Why's it get so much hate? Is it just a snoy review bomb like what always happens with Zelda?
 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
|
Why's it get so much hate? Is it just a snoy review bomb like what always happens with Zelda?
Why's it get so much hate? Is it just a snoy review bomb like what always happens with Zelda?
|
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
|
>any opinion that doesn’t agree with mine is that wretched dirty [other team]
No, but Starfield's been reviewed waaaay more harshly than most other games.
It didn't just werk.
More like previous Bethesda games haven't been reviewed harshly enough.
The sheeple are actually waking up.
most people have a problem running it and don't wanna upgrade to a piece of shit 4000 series to play a fricking screen loading simulator. i'm fricking sick of his shit engine and his shit attitude, fricker didn't optimize that game for shit
you have a point. way worse games get lenient reviews, free shills or even praised
After Fallout 76 most people aren't willing to overlook Bethesda's bullshit anymore.
No, it’s just had the Bethesda bonus taken away after years of Skyrim carrying their reputation on its back
By the audience? Can you give an example?
They literally have a wall with 10/10 reviews from basically everyone and their grandma. What the frick are you talking about?
all the optimization went into making sure the xbox could run it at 30 fps. the pc port is shit. it's offensive to pc gamers and it's getting judged accordingly. plus the game itself is kinda shit. it's everything wrong with modern games, so it's getting everyone's ire.
>padded like crazy to make the game seem bigger than it is (and to keep people subbed to gamepass longer)
>way too much walking, not enough real gameplay
>bad writing
>pozzed
>unfun side activities you're expected to repeat(the temples for unlocking powers)
>choices don't matter because the hunter is an irrelevant character
etc etc
Your concern about the reivews is something that could be answered by reading the reviews.
Bethesda ran out of momentum
People are finally waking up. Bethesda isn't going to be treated like the do no wrong favourite child any more and it has nothing to do with Microsoft
Yeah the "snoys" purchased and installed the game on their PC so they could leave a review of it on Steam, that's definitely what happened
No, this is how every Bethesda game since Fallout Skyrim should have been graded if it weren't for shills and drones.
it's exactly this
expectations SHOULD be set higher, but by the same token I feel like you would have to be asleep in order not be skeptical about Starfield's quality before release
Fallout 4 and Fallout 76 were terrible on launch
(76 is actually good now, years later but I digress)
and we have seen year after year of mediocre AAA releases. Diablo 4 for example is one of the most expensive games in gaming history from a development and marketing standpoint and it's absolute trash compared to other titles in the genre
no, there isn't some contrived conspiracy against the game. it's just fricking not good
people wanted Skyrim 2 in Space and all we got was an unoptimized singleplayer Fallout 76 with a loading screen every 30sec and a bad UI
>Starfield's been reviewed waaaay more harshly than most other games.
every aaa game this year has been a shitshow
>Starfield's been reviewed waaaay more harshly than most other games
If anything, the lazy shit hasn’t been reviewed harshly enough. It’s a monolith to an industry that’s in complete fricking shambles and should be sacrificed at the altar of stagnant game design so others learn recycling the same 18 year old game but in space is unacceptable for AAA standard.
Starfield, middling as it is, is not really like most other AAA titles these days.
It's not a third person multiplayer GaaS, nor is it a third person action-RPG with a huge focus on mo-cap and VA work to carry it. Its' not the most innovative game but Bethesda clearly just makes its own type of game and doesn't chase trends too much. Granted, I still don't like a lot of their decisions as of late. But I can't really say they're chasing the current AAA ur-genre bandwagon
>game not bad because it’s not like other thing
This excuse making is the exact reason why Bethesda will never change for the better. They’ll just keep shitting out the same game until the end of time because cucked fools will defend it and buy it.
I didn't say it wasn't bad, I was saying that it's not the same as the AAA trends that are in fashion right now.
I think Bethesda games do need to get better but in different ways from other AAA titles. The things I'd like to see changed with games like GoW or Spiderman or AssCreed or Hogwarts LEgacy are different from what I'd want to see Bethesda games change.
For instance, I think Bethesda games should lean more into the Immersive-Sim philosophy and focus more on creating in-depth npc AI trees and taking inspiration from games like Dwarf Fortress or Rimworld. Focus on making systems for players to interact with and combine, rather than creating a super bespoke/tailored experience
actually most other games are rated more leniently starfield is a shit game, 5/10 is generous
because it fricking sucks. Worst game Bethesda has ever made. Zero fun, zero meaningful exploration.
Maybe, just maybe, the game sucks?
Just look at the current player numbers. Skyrim, a 12 year old game by the same company, has 5k more players on right now.
What is Gamepass? Nobody actually bought Starfield.
>Nobody actually bought Starfield
shills are owning themselves
>What is Gamepass?
But Steam is not Gamepass.
>Nobody actually bought Starfield.
wait Hogwarts was that successful?
how come it wasn't nominated for a single category at the game awards?
oh yeah? then why isn't madden NFL 2023 listed as well? maybe goty is more than just sales. let's not forget how the other contenders alan woke 2 and balding gays 3 aren't listed that are no doubt objectively better than the mediocre potter goyslop.
>alan woke 2 and balding gays 3
you have to be 18+ to post here
>how come it wasn't nominated for a single category at the game awards?
Because it's a terrible game. It feels like a licensed movie game from the 2000s, ironic because the early Harry Potter games in the 2000s were actually decent for licensed games.
>It feels like a licensed movie game from the 2000s, ironic because the early Harry Potter games in the 2000s were actually decent for licensed games.
If a game came out that plays like a 2000s game it would be GOTY.
Because of troonys seething over jk rowling and you know it
what did jk rowling do?
>game awards
who the frick gives a shit about those?
they've been AAA advertising rigged trash ever since they existed
"GOTY" is just a marketing term that anyone can slap on their product
>Note: inclusion of digital sales data [...] is done at the discretion of the partecipating publisher
ROFL, also how convenient that you happened to crop out the source.
Can you provide gamepass numbers? Without those the only reasonable assumption is gamepass has seen a comparable drop in Starfield players to steam
Skyrim is on Gamepass too.
Steam is 80% of the gaming market.
If a game has 8k players online on steam then it only has 10k online when you factor in other services
>people who paid full price for the game are dropping it
>but people who got it for free are surely still playing it!
lmao, there's probably more people playing skyrim than starfield on gamepass as well now that I think about it
Skyrim has 12 years of mods behind it. Also space games are a cursed genre. Starfield is the most played space game on steam right now.
>muh mods
If you need mods to make a game passable then you simple have a crap game.
Starfield is not a space game. It wouldn't pass for a space game 10 years ago.
And according to modders right now, Starfield's mod support is so anemic you absolutely will not see the same for it
Is that their reaction to the early Creation Kit, do you mean? I didn't realize any modding tools were available yet. What changed from the old games?
didn't Starfield get mogged hard by HL1?
Sure did
>Maybe, just maybe, the game sucks?
a vn about incest and cannibalism is currently very highly rated, so no thats definitely not it
weeb vn players are not real people, anon
those are w*ebs anon, they hardly count as humans
they will happily eat the shittiest slop possible if it's tranime styled and has cute girls
it's expression of '7 years for this?'
If they released it in 2 years it'd be tolerable but 7 years wasted for this bs is just grim
> YOU MUST LOVE MUH TRANSFIELD.
> YOU MUST NOT PLAY BESTIALITY GAY 3!
it's ugly, empty, boring and unremarkable.
it failed to spawn any notable discussion or meme, which is the worst thing that can happen to a game nowadays
people tried it and then immediately moved on to the next game, which was unthinkable before it came out
When I played it 10% of the game was loading screens, 60% of the game was wandering through procedurally generated landscape that looked really unsettling and kept triggering uncanny valley effect to the point I was uncomfortable and last 40% was shooting up "dungeons" which was kinda ok. I honestly just want mindless shooting and I could overlook all the problems people have except the procgen maps and the feeling they gave me.
Woke soulless steaming pile of trash
i have very mixed feelings on this game. i played it a ton and enjoyed it, but it does leave something to be desired. they'd maybe have been better off keeping it within the solar system and have 9 fleshed out handcrafted planets to explore. the procedural generation did leave a lot to be desired. i'm sure i will be playing starfield ten years from now with a zillion mods installed, but it certainly didn't have the lasting impression that mw/ob/sky had, nor even fallout 3. fallout 4 had the glowing sea, but it was otherwise forgettable imho
>Why's it get so much hate?
Why? It fellow the trend left by fallout 4, fallout 76, and redfall...
Fallout 4 was a good game
All the Maryland studio did for 76 was design the worldspace itself while the Texas srudio bolted on multiplayer.
