>90s-Early 2000s reasons for not liking a game: It's buggy, its boring, Its generic etc.

>90s-Early 2000s reasons for not liking a game: It's buggy, its boring, Its generic etc.
>2015+ reasons for not liking a game: It has gay/straight characters

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >those darn developers!
    >those shadows howling and shrieking inside my skull!

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Random blacks in fantasy
    >Christians bad
    >men bad
    >ugly dykes
    Almost every game is like that currently.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      black people can exist in fantasy, christians can be bad, men can be bad, people can be ugly and still exist

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Don't bully mentally ill posters

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          only it's with whatever's on the amazon prime video frontpage

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Black people need to have a reason for existing in europe that doesn't destroy the internal logic of the story
        Its only Christians. Never Islam, Judaism, buddhism. Stop being disingenuous.
        Its not that men are bad, its that they specifically make all male characters weak and stupid while making the females flawless.
        Almost all modern female characters look like men. Not tomboys, UGLY MALES.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Black people need to have a reason for existing in europe that doesn't destroy the internal logic of the story
          Pardon?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            If you have a game set in ancient china, would half the characters be black?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Is this a game that exists, or just one that you made up right now for this specific scenario?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Scenario. Does it make sense to have a chinese epic with half the population as zulus?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Not really. I don't get what point that makes, though.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I guess being dense is essential requirement to being a woketard. Medieval euro had no nogs to begin with as they were all separated by the biggest desert on the planet down in their african safe space. Muzzie slavers were pretty much the only ones making any contact with them.

                Closest you would get to euro were muzzie slavers and raiders riding up and down the medi coast with occasional colonies/conquests in places like Sicilia and Spain. Or steppe asiatics culturally enriching borderlands like medieval Kievan Rus. Euros appearing in far outer regions like Far east was such a rare occurrence most of the big movements got noted down in chronicles as noteworthy events.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I don't think that's the case.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                It does not matter what you 'think' is true or not. We have records from 1900 years ago of a Roman Emperor born and raised in modern Tunisia being shocked and surprised Nubians existed and 'men' could be so dark. To the point both he and his scribes separately noted it down since it was such a puzzling and rare event. This is while he was in Egypt.

                Census records have not all been 1984'd yet and you can go check out the population of any country in Europe just 60+ years ago - some of them like Sweden/Norway/Finland being 99% white and native until the late 90's.
                Sweden now for example is 40% + non white. We have film from 1901 of the people and streets of Birmingham as part of one of the first documentaries and you cannot see a non White at all. Now you would struggle to find any Whites that live there.

                There is famous footage from the 1960's set in the back window of a car filming London as it drove around and the same thing was done a few years ago down the same streets and it is literally a foreign country. The original film you could not see a non white or a single signage anywhere not in English. In the later footage you are hard pressed to find an English man or women or signage in English.

                Rewriting history has become a virtue of progressives -perhaps always was.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >There is famous footage from the 1960's set in the back window of a car filming London as it drove around and the same thing was done a few years ago down the same streets and it is literally a foreign country. The original film you could not see a non white or a single signage anywhere not in English. In the later footage you are hard pressed to find an English man or women or signage in English.
                I don't get what this has to do with anything. Places change over half a century of people living and changing and moving and existing and growing - so what? 'Literally a foreign country', fuck off.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                This, is some Mexican cities they are having issues with white Americans moving in and taking over communties. They don't speak Spanish and expect everything around them to be in english. Basically creating little pockets of America in their country. But then again, they do the same thing in the US so fuck them.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Sweden white for over 2 millenia
                >suddenly in 60 years half of it's population replaced by 3rd worlders shipped from the worst places across the globe
                This is perfectly normal and natural right? Nothing to see here, nope, just places changing over time..You just le hate change

                I don't get why you're saying these things at me. Do you have a point?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Sweden white for over 2 millenia
                >suddenly in 60 years half of it's population replaced by 3rd worlders shipped from the worst places across the globe
                This is perfectly normal and natural right? Nothing to see here, nope, just places changing over time..You just le hate change

