I always use DLSS when available, usually balanced. I have a 3070 and try to run games at 1440p 144Hz silently. So I usually hike the settings down to medium in most cases.
FSR has been getting better, my laptop has a 6800s and it's breddy dece with FSR on
Literally depends on the game which one I'm using. Performance is only really great with 1440p and 4k, otherwise it will look like shit.
Balanced and Quality go well with 1080p and 1440p, looking excellent with 4k obv.
The point is that you're not supposed to see a difference numbnuts. DLSS is essentially meant to give good image quality with less power to increase FPS and/or give higher resolutions you normally couldn't run native.
I have a 3080 mobile maxed TDP with 16Gb Vram (so basically like a desktop 3070 but with more Vram) and I use Quality mode a lot, it's a free 20-30fps extra without any visual downgrade, sometimes it's even a visual upgrade.
DLSS is definitely the best feature of this generation and the best selling point to prefer Nvidia over AMD
using DLSS in Quality mode is pretty much always a good idea, with few exceptions for old games with old versions of DLSS implemented. But for anything from 2021 going forward, always put DLSS Quality if you have the option, it's free performance without any visual downgrade
Both use the same/similar algorithms, except >AMD FidelityFX™ Super Resolution
is implemented in game by devs. Only the rendered 3D image is upscaled, user interface is rendered at native resolution >AMD Radeon™ Super Resolution
is implemented on the driver level, it should work with most of games that support arbitrary resolutions out of box. The downside is that the whole image is upscaled, including user interface.
nvidia also has super resolution but in it's control panel also
DLSS is just better and cuda has specific uses if you work or some old games and modding
quality with a 3080. It's like magic.
MFW AMD
I always use DLSS when available, usually balanced. I have a 3070 and try to run games at 1440p 144Hz silently. So I usually hike the settings down to medium in most cases.
FSR has been getting better, my laptop has a 6800s and it's breddy dece with FSR on
what games are you playing in 1440p 144 on a 3070 ? tetris ?
What about that AMD super resolution something ? the one when you can enable in any games, not the FSR?
you can pretty much have FSR 2.0 in any game with DLSS anon. my 1080ti will live a little longer thanks to it
Literally depends on the game which one I'm using. Performance is only really great with 1440p and 4k, otherwise it will look like shit.
Balanced and Quality go well with 1080p and 1440p, looking excellent with 4k obv.
What should I be seeing? Right looks slightly more bright, that's it...
left is 40 fps, right is 80
ohhh, I get it now, they are supposed to look the same but with different performances. Cool
The point is that you're not supposed to see a difference numbnuts. DLSS is essentially meant to give good image quality with less power to increase FPS and/or give higher resolutions you normally couldn't run native.
right looks like shit though
I should probably upgrade my graphics card, but I worry my CPU will bottle cap it. 😐 Can't afford both right now.
I have a 3080 mobile maxed TDP with 16Gb Vram (so basically like a desktop 3070 but with more Vram) and I use Quality mode a lot, it's a free 20-30fps extra without any visual downgrade, sometimes it's even a visual upgrade.
DLSS is definitely the best feature of this generation and the best selling point to prefer Nvidia over AMD
When is DLAA going to get the same treatment as DLSS?
So would it be better to use the Quality one in MW2019, while having a 2070 Super, rather then not using it at all?
using DLSS in Quality mode is pretty much always a good idea, with few exceptions for old games with old versions of DLSS implemented. But for anything from 2021 going forward, always put DLSS Quality if you have the option, it's free performance without any visual downgrade
Whatever gives me solid 60 fps, the higher setting the better.
>quality
>3090
>2160p 120hz
>oled
>freesync: ON
It's incredible bros
What the different between AMD FidelityFX™ Super Resolution and AMD Radeon™ Super Resolution ???
Both use the same/similar algorithms, except
>AMD FidelityFX™ Super Resolution
is implemented in game by devs. Only the rendered 3D image is upscaled, user interface is rendered at native resolution
>AMD Radeon™ Super Resolution
is implemented on the driver level, it should work with most of games that support arbitrary resolutions out of box. The downside is that the whole image is upscaled, including user interface.
yes. quality at 4K
No, I do not have a grafix card new enough to enable it.
Personally I'm a big fan of DSLs, they make a woman more attractive to me.
What about AMD super resolution? it can be use on any games meanwhile DLSS only supported 200 games
nvidia also has super resolution but in it's control panel also
DLSS is just better and cuda has specific uses if you work or some old games and modding
Use quality at 1080 and 1440, and balanced at 4k
What's the purpose of graphics cards which are more powerful than console graphics cards using this on games designed for console graphics?