Everything about this is phoned in and uncultured, since it is from one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
a-at least the books were good though
"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King
bro it's a kid's book written by a single mom with an active fanbase of illiterates and millennial women, no shit it's not herman hesse, you didn't need to post a troony pasta, doesn't mean it's not a good book for what it is, great for kids (which is when you are supposed to read it)
I didn't make the thread because I'm a HP fan or whatever, it's because it's a comfy game, and in my opinion, one of the best retro games of its time, one of the comfiest for sure
You're malding about a kid game about a kid wizard on an anonymous board dedicated to retro games
You're the only one MALDING because the b***h that wrote the book said something you don't like, either way it has nothing to do with the thread, this is a great game and I want to discuss it, you troons are so annoying
When I posted about this game years ago, people would actually discuss this hidden gem, but now it's just non-stop seething from you and your ilk, go back to your containment board
I love this game
Gay. Ugly. Soulless. Vacuous. Liked by all. Checks out.
>t. little cacaboy, mama's tiny wittle piss-piss shitbaby
>t. roon
>t. mindbroken
All the maps in this game look way too empty and spacey, like a Quake map
This. Shit game. Shit franchise. Shit IP.
Typically potty potter behavior
>cacaboy moment
>peepeeboy moment
I could never understand homosexual Potter phenomena
Only autistic kids and pedos enjoy that crap
Potty Putty Polution Potter
2>1>3>the rest
it's 2>3>1 for me, everything else is shit
Nah, This is SOUL
soul
>colors were vibrant and things just felt cozy
Yeah, that's why I love banjo and spyro
>Unironically liking a franchise for little girls like harry potter
Look homosexual, you're on a website where people unironically love little anime girls, not really sure what you're trying to say here.
I actually do enjoy these kind of old graphics where colors were vibrant and things just felt cozy.
I'd rather play Barbie
I'm not really a fan of Harry Potter, but this looks comfy AF
I bet this looked a lot better on whatever its natural system was and not you horribly over-resin it till the glitches all appear
lol troons malding itt. JKR is right about you lot and you can't stand it
that seems to be the case
this game is extremely underrated. Great levels, good gameplay flow, lite exploration and collectable emphasis
And the music
Jeremy SOULe is amazing
The game's so well-designed
>all the zelda manchildren shitting on hp
lmfaoooo
Everything about this is phoned in and uncultured, since it is from one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
a-at least the books were good though
"No!" The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King
>Ganker pasta on /vr/
oh so that's where the zoomers are coming from
bro it's a kid's book written by a single mom with an active fanbase of illiterates and millennial women, no shit it's not herman hesse, you didn't need to post a troony pasta, doesn't mean it's not a good book for what it is, great for kids (which is when you are supposed to read it)
I didn't make the thread because I'm a HP fan or whatever, it's because it's a comfy game, and in my opinion, one of the best retro games of its time, one of the comfiest for sure
You're malding about a kid game about a kid wizard on an anonymous board dedicated to retro games
You're the only one MALDING because the b***h that wrote the book said something you don't like, either way it has nothing to do with the thread, this is a great game and I want to discuss it, you troons are so annoying
When I posted about this game years ago, people would actually discuss this hidden gem, but now it's just non-stop seething from you and your ilk, go back to your containment board