absolutely not, AC3 as shit as it was had its moments and was fricked dev wise, old Ganker leak confirmed its issues (over 1000 devs all in different languages and shit management) the last great AC was unity.
>was fricked dev wise
Not my fricking problem, if the game is shit it's shit.
Not to mention all the build up regarding the plot was just to find a McGuffin that magically solved everything with no explanation whatsoever.
I agree but it was tragic, AC3 ruined the lore and desmond, it even set up the literal start of the modern AC we wont get.
It was bad, iirc on Ganker the dev was like "I made some missions as a test and they fricking made it in the game" it had 0 control, hence all the scuffed ship combat and building, and the weird frontier you built up.
A co worker of mine is fricking obsessed with this game. He's been talking about it all week.
I don't fricking get it. These games are so fricking boring.
Poor motherfricker has a wife that spends all his money on bullshit and that just gets thrown away and he works 2 jobs while she doesn't do jack shit. And he decides his best use of his limited time is fricking Assassin's Creed what the frick jerking off is 100x more worthwhile than this shit. Maybe you should take that shit up Anthony and leave this fat """wife""" of yours.
Whatever games looks like another shitcreed snoozefest.
If he enjoys it then who gives a frick lol. Recommend him better shit then. If he's into the Ubi-slop formula:
Cyberpunk's stealth is way better, the game has soul despite being triple A slop, and it runs well on midtier hardware now. It's about 100x better in everyway
To add on to my other post, tell him to get Ghosts of Tsushima if he has a PS4/PS5 it's better than both Cyberpunk and AC put together, and it's also ubi-slop formula. It's better than the best AC game.
I feel like you probably just offer up autistic enthusiast-type games that aren't accessible. Correct me if I'm wrong.
AC games are such bland, corporate, focused-grouped design-by-committee crap that there's barely anything to be excited about. 1000 people work on each game and there's not an ounce of soul or personality to found in any of them
reminder, shits so fricked all marketing are literal poo poo skin shills.
Indians smell so fricking bad, even their cultural perfume smells like wet shit. They wear it at weddings and funerals. This is "high" caste let alone the literal doo doo feces low IQ poop skins are into.
I dont buy games day 1.
I will be buying this eventually though. I like these games for the premise and Im hoping because its 9th century Baghdad it has some Roman involvement
Impossible to get excited for an assassins creed game anymore. They've ruined the franchise for the last 5 or so entries. It's only assassins creed in name.
It's Ubislop.
it's not on pc until it's on Steam
even then, everyone has already played AC1
Ganker is too zoomer brained to be into
Stealth
>stealth
>when you can literally press X to AWESOME and kill everyone near
>stealth
you literally get a teleporting move that guarantees assassination no matter what
I don't see a codex release yet
I had some interest until the teleportation shit.
Origins was the last good AC game.
>Revelations was the last good AC game.
Fixed.
absolutely not, AC3 as shit as it was had its moments and was fricked dev wise, old Ganker leak confirmed its issues (over 1000 devs all in different languages and shit management) the last great AC was unity.
>was fricked dev wise
Not my fricking problem, if the game is shit it's shit.
Not to mention all the build up regarding the plot was just to find a McGuffin that magically solved everything with no explanation whatsoever.
I agree but it was tragic, AC3 ruined the lore and desmond, it even set up the literal start of the modern AC we wont get.
It was bad, iirc on Ganker the dev was like "I made some missions as a test and they fricking made it in the game" it had 0 control, hence all the scuffed ship combat and building, and the weird frontier you built up.
I have never enjoyed an assassin's creed game.
Even someone as dumb as me stops caring after a decade and a half of abject slop.
A co worker of mine is fricking obsessed with this game. He's been talking about it all week.
I don't fricking get it. These games are so fricking boring.
Poor motherfricker has a wife that spends all his money on bullshit and that just gets thrown away and he works 2 jobs while she doesn't do jack shit. And he decides his best use of his limited time is fricking Assassin's Creed what the frick jerking off is 100x more worthwhile than this shit. Maybe you should take that shit up Anthony and leave this fat """wife""" of yours.
Whatever games looks like another shitcreed snoozefest.
how brown is he?
If he enjoys it then who gives a frick lol. Recommend him better shit then. If he's into the Ubi-slop formula:
Cyberpunk's stealth is way better, the game has soul despite being triple A slop, and it runs well on midtier hardware now. It's about 100x better in everyway
NTA but I tried weening some of my normie friends off of Sonyslop and they just won't try new things
To add on to my other post, tell him to get Ghosts of Tsushima if he has a PS4/PS5 it's better than both Cyberpunk and AC put together, and it's also ubi-slop formula. It's better than the best AC game.
I feel like you probably just offer up autistic enthusiast-type games that aren't accessible. Correct me if I'm wrong.
AC games are such bland, corporate, focused-grouped design-by-committee crap that there's barely anything to be excited about. 1000 people work on each game and there's not an ounce of soul or personality to found in any of them
they're like 10 games too late to make a proper sequel to AC1. what the frick was that series
reminder, shits so fricked all marketing are literal poo poo skin shills.
Indians smell so fricking bad, even their cultural perfume smells like wet shit. They wear it at weddings and funerals. This is "high" caste let alone the literal doo doo feces low IQ poop skins are into.
I dont buy games day 1.
I will be buying this eventually though. I like these games for the premise and Im hoping because its 9th century Baghdad it has some Roman involvement
it doesnt it, its a dog shit historical game. Even Unity was rough and it had the most material. It all went to shit after AC3 and well AC3 itself.
Is it true this was an AC1 remake that they abandoned?
No, it's a DLC for Valhalla that it's being sold as it's own game.
Ok appreciate it. Haven't played AC since AC3
Last good ass creed was syndicate and this is a fact
no it was unity.
Last good Assassins Creed was Syndicate free-roam. 8.5/10. Syndicates story was a 3/10.
Syndicate's parkour sucked, didn't even have a fricking jump button and you had to go around with that stupid top hat.
I personally loved Top Hat Wolverine and his hot British sister.
Buy the latest UbiSlop, someone has to pay for all their gender identities.
Video games?
They've been doing this since AC1 btw. The French are ahead of the curve on cucking your own country.
Screen from AC1, gender identities was added later on.
Yeah fair enough but it was the beginning of the end. The permanent revolution of the left marches on.
phew glad to know my game was made by someone who takes wiener up the ass
More games should show this for the marketing campaign. It would help me better save my money.
What about political beliefs? Are diverse political beliefs allowed at ubishit studios?
Some diversities are more diverse than others.
The Isu Loki has shown me a most interesting weapon.
Impossible to get excited for an assassins creed game anymore. They've ruined the franchise for the last 5 or so entries. It's only assassins creed in name.