Redfall was a different studio entirely.
You are dumb and should feel bad about it
fallout4 was and still is a terrible game
t. someone who preordered it after how good skyrim was and recently tried to see if mods were able to fix it
Well doubling down on dumb is never a good look.
Get your shit sorted out anon.
>after how good skyrim was
But Fallout 4 is amazing if you liked Skyrim.
Skyrim was shit if you like New Vegas, Oblivion, and Morrowind, the only good Bethesda games.
no it isnt, I like skyrim, new vegas and morrowind. Skyrim has lots of content and exploration and lots of character customization. It also has background plot which is not completelty dumb. Fallout4 has nothing of that sort, its a game about base building first and foremost.
cant polish a turd
>cant polish a turd
wrong when it comes Bethesda games. They all have total conversion mods that transform any game beyond recognition.
humor me
show me total conversion mod which fixes fallout4
you can also try to do it with fallout3
The mod to fix both: Fallout New Vegas
yeah that works
wonder when new vegas on f4 engine comes out
>show me total conversion mod which fixes fallout4
it doesnt fix any problems I have described
>LOOK GUYS I REMOVED THE Black folk GUYS GUYS GUYS AM I NOT BASED GUYS HAVE I NOT FIXED LITERALLY EVERYTHING WRONG WITH THE GAME GUYS GUYS???
Your mod is ok, but you're insufferable.
Gaming "communities" are all about trying to gain acceptance and be perceived as having "distinguished" or "high level" tastes to people who don't know or care who they are. It used to be just the journalists, but now it's the majority of the group ever since marketing has effectively got the label "gamer" to stick.
It's a lot of the reason why I cut my time coming to Ganker and places like it to maybe once or twice a month or so now. It's infinitely more fun to play games to play them and enjoy yourself instead of play games to talk about them with the "gaming community".
>It's infinitely more fun to play games to play them and enjoy yourself instead of play games to talk about them with the "gaming community".
>instead of play games to talk about them with the "gaming community".
>Ganker and plays games just to talk about them instead of enjoy them
>Ganker plays games
Making a LOT of assumptions on this anon.
I wouldn't come here, but if I don't, there won't be anyone for me to talk about video games with anymore and games are still my number 1 hobby. I refuse to go to Reddit, Discord, or any of those and refuse to get on social media so this is it for me.
Frost Survival Simulator
Tale of Two Wastelands
just to name two...
doesnt remove fallout 3/4 plot
absolute nonsense. i loved morrowind from the start. oblivion was considerably dumbed down but grew over the years. skyrim vanilla was so much better than unmodded oblivion and the mods took it skyhigh. all TES games are great except Arena. I thought Fallout 3 and New Vegas were stupid because they looked ugly and I hated the setting. I didn't expect to like Fallout 4 and only tried it on a whim, it's very enjoyable with mods.
the mods make it good though. pajeetfield on the other hand is certified shit that no mod can fix.
no, it's a shit game made on a 20 year old engine
maybe if they put a modicum of effort into their next game it'll review better
>snoy review bomb
>on steam
why pajeets werent been able to make a passable narrative?
>Is it just a snoy review bomb
the game is rated 3.1/5 on the Xbox app lmao. Not even Gamepass is saving this garbage from it's bad reception. Apparently runs like shit on Xbox too.
It does run like shit on Xbox, it struggles to hit 30fps and doesn't have nearly the graphical fidelity to warrant that kind of crap performance
>it struggles to hit 30fps
From what I've read on the Microsoft Store(which actually indicates if the review was on a console or not), Xbox players are getting random crashes too so this is NMS all over again lmao. Bravo Todd!
kek
>120gb
>everything is still copypasted to the point where you see the same exact shit twice in a span of an hour
lmao
It was in development for 7 years, it's astounding how unpolished it is. I wonder if they rebooted development at least once like ME: Andromeda did, because at least that would explain how fricked it is
They were busy making all those empty planets
>snoys are buying xboxes and subbing to game pass just to review bomb starfield en masse
Is there any depth these subhumans wont sink to?
snoys review bombed it on xbox
SAR DELET YOU CAN NOT REDEEM WHY DID YOU POST YOU BLOODY
It's a Microsoft 1st party game that is critically panned or mixed reviews. It follows the pattern of Redfall and Halo Infinite. Why wouldn't you be surprised that an Xbox console exclusive isn't a runaway success with huge positive word of mouth?
