53 thoughts on “you can’t halfway press a digital input”

  1. Its just convenient terminology for when you use 1 press for multiple sections. If you come into something holding a button you didn’t exactly "press" it for that section but you still need a way to show that numerically, so half is what they use to denote this.

  2. when do they teach decimals in america? lmao

    there is literally infinite numbers between 0 and 1.
    0.1 0.2 etc.

    and guess what?

    0.5 is in the middle between 0 and 1, there, solved it for ya

    • anon computers work on binary logic
      in this case there isn’t an infinite amount of numbers between 0 and 1 there is only 0 (off) and 1 (on)
      You can have a sequence of ons and offs but there is no "half on" or half off"

  3. Factually correct
    However the term used is not "digital input" it is "press" which is a more ambiguous term
    Therefore if a press is considered as the initial downward force on the button followed by the release of said button it is in fact possible to do a "half press"

  4. of course not
    but if a task only requires half of the important parts of a "full press" of an A button, you could say it takes "half of a press"
    and in isolation this would clearly require and count as a full press of the A button, but if you can perform two such tasks sequentially (and they both use different "halves" of the full A press) you would only require one A press to obtain both of them. 2 tasks, one A press, you could very reasonably say as that each of those tasks requires "half an A press"

  5. Pannen very clearly explained why half a presses are annotated as such and if you still don’t get it you’re just a moron.

        • Honestly, IF it could be done with 0 or 1 presses, it would be noteable, but since it can’t, and the record is some arbitrary number (14?) then I don’t see any hype in it.

      • You will. You are wired into the machine via your muscles via kinetic energy transfer. Your brain sends energy from your muscles to the buttons into the machine.

        I continue to play games because I have nothing and nobody, and at the actual in game rate of speed at this rate I’ll be immortal because of how CPU cycles work, and by the time I figured it out they had already lured me in when I was a child and I had thousands of hours invested in games.

        Fast computers are fast because they have more time to be slow.

    • It’s semantics, but you can literally only press the button once, not half. The press and release are two separate actions.

      • he fucking explained so clearly i legitimately dont understand how people are still getting caught up in the idea that it somehow involves literal button presses.
        >in this scenario you press the button once
        >in that scenario you dont
        >both scenarios are important, so we came up with a special notation for this type of button press
        are you just being retarded on purpose or what. seriously what is your fucking deal

          • youre doing this on purpose. youre being retarded on purpose. why are you being retarded on purpose what do you fucking have to gain from this. its not fucking funny

          • He saved an A press by not completing the action immediately, but that was still an A press in the end. The button can’t be half-pressed. A ‘half a press’ should just be rounded up to a whole A press because that button has to be let go of eventually and it was already in a pressed state. The fact that he’s preserved the ‘held’ state still means the button has been pressed.

          • no.stop this. you re doig this on phrpise. why? yoy know what im talking about. you know what panne n is talkign about. sowhy do this shit?is it funny to yoy?are tou derivinng laughter from it?what is your fucking issue

        • they are trolling. they get it and understand it and even agree with it but they know it pisses people off because it’s a concept explained so well that there is no room for error so when they make threads like this they know somebody is going to take the bait


Add to the conversation