what you're trying to do here. That's correct. It'd be the same if the MC was female.
>SHOWING FEMALE BUTT IS DEMEANING WHEN SHE'S TALKING
When it's a deliberate butt-shot, yes. The camera is literally still, right on her ass. As she's talking about something important/emotional. It's not like the camera is moving and her butt just happens to be in the shot for half-a-second. It's purposely fixed for a good bit with her butt fully in the shot. I don't get why you're pretending not to understand and that there's no context whatsoever to these things. What do you get out of this? I know you're not actually going to reply with anything with substance and just make another all-caps post or whatever, but please try at least.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>It's bad because it just is ok???
Is miranda's ass just supposed to disappear or what? The entire point of her character is that she is sexual, why should they need to obfuscate that fact in every cutscene she is in?
10 months ago
Anonymous
what's wrong with being "demeaning" towards fake people
10 months ago
Anonymous
If a woman's ass was in frame getting into a hot spring, you would be crying foul and you fricking know it. Why do they need to include that? Why does the camera need to show it? The answer is "it doesn't"... though in both cases, it doesn't fricking matter. There's nothing wrong with letting players see sexy things. Including an ass just in the frame while talking to someone.
That's literally what happens. You're having a conversation about a serious topic and there's a sudden ass shot that comes out of nowhere for no reason. It's not even a pov shot. It looks like a blatant mistake because nobody knows why anyone would intentionally have that happen there instead of during the romance path or anything else.
>ACKshually, contextually speaking, having a camera show Miranda's ass is sexist but a journalist praising a male's ass for being hot and sexy is okay, as you know, we take what fanservice we can get, and by fanservice, i contextually mean straight up MAN ASS cuz showing FEMALE ASS is terrible and infamously bad!!!!!!!!!!!! CONTEXT!!!!!!
have a nice day
Because most videogame journalists barely have any integrity anymore after they were forced to sacrifice it just to avoid going out of business, and review sites pushed them out of actually reviewing videogames so now it's mostly personal opinion pieces and clickbait.
>internet makes "news" free >all major cities used to support several major news papers that all employed hundreds of journalists, investigators, writers, etc >suddenly people stop paying for news >journalism and writing no longer realistic career choices >all the talented writers and journalists move to new industries >internet news earns almost no money since its free so internet journalists are low quality life failures >reporting news no longer financially incentivized, now getting and keeping peoples attention makes money
its pretty simple and its one of major reasons civilization is failing
>Anon doesn't realize the hostile takeover of society by corporations and their handlers is way, way bigger than vidya and thinks he's fighting some big fight by yelling at games journos
lol
It's still too small a piece of the puzzle to bother with. They've won, straight up. Whether it's arguing about idpol or the game journos that push it, people's anger is redirected. And once they're tired of that, there's just enough bread and circus left to distract from how awful everything really is until it's time to yell about the inconsequential again tomorrow. I understand your anger anon, truly. I just think the hole is the ship is too big and not enough people want to bother acknowledging it.
[...]
[...]
/leftypol/ demoralization
These people don’t win shit, all they do is destroy and they’re useful idiots who have shitty lives living in small apartments with dead end jobs due to having a shitty father or no father at all. Once the people in power don’t need them they’ll be easily thrown off the bus.
I'm not trying to demoralize anybody. I just want the memo when there's an actual fricking fight and not yelling into the internet void.
>they won
I disagree, anon. They win when each of us has become silent and refuses to say anything in the face of objective moronation
no war is truly over until the ideas have been scrubbed, which is why totalitarian shitholes maintain censorship or else free expression would not threaten their establishment
I maintain my ideas and express them. It just seems nobody cares or if they do they're focused on the minutia. I'm tired and want actual change.
>they won
I disagree, anon. They win when each of us has become silent and refuses to say anything in the face of objective moronation
no war is truly over until the ideas have been scrubbed, which is why totalitarian shitholes maintain censorship or else free expression would not threaten their establishment
poofter journos don't think about whether they actually like something, but whether a b***hy woman would shame them if she saw what they were playing, and then they try to emulate what that b***hy woman would say
>ITT: terminally online chuds thinking they're brave warriors because they spend their time """fighting""" by shitposting on Ganker for... more women's butts in AAA video games?
kek
It's almost like those of us who aren't white have been trying to warn you tards that gay men hate straight men and everything they enjoy.
There's a reason we don't like them.
>Fallout's got your post-apocalypse covered >Elder Scrolls' got your fantasy covered >Starfield's got your Space Sci-Fi covered
What else could Bethesda make that can spare us from homosexualry with the power of mods?
A lot of these people are just fueled by preconceived bias. They hate you and they have no problem lying about their motivations or holding double standards, as long as they're the ones who benefit in the end. Gender politics, race politics, intersectionality, etc. All of this comes from one group of people deciding to use whatever means possible to tear down another group. This is why you can't have an honest debate with leftists, they will always respond with insults, passive aggressiveness, gaslighting, manipulation, sophistry, or censure. It's all about power, has nothing to do with what's right or wrong, or even morality at the end of the day, though they often use it as another manipulative justification. They see you as an enemy and will take advantage of people's good will to get power over you.
Celebrating penis mods isn't "sleaze?" That's a hell of a lot sleazier than a guy making a crack about big boobs and not even exposing said breasts to the viewer.
Do you really not understand the difference "a mod allowing the player to give a big penis to their character" and a character making cringe jokes about a young woman's physique? You would have a point if the mod was allowing the player to rape NPCs.
...you can't be genuinely making the comparison that making a passing joke at a woman's bust is akin to rape.
I didn't compare boob jokes with rape you moron, I just said that because "a mod allowing you to make boobs joke" would be moronic. You obviously understood the point of my example and are just being disingenuous.
10 months ago
Anonymous
You literally said I wouldn't have a point unless someone was getting raped. Maybe your point was just shit. The fact one is a mod is irrelevant. They are celebrating full frontal wieners, and bemoaning "sleaze" when it's just a fricking joke about boobs (and the man was supposed to be a jerk, by the way). If you think that isn't hypocrisy you're probably just really fricking dumb.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>You literally said I wouldn't have a point unless someone was getting raped.