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I've accepted it to some degree. I'm looking to buy land in a certain 3rd world country because my wealth would go further there, and I think it would be cool to be treated like royalty just because I can tip their entirely weekly pay in the span of seconds. The power dynamic is appealing.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >The power dynamic is appealing
                I guess it's the same for, e.g., the third-worlder cleaning toilets in a first-world country, where the minimum wage would be what they would earn in a month back home.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Yup, we're basically just switching places. They are taking my country and I'm taking theirs.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah they do, only this is the first time in recorded history they have changed this radically or totally WITHOUT conquest by steel, fire and blood. It is not a coincidence most lefties are chronically lacking in testosterone and cannot understand other people having innate dislike, discomfort and aggression to their ideals. You are fighting tens of thousands of years of human evolution where what we are seeing is considered a danger and threat to those we love and care for.

                There is a reason the ideals of progressives line up with internationalists. By progressive logic Genghis Khan and Alexander's conquests were not world shaping events we are still feeling the effects of to this day, that have altered the very genetic material of the people that inhabit those areas and altered their culture and history forever.

                Caesar could only dream of the demographic change (in favour of Rome) that is being accomplished today. Not only is this the first time it has been done without fighting on the part of natives it is a conquest that supersedes historical military takeover. Romans moved Latins and Italians into non Italian territory for settling over the course of 500+ years and Europe alone has eclipsed that demographic change by volume and total effect in 50 years.

                >Why do we dislike the corruption of a media our race pioneered concerning settings and flavour developed by our people?
                >No one cared when Mass Effect had a black Captain Anderson - he was written to be Captain David Anderson first and incidentally black.

                Now we have progressives attempting to rewrite history/culture/myth so that non whites and gender confused gays were not only totally widespread in Europe and European settings, but were also universally tolerated and even celebrated - but are also perpetual victims.
                Meanwhile in real life the only reason there are parts of the world without slavery is due to White Christian Englishmen.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >black people can exist in fantasy, christians can be bad, men can be bad, people can be ugly and still exist

        They CAN, yes. But SHOULD they?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Sure, why not. It's all imaginary anyway.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Its okay to have a kfc in middle earth its fantasy mannnnnn
            sigh. Endless lying.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Weird - I don't recall saying that. Are you sure you responded to the post you meant to respond to?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Its all imaginary
                fuck off

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I mean, *you* were the one to put those words in my mouth for some reason.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I made a point. You're being dishonest.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                oh so now all of a sudden internal consistency matters, huh?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >You think a Nissan Rogue Sport™ in your game destroys the setting? But its all fantasy so why do you care?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >christians are bad
        Fixed.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >t.600 pound fedora
          >MOMMMMMMM THE CHRISTIANS ARE PRAYING AGAIN

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >blacks are shoved into everything and annoyingly so in traditionally European fantasy
        >all Christians are always bad
        >men are always bad and women are always good/misunderstood
        >everyone is ugly and beauty is considered bad
        this is the problem

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >the "good" they write is basically evil, but with the plot forcing em to do good things

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >the "good" they write is basically evil, but with the plot forcing em to do good things

          Sounds like you're mad at stuff just that it exists and you don't like it. Fair enough. Deal with it I guess.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            sounds like you're mad that your holy cows aren't considered sacred by me. If you don't like it you can ignore what I write, hypocrite.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            People that talk like you make games sell less.
            Luckly for the developers, they already got paid for the garbage and the marketing department can always come up with some retarded excuse.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >People that talk like you make games sell less.
              I don't understand what this means. 'Sell less' compared to what?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Games with no annoying as fuck characters

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I bet you "deal with it" too when there is something you dislike.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              I mean, I'm being perfectly civil and we're having a, mostly, pleasant chat. I'm happy to talk with people if they're being reasonable and not, you know. Is there a problem?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You're being antagonizing without the overt insults. It's like a child with a hand near another kids face saying "Im not touching you."

