you can clearly see blocky edges in 1080p and distant objects are just mess.
i hope that 4k will become default in 4-5 years.
anti-aliasing tech like DLSS or newer and better DLAA is cool but it doesn't make things look sharper.
current gen GPUs aren't made for 144hz 4k gameplay but post-next gen of GPUs definitely should be.
Pushing for higher framerates and faster response is more important than a render resolution. I'm here to play games not look at shitty 30fps movie game with 80ms lag.
Absolutely fricking not. Anti aliasing is so crisp on 4k, but even that has artifacts. 8k isn't even a meme. The dumb anons who can't tell the difference between frame rates and between resolutions are absolute charlatans. Theyre the same people who also can't notice input lag, even on rhythm games. I'm certain these are the same types of generally unaware people who vote democrat, can't articulate notes in food or beverage, and haven't studied a thing since graduating or dropping out. Frick you smooth brains.
If you play only twitch shooters, you want 1440p244.
If you play ANYTHING ELSE, you want 4K60.
There are still issues with UW, HFR, HDR etc but not with 4K - this "just works" since the industry actually universally adopted it years ago.
4K is particularly great in anything with a lot of GUI since you get that lovely crisp image like on a flagship phone screen.
4K displays are also really cheap these days, often being the same price as 2K.
a thread died for this
Good. It was shit.
>a Dead Space Remake troll thread died for this
There, fixed it for ya
you can clearly see blocky edges in 1080p and distant objects are just mess.
i hope that 4k will become default in 4-5 years.
anti-aliasing tech like DLSS or newer and better DLAA is cool but it doesn't make things look sharper.
current gen GPUs aren't made for 144hz 4k gameplay but post-next gen of GPUs definitely should be.
4K > 60+ fps
Wrong.
I got a 4k 144hz monitor a few weeks ago and I can tell the difference but it's not something life changing, i don't get the hype
Pushing for higher framerates and faster response is more important than a render resolution. I'm here to play games not look at shitty 30fps movie game with 80ms lag.
For me, it's 720 with drops
pleb
Absolutely fricking not. Anti aliasing is so crisp on 4k, but even that has artifacts. 8k isn't even a meme. The dumb anons who can't tell the difference between frame rates and between resolutions are absolute charlatans. Theyre the same people who also can't notice input lag, even on rhythm games. I'm certain these are the same types of generally unaware people who vote democrat, can't articulate notes in food or beverage, and haven't studied a thing since graduating or dropping out. Frick you smooth brains.
shill
>4k is a meama hahahar 1080p is all you need farts
also
>yeah bro the TAA is my making my game blurry dauhahdr
Just disable it and stop sitting <1 meter to your screen.
>TAA
just downscale the game from 4k and output to 1080p
problem solved.
4k is a meme
>gets 200+ fps in games
>20+ fps with RTX on
Resolution is a meme. I have a 1440p 144hz monitor and I turn down everything to get more fps.
I used 1440p from 2012 to 2023, 4k came a bit later
should i buy a 4070 TI ?
no, get a used 3060 ti
>8GB VRAM
That's still enough for basically any game today, steam hardware survey says like 50% of people have 4 or less
> he doesn't downsample
My games are so crisp. Stay mad.
If you play only twitch shooters, you want 1440p244.
If you play ANYTHING ELSE, you want 4K60.
There are still issues with UW, HFR, HDR etc but not with 4K - this "just works" since the industry actually universally adopted it years ago.
4K is particularly great in anything with a lot of GUI since you get that lovely crisp image like on a flagship phone screen.
4K displays are also really cheap these days, often being the same price as 2K.
1080p to 4k via nvidia image scaling master race