I used rape as an (extreme) example of sexual harassment you dumbass, I didn't say that boobs jokes were as bad as rape. I could have said "you would have a point if it was a mod allowing you to grope NPCs", or something similar, and it would have meant the same thing. Again, you obviously understood what I meant. >They are celebrating full frontal wieners, and bemoaning "sleaze" when it's just a fricking joke about boobs (and the man was supposed to be a jerk, by the way). If you think that isn't hypocrisy you're probably just really fricking dumb.
Firstly, I've never said that I agreed with the journalist about RE4 VR, I just said that he wasn't hypocritical. (if you ignore the fact that the two articles were written by different journalists, of course.)
Why do you think that a journalist happy about a game removing sexually harassing (at least in his opinion, again I don't care about that issue itself) jokes should be angry about a mod allowing you to have a big penis? There's literally no link between these two things. If that journalist wrote another article complaining about breast size sliders, sure, you would also have a point.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>I used rape as an (extreme) example of sexual harassment you dumbass
Do you really not understand the difference "a mod allowing the player to give a big penis to their character" and a character making cringe jokes about a young woman's physique? You would have a point if the mod was allowing the player to rape NPCs.
>You would have a point if the mod was allowing the player to rape NPCs.
You literally said, right here, that I DO NOT HAVE A POINT unless it was as extreme as rape. Learn your own fricking words and what they mean. >Again, you obviously understood what I meant.
Your words and your supposed meaning are entirely divorced. Your optimism is simply to spare your feelings that you didn't successfully communicate what you meant. >if you ignore the fact that the two articles were written by different journalists, of course.
PC Gamer is allowing these people to speak for the publication. If the views expressed don't represent them, they should not publish them. >Why do you think that a journalist happy about a game removing sexually harassing jokes should be angry about a mod allowing you to have a big penis?
Because the topic of both is "sleaze." It's right there in the headline of the first, and you damn well better believe "wieners" is a sleazy topic inherently. They assert a joke is sleazy, and then cheer and holler and clap when a mod for wieners let said wieners be even bigger.
10 months ago
Anonymous
>You literally said, right here, that I DO NOT HAVE A POINT unless it was as extreme as rape. Learn your own fricking words and what they mean.
I used rape as an example because it's an example of sexual harassment and the first article was about sexually harassing jokes. My point was that these two articles were talking about two completely different things, it wasn't that the second article was about something less serious than rape. If you're too moronic to understand such a simple comparison, it's not my fault. >Your words and your supposed meaning are entirely divorced. Your optimism is simply to spare your feelings that you didn't successfully communicate what you meant.
I was indeed too optimistic about Ganker's average IQ. >PC Gamer is allowing these people to speak for the publication. If the views expressed don't represent them, they should not publish them.
Yes Anon, journalism websites can't hire two people who have slightly different opinions about some topics, everyone knows that. >and you damn well better believe "wieners" is a sleazy topic inherently.
It's not.
If gays didn't try to punish, recruit, convert, and otherwise meddle with heteros, their existence wouldn't be such an inconvenience on everybody else. Until they can stop that shit, I don't see why they should be tolerated at all.
I'm really tired of trans homosexuals and women fricking up games. I'm trans btw. Frick off. Seriously stop making everything about your goddamn stupid gender politics.
You the China that will have a massive population collapse since they killed their daughters leading to generations of incels who will inevitably destroy China? You mean the same Islam having a inbreeding crisis and loads of young people leaving their death cult?
Face it; male heterosexuality is done for.
Male hets are honestly pitiful. Even when they enslaved women, they are still miserable around them. They don't know what they want so they lash out causing problems for everyone.
I can't imagine being straight. It must be tiring being attracted to the gender you despise and have nothing in common with.
It really does suck ass. Especially now that every single semi-attractive woman is a literal prostitute. They b***h about dudes going after young girls but that's the only way to guarantee that she's not 100% OF thot or c**ting sex working leftist prostitute. Next best bet is to become a christian radical but even they'll cheat on you because none of them even read the fricking bible. Frick this gay earth.
SEETHE
[...]
You the China that will have a massive population collapse since they killed their daughters leading to generations of incels who will inevitably destroy China? You mean the same Islam having a inbreeding crisis and loads of young people leaving their death cult?
Face it; male heterosexuality is done for.
I can't imagine being straight. It must be tiring being attracted to the gender you despise and have nothing in common with.
>tfw male heterosexuality will collapse soon
Serve you chuds right for being natural-born rapists, murderers, and generally unpleasant to be around.
See, these posts are a lot harder to take seriously when you know they're typed by white guys and Americans, who are on their way out.
Best places for women: European white predominately white nations
Worst for women: sand and mud Black person resorts
Yet they cling to troony blackula like jesus christ
Ever tried being a man? Poor people are oppressed. Stop being poor. Women use men to stop being poor and that's punching down if you ask me. Men actually try to climb the ladder. Chicks just dig their heels in and go up the backs of hard working citizens. If you're oppressed it's because you lack skill. Dumb c**t.
I will not rest until the whole world is gay for men, even the women. All women will transition and find a new fondness but only for shota wiener with no balls. Loose flaps of fat quivering in the wind hanging from the space that used to house their veganal walls.
you already know the answer deep down. the culture war was lost and now you have homosexual men, ugly women and israelites making all the decisions
and trannies
He did say homosexual men.
Hold on now.
Not all trannies are homosexual men. A good number of them only transition so they can invade women's spaces and be perverts in them.
he said himosexuals already
/thread
/leftypol/ demoralization
These people don’t win shit, all they do is destroy and they’re useful idiots who have shitty lives living in small apartments with dead end jobs due to having a shitty father or no father at all. Once the people in power don’t need them they’ll be easily thrown off the bus.
and poos and Black folks
Poos and Black folks hate homosexuals and trannies though
They hate White men more, and that's gonna be okay. 🙂
Nah, I definitely hate homosexuals more than I hate white dudes.
There are white dudes I can get along with, there are no homosexuals I can get along with nowadays.
and yet every single non white human on the planet is desperately trying to migrate to a white made society
why is that? are they superior societies?