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Well, I'm sorry you feel that way I guess.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Sorry you resort this behavior for entertainment. You need a hobby.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >playing the gay that reached nirvana when he's internally crying

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                There is.
                and they already pointed out the topics.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >black people can exist in fantasy
        In yours, maybe. Not in mine.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >I don't want Japanese Samurai in my Turkish Jannissary fantasy game
          >Californian: No problem, I see why.
          >I don't want Turkish Jannissary in my pre-colonial Native American fantasy game
          >Californian: Ah that makes sense
          >I don't want Native Americans in my subsaharan Wakanda fantasy
          >Californian: Perfectly fine
          >I don't want Bla-
          >Californian: THAT IS TOO FAR
          Californian culture is black worship.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Name 5 games that are like that.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Blacks in fantasy
        GOW, Greedfall, Pathfinder.
        >Christians bad
        Outlast, Bayonetta, LOU
        >Men Bad
        Outer Worlds, Horizon zero dawn, LOU
        >Ugly Dykes
        LOU, Outer worlds, Horizon Zero Dawn, New Warcraft remake

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >didn’t even name 5 that had them all or 5 in each category
          Pathetic.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            These are just mainstream games that I named. 6 games just in that post. Do you want me to keep going?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Last of Us is 3/4
          Wow I'm never playing that dogshit game lmao

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >nooooooo you can't say anything negative about my heckin christianiterino
      Literal sjw crybabies.
      >entire thread is 4chan crybabies seething about shit that doesn't matter while nobody doing the complaining even plays videogames

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        No, we get upset over things that matter, not having mentally ill crossdressing lunatics in games.
        We used to play the games until your ilk ruined them. Trannies don't play games, they're just self centered lunatics who want representation even if it doesn't make sense.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Random blacks in fantasy
      What if they're voiced by a white guy?

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Anakin was relentlessly handsome

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Games are all of the above + gay.
    So are you OP.
    Go suck bag of dicks if you like 'em so much.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    When all games are buggy, boring and generic, you need to judge by different values

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >uhm it's unrealistic fantasy
    >uhm okay it's not real anyway so who cares
    KYS

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What is 'unrealistic fantasy'? I don't recall this being brought up until just now, in your post.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I just don't think 'black people existing' is equal to 'gravity doesnt exist' or whatever equally absurd scenario you can only dream up inside your own skull for the sake of points-scoring.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >2015+
    >Game is buggy, boring and generic
    >Retards defend it saying "Don't put pressure on the devs! they did their best! Wait for Patches, DLCs will fix in the game! Just two more years!"

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nodding my head at magic and dragons and enchanted swords and stuff. Screaming redfaced in anger at the computer screen when a black person appears. Like a normal brain

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >YUO DONT LIKE DIVERSITY HIRE YET MAIGC EXIST!!!!!1!11!

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Well, you know how it is, Joker.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Fantasy is based on european middle ages and the fantastical elements come from european folklore. There are no morons period. If you want morons make a game set in 21st century America. Why do you want morons in games so badly to begin with? Everyone around the world hates them. Why would you want them in your escapism media?

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I can't think of a game with forced diversity or whatever where the rest of the game wasn't also shit.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This is entirely the point. For every good game with only lip service to progressive politics at most, we have 10 by multinational conglomerate developers that use it as a screen/crutch or flat out no longer have people on staff that have the professionalism and skill to make good games.

      So pattern recognition means just like finding a brightly coloured frog in the forest - when we see the same 10+ years of forced diversity political bullshit no matter how they try to insist it is not - red flags go off in our heads and immediately, suHispanicion of low quality work in whatever or all fields of development becomes radically more likely.

      You also have anyone older than 25 vividly remember a time when this was not true. Increasingly, due to hipsters, zoomers and younger are emulating older games and seeing what was before 2012 or so.
      Mass Effect today would be considered hyper bigoted misogynistic and whatever other terms Journo's who almost universally SUCK at video games use to attack something.

      Even babies first FPS - Halo - is universally regarded as the worst campaign being Halo 5. Where they insisted on giving Cortana a 'YASS QUEEN' storyline that invalidated not just the previous game but 15 years of story as well.

