The ball is obviously missing from the basket due to the cover being flat. Sally will surmise Ann is a thieving Black person and go beat her until she stops moving
This test has nothing to do with autism or empathy. It's a test to see whether a child has developed the ability to understand that other people are separate entities. Children under the age of 4 usually fail this test.
I think something analogous to this was presented to smart animals and they too all failed it.
It's called theory of mind. And autistic children will fail it into their teens, sometimes even as adults. And even if autistic adults can solve it, it tends not to be quite the same as a neurotypical.
>Although the extent to which some nonhuman animals understand mental states is currently under debate, attributing false beliefs has been considered to be beyond their limits. A recent study by Krupenye, Kano, Hirata, Call, and Tomasello (Science, 354, 110–114, 2016) shows that great apes pass a false-belief task when they are tested with an anticipatory-looking paradigm developed for nonverbal human infants.
IIRC it's a test for whether someone understands what someone else might understand. A reader knows that the ball has moved but Sally does not know that.
He probably was. Whole boards is full of borderline prepubescent spastics. Just look at the rest of the posts in this thread making shitty attempts at humour. Wish every one of these little shits gets raped and bricked in the skull.
Sally is a kid with no object permanence. The claim she wants to play with the ball specifically is incorrect. The ball no longer exists to her until she has checked the basket and the box for something to play with.
>Where WILL sally look for the ball
She will look in the basket first because that's where she last left it. It doesn't ask where SHOULD Sally look. Devil's in the details.
sally looks in the box because she's known ann for a while, which means she also knows her constant bullshit.
sally then throws the ball right at ann's stupid fricking face because she's done this six times now and hasnt been funny once.
next question.
I put an arm between the basket and the box, filtering it to only grab balls, and connect it to my main bus.
Fricking trivial, give me something more challenging next time.
The box. Next question.
The box. Next question.
The box. Next question.
The ball is obviously missing from the basket due to the cover being flat. Sally will surmise Ann is a thieving Black person and go beat her until she stops moving
As a person with ADHD I'd probably check both at random
A crummy ball?
Is this a test to see if someone is black?
A testy to see if children lack empathy and doesn't know how to see something from someone else's point of view.
The ol Breakfast question.
This test has nothing to do with autism or empathy. It's a test to see whether a child has developed the ability to understand that other people are separate entities. Children under the age of 4 usually fail this test.
I think something analogous to this was presented to smart animals and they too all failed it.
>nothing to do with autism
Except that the tests found autists fail it at much higher rates than normals
It's called theory of mind. And autistic children will fail it into their teens, sometimes even as adults. And even if autistic adults can solve it, it tends not to be quite the same as a neurotypical.
how do you pose a question to an animal?
An animal will just point to where the object is
>Although the extent to which some nonhuman animals understand mental states is currently under debate, attributing false beliefs has been considered to be beyond their limits. A recent study by Krupenye, Kano, Hirata, Call, and Tomasello (Science, 354, 110–114, 2016) shows that great apes pass a false-belief task when they are tested with an anticipatory-looking paradigm developed for nonverbal human infants.
Realizing someone else is different than you is the most basic form of empathy.
IIRC it's a test for whether someone understands what someone else might understand. A reader knows that the ball has moved but Sally does not know that.
if you have to ask you're at least 50% black
What a weird question. She'd check the box, where the ball is at. Duh.
do you think this is funny
like are you sitting in front of your computer wheezing away at how fricking funny your post was
He probably was. Whole boards is full of borderline prepubescent spastics. Just look at the rest of the posts in this thread making shitty attempts at humour. Wish every one of these little shits gets raped and bricked in the skull.
>t. basketgay
Ann is white, so she'll still check the basket first.
Sally knows Ann is a theiving c**t and the assumption that she moved it to the box is a safe one.
Sally is a kid with no object permanence. The claim she wants to play with the ball specifically is incorrect. The ball no longer exists to her until she has checked the basket and the box for something to play with.
>Where WILL sally look for the ball
She will look in the basket first because that's where she last left it. It doesn't ask where SHOULD Sally look. Devil's in the details.
I'm assuming anyone that answers "box" is just trolling to be silly
The Inside of my pants
The basket because that is where she left it.
sally looks in the box because she's known ann for a while, which means she also knows her constant bullshit.
sally then throws the ball right at ann's stupid fricking face because she's done this six times now and hasnt been funny once.
next question.
I put an arm between the basket and the box, filtering it to only grab balls, and connect it to my main bus.
Fricking trivial, give me something more challenging next time.
>filtering it to only grab balls
Anon, no!