This is the one thing I will never get
>America is a racist xenophobic shithole, chud
>nyooooo I must come and settle down in this racist xenophobic shithole!
money
And yet they have a shitload of trannies and homosexuals among themselves.
The winner is not victorious until the loser admits defeat
As opposed to incels from /misc/?
Truly these are the only two groups. Heterosexual adults do not exist outside of /misc/ after all.
nerdchads need to rise up
There is none.
Go ask him.
>gay mindbroken pokegay
Frick you op for even reposting his useless tweets. Imagine ever using Twitter. I'm glad Elon is destroying it and putting half its employees out of work. With any hope they will all starve.
husbandogay too, given that's Toro in his banner.
>gay gay complaining about attractive women like their opinion and perspective matters
So tired of this type of game journalist and yet they are so fricking common
>Twitter has slowly been noticing that gay men are actually the most consistently misogynistic and transphobic group on the planet
It's pretty funny to watch, if conservative morons weren't constantly hogging the limelight there'd be a much funnier fight starting by now.
Yes, it's very porblematic
>That picture
Thanks for posting that, I'm fricking speechless
Who else would apply to such a shitty job?
"My dream is writing at kotaku". Said no one ever.
Libtards will destroy the narratives they can't control or produce themselves. You don't seem to understand there's a war being waged against you and articles like this are the bullet.
he's a gay
Anon, get this through your poorly developed brain: there is no double standard. The writers do not give a shit about the stance, they care about engagement. They will write whatever generates the most clicks, which is going to be whatever generates the most outrage in their readers. You are perpetuating this behaviour by spreading whatever plague they write.
From now on, ignore it. Let it be and in time this type of "journalism" will disappear, to be replaced by whatever else works to generate clicks.
This can be applied to any thing that generates money from attention: celebrities, pundits, politicians, products and companies.
>they care about engagement.
nah, you're an ignorant homosexual that needs to lurk more
>No rebuttal other than I WANT TO BE UPSET
You're the reason these journalists get paid to write this crap.
There was a rebuttal. You can't understand it because you are stupid. Or I am stupid for responding as if you aren't trolling. In either case, continuing this would clearly be stupid.
The outragebait always goes in the same direction. There is a double standard, and you're very stupid trying to seem smart and failing.
>complaining is actually counter-productive!
>silence actually changes things!
>spreading info does no good, it's better to be ignorant!
>this can be applied to anything- don't care about what people do or say, just consume and be silent and shut the frick up! this is genuis! i'm so incredibly intelligant and everyone is so dubm!
The problem with this line of thinking is illustrated by the replies. We could very well solve issued like this by not engaging, but not enough people will get on board. Anons feel as their righteous indignation is more valuable than a click on the article. It isn't.
describe, in detail, how consumers ignoring journalists pushing certain agendas, and being lockstep in tune with corporate higher-ups, would solve said issues of corporations pushing certain agendas.
You can't, because what you promote is conformity, censorship, and moronic complacency until the solidification has been made complete. Consumer's speaking their voices matter and only moronic dumbshits think encouraging consumer silence is an actually legitimate answer to solving cross-sectional agenda collaborations
you and your kind are dogs trying to control and herd consumers as though consumers were animals to be corralled and directed
describe, in detail, how morons plastering this garbage on the catalog every hour solve issues of corporations pushing certain agendas
consumer awareness spreads social change because consumers can change their habits and/or show support to other auxiliaries and/or spread memetic influences
whereas consumer ignorance only perpetuates the problem by encouraging silence in the face of objective moronation and cannot circumvent a problem it allows journalists to fester and preach its totally-not-a-religion-but-you're-a-bigot-aka-a-sinner-if-you-disagree without any criticism whatsoever
the first pursuit allows conceptual battling, whereas the second approach allows literal corporate shills and journalist preachers to spread their Holy Word of Modern Sensibilities
now it's your turn to
>describe, in detail, how consumers ignoring journalists pushing certain agendas, and being lockstep in tune with corporate higher-ups, would solve said issues of corporations pushing certain agendas
You can be aware of something bad and still recognize that the best to fight it is to change the channel, and not hand it out to all your friends so you can complain about it. It is brain pollution, and since you do not have the power to delete it (i.e. clean it up) the most responsible thing you can do is to not multiply it.
>don't complain because knowledge about corporate interests are brain pollution
the disease is within submission and acceptance, not within criticism, for complaining exists as a form of consumer resistance and memetic structural objectification. pushing silence enforces the destruction of consumer preferences as non-criticized corporate manifestations become common-place and established.
I was going to get angry at your post because I thought you were messing with me, but then I thought "heh, this sounds like a Deus Ex NPC" which is cool and brought my mind back to vidya, so thanks anon. Perhaps you are right.
>consumer awareness spreads social change because consumers can change their habits and/or show support to other auxiliaries and/or spread memetic influences
Normalgay cattle that form the vast majority of the consumer wallet voting bloc do not, in fact, browse Ganker. They continue to buy new thing and get excited for next new thing irrespective of these threads. Most Gankerirgins are brownoid pirates who won't buy anything regardless of whether they're based or woke
not that anon but pointing at something and sharing it all over and saying "Look at this! I can't believe it! Isn't this an outrage?!" is not resisting anything, it's signal boosting. And I will criticize leftists on Twitter who do the same thing, by digging up something old and racist, spreading it around to as many people as possible, most of whom would have never heard of it otherwise, and then saying "my goodness we have to stop this filth from proliferating!"
>signal boosting is bad
How is spreading news of journalistic influences collaborating with corporations trying to create sociocultural change a bad thing?
>bringing partisan crap into this
don't be fricking moronic, you homosexual ass Black person
What people spread is not primarily news, it is outrage, and what news value is there gets tainted and distorted by the outrage.
>what you promote is conformity, censorship, and moronic complacency
This comes from ignoring shitty games journalists? Really Black person?
>just let preachers spread their word, what harm can be done?
let's just ignore history what happens every time borderline religious journalists continue to push their propaganda
I object if I see it, but the difference is I'm not seeking it out. Doing so is bad for you and your cause.