      That is what they do. They do not even come up with their own mediocre characters/settings. They latch onto existing ones and corrupt them until it dies then move on. God forbid anyone is a long time fan of anything and takes umbridge with such desecration.

      As far as fantasy goes - no one is inserting Whites into the 3 Kingdoms China for example. Whites made a game about Japan that was better than the Japanese have ever made of their own period history that was not fantasy. Yet apparently in European mythology/fantasy/setting we MUST have modern melting pot bullshit. It never occurs to progressives that the vast majority of us just do not like your ideology or the world we are forced to live in - unless we are insultingly low IQ.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    90s-Early 2000s games:
    >buggy, boring, generic etc.
    >fun characters, jokes and sexy women still make them momorable

    2015+ games:
    >buggy, boring, generic etc.
    >now with pozz, morons, and chud propaganda

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >90s-Early 2000s games:
      >fun characters, jokes and sexy women still make them momorable
      maybe if the game was japanese or something. there are plenty of western games during this time with dogshit character design. tons of them had those shitty CGI bimbos

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Just ignoring the idea of trading, travelling, etc. Ridiculous.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Like that's ultimately what it boils down to, right? I don't like this, make it go away. And you're unable to cope with the answer being 'no'. Am I wrong or am I right?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Insult half of your audience, most of whom are the loyal players because men are more likely to be serious gamers than women
      >Insult half of the political body of the country
      >insult the largest religious group in the country
      >make everybody ugly which alienates most people because people don't like ugly crap
      Why? And why is every company doing it?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Wait wait hold on. Are "diverse video games" the ultimate all-powerful evil in this scenario you've imagined, or are they feeble weak-minded drivel? They can't be both.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Why do dumbasses like you insist on making stupid arguments that no one made. Who called them evil or all powerful? People are just fed up with it being shoved into everything.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Who called them evil or all powerful?
            I mean just picking something at random from what you were saying, 'insulting the largest religious group in the country' would be a pretty heavy thing to do, right?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >I mean just picking something at random from what you were saying
              Who do you think I am? Are you just assuming things?
              >'insulting the largest religious group in the country' would be a pretty heavy thing to do, right?
              How does this equate to "evil" or powerful? Do you understand what those words mean?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I think we're both kind of losing the thread of conversation here. I'm happy to talk, though.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                No, I asked some pretty simple questions and would still like to know why you assumed anyone called these groups "evil" or "all powerful."
                >I'm happy to talk, though
                You can start by answering my question.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Which question? Like I said, lost track. There seem to be a few people jumping in, so I'm not sure I'm responding to the right person. Would you mind repeating it for me, so I can answer in good faith?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Pretty simple. Who called them evil or all powerful or why did you assume that.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Who called them evil or all powerful
                Me, I did. Because insulting the largest religious group in the country must be a pretty evil thing, right? Something you'd need to be pretty powerful to do, right? Or am I wrong?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                So to be clear, would you consider a homeless guy who says, "christian suck" to be evil and all powerful then?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Hey I answered your question. Would you please do me the same courtesy and answer mine? - the one in this post:

                >Who called them evil or all powerful
                Me, I did. Because insulting the largest religious group in the country must be a pretty evil thing, right? Something you'd need to be pretty powerful to do, right? Or am I wrong?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Sure. You're wrong. Now and the question I posed about the homeless man or better yet, explain how merely criticizing something makes you evil and powerful. How does that logic work?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Sure. You're wrong.
                Fair enough. So if they're not powerful at all, then why all the fuss?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You don't have to be powerful or evil to be annoying, obnoxious, or ruin something. Do you understand this concept?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >You don't have to be powerful or evil to be annoying, obnoxious, or ruin something.
                Surely we can agree that ruining things is an inherent expression of power. If I go and kick over your Scrabble board, I ruined your game, didn't I.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Surely we can agree that ruining things is an inherent expression of power.
                Elaborate how this logic works. I am very interested in this train of thought.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Like I said: if I go kicking over your Scrabble board, I think we'd both agree that's an obnoxious thing to do, and I've ruined the game because the tiles all fly all over the place, it spoils the atmosphere, etc. Seems pretty straightforward.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                How does that make you powerful though. Explain that. You keep avoiding this kind of answer and I am curious why? You aren't being disingenuous are you?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I've obviously wanted to ruin your game, and you've clearly been unable to stop me, so I've won out and done what I set out to do, which is spoil your game of Scrabble. Thus, me ruining your game is a demonstration of my power and your lack of. Right?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                How does that demonstrate power? However, let's not use a hypothetical anymore because it's not comparable. Your mental exercise is one game that I am currently playing. In real life it's several games I am not playing and dont want to play because of their annoyance. How does that translate into power? What is your definition of power to come to this conclusion anyway?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Oh come on, that's a load of questions that'd need massive answers. Be fair.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I know it might be really hard for you but I have faith in your ability to give an honest and pure hearted answer to this because you are clearly a good honest person.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                It's annoying when, having laid out precisely how one would demonstrate power in response to your question, the very next words out of your lips were 'how does that demonstrate power'. So either I'm not being clear and we're just driving in circles, or you're not reading my posts properly, and here we are.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                but that doesn't demonstrate power to me so I would like your definition of power to better understand your logic. We need to agree on the wording before we can agree that an action meets the criteria. Also, like I said. We should no longer use that example because it's not accurate to the situation and thus a bad comparison.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >but that doesn't demonstrate power to me
                I kick over your Scrabble board, you couldn't stop me, I clearly have power over you otherwise you'd be playing Scrabble instead. Seems pretty straightforward to me. Where are we going with this?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                But like I said, you didn't. Your scrabble board is a bad comparison because the real conversation here is a about digital media that most are not actually playing, is not my property, not in my vicinity, etc etc. Your comparison is flawed and thus not usable. Hwoever, that's curious. If you think that is power, why make the comment in the first place mocking people who would consider them powerful?
                >Are "diverse video games" the ultimate all-powerful evil in this scenario you've imagined How odd. You yourself are saying it's powerful why would you say someone else imagined it, when you are doing it?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Anon you were banging on about this so much I thought you were going somewhere with it. Fuck's sake.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                banging on it? What are you talking about? You brought up the scrabble, dude. You are the one talking about power, so why not do it sincerly?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                But like I said, you didn't. Your scrabble board is a bad comparison because the real conversation here is a about digital media that most are not actually playing, is not my property, not in my vicinity, etc etc. Your comparison is flawed and thus not usable. Hwoever, that's curious. If you think that is power, why make the comment in the first place mocking people who would consider them powerful?
                >Are "diverse video games" the ultimate all-powerful evil in this scenario you've imagined How odd. You yourself are saying it's powerful why would you say someone else imagined it, when you are doing it?

                whoops meant to seperate this.
                >Are "diverse video games" the ultimate all-powerful evil in this scenario you've imagined

                How odd. You yourself are saying it's powerful why would you say someone else imagined it, when you are doing it?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >You yourself are saying it's powerful why would you say someone else imagined it, when you are doing it?
                ...pardon?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >I kick over your Scrabble board, you couldn't stop me, I clearly have power over you otherwise you'd be playing Scrabble instead. Seems pretty straightforward to me.
                Did you not write this?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I've obviously wanted to ruin your game, and you've clearly been unable to stop me, so I've won out and done what I set out to do, which is spoil your game of Scrabble. Thus, me ruining your game is a demonstration of my power and your lack of. Right?

                and moreso, what is "evil" about that? Let's not forget that you also used evil in your comment. Why?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Because, frankly, it was a throwaway adjective used for mildly comedic exaggeration.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                So in your comment where you seriously used the word powerful to describe an action you also used an unserious word? Why would you expect anyone to discern serious from unserious when you combine them?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                That's right. And, because I'm not using prepared notes or anything and it's not a court of law. I'm just a big dumb idiot on the internet responding to things I'm reading.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                oh don't beat yourself up. It's just silly is all

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                oh and you still didn't answer my question
                >explain how merely criticizing something makes you evil and powerful

