Am I supposed to just accept that Andross was a giant brain floating around an endless void?

Am I supposed to just accept that Andross was a giant brain floating around an endless void?

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    and what exactly do you think that you are?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Damn..

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      God damn got him

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      just a normal brain kickin it in a bone castle till it all falls apart.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's philosophy, Pullo.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    yes

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Anon, did you know that there's a brain inside your head RIGHT NOW?!?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Impossible

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      He's a Nintendo fan so I find that extremely unlikely

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Thank you. That's the funniest post I've read in ages.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >playing starfox means you're a nintendo fan
        and this is autism

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          anti-Nintendo people think about Nintendo way more often than actual Nintendo fanboys.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Nintendies on suicide watch.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Anon, did you know that there's a brain inside your head RIGHT NOW?!?

      Did you forget where you are right now?

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    as opposed to being a floating head with arms?
    or a cube?

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >tfw too smart for /vr/

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    disembodied brains always make me uncomfortable as frick. I don't like thinking about the fact that I'm just a wad of neurons piloting a meat suit.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Not as disturbing as being a wad of neurons which only thinks that it is piloting a meat suit.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Well then I have good news!
      You're not even that. You're the traffic pattern of electrons (not the electrons themselves) in the brain.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Well, not even that. Like a subsystem of that.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I have even better news: particles such as electrons are not in a defined state until they're measured, meaning measuring particles makes them "pop" into existence. They do not exist as a defined classical point in space prior to that. Which means nothing exists until it's detected and reality is subjective.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >It's this moronic interpretation of the Heisenberg principle

          All the Heisenberg principle says is that in order to measure any quantum state, you have to interact with the state in some way, which changes the accuracy of you measurement. Thus there's a fundamental limit to the accuracy of certain pairs of measurements, like momentum and position or energy and time. It analogous to knowing the pitch of a string on a guitar and the time duration it vibrates when you play it. It doesn't mean reality is subjective, it means there's a fundamental limit to how much information we can get about a quantum system regarding important quantities. It doesn't mean reality is subjective or electrons or other particles "pop" into existence via measurements. It means that as systems, particles can have their states measured statistically.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            What about superposition of states? It tells us all states are true and display a wave like behavior until you try to measure the system, and at that point you get a particle. The wave function colapses and this colapsing is just a mathematical update. Thanks for your time, you seem to understand more than I do.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              The superposition of states is best described all quantum states can be described as linear combinations of quantum states, just like how if you add two waves together in the classical world (assuming there's no energy lost due to thermodynamics), the resulting wave is the linear combination of the resulting waves. Likewise, the linear combination of quantum states is a valid quantum state. That's the essence of what superposition means. I think that's why quantum mechanics can be expressed very well in terms of linear algebra and differential equations, since they both deal with superposition (if you have two solutions to a differential equation, then the resulting sum is also a solution to the diff eq. There's a similar result in linear algebra if you consider the span of the solution of an equation).

              Wave function collapse is exactly what happens when the wave function interacts with any measuring device or object. Instead of ranging over a wide range of potential momenta and positions, wave function collapse forces the observation to take on a smaller range of values due to the interaction.

              Quantum mechanics is a very strange field. I'm not 100% on it and I'm pretty sure that even the most talented physicists aren't 100% sure what it means. It has a lo of classical analogues that help make it clear, but fundamentally it is drastically different than the classical mechanics we experience in everyday life. If you want to dig deeper into quantum mechanics, I can recommend the book Quantum Mechanics by David Griffiths. It's the textbook I used to learn QM in undergrad. It's the standard for the field. I think it's a pretty good introduction to the concepts and math behind the field and if it doesn't get too ahead of itself since he explains himself well.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I forgot to add that the book is on libgen.is, so you can download it and not buy it if you don't want to.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Did you accept the giant face or giant monkey face, or a talking fox flying a space fighter jet, or a toad pilot, a bird pilot, a rabbit pilot, pig pilot, or a general dog, or space talking dinosaurs?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, right after I accepting Jesus Christ as my personal Lord and Saviour.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    The real question is why did he think this of all times was the appropriate moment for a cringeworthy pun?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      He's horrendously deformed and having a laugh.
      That Andross is a real card!

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Cause he knows it hurts

      >Only I have the BRAINS to rule Lylat!
      >OUCH! Damn Andross you ARE evil!!

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It was obvious that he experimented on himself from his madness.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Watch The Lawnmower Man. It will all make sense to you then.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Of course he's a gi[g]ant[ic] brain. Didn't you see the prequel where he declared that he was the greetest and that he was leaving Corneria for no raisin?

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Andross is a Bolzmann brain

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    his brain became so powerful he can stay fully conscious just with it and his eyes, fox just blasted everything else off. it's the same with how you tear off the outer layer of his robot form in the easy path.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Boltzmann did.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I mean is it any more strange than fighting a disembodied floating head of a gigantic geriatric monkey wizard/mad scientist?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It is all too common for it to happen to the best of us.

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Well yeah, who else would have the brains to rule the galaxy?

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    SO ANDROSS, YOU SHOW YOUR TRUE FORM.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *