The document itself sites God as being the source of the rights you dumb Black person. Whether you believe in God or not is irrelevant
3 months ago
Anonymous
It's pretty fricking relevant because the "inalienability" of your rights means absolutely nothing to someone who doesn't believe in god
3 months ago
Anonymous
nta but this is why I believe in violence as God. The contextualizes the tree of liberty.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Violence is God, it's the ultimate power in the universe and every other ideology bows to the superiority of violence. Believing in love and peace is all well and good but without a monopoly on violence to maintain that love and peace it's a doomed ideology.
>the israelite uses regular home copies instead of rental copies for his israeli business >gets sued by israeli lawyer that was contacted by the israeli business
you are the israelite
no shit sherlock. difference is that physical license is impossible to keep track of and not worth the trouble. while digital license one can essentially click a button and make it useless.
What said, also they usually don't have strong legal authority to do anything even if you did. Sony can't break into your house and take back your copy of FF7 because you played it in public once. They can however revoke access to your account that you bought a digital copy of FF7 with because you broke their rules.
>difference is that physical license is impossible to keep track of
physical licenses are impos-ACK >while with digital licenses one can essentially click a button and make it useless.
except anyone with a brain backs up the files and runs a crack because DRM is for cucks.
it doesn't matter if the copy works when they can remotely brick your console, since they also hold the perspective that hardware is only licensed to you as well
Home ownership is a complete scam. You wind up paying more than if you'd just rented, and the idea that "I can pass it on to my kids" is completely laughable, otherwise you'd hear far more stories of people being given houses by their parents and grandparents. In reality 99% of the time something comes along that forces you to sell the house. Why do you think there's nonstop adverts for mortgages? Because banks are your friends?
>You wind up paying more than if you'd just rented
tell me you never made numbers to buy or rent a house without telling it
It's sheer empiricism and common sense. Very few people get given houses by their parents, and the sheer fact that multi billion dollar banks (see: corporations) are advertising mortgages (see: products) should be a glaring red flag that someone's making money and it ain't gonna be you.
But please, by all means, tell me how smart you are while falling for scams.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Is this your cope for being a rentoid? kek. I dunno what country you're in but here I'm paying $560 a month mortgage on a property that would cost me $1000 a month in rent. I have 10 years left on it and I'd make $40,000 profit if I sold it today.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>"Hmmm, lets give out loans that make less money than if we just bought and held onto the property ourselves."
This is what you think goes through the minds of banks. They're just being generous! Really! pfffahahaha what a fricking rube
3 months ago
Anonymous
Are you moronic? I dont need an answer to that I need you to reflect on it. Because what you are implying literally happened over covid. Banks and the big boys bought houses and then realized managing houses is aids because rentoids are scum. Owning a mortgage is literally free money while managing property is barely more and requires 20* the time and effort
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Profit >Get taxed >Another house will cost the same or more.
Dumb frick
>you'd hear far more stories of people being given houses by their parents and grandparents
well that's how it usually works if your parents or grandparents had house. most just have their own houses at that point and sell the one that they inherit.
i'm actually just inheriting part of house, i think relatives are just gonna put it on sale and i get some share of the money. was thinking of buying the rest, but frick it way too big for me and probably can't get loan. would've to sell couple cars and stuff
ground tax is a thing everywhere
and it's also not you who decides if your govern mente introduces it
cope
3 months ago
Anonymous
it isnt though, because I own a house, and I own the ground beneath it and around it, and I don't pay any tax over it
3 months ago
Anonymous
doubt.jpg
3 months ago
Anonymous
I live in Croatia so frick you that shit doesnt exist (unless its a holiday home that you dont actually live in but I do so still frick you)
3 months ago
Anonymous
>shit hole
gotcha
>The general VAT rate is 25%
hahahaha >Consumption tax is levied at the maximum rate of 3%.
hahahahhaa >Inheritance and gift tax 4%
hahaha >Real estate transfer tax 3%
hahahahaha
3 months ago
Anonymous
>shit hole
yeah its awful here I cry every day
3 months ago
Anonymous
All subjects are obligated to pay VAT at a rate of 25% when transferring land classified as building land.
Sell the same land 4 times and the govern mente got 100% LMAO
Your landlord doesn't own his house either then, meaning if the government takes it from him, you'll still be out on your ass. Have fun paying your landlord's property tax for him till then, though.
no, the government will sell the house to some other greedy slave owner, who will then keep you living there, for a price. There will be a rent raise of course.
3 months ago
Anonymous
No, it entirely depends on the reason the government took the landowner's property. It's possible there might be no building anymore when they're done with it. But as a rentoid, at least you'll have the freedom to look for another place.
Since consolecucks are tech illiterate morons, they don’t realize that even if a company revokes their license for software we paid for, we can always crack it
Imagine having to panic and cross reference every game in existence with this site before you can buy it. I can see you now holding up the line at gamestop because you're telling the cashier "one second I need to make sure Assassins Creed: Pride Edition is the right version to buy".
Every single game I've bought on steam since 2006 is still in my library, can still be downloaded and played, and will be available until I die. When the PS6 gets announced you have to kneel at the foot of your bed and pray to god that Sony even will allow you to play your old games on the new platform. If you're still a console gamer after the last 2 generations there's just no hope for you and you're getting fricked over the most out of everyone and you don't even know it.
t. consolegay since the original NES that actually pays attention to what's happening around me
>Imagine having to panic and cross reference every game in existence with this site before you can buy it
lol you're braindead af just don't buy any western cancer and you're good
>Snoy cries in fear that anyone would check if their discs actually play >imagines nonsense
(actual physical chads research before they buy) >cries even more >bu buh digital downloads are superior!!!
Software is weird and unlike other products, and our laws and thinking have been inadequate from the beginning. Letting everyone copy whatever they want whenever they want doesn't seem like a great idea to me but neither is the convoluted bullshit we came up with.
It's there to scare you off. A publisher cannot prohibit rental or resale of something they publish in Europe or USA. They can say they do, but it has no legal meaning.
Exactly. Otherwise Blockbuster would've been screwed. I'm pretty sure even the VHS boxes also said "for home use only", etc.
It's just JP companies thinking they can apply their moronic JP consumer laws that are for anyone BUT the consumer.
Trademarks are not the same as copyright and half of the latter text is completely void in Europe. But yes, copyright in its current form is an injustice and it was no different when PSX was current.
If they told every person who was going to buy their game to their face in plain language "you won't actually own this game and we can take it from you at any time for any reason" a lot of people would not buy that game. There's a reason they hid it on page 22.
No shit. You don't buy games as in "Final Fantasy VII now belongs to you". You buy a physical item that gives you access to use it in whatever way the product is intended to be used.
It's the same for literally anything you buy. You can use the product at your will but if you destroy it, you won't get for example a replacement just because you paid for it once.
It's literally the same for anything. A bicycle, a hairdryer or even a house.
https://web.archive.org/web/20150821073728/https://dropsdejogos.com.br/index.php/noticias/industria/item/466-exclusivo-sony-notifica-sites-e-perfis-do-mercado-livre-que-comercializam-ilegalmente-jogos-digitais this is good example.
No shit, Black person. The difference is just that 30 years ago publishers didn't have the means to revoke a license. But ever since we started registering games to accounts 20 years ago they can just push a button and revoke that license, as stated in the licensing agreement every user has to sign in order to use the software, for any reason at any time without any warning.
yeah it's much better to always wait a couple of years and i seriously mean this i got all my games so much cheaper plus most of them are better revisions
>You never owned your games
That's great. I don't feel bad for all of the editing, pirating, and redistributing I've been doing since I was 14, because as I was never a customer, I never had to agree with their terms of service from the beginning. Do continue to make games worse for legitimate customers just to get back at me, however.
Uh, you own your copy of the game. When did people stop using the term "copy" of the physical product you own? Also, the anti "backup" stuff they talk about has never, ever held weight in court.
Ownership is an illusion
>If you take this, I'll kill you.
Let's see you yap about "illusions" with my shotgun barrel down your throat.
you're only allowed to do that because the government grants you ownership and defense over private property
>daddy government must approve what I do
Just end it tonight. You already have the rope, so just do it.
freedom is literally an artificial concept
> the government grants you ownership and defense over private property
No they don't. God did. Learn yo read
>God
lol
The document itself sites God as being the source of the rights you dumb Black person. Whether you believe in God or not is irrelevant
It's pretty fricking relevant because the "inalienability" of your rights means absolutely nothing to someone who doesn't believe in god
nta but this is why I believe in violence as God. The contextualizes the tree of liberty.
Violence is God, it's the ultimate power in the universe and every other ideology bows to the superiority of violence. Believing in love and peace is all well and good but without a monopoly on violence to maintain that love and peace it's a doomed ideology.
>court in spain is asking some 80+ years old guy for 25 years in jail for defending his own fricking house
goverment is shit
This
Soulless bug
you won't do shit, chuddie.
>>If you take this, I'll kill you.
you can say that about anything whether you own it or not.
you're full of bullshit. movie rental places kept renting out games in spite of israeli legal disclaimers like that.
>the israelite uses regular home copies instead of rental copies for his israeli business
>gets sued by israeli lawyer that was contacted by the israeli business
you are the israelite
no shit sherlock. difference is that physical license is impossible to keep track of and not worth the trouble. while digital license one can essentially click a button and make it useless.
What said, also they usually don't have strong legal authority to do anything even if you did. Sony can't break into your house and take back your copy of FF7 because you played it in public once. They can however revoke access to your account that you bought a digital copy of FF7 with because you broke their rules.
>while digital license one can essentially click a button and make it useless.
Wrong.
>difference is that physical license is impossible to keep track of
physical licenses are impos-ACK
>while with digital licenses one can essentially click a button and make it useless.
except anyone with a brain backs up the files and runs a crack because DRM is for cucks.
it doesn't matter if the copy works when they can remotely brick your console, since they also hold the perspective that hardware is only licensed to you as well
fricking moron
bluray has hardware DRM implemented via PKI and they can do all sorts of horrible shit with it
You never owned your DVDs.
you don't even own your house
>2024
>owning a house
The frick is anyone buying a house in this age?
I am in month or two
Home ownership is a complete scam. You wind up paying more than if you'd just rented, and the idea that "I can pass it on to my kids" is completely laughable, otherwise you'd hear far more stories of people being given houses by their parents and grandparents. In reality 99% of the time something comes along that forces you to sell the house. Why do you think there's nonstop adverts for mortgages? Because banks are your friends?
>you'd hear far more stories of people being given houses by their parents and grandparents
That is exactly how I got my house.
It happens but doesn't negate the rule that home ownership just isn't worth it for most people.
>You wind up paying more than if you'd just rented
Lol no. You can literally make a profit selling a house you're still paying a mortgage on.
>Oy vey, we got another sucker here boys!
It's sheer empiricism and common sense. Very few people get given houses by their parents, and the sheer fact that multi billion dollar banks (see: corporations) are advertising mortgages (see: products) should be a glaring red flag that someone's making money and it ain't gonna be you.
But please, by all means, tell me how smart you are while falling for scams.
Is this your cope for being a rentoid? kek. I dunno what country you're in but here I'm paying $560 a month mortgage on a property that would cost me $1000 a month in rent. I have 10 years left on it and I'd make $40,000 profit if I sold it today.
>"Hmmm, lets give out loans that make less money than if we just bought and held onto the property ourselves."
This is what you think goes through the minds of banks. They're just being generous! Really! pfffahahaha what a fricking rube
Are you moronic? I dont need an answer to that I need you to reflect on it. Because what you are implying literally happened over covid. Banks and the big boys bought houses and then realized managing houses is aids because rentoids are scum. Owning a mortgage is literally free money while managing property is barely more and requires 20* the time and effort
>Profit
>Get taxed
>Another house will cost the same or more.
Dumb frick
Why would you buy a second house
>You wind up paying more than if you'd just rented
tell me you never made numbers to buy or rent a house without telling it
>you'd hear far more stories of people being given houses by their parents and grandparents
well that's how it usually works if your parents or grandparents had house. most just have their own houses at that point and sell the one that they inherit.
i'm actually just inheriting part of house, i think relatives are just gonna put it on sale and i get some share of the money. was thinking of buying the rest, but frick it way too big for me and probably can't get loan. would've to sell couple cars and stuff
>You wind up paying more than if you'd just rented
israelite detected.
>oyy vey, you will own nothing goy! Renting from your corporate overlords is the future!
>paying more than if you'd just rented
wut
I'm currently looking for one. My house is falling apart and I'd rather buy a new one than repair this one.
Me. I am. Working on getting a nice house with a deck overlooking a lake. Should be comfy.
it's comfy. except mosquitoes are a bit annoying
Just wear a beekeeping suit at all times. Hope there aren't any spiders inside it.
I'll be 50 and never pay rent again
and you'll still vote for Obama if you had the chance, cuck.
people that realise renting is more expensive than paying mortage
you don't own the house
the government does, otherwise you wouldn't be paying endless ground tax
>ground tax
i own my house and i dont pay such a thing. im not an ameritard though so
ground tax is a thing everywhere
and it's also not you who decides if your govern mente introduces it
cope
it isnt though, because I own a house, and I own the ground beneath it and around it, and I don't pay any tax over it
doubt.jpg
I live in Croatia so frick you that shit doesnt exist (unless its a holiday home that you dont actually live in but I do so still frick you)
>shit hole
gotcha
>The general VAT rate is 25%
hahahaha
>Consumption tax is levied at the maximum rate of 3%.
hahahahhaa
>Inheritance and gift tax 4%
hahaha
>Real estate transfer tax 3%
hahahahaha
>shit hole
yeah its awful here I cry every day
All subjects are obligated to pay VAT at a rate of 25% when transferring land classified as building land.
Sell the same land 4 times and the govern mente got 100% LMAO
>
Dunno about Amerilard land but it's a thing here in Australia and it's fricking stupid
Your landlord doesn't own his house either then, meaning if the government takes it from him, you'll still be out on your ass. Have fun paying your landlord's property tax for him till then, though.
no, the government will sell the house to some other greedy slave owner, who will then keep you living there, for a price. There will be a rent raise of course.
No, it entirely depends on the reason the government took the landowner's property. It's possible there might be no building anymore when they're done with it. But as a rentoid, at least you'll have the freedom to look for another place.
I bought one in 2018 via a USDA loan specifically intended for poor people.
>being able to afford a house
welcome 1960
enjoyed time travel experience into the future?
>rental is prohibited
funny
also my country doesn't give a frick i can download and copy whatever the frick i want for personal use
To be fair, rentals were illegal in Japan at the time
doesitplay.org
I OWN elden ring, can you say the same, Pcgay?
Yes? Do morons thing just because a game is on steam means it can't be played offline?
Since consolecucks are tech illiterate morons, they don’t realize that even if a company revokes their license for software we paid for, we can always crack it
you couldn't even crack your mom's bras lmao
Imagine having to panic and cross reference every game in existence with this site before you can buy it. I can see you now holding up the line at gamestop because you're telling the cashier "one second I need to make sure Assassins Creed: Pride Edition is the right version to buy".
Every single game I've bought on steam since 2006 is still in my library, can still be downloaded and played, and will be available until I die. When the PS6 gets announced you have to kneel at the foot of your bed and pray to god that Sony even will allow you to play your old games on the new platform. If you're still a console gamer after the last 2 generations there's just no hope for you and you're getting fricked over the most out of everyone and you don't even know it.
t. consolegay since the original NES that actually pays attention to what's happening around me
>Imagine having to panic and cross reference every game in existence with this site before you can buy it
lol you're braindead af just don't buy any western cancer and you're good
>Snoy cries in fear that anyone would check if their discs actually play
>imagines nonsense
(actual physical chads research before they buy)
>cries even more
>bu buh digital downloads are superior!!!
False narrative. IP ownership is different than ownership of a physical copy of a game you paid for.
My NA copy doesn't have this so I guess I do own it.
Policy is just opinion, it's not legally-binding.
i own anything i buy
>Can't resell
Wonder how that worked out for them.