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I never said either. Why are you putting words in my mouths? I'm asking why is every company pushing this?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No it's not a matter of you just don't like X but it's disingenious cunts doing it out of spite and to mess with a certain established culture and genres. If you liked something and I started messing with it out of spite and changed it to the point it lost all it's initial identity you would rightfully be displeased and told me to fuck off. This is at it's core about external people ruining an established thing. This is why people get pissed about it, they have a connection with it and someone is messing with what they like, they take it personally.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >disingenious cunts doing it out of spite
        I don't know why you'd assume that. Is there any particular reason you assumed people were doing ... what again? ... out of spite?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >endless articles antagonizing and shitting on "gamers"
          >endless twitter gay devs and journos attacking "gamers"
          >"huh why would you assume they're ruining games out of spite?"
          have a nice day gay. You are a liar and a disingenious cunt.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >90s-Early 2000s reasons for not liking a game: its popular

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >It's on a platform I have decided I dislike because (incoherent anger)

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >>90s-Early 2000s reasons for not liking a game:
    it has sex in some capacity, possibly even not one that actually made it into the game

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I miss when developers made believable characters instead of realistic, or hyper exaggerated ones. At times it feels like all these characters post-2010 are the college kid archetype, very self assured and still proudly ignorant of their own mortality. It's like the jokes and quips could be spoken by any given character with the same emotional effect on the audience. It's very dull. Kind of makes me hate them for just existing. I think sometimes I let anger overwhelm my poor experience with any given game, it clouds my judgement and instead of focusing on the lack of skill by the developer I latch onto political talking points out of malice.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Not really, and those are still the usual reasons and you know it. Every game on release gets hate over being buggy nowadays, Steam reviews tank on release of big games because of it.

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Time changes, yes.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Pedantic pilpul because the garden gnome ran out of prepared talking points and responses.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I don’t care about black or gay characters, just don’t change existing characters for diversity’s sake

    no tr**s characters though

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I really hate “this” posters, but i have to be the retard this time and agree with you. Those things above are “fine” just dont put them in i a preachy way. A regular character and a walking propaganda are easily distinguishable.
      Trannies are an exception because they because thats where i draw the line

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >I don’t care about black or gay characters
      Really? Who are your top 5 gay characters in gaming.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I can’t think of any that are explicitly “gay”, as in their sexuality is directly referenced or part of the story. But there are a lot of queer-coded characters I like. Emet-Selch comes to mind, I can’t think of any more on the spot though because their sexuality isn’t really important, it’s how compelling the character is on screen.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Emet-Selch
          He isn't gay.
          >I can’t think of any
          lol
          Everytime

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Emet Selch is absolutely gay, or probably bisexual. I can’t think of “gay” characters because I don’t play fag shit like Life is Strange where the story is just for the audience to relate to what it’s like to hide your dilator from your parents. JRPG villains, Tiny Tina from borderlands, Edelgard, Ciri from The Witcher, Pyro from tf2, Tracer from OW, are all good examples of characters with questionable sexuality. They’re queer-coded but their sexuality isn’t the focus of the story. Gay people can exist in media without being some kind of stereotype and needing to make some kind of statement about what it’s like to be gay, you absolute gay. There’s nothing wrong with gay characters. Gayness is normal, I just don’t feel the need to gawk at it like a leftist because I don’t see it as something to cheer/hate for. It’s just normal.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >Emet Selch is absolutely gay
              You are delusional.
              >I can’t think of “gay” characters because I don’t play fag
              But you said you didn't mind gay characters, how the fuck could you tell?
              >queer-coded
              lol
              lmao

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                stay mad that I’m speaking facts

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >facts
                >I FEEL they are gay, I have no evidence but I FEEL they are "queer coded" (not a real thing)
                lol

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                queer-coded is absolutely a thing, are you fucking stupid? It’s when a character presents themselves as gay, but the story doesn’t actually make any direct reference to their sexuality. Are you autistic?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >queer-coded is absolutely a thing

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queer_coding

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Those buggy, generic, and boring games are more interesting to play and talk about than polished turds about brown fags and trannies.

