They should keep it. The whole point of how reviews on Steam work is the customer can decide what ones are relevant to themselves, language, positive/negative, time, bombing, etc all can be turned off or focused on. Only fanbabies that cry "think of the billion dollar company" care about the overall collection of them.
>65% of reviews are made by chinks >rest by redditors or tf 2 gays
i mean its a raid so no shit, they should put a number of X hours you need to play before making a review, it doesn't matter if its negative or positive.
Eh, but what if a guy bought some shit and couldn't review it ans refund cause of the x hours demand? For as much attention as this kinda of shit gets, reviewbombing ain't the avarage review experience
>they should put a number of X hours you need to play before making a review
That's bullshit, it has been out for some time before steam, so a person with no hours in steam can still have an informed opinion.
>game crashes to desktop on startup >can't warn others because "must have x hours played"
yeah this does not work.
The only thing that works is already implemented; it shows the hours played next to the review. A potential buyer can now decide for him/herself whether take the review seriously or with a grain of salt.
I reviewed OW2 negatively and I already have 60 hours on Steam and I've played every season so far.
I do it for no reason other than to piss blizzdrones off.
>game is bad >company has destroyed all goodwill >long-time fans have been shafted over and over >somehow this doesn't make it okay to leave a bad review
The sheer vitriol and hate directed towards Overwatch 2 is warranted. Blizzard took something that was universally beloved and completely butchered it.
Is it as bad on a technical level as its contemporaries? No, but that doesn't matter. This is the only effective way for consumers to voice their displeasure with a game. Voting with your wallet doesn't work since gays will buy the game anyway and if the game doesn't hit its sales target then the guys in suit will blame everybody else but themselves.
A hate campaign is the only way to get the message through to them since public opinion in truth matters more than sales numbers.
I'd recommend playing the hit megamassive online role-playing game Final Fantasy XIV instead. Its free up to level 60, and includes the critically acclaimed expansion Heavensward
You can't call the most/2nd most popular MMO in the world a cult classic
Cult classic implies a lack of popularity, as though a hidden gem with a small base
Because on basically every level people are encouraged to utterly dismiss criticism under the pretense that it's "subjective" and that "other people have tastes" because having objective standards is bad for corrupt businesses and governments.
Ever since Netflix removed the thumbs up and down every fricking media corp has been desperately trying to find ways to remove any and all negative feedback.
I'll flip the question on you. Why should Steam NOT allow this?
They should keep it. The whole point of how reviews on Steam work is the customer can decide what ones are relevant to themselves, language, positive/negative, time, bombing, etc all can be turned off or focused on. Only fanbabies that cry "think of the billion dollar company" care about the overall collection of them.
>World of Warcraft: Classic: Fresh Steam Servers Edition
Make it stop!
>this is hurting Blizzard's brand
Lol. Lmao even
Its a reflection of the brand, the damage was done already.
Exactly, they wouldn’t be putting this game on Steam, or trying to get acquired by Microsoft if their reputation wasn’t already destroyed
Steam is basically the only company that allows users to rate shit. And these Black folk cry out in pain because their goyslop was rated faithfully.
Based. Blizzard doesn't deserve this treatment from malding TFzisters.
>calls it overwatch 2
>2
>second instalment
ahahahahahahahahahahh
>65% of reviews are made by chinks
>rest by redditors or tf 2 gays
i mean its a raid so no shit, they should put a number of X hours you need to play before making a review, it doesn't matter if its negative or positive.
good idea on paper but bad because then people would have to choose between refunding a bad game or eating the cost to warn others
>of X hours
imagine for a second that you install game and it was awful from the start for whatever reason
9000 positive reviews
think again
Eh, but what if a guy bought some shit and couldn't review it ans refund cause of the x hours demand? For as much attention as this kinda of shit gets, reviewbombing ain't the avarage review experience
>they should put a number of X hours you need to play before making a review
That's bullshit, it has been out for some time before steam, so a person with no hours in steam can still have an informed opinion.
If you remove all negative chink reviews the rating will be around 30% which still is fricking low even if you take into account tf2 reviews
why chinks? aren't they still Great Walled out of blizz games?
Yup, they were also most of the Overwatch playerbase, which why the attempt to dismiss it is extra funny.
That's why. This is the first time since getting walled they've been able to play overwatch, but they have to rebuy and start from scratch.
the wall is a wrong term because it was blizzard who pulled out from china because of the disagreements with their chinese former business partner
>game crashes to desktop on startup
>can't warn others because "must have x hours played"
yeah this does not work.
The only thing that works is already implemented; it shows the hours played next to the review. A potential buyer can now decide for him/herself whether take the review seriously or with a grain of salt.
steam reviews are a fricking joke in 95% of cases, memes, reddit humor, jokes etc to farm shitty awards and upvoats .
Depends how you use it.
I just look at positive/negative ratio and make a decision based on that.
A shit game will obviously have a shit ratio
yeah, like 99% positive
I reviewed OW2 negatively and I already have 60 hours on Steam and I've played every season so far.
I do it for no reason other than to piss blizzdrones off.
>game is bad
>company has destroyed all goodwill
>long-time fans have been shafted over and over
>somehow this doesn't make it okay to leave a bad review
The sheer vitriol and hate directed towards Overwatch 2 is warranted. Blizzard took something that was universally beloved and completely butchered it.
Is it as bad on a technical level as its contemporaries? No, but that doesn't matter. This is the only effective way for consumers to voice their displeasure with a game. Voting with your wallet doesn't work since gays will buy the game anyway and if the game doesn't hit its sales target then the guys in suit will blame everybody else but themselves.
A hate campaign is the only way to get the message through to them since public opinion in truth matters more than sales numbers.
>98% positive reviews is fair
>98% negative is not
curious
>wipe reviews
>people just add negative ones again
what would be the point?
NO THINK OF THE BRANDS! THE BRANDS! PEOPLE COULD LOSE THEIR JOB FOR MAKING BAD GAMES AND BEING PREDATORY TO THE CONSUMER!
>cult classics like World of Warcraft
>cult classic
>WoW
never heard of it. any good?
I'd recommend playing the hit megamassive online role-playing game Final Fantasy XIV instead. Its free up to level 60, and includes the critically acclaimed expansion Heavensward
soon 70 and stormblood too in like a month and a half
words mean nothing anymore. they're just kind of decoration
well its a classic and it has a literal cult of blizzard worshippers behind it
i know you were young back then but it literally set the mmo standard and everyone tried to copy it for the next twenty years
You can't call the most/2nd most popular MMO in the world a cult classic
Cult classic implies a lack of popularity, as though a hidden gem with a small base
"cult classic" is a term that just means it garnered a very passionate fanbase. as if the game was a cult; a religion.
Anon, cult classic means it's popular in a niche segment of the population.
You know, like the beliefs of a new start up cult.
Maybe if Blizzard allowed reviews years ago they’d have a better gauge at how much their reputation has fallen and correct it before it got this bad.
>make the original game worse
>add a metric SHITTON of DLC
>there's no way anyone can think this is bad in any way
HAHAHAHAHAHA
LEAVE THE MULTI BILLION DOLLAR COMPANY ALONE!
*Unsheaths Katana*
Why the frick can't people take criticism.
Because on basically every level people are encouraged to utterly dismiss criticism under the pretense that it's "subjective" and that "other people have tastes" because having objective standards is bad for corrupt businesses and governments.
Ever since Netflix removed the thumbs up and down every fricking media corp has been desperately trying to find ways to remove any and all negative feedback.
>Jester award
smuganimeface.jpg