Literally every single aspect of the game is half-baked and underdeveloped. It's chock full of 'potential' and that's essentially the nicest thing you can say about it. But unfortunately 'potential' isn't worth jack shit to anyone playing right now and it seems even the most ardent Bethesda fanboys are getting tired of waiting for mods to fix it.
>mods to fix it
How? There's no tools
I think the real deathblow to Bethesda here is that by the time they release proper modding tools, most people will be so disinterested in the game that very view modders are going to invest serious time and effort into modding it. In the past there was always a sort of prestige for modders to come flying out the gates with a new Bethesda release making cool mods and developing their own followings. What's the incentive to develop a mod that takes months of work for a game that is already dead in the water and generally not fun to play.
I really want to see Todd trying to create an incentive for modders to mod it. The simplest incentive is to embrace that game is garbage and try to sell modding it as ultimate modding challange - start with shit and turn it to gold. No one has interest in this so if it happens you will know it is Todd trying to clumsily pull the strings.
Do you think they'll push the "paid mods" debacle again to try and incentivize them? Obviously that would backfire spectacularly again and push even more players away from whatever husk of a playerbase is remaining at that point.
Starfield isn't going to get extensive mods because there's absolutely no starting point. People go on and on about mods for TES and Fallout but there, the mods exist primarily to add on to existing features, characters, locations, and lore. There is no foundation there to make people say, "Yes, I am going to put my time into building something here, it is worth my effort". Not only is the artstyle shit and the game world(s) utterly barren, but the characters are are awful, boring, and ugly. The amount of work it would take to make something even vaguely entertaining using it as a base would be better spent making a new fricking game.
>absolutely no starting point
So you are saying that it is complete shit and only you fellow modders can turn it to gold? Remember it is not only the proof of your love to Bethesda but it is also proof of your skill and mastery.
There are not many mods for fallout4 to begin with because its a bad game and people dont want to mod bad game. But stafield is so bad it makes fallout3 look good.
Exactly. Why would people start brand new projects on a horrible dogshit game like star field that offers not a SINGLE interesting new feature when they could just keep working on shit for skyrim or new vegas?
>There are not many mods for fallout4 to begin with
My dude, there's nearly 50k on Nexus alone. It has the third highest mod count on the site, ahead of F3 and New Vegas.
>there's nearly 50k on Nexus alone
They better not be fricking coomer mods.
you know nothing of modding
99% of those mods are lgbt flag retextures
if you go for actual top end mods fallout4 is completely barren
most modded high end thing in it is guns also
Anon I think you've spent way too much time here.
I can tell you I spen too much time modding beth games and I know what I am talking about
I found like 5, what the frick are you talking about?
5 what? mods?
Yes
oh yo mean lgbt retextures
I was joking
There lots of retextures tho, insane amount of journals
you can compare top 100 mods all time for skyrim vs top 100 mods for fallout4 for all time to se stark difference
I wonder if Bethesda even considered the fact that anyone who would have made mods for their games 5-10 years ago can now just as easily use Unreal/Unity to make a fully fledged game of their own and sell it for $10 on steam these days. I think a lot of the people who made super popular mods for their old games have actually gone on to do exactly that. So all you're left with now are noob modders who might make one or two UI mods to try and get some name recognition.
>everybody is a snoy
lmao
>Pretending like Ganker isn't absolutely infested with snoy vermin
>everybody is what I don't like
Terrible game.
>STARBORN
>90% of the NPCs are fauci stare black/brown people
>guns are abominations (surprise there, bethesda)
>skills are terrible
>empty procgen worlds
>generic setting (who wants to play this when elder scrolls and fallout exist?)
I've been saying it for years, Skyrim was the swan song of Bethesda softworks. They will be nothing but blue haired women and diversity hires then the company will die, in 5 years or less.
Doesn't do one thing well. What does starfield excel at? Gun play? Third person action? Spaceships? Exploration? What singular focus in this game is unrivaled. In an attempt to please everyone, it pleased nobody.
Also. Space isn't for everyone. Look at any space game. They are all niche. You couldn't like x4, nms, ED, SC, etc. What in the world made normies think they would like it now?
