This is it? Really?? We have the Pokedex numbering, there isn't an empty spot after Dipplin in the Pokedex. Why the frick does this not evolve
....???!!??
This is it? Really?? We have the Pokedex numbering, there isn't an empty spot after Dipplin in the Pokedex. Why the frick does this not evolve
It'll evolve in Indigo Disk, moron.
No, it won't, otherwise there would be a blank Pokedex slot
Why would an Indigo Disk pokemon be in the middle of the Teal Mask pokedex you fricking moron?
That's not how dex numbering works moron
Galarian Slowbro/king
Those aren't new Pokemon you moron
Yes anon. They would make the Kitakami Pokedex impossible to complete until Part 2 releases
it does evolve. wait for indigo disk later in the year
Why would Dipplin evolve when Flapple and Appletun don't?
Because Dipplin is superior.
it isn't
It's not going to evolve.
applin and its evos are all pokedex filler
no they're not
yes, they are. they are dragon pidgeys
no they're not you stupid c**t!
> reeeeeeee
but enough about you
Isn't it already an evolution of applin? Why would it need to evolve?
Because the Pokedex description says that unlike Appletun and Flapple, Dipplin is two dragon-worms and not just one (the tail belongs to a different creature compared to the face).
It also looks way too similar to Applin compared to its other two evolutions, so both lore wise and design wise you'd be led to think that it evolves again.
I don't think we can be sure until the 2nd DLC, not all evolutions come right after the other in the Dex even though this never happened before within the same generation.
>you'd be led to think
No, you tricked yourself into believing in some moronation that nobody else even considered for a second, and are surprised when the obvious happened.
This, they say it evolves from Applin and not shit else about maybe evolving again
>It also looks way too similar to Applin compared to its other two evolutions, so both lore wise and design wise you'd be led to think that it evolves again.
A fourth evolution is not expected like a third. Stop being moronic.
>It also looks way too similar to Applin compared to its other two evolutions, so both lore wise and design wise you'd be led to think that it evolves again.
How can you say this when Dudunsparce exists.
It's already an evolution of Applin. Why would it get a second evolution and Flapple/Appletun not get one?
Applin is an apple.
Flapple is the worm inside the apple.
Appletun is an apple pie.
Dipplin is a candy apple.
Applin has two worms inside of the apple.
This isn't apparent at all in the current design, this is a pretty big tell that it's going to evolve into a mon that has that concept as a more prominent aspect of its design.
Not necessarily. I'm pretty sure the double worm thing is just a clever way of explaining the "stick" on the design being from a different creature, and nothing more.
They literally do this all the time you troglodytes, it's the most obvious design detail in existence.
You just deny it because you're autistic.
What does a candied apple evolve into, anon?
Another candied apple with two headed hydra inside of it.
NTA, but this makes zero sense. Dipplin is already larger than Applin. The applin line are very small in general. It's not going to turn into some 600 BST two headed hydra, wtf are you smoking.
Why are assuming Dipplin has high stats?
It could have the same base stat as Applin but then evolve into some more in line with Appletun and Flapple in terms of stats.
Why would an evolution of Applin have the same base stats as Applin, you absolute blockheaded moron?
It's Kieran's ace dumbfrick, he becomes the champion of blueberry academy he's obviously not going to bring this shitmon as a champion.
They've been doing been doing this "pokemon evolves with the trainer" thing since gen 7 with Gladion and Silvally, it's really not that hard to get.
You just keep on inventing new excuses because you can't justify old ones, huh?
No, my """excuses""" are based on understanding how gf have structured their games prior and seeing the obvious hints that have been consistent throughout.
Yours however are based on nothing but your developmental disability preventing you from accepting things being different.
>No, my """excuses""" are based on [schizophrenic mysticism]
>Ace
>shitmon
Red had a level 81 Pikachu and he was the final challenge in the original H/S games. Silvally is not a split-evo. Dipplin is clearly made for VGC in mind. Flapple and Appletun both had play during SwSh Ladder. Appletun in particular can be extremely bulky, Dipplin no doubt will be bulky as well, and it's ability will be great for partner pokemon with low accuracy moves. If it's signature move works on it's partners as well, it's going to be very good for trick room. Learn what Branched Evos are.
>muh split evo
Pure pattern homosexualry.
Let me guess, you also thought that legendaries weren't ever gonna have evolution lines?
>Pure pattern homosexualry.
>"my """excuses""" are based on understanding how gf have structured their games prior and seeing the obvious hints that have been consistent throughout."
>Let me guess
That's right, you keep doing that. That's all you can do.
Crying and ignoring it won't change anything. The only thing you can do is make assumptions and headcanons. My argument comes from prior history that even applies to legendries. Yours is "muh feelings"
Here you go:
https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/List_of_Pok%C3%A9mon_with_branched_evolutions
Study up on this for awhile, and try not to cry next time.
You have not given a single argument to why they won't make Dipplin evolve, all your posts have been different variations of "they won't" ignoring any of the point I've made because you think that GF has unusually strict rules on how they can design pokemon.
Btw can you tell how many legendary pokemon evolves prior to gen 7?
>argue that x WON'T happen
Not that anon.
Why do you think it will exactly?
Because Red the main character of the most well known game in the franchise has the mascot of said franchise as his ace?
>.t
Literally just wrote it out for you. I even explained to you what split-evos are and even posted a link with other examples. I even corrected you when you use Silvally as example when Tyrogue is a much better example.
Calling everyone a "dumbfrick is not making a point. The only thing left for me to do is draw pictures for you.
"Because it's a split evo" is a worthless, meaningless argument constructed around preconceived notions.
People were using the exact same train of logic in gen 7 to pointelessly argue against the two box art legendaries evolving from Cosmog or before gen 5 but then it was about pokemon fusions.
"They've never done it before so they won't ever" is not a valid point.
>"Because it's a split evo" is a worthless, meaningless argument constructed around preconceived notions.
It's already a split evo, you dumb moron. They quite LITERALLY did this before for YEARS. Hell even Cosmog is a split-evo. You think purposely being obtuse is doing you any favors? No one said anything about fusions or whatever the frick you're blabbling on about.
Please learn how to follow a conversation instead of jumping into arguments without understanding what the other person is saying.
You should follow your own advice, it's clear you have no idea what a split-evo is and the consistency they have been presented in.
The thing is that you're more moronic for now.
Between it being split evo with other options already having high enough for non-evolving mons BST and literally NO SPACE IN DEX for evolution there's more going against it not evolving than your screeching about design principles and what should be in Champion's team - GF is well known for underwhelming designs and the other one is just your autistic headcannon that may not happen.
But here's a glimpse of hope for your moronic imaginary idea, a compromise of some kind. What if it will get alternate form? Some kind of ability or attack that will make it's candied shell to break. It's still a damn idea so don't get heated over it lol.
You Black folk are dense as frick so might as well repeat it all the counter arguments into a single post so you people can drill it in your thickass heads.
>Muh stats
Could have the same stats/slightly higher stats than Applin
>Muh dex space
Evolves in the Indigo Disk, pretty fricking clear about that
>Muh splitting evo don't evolve
Pattern autism that has no real weight in an era where GF has actively tried to break the formulaic nature of their games.
>Muh design is already complete
Hell no it isn't, The two worms in an apple is a pretty clear trait that is not represented in Dipplin's design.
Now try to answer this without circular reasoning.
Your "arguments" are just fricking dogshit delusions. Bunch of "could be", "would be" homosexualry. At this stage I'm convinced that you're just bad troll. And if it's not trolling then take your fricking meds because you'll end as train track grease like you fellow schizo Terry.
>Still going
You are the one with circular reasoning.
This is going nowhere because you stopped listening. You can keep ignoring everything presented to you, but everything you said will still remain headcanon that's not supported by anything but your feelings. You've refuted nothing, and you keep going in circles about "well I don't like agree with that so I'm going to ignore it". The design is complete and your "refute" is "well it's pretty clear it's not" to who? You? No one cares about your headcanon. You can't complain about the looks of evos when Gamefreak literally gave us Dudunsparce and another split evo(charcadet) that works on the same logic as the many before it. Basically, you're a fricking moron. But I i accept your apology.
>Still going
You are the one with circular reasoning.
This is going nowhere because you stopped listening. You can keep ignoring everything presented to you, but everything you said will still remain headcanon that's not supported by anything but your autism. You've refuted nothing, and you keep going in circles about "well I don't like agree with that so I'm going to ignore it". The design is imcomplete and your "refute" is "well it's pretty clear it is" to who? You? No one cares about your headcanon. You can't complain about patterns being broken when Gamefreak literally gave us Solgaleo/Lunala and another legendary evo(Urshify) that works on the same logic as the many before it. Basically, you're a fricking moron. But I i accept your apology.
Why would they add a third split evolution for Applin and make it the only one of the 3 the evolve a second time? Both Flapple and Appleton have the exact same base stat total (485) , so either Dipplin would have the same BST and then evolve again which would make it the strongest of the 3 by a huge margin, or dipplin would have worse BST and only achieving 485 upon evolving making it an utterly pointless evolution.
Use your brain, moron.
see:
Anon is clearly that Dipplin is the fast one of the three
Why would they make an evolution that has the same terrible stats as it’s pre evo (sub 300 BST) just to justify having a second evolution? Especially when the BST of the other two branch evos aren’t that high. The only time an evolution has kept the same BST as it’s pre evo was Scizzor and Kleavor, but that’s not because they were setting up more evolutions after those 2, it’s because Scyther already had good stats. Your head canon for wanting Dipplin to evolve again doesn’t mean there’s any logical reason for it to happen, especially when absolutely everything we know about it so far points to it not being the case.
Porygon2 and Porygon Z have almost the same base stat.
Flapple and Appletun inexplicably had the same GMax form, maybe they’ll make all 3 Applin evos evolve into the same thing.
Okay moron why did it need to evolve
>he's obviously not going to bring this shitmon as a champion.
I mean theres been worse
Avalugg's more of an embarrassing choice
Oh yeah I forgot she had that fricker. God damn her team sucks
I'm guessing you never fought that pajeet Geeta before huh?
Scizor and Kleavor
>Why are assuming Dipplin has high stats?
>It could have the same base stat as Applin
Why the frick would they waste a split-evo just to give it the same exact stats but a unique ability AND signature move? That's like evolving tyrogue into Hitmontop with the same exact stats and then evolving it again because reasons.
holy shit you sound moronic.
>It's not going to turn into some 600 BST two headed hydra, wtf are you smoking.
It's gonna be pretty funny if they turn Applin into a pseudo in Gen9.
Uh, that would actually be cool.
Yeah because everyone knows buildings evolve into railgun bridges, right anon?
>Applin has two worms inside of the apple.
No, that's Dipplin. When Applin evolves to Dipplin, another worm enters the apple, like how Maushold has two more Tandemaus join in.
>this is a pretty big tell that it's going to evolve into a mon that has that concept as a more prominent aspect of its design.
It will not. You are forgoing the candied apple aspect to focus on the two worms when that's just a complete misdirection. Dipplin won't evolve again, because what would a candied apple even evolve into?
"join in"
Pokémon likes to do stupid things now with their gimmicks.
Mega Rayquaza being able to Mega Evolve without a Mega Stone.
Mega Raichu being the only regional form with an exclusive Z-Move (not counting the original forms of Alolan Firts partner Pokémon).
Galarian Darmanitan being the only regional form with a form change.
Galarian Slowpoke being the only regional form to have a branched evolutionary family, not counting Hisuian Basculin who only evolves into one of two forms.
Hisuian Basculin being the only regional form to go by a different name and also be natively available in a different region (Kitakami).
Paldean Tauros being the only regional form with breeds.
Iron Valiant being the only Paradox Pokémon to be a combination of two different species of Pokémon.
Poltchageist and Sinistcha being the first ecologically similar Pokémon where their design and naming scheme are in reverse.
So it would make sense for Game Freak to introduce the first Pokémon to evolve in a branched evolutionary line to evolve even further.
>Hisuian Basculin being the only regional form to go by a different name and also be natively available in a different region
That means it's just a new stripe, moron, not a hisuian form.
cute shit
Insane that this apple bullshit, a concept not worth even making it to the drawing board in the first place, let alone becoming a single fully fledged Pokemon, is now going to constitute at least 4 different Pokemon. The absolute state.
How is it a worse concept than, say, Stonjourner and Eiscue?
If it Gigantamaxes, will be forms be the same as Flapple and Appletun's? If so, what happens to the second wyrm?
Dipplin isn't even in SwSh
One eats the other. Luckily, the gmax kinda looks like Dipplin to the same extent as the other two do.
If you would watch the damn trailer you would know. THIS IS THE EVOLUTION. Literally Applin in Kitakata evolves into this thing.
Pokemon has most moronic, uneducated, blatantly stupid fanbase ever.
Dipplin and Poltchageist honestly look like a regional forms that they turned into their own pokemon. I guess they really didn't want to make 'kitakamian forms' or whatever.
Can't wait to see these people in full cope mon when its evolution gets revealed, frick paterngays
>Says the man trying to patterngay Gamefreak development behavior
Khu has all but confirmed that it's happening in the second dlc
Um the tree is Sandaconda, it's based on the staff of medical guy
Why would sandaconda evolve into a tree with two snakes?
It's clearly either a Dipplin evo or form.
You're just being moronic
But enough about you
Or it's tropius or etc etc
>Khultist
Name ONE thing this chigger got right. You literally can’t.
We knew everything about every game since 2021, schizo.
Nothing. That’s what I thought.
Cope.
>The mons that would get paradox forms
>The plot of SV
>Tatsugiri
>Palafin/Finizen's form change
>Digglett regional fake
>The gen 9 starters
>The entire PLA dex.
I don't doubt Khu had sources for those but I haven't really seen anything of his yet that's been proven right for the DLC
>When did he ever leak anything
>[Clear tease of mons before their reveal]
>"I didn't see it so it doesn't count"
i hope someone is screenshotting all these angry posts saying it won't evolve. it's going to be very funny when the evolution is revealed/leaked for indigo disk.
>let's slap a green stick on applin and call it a new pokemon!
cross gen evos after gen 4 were a destructive mistake
>implying almost all of the gen 4 cross gen evos were not horrible
>almost all of the gen 4 cross gen evos were not horrible
that's correct. only tangrowth and weavile are comparable to the lazy shit that is dipplin. the other ones from gen 4 are pretty good
because it IS evolved, dumbass.