And piracy was never a theft
Software is weird and unlike other products, and our laws and thinking have been inadequate from the beginning. Letting everyone copy whatever they want whenever they want doesn't seem like a great idea to me but neither is the convoluted bullshit we came up with.
>product
how weird
'Prohibited' how, exactly?
It's there to scare you off. A publisher cannot prohibit rental or resale of something they publish in Europe or USA. They can say they do, but it has no legal meaning.
Exactly. Otherwise Blockbuster would've been screwed. I'm pretty sure even the VHS boxes also said "for home use only", etc.
It's just JP companies thinking they can apply their moronic JP consumer laws that are for anyone BUT the consumer.
Trademarks are not the same as copyright and half of the latter text is completely void in Europe. But yes, copyright in its current form is an injustice and it was no different when PSX was current.
If they told every person who was going to buy their game to their face in plain language "you won't actually own this game and we can take it from you at any time for any reason" a lot of people would not buy that game. There's a reason they hid it on page 22.
>broadcast
>cable transmission
>public performance
So uploading a video of it or streaming it is prohibited.
No shit. You don't buy games as in "Final Fantasy VII now belongs to you". You buy a physical item that gives you access to use it in whatever way the product is intended to be used.
It's the same for literally anything you buy. You can use the product at your will but if you destroy it, you won't get for example a replacement just because you paid for it once.
It's literally the same for anything. A bicycle, a hairdryer or even a house.
But I still do.
Really? But I just put MY Final Fantasy 7 disc into MY Playstation and started playing MY game that I BOUGHT 27 years ago.
You don't even own your car
I do. Imagine not just buying a car outright.
>don't pay the mandatory taxes and insurance
>can't legally drive the car on that you "own"
That's a subscription service. You can still own the vehicle, but not the road(servers) it is driven on.
you don't pay for the road, you pay for the loisense
This. The moment you call someone Black person on the road, the company can just push a button and stop the car from working.
I will always own my games, homosexual ass
you dont own anything in your life, what is this, communism?
This is not a legal contract. It just says it's prohibited, but they legally can't stop you from doing it.
oh yeah that's why hundreds of stores were sued for doing that in the past decades
stop making things up in your head to suit your own agenda
really? wasn't that long ago that switch stores were shut down. ps4 brazilian stores before that.
>oh yeah that's why hundreds of stores were sued
Name 5 and the reason..
like every store selling pirated games in estonia, then multiply that with 50 other countries with stores shut down
https://web.archive.org/web/20150821073728/https://dropsdejogos.com.br/index.php/noticias/industria/item/466-exclusivo-sony-notifica-sites-e-perfis-do-mercado-livre-que-comercializam-ilegalmente-jogos-digitais this is good example.
I OWN EVERYTHING
dilate troony
You own nothing. All things that exist belong to God.
No shit, Black person. The difference is just that 30 years ago publishers didn't have the means to revoke a license. But ever since we started registering games to accounts 20 years ago they can just push a button and revoke that license, as stated in the licensing agreement every user has to sign in order to use the software, for any reason at any time without any warning.
>arcade use
>ff7
>makes pc licensing trannies seethe
feels good man (¬‿¬)
>Two Metroid Dread copies
Why, anon?
https://www.benoitren.be/switch-cartridgerevisions.html
Oh, those are some major updates on the carts.
So it's better to get carts from latter production batches...
yeah it's much better to always wait a couple of years and i seriously mean this i got all my games so much cheaper plus most of them are better revisions
>say Black person online
>sony bans my account
>money not stolen
>NOOOOO I BOUGHT ALL MY RETRO GAMES PHYSICAL I DONT EMULATE I OWN MY GAMES WHAT DO YOU MEANNN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>You never owned your games
That's great. I don't feel bad for all of the editing, pirating, and redistributing I've been doing since I was 14, because as I was never a customer, I never had to agree with their terms of service from the beginning. Do continue to make games worse for legitimate customers just to get back at me, however.
why do third world trannies alwys think buying video games is excluding pirating?
>you don't own it, unless you can rent regular home copies to people as a business
frick off, moron
Uh, you own your copy of the game. When did people stop using the term "copy" of the physical product you own? Also, the anti "backup" stuff they talk about has never, ever held weight in court.