People just aren't willing to give bethesda a pass for making shitty games anymore
I have literal pajeet bethesdrone friends with at least a few hundred hours of playtime on skyrim that won't put up with shartfield because even the minimal degree of depth and care put into the world in recent releases like skyrim and fo4 wasn't fricking there because they tried to rip off no man's sky with procgen and it came out completely shit
Doubt
I genuinely enjoy exploring untouched worlds even if it barely gives you any exp
It's a nice atmospheric game
People wanted it to be the next fallout or tes but it never tried to be that so people are hating on it
Can't wait for mods to add more biomes and survival systems
Maybe even removing some loading screens although those only took like a few seconds to me so I really don't think they area problem but i can see the appeal of seamlessly travel through the universe
oh frick my esl is showing
i'm eastern european not indian I swear!
Your brown skin is shown by your tolerance for this piece of shit skinnerbox
>I genuinely enjoy exploring untouched worlds
homie wtf are you talking about, every single thing you can land on has not only already been discovered—but has some sort of outpost or research lab or something on it. There is literally no such thing as an 'untouched world' in this game lmao. Even planets with space magic temples will have mining facilities a stone's throw away and we're expected to believe that these places have been sitting there undiscovered and undisturbed for eons. Bethesda completely fricking botched the exploration aspect of their space exploration game and it's embarrassing.
>People wanted it to be the next fallout or tes
probably because that's what they marketed it as
>enjoy exploring untouched worlds
On this, I enjoyed No Man's Sky much more. Starfield was good during the first three explorations. After this, every planet felt exactly the same. The loading screens are adding to this feeling of always being on the same planet.
>untouched worlds
ironically the only planet in starfield that looks like you're the first human there is earth
>7/10 basic game has reviews drop to ~70% after honemoon phase
>Console wars cucks lose their mind over it
I don't get console wars homosexualry anyway. RPGs are for PC audience first and foremost, Steam is a pc platform and Ganker is overwhelmingly playing on pc. Why does a console live rent free in your head ?
It's because the game is total fricking dog shit at every concievable level. It does not one thing right.
why is no one playing the game then?
it has less players than skyrim
are the snoys in your room preventing you from playing the game?
Nobody liked Daggerfall (except contrarians) or the way it does traversal, "exploration", proc gen, or anything it does for that matter. Todd makes Space Daggerfall with guns and spaceship building. Gee, I wonder why the people who expected Skyrim in space, the large majority of Bethesda fans and people who even know Bethesda exists, are so upset they don't feel the Bethesda Magic they were hoping for.
This game is the definition of vast as an ocean deep as a puddle, and on top of that it's a bug riddled mess. If I ever bothered reviewing games I'd give it a negative and I burned over 100 hours in this for some reason.
now post what cyberpunk's steam rating was after 3 months
This guy's in Cyberpunk too? Who the frick is this guy? The friggin' pope?
Doesn't run smoothly on anything but a high-end PC, it's the worst optimized game of 2023 easily. Also unless you're running a PCIE4 nvme ssd, the loading screens are intolerable. It was clearly developed for Xbox Series X first with its 5GB/s compressed disk read speeds and PC was an afterthought. The PC version doesn't even support Direct Storage which would make a huge difference
Also we have games like Cyberpunk now with no loading screens after the initial load. Loading screens every 30 seconds is no longer acceptable. It's not charming or cute, it just feels ancient and fricking lazy, like they didn't even bother to mask them with elevators
Now that the game is heavily discounted on steam already should I get it or should I take the reviews as a red flag and avoid it?
No mod tools yet, so is a Bethesda game without the usual mods, you use your money how you see fit, but I won't purchase a pizza with only the bread
pirate it if you have to play it, don't give money to bethesda moron
it took people long time to notice bethesda cant make rpg anymore
The travel system and loading screens are just too shit for me + landing on bare planets takes too long to move around. I'm going to park it for 2-3 years until mods catch up to redeem some of it.
Right, the gameplay is fast travel, land on a planet, run for several minutes through nothingness until you reach your objective. I wish I knew the development story of this game because it seems very unfortunate
Because they took 10 years of development time to release a game worst than fallout 4, worst than fricking the Outer Worlds even
>worst than fricking the Outer Worlds even
I wouldn't necessarily go that far, but if nothing else Outer Worlds did have an identity at least. It's one that didn't grab a whole lot of people, but it was at least something, which is more than I say for Starfield.
outer worlds was bad but it was offensively bad
starslop is just a boringly bad
I think they are using bots to raise their scores.
Some reviews posted those last two days look a bit weird and different than the previous ones. It feels inorganic.
NO THEY ARE NOT USING BOTS IT IS VERY GOOD GAME WITH VERY GOOD GRAPHICS I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT A BOT IS
SAR IT IS VERY ORGANIC IT IS VERY GOOD GAME THAT PEOPLE ENJOY STOP POSTING SAR THE SNOYS REVIEW BOMBED IT
>starfield is 20 gb and can run on a potato
underwhelming but okay
>starfield is 120 gb and needs a modern gpu with a ssd to run at all
bloated and soulless, good job microsoft paying $7b for that shit
STARFIELD IS A GOOD GAME IF YOU CAN USE YOUR IMAGINATION TO OVERLOOK IT'S SHORTCOMINGS
>just imagine game being good
lol
OLD GAMES USED TO LOOK LIKE SHIT AND YOU USED YOUR IMAGINATION TO FILL IN THE GAPS THAT'S ALL YOU HAVE TO DO TO ENJOY STARFIELD
never compare a bad game like starfield to a great game like breakout ever again
It's 2023. The devs are perfectly capable of filling the gaps on their own
Yeah, but it's also fault of the gay zoophiles who play BG3 and the trannies who worship Crap Vegas
Chuds lost.
Starfield is india in space
It was the chud hedge against the massive success of BG3 and chuds thought it was going to shill religious, pro american and anti china propaganda which it does but the game sucks.
>It was the chud hedge against the massive success of BG3
Starfield is as gay and brown as BG3 is. You are schizophrenic. There were 2 big named based games that came out this year and both came from asia.
>and chuds thought it was going to shill religious, pro american and anti china propaganda
No, an Indian bethesdrone shitposter said that.
???
starfild is literally in the most literal way full brown you disgusting lying Black person troony
bg3 barely has any nigs
>Xbox exclusive
>is on PC
uh xkekbros what the frick?
When it's convenient to change the narrative it would be a mistake not to do it, they were saying that PS5 games being ported to PC means they are no longer exclusives, so they changed the narrative to - If the only console that you can play the game on is Xbox then it's Xbox exclusive.
It's boring
Yeah the fatal flaw is the writing isn't even good. That could have carried the game in spite of all the other flaws
People said it was the standard Bethesda experience. Here are my problems with the game:
>No gore, look at FO3 and FNV, it SEEMS that it was toned down to appeal to more of an audience. Who? Kids? They played it anyways? This confused me.
>The main story attempted to create lore out of NG+ and it lost focus in my opinion. The "best" quest everyone talks about is the UC one with the Terramorphs but there aren't really any consequences for your choices and actions. Whereas in FO3 or FNV we would either see upgraded enemies with rockets or if we put the FEV virus in the water people would line up outside the clinics.
>World building and AI going about there day just sucks ass. People are trying to cope so much saying there is no need for big cities and that humanity is actually struggling after the war and leaving Earth. Shut the frick up and stop making excuses or lazily mapped cities. There are no schedules, there is no actual feeling of immersion. The closest is the Neon. Hell if they made a planet just filled with Neon's style I would be happy. Yet the minute you leave the one main street to go to the "ghetto" it's just an alleyway and nothing ever happens.
>UI is just terrible done. Menu after menu after menu. More menus please. I'm about to menuuuuuuuu.
>Relationships? I mean I never really cared about romantic relationships in these games but between the crew it just makes no sense. Their established morals given backstory do not line up with their reactions to the player's actions. We have no problem working someone for an artifact piece but then against thievery? Even warranting someone's death? The part where you are getting chased from the Lodge through Jemison and the countless injured or killed - no one bats an eye about that. UC doesn't care and no one in Constellation cares. The same filter / script is used for the terramorphs on Jemison.
It's just LAZY. And if anyone paid extra to play early, you're a fricking moron. The game is BAD.
Area 18 makes any of Starfield's cities look like a joke.
I still can't believe the game has fricking Star Shouts. Did they not have any idea how lazy that would look?
fallout 4 had those goofy dragon deathclaws that used a werewolf rig and fallout 76 had giant bats that breathed radiation which were just reskinned skyrim dragons
yea, it was awesome
they thought that s o y s will do s o y emote when they see skyrim reference and it would be a free promotion
But nu-zelda is just garbage
>Sony ponies paying $70 just to leave a bad review
Imagine being a Bethesdrone.
The game is very mid 5.5/10. It would've been more forgivable if it came from a AA eurojank studio like SPIDERS or something but this is Bethesda with a billion dollars from Microsoft to make Todd's magnum opus come true.
supposedly Bethesda still has 500 employees working on post-launch stuff. Where? What? What the frick are they doing? It took them 1 month to add an FoV slider, 2 months to add. What in the absolute frick are those people even doing since it's clearly not devwork.
>another bethesda simp cope thread
Starfield copers are so mentally ill
What were they thinking with procgen? Look at this. Will you ever see anything like this in Starfield?
Is there even anything to stop you running in a straight line to wherever you're going? All I've seen is rolling hills
Hey guys, let's talk about a good game instead. Should I finally buy Stick of Truth? Do you need the DLC?
Yes and no.
Well alright, good conversation.
Why is it so hard to accept that the game might just be disappointing to the majority? Clearly you have no issues of saying that Gollum was a disappointing game.
Parroting behavior, they buy Bethesda craps but they want other thing. Since the first day, I know this game would be a Fallout/Skyrim, that was the reason why I don't bother buying it, I don't like fallout and Skyrim.
ESL, if it was up to the standard of their previous titles most of us would be content. It's not.
I like my rpgs to have role play in them. The reactivity to your actions in Starfield is particularly awful.
>runs like shit on pc
>looks like a 2015 game despite this
>ship combat & flying is shallow and underwhelming
>on foot sections literally just feel like a fallout 4 mod
>a dozen or so actual good worlds at most, the rest is padded out with empty procgen planets with nothing interesting on them
>story is short and mediocre
>"revolutionary" new game+ mechanic actually kinda sucks and leaves a bad taste in the mouth
even by bethesda standards starslop was pretty bad
>starborn
this will never cease to be hilarious
they literally used AI to write about 90% of the game's dialogue, and some of the voiceovers are actual AI. You can literally tell what's AI and what isn't when you play the game.
Can you post some examples?
Legit curious.
Dude, trust me.
It's a shitpost.
all bethesda haters are shitposts
>t. Todd Howard
cope Black person
>this thread again
>it will reach 200+ replies again
>with the same recycled and reused responses and replies again
>the thread will die and another one with identical wording and the exact same pic will do just as good a whole 1 or 2 hours after this dies
I quit. It's not even about Starfield, but just the problem with Ganker being this increasingly predictable and formulaic for so long with no end in sight. I'm not going to Twitter, Reddit, or Discord or any of the other social media since they aren't any better, but I'm done hanging here. Bots and shitposters win. Thanks Ganker.
you do realise tis just bots and jeets talking to eachother, right?
Its just not a good game. In every aspect of being a game it fails. The controls are shitty. The gameplay is shitty. Moving between things is shitty. The graphics are shitty. Theres giant empty fields literally everywhere, its a game about space exploration except theres literally no reason to do it. Every function and feature is half implemented and purposeless.
If starfield came out in 2003, it would be an amazing game. That was a time when shitty controls, shitty gameplay, and big empty spaces punctuated by loading screens and menu based travel would fly in a AAA game.
In 2023? We've seen the same thing done better in countless other games. So what makes this one unique? Literally nothing.
Plus its filled to the absolute fricking brim with ugly old women, Black folk and trannies. Things nobody wants to be reminded exist in their leisure time.
I liked building the space ships, it's like a cross between the Sims and Kerbal. That's about the only positive thing I can say about the game.
I would rather have a Star Trek version of the Sims than Starfield.
yea pretty much
reviews were very positive until a few days ago, the definition of a review bomb
>le console war
i really don't think this shit is as prevalent as you people make it out to be
the game is just very very bad
It's because Ganker shitposters are always looking for the next TORtanic so they can feel like they have some control over which games succeed or fail in the industry
Starfield is a C-grade, 7/10 game. It's normal and unremarkable. The desire to make it seem like some huge disaster is funny because even games like Starfield in mediocrity still do well financially and okay critically
See that website you took a picture from? You can literally read hundreds of negative reviews there explaining in detail what's wrong with it
>another Xtroon cry/cope thread
Stop crying all day, everyday!
Mods will fix it.
by the time they actually release the ck (if ever) nobody will care anymore
how did delphine get the horn?
it competes with troonygate and we know how obnoxious trannies can get
>normies are onto bethesda's bullshit so now it's every autistic Gankertard's DUTY to defend the game