Also please explain to me how ignoring what I don't like promotes censorship.
>generic tough guy image
All you do is make it easier to be discredited because what is happening is you get people lashing out at every little thing no matter how minor and it turns into a cried wolf type situation where nobody takes anyone seriously anymore because it's all just constant noise.
Finally an intelligent poster on Ganker.
>do not engage journalists who are acting as propaganda mouthpieces for corporate interests!
>be quiet! this is smart!
Not a very good mouth piece if nobody listens to it.
that's the issue here, anon
these journalists are lockstep with corporate interests, they write articles which criticize thing that company is removing and fans are complaining about and then promote things which are moreorless the same thing they previously removed but this time for homosexuals and queers
pushing for ignorance and silence further normalizes things like pic related because without any form of resistance, companies are free to push whatever agenda they desire without zero consumer pushback whatsoever.
whatever man
That's a cute pussy
See
Go back to r/gamingcirclejerk
>journalists are useful idiots
>so therefore ignore them and go to a place more censorious than this shithole
delete your twatter
rent free
>I shitposted on Ganker, I'm part of THE RESISTANCE!
the absolute state of Ganker
>consumer criticism is not a valid form of resistance to corporate ideas, it's moronic and useless!
the absolute state of newshitter tourists
>we're gonna take down the system.... by shitposting on Ganker!!!!!
>societal culture nosedives in record time
bravo you brave culture warrior you
>if you criticize company thing, it's a cultural war
>if you accept it, it's not cultural
how is consumer resistance cultural, while acceptance and submission like a little b***h, which is what you preach, is not cultural?
>newshitter tourists
>won't say newbie
>is under the illusion Ganker actually has any reach
>calls others tourists
lol
lmao, maybe
you're a homosexual through and through, matters not whether you're firstly acknowledged as a newhomosexual or a shitter
if you don't like something, just don't buy it bro. it's that simple. vote with your wallet.
until warlords like The Finkle swoops in, which is why consumer silence entirely benefits economic and journalist collaborations which are pushing corporate interests
without any sort of consumer resistance whatsoever, consumer education about corporate decisions becomes about being unironic paypiggie whales, rather than memetic support for certain ideals which have a staying power within a given franchise or product which has a certain sense of identity within a given community.
>muh Blackrock
yawn. conspiracy theorists are so lazy nowadays.
Debunk it.
NTA, but where else are you even allowed to talk openly about these things anyway.
Fair point. Anon just seems to be under the illusion that it's more than talking and is actually accomplishing anything.
Well don't underestimate the reach of this place, if this truly was no more than some backwaters shithole out on the far reaches of the clear net there would be no need to shill or, or raid here, or even come here at all.
see
Haven't bought a single piece of western media in over a decade now. That still doesn't answer the question.
because it's a moronic question, "talking about these things", on Ganker or elsewhere, won't accomplish anything. you can't stop progress.
Than what you said has nothing to do with what I said.
>here or elsewhere
so talking about issues never solves issues? what the frick?
And whose progress?
that's the major problem with anons like you, you push moronic ideas like "it's progress" without realizing you're essentially pushing a form of idpol
>so talking about issues never solves issues?
when your opinion is objectively wrong, no.
Just like yours?
All of my opinions are objectively correct, though.
Well, in your head.
Good, my head is the only important one.
yo, this dude is a walking god his shit is fire fr fr no cap
hey jesus 2.0! when you gonna reset the earth and wipe out all the unbelievers and establish your eternal kingdom?
>tfw playing gnostic vidya
If he's a walking god we'll have to team up on him, the Demiurge can't keep us trapped forever
We will smash the Demiurge and his false reality and free the divine shards within the clayborn and humanity shall become truly great
Honestly, I'm pretty interested in Gnostic religion but don't know a whole lot about it, do you have any pointers on where to start?
>objectively wrong
to the journalists?
so be silent because corporate interests are right and journies cannot be wrong?
Couldn't you do this with most cartoon women and get a similar result?
with leftists cartoons, yes
the left only knows how to hate beauty because they are ugly themselves
No
Male and female characters are supposed to be drawn differently
This is a leftist thing.
>women can't be strong so you make her a man instead
Now that's what I call empowerment.
thats my problem with the thing. a strong women needs to be a women. i think in Tremors 1990 they did the strong women perfectly, where she's a seismologist, witty, courageous and not some bimbo while still having a female appeal or the opposite, a strong man in women getup
Looks like Ed Wuncler from The Boondocks.
>so talking about issues never solves issues?
What issue? "There aren't enough sexy women in mainstream video games"?
if "too many sexy female characters in video games" can be an issue, then it's perfectly reasonable for "not enough sexy female characters in video games" to be an issue as well.
"noooo I can't fap to this character, she's not sexy enough!!!" is not "an issue".
Not to mention that there are still plenty of games with sexy female characters.
then "noooooo this female is too sexy it's making me take mental damage" is not an issue either.
One thing has meaningful real life consequences, the other thing doesn't.
how is having a sexy woman available damaging to your mental health?
imagine being so fragile about genuine heterosexuals loving aspects of biological females that you propose censorship because men shouldn't lust after women or some homosexual shit
No it doesn't.
if "nooo i can't fap" is not an issue then "yaaay straight men can fap" is also not an issue yet, unsurprisingly, the second is almost always an issue
just buy porn games if you want to fap?
>Why have sexy stuff in vidya?
JUST WATCH PORN LOL
>Why have violence in vidya?
JUST WATCH LIVELEAK LMAO
>Why have mature adult concepts?
JUST WATCH A DOCUMENTARY HAHA
>Why have a game with spirituality?
JUST GO TO CHURCH LEL
>Why have a game with critical thinking and puzzle-solving?
JUST READ A BOOK KEK
>Why have a game with realism?
JUST STEP OUTSIDE HEHEHE
>Why have a game with fantasy?
JUST PLAY WITH REAL THINGS LUL
amazing, 7 comparisons and yet they're all completely moronic.
He's exactly right tho? You've created a false dichotomy that he should go and do something else instead of enjoy entertainment in the way he's chosen. It's literally on-the-nose to the "go watch porn" bullshit you threw in his face.
I didn't say "Go watch porn", I said "Go buy porn video games". The difference should be obvious.
Porn games are vastly under-developed compared to triple-A games that just contain fanservice. You won't find porn games on the same budget precisely because sexuality is demonized and reaches a much smaller audience.
...which is why you should buy porn video games, if you want porn video games with a higher budget?
>sexuality is demonized and reaches a much smaller audience.
Are you really saying that pornography is a niche thing that very few people consume?
>Are you really saying that pornography is a niche thing that very few people consume?
Pornography GAMES absolutely are. They obviously, observably are. Why are you so dishonest?
>sexuality is demonized, but ONLY in video games
Do you really believe this?
Another incredible misquote. Sex content has to slide under a certain bar to get their movies in the average theater too. Broadcast TV and radio obviously won't just air anything either. You can obviously buy porn movies, but think about how much easier it is to record two people having sex than it is to develop a game from scratch that does the same thing. That requires a substantial budget where porn videos do not.
So what? We're just going back to what I said, which is, "if you want porn video games with a higher budget, buy more porn video games". I've never said that porn games weren't niche, I just said that it wasn't because "sexuality is demonized". Ton of people watch porn. It's a multi-billion dollar industry. Porn video games are even allowed on Steam nowadays. If porn video games are not successful, it's not for some moronic reason like "sexuality is demonized".
I'm not really interested in your argument beyond your original assertion anon should just go buy porn if he wants fanservice. Which is of course bullshit. If you just want more people to buy porn games and get them bigger budgets, fine. But nobody should be forced to do that if they want to see attractive females in games.
I could have said "buy video games with fansevice in them if you want more video games with fanservice in them" and my argument would have been the same. These games undeniably still exist. Porn was just an example, idk why it is so hard to understand this.
I'm just saying that Ganker should stop whining when some video game doesn't appeal to them (e.g. doesn't have enough fanservice) and just buy video games that do appeal to them.
Sadly there's a total lack of anything good lately with such content. There's nothing good at all for that matter. Everything is shit.
"Vote with your wallet" only works when the industry isn't scared stiff of putting attractive women in their games. Even doing this gets them labeled "chuds" these days.
>sexuality is demonized
it use to be but since people driving this mentality is dying out and getting old and it is trendy to be sexual deviant with 10 different genders it sure as shit ceases to be demonized.
That's how it used to be but since bg3 came out, now it is completly acceptable fill you AAA games with as much degeneracy as possible, as long as women are ugly and there is homosexual sex.
Because they suck as actual games and are even worse at being games than movie games.
There's no inherent reason why they should be worse than any other game. That's just how it works out because they don't have a budget or a broad audience compared to most retail released games.
Its fundamentally because they always design with porn in mind first and the game part is tacked on low effort shit most of the time and includes infamous situations like missing out on unlocking and seeing stuff when you're actually good at the game because you're meant to lose to see the sex scenes.
There's way more kinds of pornographic games than you're asserting. Not every h-game is a fem mc action platformer with sex on defeat.
what's truly amazing is how selectively moronic your position is, which is precisely what the 7 comparisons pinpoint. You pretend that being selective about what types of games can have straight sexual elements is not a quasi-religious sociopolitical position and outright moralhomosexualry
your arbitration specifies limiting "harmful" straight male sexuality towards pornography, which is somehow magically not harmful, when in other mediums, such as telelvision, the expression of sexuality is not defacto pornography. Simultaneously, you support shoving homosexual shit in a video game is okay and an important issue whereas you think criticism over including sexy females is an unimportant issue
your stance is incredibly moronic and simplistic moralhomosexual b***hing over heterosexual elements within vidya
tldr you're infected with the gay
why are you putting words into my mouth and ranting about schizo bs when I literally just said "if you want more of [x] in your video games, buy video games with [x] in them"? It's that simple. You just have to acknowledge the sad reality that not EVERY video game is forced to appeal to you specifically, and that's ok.
Why do specifically sexual elements have to be in only pornographic games?
When did I say that? I was replying to someone talking about how "reee I can't fap to vidya anymore!!!". If you want to fap to video games, buying porn video games is the most obvious answer.
If you just want video games with fanservice in them, again, feel free to buy video games with fanservice. There are no laws forbidding developers from making them.
Frick off. I'll buy anything I want, including any degree of fanservice short of "porn" I choose.
Ok? Buy it then?
Just go to a pride parade if you want to see gay representation
See, this game is not hard at all
Dishonest liberal hyperbole. All you have is attempting to make people stupid for wanting what they want.
If talking about things don't matter, then you should just follow your own advice and stop posting lmao.
why are you assuming that my intent when posting in this thread is the same as your intent?
Oh, so only talkin about some things matter? What things matter to talk about and what things don't matter to talk about?
>"so only talkin about some things matter?"
i've never said that.
your intent is to convince people that your moronic opinion is right. circlejerking on Ganker (or on some other irrelevant website) obviously won't accomplish that. I have a different reason for posting in this thread.
What do you think you can accomplish by posting in this thread that no one else can?
>What do you think you can accomplish by posting in this thread
Same reason why anyone mentally healthy posts on this shithole:to have fun :^)
So you are now the arbiter of having fun?
If you think circlejerking on Ganker is fun, np. My point was just that you're extremely moronic if you think that it will actually accomplish anything.
>>The writers do not give a shit about the stance, they care about engagement. They will write whatever generates the most clicks
>nothing in the thread links to the actual article and nobody is going to seek it out and read it in its entirety
>the thread will be gone in 10 minutes tops
You haven't thought this through, have you?
>nobody is going to seek it out and read it in its entirety
very naive assumption anon. this site is not immune to these tactics. if people are sharing and talking about it, it's working.
theres probably some users sending death threats to his twitter right now considering how /misc/gays schizos are
ignoring it hasn't worked out so good so far...
i think pointing it out and criticizing it is a better tactic
Journalists aren't that smart
well it think you made this post to generate (you)s
go frick yourself homosexual
>The writers do not give a shit about the stance, they care about engagement. They will write whatever generates the most clicks, which is going to be whatever generates the most outrage in their readers
So why they are not making "nazis are actually the good guys" "I want more sexy e-girls" etc articles? That would generate MUCH more outrage and clicks from troons and leftist, aka the majority of social media gays
>state the fact about manufactured ragebait
>HUR DUR homosexual FRICK U JOURNALIST NO SMORT
>gets the most engagement out of any post
You can't make this shit up.
the sentiment is correct but as you've accidently demonstrated, more than half of people who read this are simply too moronic to follow suit even when told the start, middle and end
The seething replies you are getting basically prove your point. However, ignoring your post would have also proven your point. Is there a middle ground that ignores clickbait while also pointing out how dumb it is?
So long as they don't touch Tali I'm good, Miranda's model fricked up Yvonne's beautiful face anyway.
What double standard?
He's a homosexual, of course he would prefer a jap ass to an actual attractive Woman
>Ganker doesn't understand context and tries to frame the instances as identical
>i-it's about the context, chud!
Lol, lmao.
>guy getting naked and showing ass for a quarter of a second to soak in a sauna and some gaygo liking it is totally the same thing as the camera inappropriately focusing on a character's ass while she's having a serious conversation with the player about her being an artificial creation and then also discussing how she's worried about her sister because of their abusive/controlling father
irrelevant in context
>it's irrelevant because I say it is
every time
>uh see, her fully covered ass is focused upon for more than a brief second so it's evil and harmful while a naked guy ass that a journalist got a woody over and salivated over seeing his naked butt so much the journalist pretended it's actually journalism to talk about how much he likes seeing Jin's ass-cheeks is okay and in fact justified
you're a hypocritical gay homosexual
what's new?
>more than a brief second
lmao it literally sits there forever until you advance the conversation.
OH NO BETTER SHOW MORE MALE PROTAGONISTS BARE ASS CHEEKS IF ANY CAMERA DARES TO LOOK AT A WOMAN'S ASS FOR MORE THAN 10 SECONDS! YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO LOOK AT FEMALE ASSES THIS IS WRONG
BARE NAKED MAN BUTTS ARE THE ONLY THING OKAY
Not him but the camera doesn't deliberately zoom in on the MCs ass in GOT when he's getting ready to get into the sauna. In Mass Effect, it's deliberate with Miranda to make things sexual during something that's not supposed to be sexual nor arousing at all, but a serious emotional conversation. It's pretty sad that you're pretending not to understand nor see the difference.
>doubling down on his disease
NO YOU SEE IT DOESN'T ZOOM IN MAN ASS, IT ONLY SHOWS NAKED MAN ASS SO IT'S GOOD
BUT WHEN IT A FULLY CLOTHED FEMALE ASS IS SHOWN, THEN IT IS BAD AND WRONG AND OBJECTIFYING HOW DARE YOU LOOK AT A WOMAN'S ASS YOU SHOULD ONLY BE CHEERING ON MAN ASS
>I AM SILLY
I THINK NAKED MAN ASS IS OKAY TO SHOW BECAUSE IT'S NOT ZOOMED IN BUT WHEN A FULLY CLOTHED WOMAN HAS AN ASS SHOT THEN IT IS ACTUALLY CREEPY AND DISGUSTING
This is why nobody cares about what you think, you argue like a child throwing a tantrum because he isn't getting his way.
NAKED MAN ASS WITH NO ZOOM IS GOOD
FULLY CLOTHED FEMALE ASS SHOT IS EVIL
>NO YOU SEE IT DOESN'T ZOOM IN MAN ASS, IT ONLY SHOWS NAKED MAN ASS
Well yeah. He's getting into a sauna. Him being naked doing so is natural. It's not sexual unless your a coomer who can't see someone nude without wanting to jerk off.
>BUT WHEN IT A FULLY CLOTHED FEMALE ASS IS SHOWN, THEN IT IS BAD AND WRONG AND OBJECTIFYING
When it's done at a time where it's unnecessary and for no reason other than to arouse you at a time when things are supposed to be serious and emotional, sure. Why does there need to be a lingering butt-shot as she's telling someone her tragic story? It just demeans everything.
SHOWING NAKED MAN BUTT IS FINE WHEN HE'S DOING SOMETHING NATURAL
SHOWING FEMALE BUTT IS DEMEANING WHEN SHE'S TALKING
>SHOWING NAKED MAN BUTT IS FINE WHEN HE'S DOING SOMETHING NATURAL
Yes. I don't get what you're trying to do here. That's correct. It'd be the same if the MC was female.
>SHOWING FEMALE BUTT IS DEMEANING WHEN SHE'S TALKING
When it's a deliberate butt-shot, yes. The camera is literally still, right on her ass. As she's talking about something important/emotional. It's not like the camera is moving and her butt just happens to be in the shot for half-a-second. It's purposely fixed for a good bit with her butt fully in the shot. I don't get why you're pretending not to understand and that there's no context whatsoever to these things. What do you get out of this? I know you're not actually going to reply with anything with substance and just make another all-caps post or whatever, but please try at least.
>It's bad because it just is ok???
Is miranda's ass just supposed to disappear or what? The entire point of her character is that she is sexual, why should they need to obfuscate that fact in every cutscene she is in?
what's wrong with being "demeaning" towards fake people
If a woman's ass was in frame getting into a hot spring, you would be crying foul and you fricking know it. Why do they need to include that? Why does the camera need to show it? The answer is "it doesn't"... though in both cases, it doesn't fricking matter. There's nothing wrong with letting players see sexy things. Including an ass just in the frame while talking to someone.
>the camera inappropriately focusing on a character's ass
homosexuals like you should be gut shot.
That's literally what happens. You're having a conversation about a serious topic and there's a sudden ass shot that comes out of nowhere for no reason. It's not even a pov shot. It looks like a blatant mistake because nobody knows why anyone would intentionally have that happen there instead of during the romance path or anything else.
I hope you get raped to death by monstrous Black folk.
>ACKshually, contextually speaking, having a camera show Miranda's ass is sexist but a journalist praising a male's ass for being hot and sexy is okay, as you know, we take what fanservice we can get, and by fanservice, i contextually mean straight up MAN ASS cuz showing FEMALE ASS is terrible and infamously bad!!!!!!!!!!!! CONTEXT!!!!!!
have a nice day
Because most videogame journalists barely have any integrity anymore after they were forced to sacrifice it just to avoid going out of business, and review sites pushed them out of actually reviewing videogames so now it's mostly personal opinion pieces and clickbait.
Anyone with a brain knows that the reality is that homosexual men hate anything enjoyed by straight men.
not really,
you never heard of "straigh guys for gay eyes?"
When will you morons learn these sites life off rage clicks and controversy?
>one guy's opinion matters
>literal gay
>doesn't like women's ass
shocker
It's not. It's just that gay guys and women have increased in numbers in the industry.
journalists are massive fricking homosexuals
its not hard to figure out
>he thought safe horny was a joke
>2 likes
Weak men trying to be popular among feminist women. These weak men are usually creepy predators who try to get close to women this way.
gamer gate
>internet makes "news" free
>all major cities used to support several major news papers that all employed hundreds of journalists, investigators, writers, etc
>suddenly people stop paying for news
>journalism and writing no longer realistic career choices
>all the talented writers and journalists move to new industries
>internet news earns almost no money since its free so internet journalists are low quality life failures
>reporting news no longer financially incentivized, now getting and keeping peoples attention makes money
its pretty simple and its one of major reasons civilization is failing
It's not that they don't like the things you like but hate that you like them.
cause sexy women bad
They sell outrage not consistency
If only they altered the infamously terrible Miranda Butt face.
The vast VAST majority of critics and journos are cowardly vermin, that's why. Recommended listening, because this song is eternally relevant.
>Ganker criticizing double standards after it spent 1 month seething about BG3
lmao
>Anon doesn't realize the hostile takeover of society by corporations and their handlers is way, way bigger than vidya and thinks he's fighting some big fight by yelling at games journos
lol
what if... some game journies... are in fact... mouthpieces... for the established fourth estate and fifth column...?
It's still too small a piece of the puzzle to bother with. They've won, straight up. Whether it's arguing about idpol or the game journos that push it, people's anger is redirected. And once they're tired of that, there's just enough bread and circus left to distract from how awful everything really is until it's time to yell about the inconsequential again tomorrow. I understand your anger anon, truly. I just think the hole is the ship is too big and not enough people want to bother acknowledging it.
See
I'm not trying to demoralize anybody. I just want the memo when there's an actual fricking fight and not yelling into the internet void.
I maintain my ideas and express them. It just seems nobody cares or if they do they're focused on the minutia. I'm tired and want actual change.
>they won
I disagree, anon. They win when each of us has become silent and refuses to say anything in the face of objective moronation
no war is truly over until the ideas have been scrubbed, which is why totalitarian shitholes maintain censorship or else free expression would not threaten their establishment
Because men are better than women
poofter journos don't think about whether they actually like something, but whether a b***hy woman would shame them if she saw what they were playing, and then they try to emulate what that b***hy woman would say
Straight white men BAD
its not a double standard
things are judged differently due to the context in which they happen
Yup. Like how men can walk around shirtless everywhere while a woman will be arrested in some places.
>ITT: terminally online chuds thinking they're brave warriors because they spend their time """fighting""" by shitposting on Ganker for... more women's butts in AAA video games?
kek
>he says while being a terminally online chud posting on Ganker
>n-no u!
Projection.
Damn, you really felt called out.
Because men can defend themselves, they aren't afraid of receiving compliments because that is just that, now women are always afraid of rape
It's almost like those of us who aren't white have been trying to warn you tards that gay men hate straight men and everything they enjoy.
There's a reason we don't like them.
>Fallout's got your post-apocalypse covered
>Elder Scrolls' got your fantasy covered
>Starfield's got your Space Sci-Fi covered
What else could Bethesda make that can spare us from homosexualry with the power of mods?
One is sexuality, the other is sexualization. Simple as.
That doesn't even mean anything.
>one gets homosexuals horny
>the other gets heteros horny!
>reeeeeeee
>Thing is sexual because some person was aroused by it
By your logic feces is inherently sexual too since many people have a fetish for it.
Basically this.
Homosexuality good, heterosexuality bad!
That's the motto of the western world.
Lusting after a man's bare bottom has zero difference from lusting after a woman's. Except that a gay liberal can't smell his own shit.
Journalists are propagandists unless they are independent journalists.
A lot of these people are just fueled by preconceived bias. They hate you and they have no problem lying about their motivations or holding double standards, as long as they're the ones who benefit in the end. Gender politics, race politics, intersectionality, etc. All of this comes from one group of people deciding to use whatever means possible to tear down another group. This is why you can't have an honest debate with leftists, they will always respond with insults, passive aggressiveness, gaslighting, manipulation, sophistry, or censure. It's all about power, has nothing to do with what's right or wrong, or even morality at the end of the day, though they often use it as another manipulative justification. They see you as an enemy and will take advantage of people's good will to get power over you.
hypocritical minds are attracted to leftist ideologies
It's simpler than that. Dumb NPC's are attracted to leftist ideologies.
There's nothing hypocritical in this pic.
sure, what do you say about this one
Celebrating penis mods isn't "sleaze?" That's a hell of a lot sleazier than a guy making a crack about big boobs and not even exposing said breasts to the viewer.
Do you really not understand the difference "a mod allowing the player to give a big penis to their character" and a character making cringe jokes about a young woman's physique? You would have a point if the mod was allowing the player to rape NPCs.
...you can't be genuinely making the comparison that making a passing joke at a woman's bust is akin to rape.
>boob jokes = rape
are you deranged?
btw Ashley isnt a minor. Just in case.
I didn't compare boob jokes with rape you moron, I just said that because "a mod allowing you to make boobs joke" would be moronic. You obviously understood the point of my example and are just being disingenuous.
You literally said I wouldn't have a point unless someone was getting raped. Maybe your point was just shit. The fact one is a mod is irrelevant. They are celebrating full frontal wieners, and bemoaning "sleaze" when it's just a fricking joke about boobs (and the man was supposed to be a jerk, by the way). If you think that isn't hypocrisy you're probably just really fricking dumb.
>You literally said I wouldn't have a point unless someone was getting raped.
I used rape as an (extreme) example of sexual harassment you dumbass, I didn't say that boobs jokes were as bad as rape. I could have said "you would have a point if it was a mod allowing you to grope NPCs", or something similar, and it would have meant the same thing. Again, you obviously understood what I meant.
>They are celebrating full frontal wieners, and bemoaning "sleaze" when it's just a fricking joke about boobs (and the man was supposed to be a jerk, by the way). If you think that isn't hypocrisy you're probably just really fricking dumb.
Firstly, I've never said that I agreed with the journalist about RE4 VR, I just said that he wasn't hypocritical. (if you ignore the fact that the two articles were written by different journalists, of course.)
Why do you think that a journalist happy about a game removing sexually harassing (at least in his opinion, again I don't care about that issue itself) jokes should be angry about a mod allowing you to have a big penis? There's literally no link between these two things. If that journalist wrote another article complaining about breast size sliders, sure, you would also have a point.
>I used rape as an (extreme) example of sexual harassment you dumbass
>You would have a point if the mod was allowing the player to rape NPCs.
You literally said, right here, that I DO NOT HAVE A POINT unless it was as extreme as rape. Learn your own fricking words and what they mean.
>Again, you obviously understood what I meant.
Your words and your supposed meaning are entirely divorced. Your optimism is simply to spare your feelings that you didn't successfully communicate what you meant.
>if you ignore the fact that the two articles were written by different journalists, of course.
PC Gamer is allowing these people to speak for the publication. If the views expressed don't represent them, they should not publish them.
>Why do you think that a journalist happy about a game removing sexually harassing jokes should be angry about a mod allowing you to have a big penis?
Because the topic of both is "sleaze." It's right there in the headline of the first, and you damn well better believe "wieners" is a sleazy topic inherently. They assert a joke is sleazy, and then cheer and holler and clap when a mod for wieners let said wieners be even bigger.
>You literally said, right here, that I DO NOT HAVE A POINT unless it was as extreme as rape. Learn your own fricking words and what they mean.
I used rape as an example because it's an example of sexual harassment and the first article was about sexually harassing jokes. My point was that these two articles were talking about two completely different things, it wasn't that the second article was about something less serious than rape. If you're too moronic to understand such a simple comparison, it's not my fault.
>Your words and your supposed meaning are entirely divorced. Your optimism is simply to spare your feelings that you didn't successfully communicate what you meant.
I was indeed too optimistic about Ganker's average IQ.
>PC Gamer is allowing these people to speak for the publication. If the views expressed don't represent them, they should not publish them.
Yes Anon, journalism websites can't hire two people who have slightly different opinions about some topics, everyone knows that.
>and you damn well better believe "wieners" is a sleazy topic inherently.
It's not.
Yes there is. You are just dishonest, like the people writing those articles.
if he had any integrity he wouldnt be a leftoid in the first place
western media is literally ruled by the gay mafia
Because he is a homosexual, he gets turned off by a woman's ass and gets turned on by a man's ass
Because they hate women. Except unlike us they're ashamed of it so they overcompensate
Should've gatekept the hobby harder.
>why do bug chasers prefer men's asses over women's asses?
homos feel about women the same way you feel about men. unfortunately, homos run game journalism
If gays didn't try to punish, recruit, convert, and otherwise meddle with heteros, their existence wouldn't be such an inconvenience on everybody else. Until they can stop that shit, I don't see why they should be tolerated at all.
Because they don't give a frick about being hypocritical and pointing it out is a waste of time.
The only thing you can do , is do it yourself so they become the ones whining about hypocrisy.
>double standard
I'm really tired of trans homosexuals and women fricking up games. I'm trans btw. Frick off. Seriously stop making everything about your goddamn stupid gender politics.
>tfw male heterosexuality will collapse soon
Serve you chuds right for being natural-born rapists, murderers, and generally unpleasant to be around.
>heterosexuality is over
Finally, humanity can end
You'll never be a woman you sissy pussy praising cuck queer.
SEETHE
You the China that will have a massive population collapse since they killed their daughters leading to generations of incels who will inevitably destroy China? You mean the same Islam having a inbreeding crisis and loads of young people leaving their death cult?
Face it; male heterosexuality is done for.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/11/07/this-chart-shows-the-best-and-worst-countries-for-women-in-the-world-today/
If you hate the US so much then goddamnit, b***h, take your axe wound and van gogh.
>xe doesn't know about china and islam
I can't imagine being straight. It must be tiring being attracted to the gender you despise and have nothing in common with.
Male hets are honestly pitiful. Even when they enslaved women, they are still miserable around them. They don't know what they want so they lash out causing problems for everyone.
It really does suck ass. Especially now that every single semi-attractive woman is a literal prostitute. They b***h about dudes going after young girls but that's the only way to guarantee that she's not 100% OF thot or c**ting sex working leftist prostitute. Next best bet is to become a christian radical but even they'll cheat on you because none of them even read the fricking bible. Frick this gay earth.
See, these posts are a lot harder to take seriously when you know they're typed by white guys and Americans, who are on their way out.
Best places for women: European white predominately white nations
Worst for women: sand and mud Black person resorts
Yet they cling to troony blackula like jesus christ
It's okay to poke fun at male genitals! Balls and shaft, funny! Big vov! Smol vov! So clever. HEY wtf STOP TALK ABOUT BOOBIE CHUD.
It's called punching up. Men deserve to be made fun of for oppressing people.
Ever tried being a man? Poor people are oppressed. Stop being poor. Women use men to stop being poor and that's punching down if you ask me. Men actually try to climb the ladder. Chicks just dig their heels in and go up the backs of hard working citizens. If you're oppressed it's because you lack skill. Dumb c**t.
MALE ASS FUNNY HORNY HAHA
FEMALE ASS NONO ZONE GO TO JAIL
I will not rest until the whole world is gay for men, even the women. All women will transition and find a new fondness but only for shota wiener with no balls. Loose flaps of fat quivering in the wind hanging from the space that used to house their veganal walls.