          A lot of those old games had ambitious ideas and were very experimental in their storytelling and themes. Whereas woke shit is either just a queer/gnomish power fantasy or a PSA about Hitler.

          stay mad that I’m speaking facts

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queer_coding

          It is not a really thing, it is when fags have a headcanon about a straight character.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >character acts gay
            >no info in story about what they are
            What term would you use to refer to this

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Characters don't act gay unless if they're fucking or kissing each other.

              What I see are gay people claiming that platonic actions between straight men are gay when it isn't the case.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Do you have autism?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >characters don’t act gay unless they’re fucking or kissing
                This logic applies to straight characters, too. Every character in video games now has questionable sexuality unless you’ve seen them fuck or kiss someone of the opposite sex

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >character acts gay
              Does he have sex with men?
              He is gay.
              Does he not?
              He is not gay.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                What if the character is gay but a virgin

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >What if he has sex with men but has never had sex?!

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >2015+ games are unfishished, shallow, soulless made by comittee with no vision
    >t-the reason you dislike them is
    No fuck off.

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Let's look at the best selling games of 2022 so far
    >Horizon Forbidden West
    Shallow Ubisoft Tower game, it is bad before shoving progressive politics
    >Call of Duty Vanguard
    Uninspired, Soulless and Boring basic shooter, it is bad before shoving progressive politics
    >Overwatch 2
    Boring, regurgitated content from the first game, shit matchmaking, it is bad before shoving progressive politics
    >FIFA
    It's shit.
    >Madden NFL
    It's shit
    >NBA 2K
    You know it's shit.
    >The Last of Us: Part I
    Downgraded remake of a game, third time since the PS3 era. Fuck SONY. Bad before progressive politics.
    >Saints Row
    If you removed all the progressive politics you would get a shitty, boring buggy mess. It sucks.

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >my race, sexuality, religion in game good
    >your race, sexuality, religion in game bad
    No self awareness, you wonder why others treat you in the same way when you try to treat them like that

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Who's the Anakin Skywalker / Darth Vader or gaming? (no the star wars games don't count)
    And why is it Vergil?

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I think pointing out your game has XYZ marketing gimmicks is a signal showing where effort was put.

    Show the game, not demographic marketing.

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The star wars prequels are pure goyslop

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You're confusing them with the sequels.
      The Prequels are a mess because George had full unbridled control. It's the opposite, they are soulfull trainwrecks.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >defending the prequels
        Peak goyslop mentality

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          The sequels make them look far better than they are. But they are not goyslop.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not talking about the sequels chud. It's well known that the prequels are trash. So fuck off with your goyslop.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >I'm not talking about the ACTUAL goyslop, I'm talking about the ones with no gnomish influence
              It's so fucking tiresome

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >It's so fucking tiresome
                You can literally only speak in memes you've read here lmao. I'm not interested in the star wars prequels. They are goyslop. Enjoy them all you want. Show them to your little nephews since you sure as hell won't have any kids. You're fine. Now fuck off chud.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Anon the sequels are ACTUAL goyslop

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >it's well known
              yeah according to goyslop enjoyers

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    i hate morons and Ganker is the worst board on the site

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I think racism is bad.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I respect your opinion but disagree.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I don't respect your opinion and agree.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I am completely neutral towards your opinion

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >38 posters with one clearly baiting all the retards by constantly saying "no (You)" and never admits to anything
    >Retards here still reply to that gay
    It's funny that retards take anything said here seriously after hiro's takeover of this site and jannies letting this place to rot.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The goyslop is effecting your brain..

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >He doesn't know
      We're using him as a sounding board to say what we want about the absolute state of things, regardless of his motivations, it's useful as a mechanism to reconstitute ideas into actual arguments.

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Bugs mattered more when games didn't consistently get patches after release. Bugs mattered more when consoles didn't have internet connections.

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I will never touch a game that has force gayshit in it. Simple as.

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    2015+ reasons for not liking a game: It's buggy, its boring, Its generic etc. and It has gay/straight characters

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *