>artists and coders literally foaming at the mouth in light of AI
>not realizing AI will literally just make them more efficient
>not realizing the artist will soon not even need the coder and vice versa
>no, both parties decide to either ignore, deny, or even protest AI and AI-related technologies
What the frick.
Take a W when you see it.
Don't go full-moron, quit, and start waving signs around.
Game dev'ing has never been easier, kek
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Lol
https://fortune.com/2023/06/23/lawyers-fined-filing-chatgpt-hallucinations-in-court/
> source: trust me
>https://fortune.com/2023/06/23/lawyers-fined-filing-chatgpt-hallucinations-in-court/
>Humiliated lawyers fined $5,000 for submitting ChatGPT hallucinations in court: ‘I heard about this new site, which I falsely assumed was, like, a super search engine’
KEKED
You've never made anything in your entire life
>it continues foaming at the mouth trying to turn a W into an L
sad
AI shills get the rope.
I've made you seethe.
Anyone protesting against AI is a hypocrite.
this
these morons may as well go into a cave and bash stones together to make "art" if they hate technology so much
"you dont want ai to ruin art yet you use technology"
just join the olympics with leaps that fricking huge
you may as well sew your mouth shut if you're not going to suck my wiener then
only people who like AI art are talentless people who couldn't create shit. have a nice day israelites
lmao
seethe more
>picrel took 30 seconds to make
i know right. i made myself a fairy waifu the other day
Yeah, I could tell
cope
Cope about what? I'm not an artist, I'm just saying you're a shit prompter that's fine with shit art.
So you can't draw AND you can't prompt.
lmao
you're below everyone.
>you can't draw
Yes
>you can't prompt
I can prompt better than you, lol
The fact that you keep posting such garbled bullshit without any care for refining your results, and trying to treat it as a highlight of your efforts, shows you're not nearly in the same league as my AI prompting, and you're undeserving of even glimpsing the chocolate queens I've spent ages grinding out of the mill.
>chocolate queens I've spent ages grinding out of the mill.
Based. Post choco giant tiddied waifs
Make em yourself. Know the toils of trying to get the right amount of floofy dark hair (or really any floof without going kemonomimi), the glistening to work well with dark pigmentation, how bra melting especially affects choco bosoms, and when going the extra mile to achieve high quality, you too would know that heathens like him don't deserve a glimpse at sun-kissed queens
lol, just keep digging yourself deeper mate. Little tip for ya: trying to go for more of a painted style to hide the smearing and deformation of your results doesn't actually work. Have some actual standards with your AI art, it's just a matter of observation and feedback, or are you truly that fricking lazy
>REEEEEEE
kek
please, keep it coming
>floofy dark hair (or really any floof without going kemonomimi), the glistening to work well with dark pigmentation, how bra melting especially affects choco bosoms, and when going the extra mile to achieve high quality, you too would know that heathens like him don't deserve a glimpse at sun-kissed queens
jfc, go back to r*ddit
>no response but to just post more shit and shitpost
>in fact doubles down by using slime to try to hide his lazy prompt refinement
lol
You will never be an AI artist
lol
lmao even
And it's a generic moe. Congratz you didn't create art, you generated a picture.
lmao
He's right, that looks like moeslop.
wew lad
keep that seethe coming
I just don't like tranime. I don't mind good anime art though.
>tranime
Zoomer election tourist.
Cope
You people are basically caricatures at this point.
Seethe harder
kek
Moot point
who?
cope tourist
Seethe Black person
dilate
He can't save us now.
I'm happy moe weebshitters are being replaced
Good riddance
Keep up the AI art consuming and make those moe slop "artists" an hero
I'd rather the fanbase for it die. This whole thread seems like a bunch of guys who used to pay for anime porn now getting A.I to generate it for them and seeing it as a personal victory.
Weird stuff.
How long have jeets been at it and it has still moved nowhere?
I'm posting stuff I saved ages ago, so that image likely is actually quite outdated.
13th Feb was when I saved it.
Are you the guy who always used to post those incredibly uncanny valley smiling girls in other AI threads on Ganker over the months?
nope
I usually ignore these threads because they're just zero arguments.
no one is going to be convinced either way here - either you're ok with ai art or you aren't, and both sides have their heels dug in about it.
it's just fun fricking with people.
I'm sure actually good artists will be able to use the new tools at their disposal. You still made a generic anime girl and think yourself better than a stick doodler.
Not the moe AI poster, just wanted to show you what normies think "real art" is
You are just talking to me. I'm not here representing anyone beyond that.
Do you have a link to the full article? In the clipped headline it says it won the digital category and I'm curious what the other submissions look like.
BTW I really like that image so thanks for sharing.
>Congratz you didn't create art
who asked?
You are moronic.
i will not be requiring your services
this
the only people i see pushing ai art are lazy tech bros who just want some quick money
>NOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU NEED TO PAY ME TO DRAW MENTALLY ILL Black person KEKOLD PORNO IM SO TALENTED
have a nice day artcel subhuman
>artcel
what does that even mean? art celibacy? i think artcel fits more with AI obsessed freaks that surround themselves with fake art
>only people who hate AI art are talentless people who couldn't create shit
ftfy, also israelites love AI as much as they hate it but you just parrot so...
Anyone pretending to support AI is a contrarian or is otherwise soulless. You looked at the people in Wall-E who were comically obese, confined to their rascals, and enslaved by constant lowest common denominator pop culture and pizza and thought "I don't see what the problem is, that seems convenient"
I see two ways AI could go.
>AI cannot create real art and will always be inferior
Guess you don't need to fricking worry then, shut up.
>AI creates the same or similar enough art to real people
So a thing that is objectively more efficient can do the same thing as a human for less cost. You deserve obsolescence.
There's just no winning for real people in real life.
Or it could worse than real art but good enough for corporations to pretend otherwise
That's not art. It's corporate material devoid of artistic intent and generated only for monetary gain. The idea behind art is creative expression, and AI helps to alleviate that burden. The argument that it's bad is predicated on the idea that an artist's mechanical skill is more important than the artistic intent itself.
Mechanical skill = artistic intent
Feeding the AI the input = no different than stroking a paint brush on a canvas. If the AI gives me an image that reflects my input then I have successfully expressed myself and it's artistically valid, eat shit.
This.
/thread
oh no, the people who draw ugly grubhub characters will be out of business. How tragic.
You people are fricking moronic. If AI generated content is as bad as you claim then it shouldn't be generating enough revenue to be a viable business decision since no one will buy it and will fizzle out before long.
>no but the plebs have shit taste unlike me and they will buy garbage
Who the frick made you Black folk the authority on what is high quality art and what isn't? FFS you're on an anime website the shit that get high praise here is low brow juvenile shit literally marketed towards children
>AI creates the same or similar enough art to real people
this is AI generated.
I can tell, she's missing a finger.
>hire artist
>artist uses AI to help with art
oh no, jobs are being stolen!
>art is about efficiency
It actually is. You are not approaching it from the correct perspective. The efficiency of the user's time, skill, and effort are extremely important when deciding which medium to use. That's why Photoshop and Illustrator are the main choices right now for any artist who takes themselves seriously. There's no reason supplementary usage of AI is different.
>Don't go full-moron, quit, and start waving signs around.
>quit
You know very well that AI is/will be used as a cost cutting measure and there will be layoffs.
You mean like how it's happened throughout human history? Why exactly is anyone supposed to be immune from progress?
We haven't had a technological change capable of affecting so many jobs across different industries before. The goal is to replace (rather than supplement) workers with AI. They're chomping at the heels to replace as many workers as they can.
Thanks for not answering my questions.
AI will not create more jobs, that's a autistic cope or damage control. It will widdle down available jobs to humans down to a few complementary, repair, or troubleshooting jobs, eliminating hundreds of thousands of people so a few rich homosexual moneyhumpers can save a few hundred thousand a year paying people to do their jobs.
have a nice day unironically goldfarbshekelbergstein. T. Not a coder or an artist despite your incoming deflection that I somehow am for seeing through your bullshit.
Based poster. I've enjoyed the mental imagery you've produced, please start writing.
The people whose jobs will be eliminated from this:
>pajeet shovelware coders
>porn commission artists
>SJW Hollywood propaganda writers
good riddance.
Eventually it will be everyone in those fields.
But I think the 'good riddance' part will still be valid then.
by the time ai will actually replace "everyone" we will have UBI or die from vaxx
>or die from vaxx
not me - pure blood for life however short that may be.
shovelware coders
replaced with pajeet tier shovelware """ai"""
>>porn commision artists
can't argue, good riddance
>>SJW Hollywood propaganda writers
will be replaced with SJW ai propaganda writers
anon, AI is a tool, SJW slop is only in power because of how domineering they are manipulating others in their industry. If their purpose for being there is removed as creative writers cause AI does it better, they will ALL be replaced. No one has time to deal with their drama shit. Woke infected industries will be erased out by AI and I would worship Skynet if the world got there a little bit faster.
youre fricking moronic and it shows you dont do the actual soul crushing work
>t.artist
People thought the same thing about every technological revolution. They thought that machines would mean that factory jobs ceased to exist. It’ll be fine
You have no fricking idea what AI means, moron.
Factory jobs are now all shit or outsourced to third-world countries, anon. Good ones effectively did cease to exist unless you live in China.
>They thought that machines would mean that factory jobs ceased to exist
they were right though? a lot of those jobs did cease to exist.
that's why some type of ubi will need to be incorporated, otherwise there will be violence/unrest from normoids
the only people who care passionately about AI art are the artists bad enough to be replaced by it and the prompters incapable of even that.
Damage control. Maybe I should use AI to track down shill posts and sage respond to blow them out and make them look bad to ruin their money.
>the artists bad enough to be replaced by it
disney literally put out an intro made by AI that looks like shit for a new tv show. any artist can be replaced by it because the people using AI just care about it being cheap and fast and the people funding this stuff love cutting corners
>the people using AI just care about it being cheap and fast
literally yes
what other concern would a business have?
why do artists feel 'owed' anything?
>only bad artists will be replaced!!!
>well not really but why would corporations care
why was your response to start rimming corpos
i want good looking art, which corpos can fund and artists can make. ai art looks like dogshit
Are you going to answer the points I raised, or just sperg out?
>ermmm the corporations want to make money so... there
are you going to raise any points or just tongue corporate butthole some more
You could just say 'no'.
I'll accept your concession, but I'm not happy about it.
post some beautiful ai art
>THAT'S NOT BEAUTIFUL IT'S SO SOULLESS
so predictable.
Time to reskill, drawgays.
lmao
NOOOOOOOOO
THE AI WAS SUPPOSED TO REPLACE JOBS I HAVE NO RESPECT FOR LIKE DRIVING TRUCKS OR MAKING FOOD REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
HOW AM I GOING TO MAKE MONEY SELLING BIZARRE FETISH PORNOGRAPHY TO THE MENTALLY ILL?
now I feel even more ashamed for burning my dosh on coomer art
driving trucks, fast food, working retail, manual labour etc. are all shitty jobs that noone wants. its not that theyre not respectable, its that theyre miserable and devoid of meaning.
if we had an economic system that was even slightly functional, automating those jobs would be ideal
I realized earlier today that I haven't seen anyone really talking about AI any more, not even bait threads on Ganker
well I guess here's one place, still
It's because the technology is improving time and again and is now reaching the point where their snide "look at the hands lol" comments don't even work.
They're scared now.
>the technology is improving time and again
Places like HN would be basedfacing if that were the case... all quiet.
ok moron post a picture that can fool everyone then
see
>won the colorado state fair art show
on to the louvre next then
Always the same with you tards.
>SHOW ME THE THING
>shows thing
>NOT THAT THING
it didn't even win the whole thing on second look lol. just the digital category
>just ignores being called out for goalpost moving
ok bro
uhhhhh logically fallacy much?? the ai bubble will pop soon and it will remain as a personal jack off tool for coomers with face blindness
if you knew anything about Pueblo, where the fair is hosted, you wouldn't be posting that lmao
The only thing I heard about AI is that marvel used it in the intro of their new series
Which made people make a thread on Ganker that almost made me search for the torrent of the series, which probably was why they used it to begin with.
I've automated every part of my job that doesn't require my physical presence already
it'll be a while until what I'm doing right now is fully automated though, prompt engineering is a bit trickier than many realize and you still need to be knowledgeable enough to know when the LLM is hallucinating or not
this is also what prevents a matryoshka doll situation from developing in which AI prompts AI prompts AI prompts AI to fully automate- none of them can reliably discern junk data from good data and any hallucinations have a cascade effect
>I've automated every part of my job that doesn't require my physical presence already
>it'll be a while until what I'm doing right now is fully automated though, prompt engineering is a bit trickier than many realize and you still need to be knowledgeable enough to know when the LLM is hallucinating or not
Giving someone detailed instructions and then proofreading the result isn't automation. Sorry for your loss.
not sure what level of cope you're on but I hope you get better
The shittiest part of any job is editing, and that's what AI reduces your whole job to, ass tech for ass future.
Ya'll should've listened.
>Ya'll
go back
But could he beat TRUMP in the GENROLL ELECTIIIIIIION?!?!?!!!!! Come on anon. Biden was the SENSIBLE choice and the HONEST choice. Think of the NATIONAL DEBT if we did that UBM thing in preparation for the AUTOMATION boogeyman that doesnt exist.
Artists mad
Shit like this makes me profoundly sad, we really are just the sex organs of the machine world.
https://twitter.com/Culture_Crit/status/1671281599437062146
kek
this kind of pretentious shit is so hilarious to me.
just look at the guy making it. he's like
>what the frick am I doing here...?
and the way he just throws his hands forward as if to say
>here's your slop
I think the guy is more art than the buckets.
who gives a shit, contests have always been cancer, duchamp should have cleared that up for you long ago
no one even read the article, he put that art in and said he didn't use AI, there was a category he could've submitted it. People are mad he lied.
> I won
The computer won.
To the winner go the spoils.
If he got the prize, he won the game.
Or did photoshop win all the digital art contests before?
tbh when photoshop became the medium of choice is when I lost respect for artists
if it's not something you create with your own hands without assistance from a machine that you did not build then it's not particularly impressive.
But what if you put together the PC PS is running on?
What a Black person take and I don't even have sympathy for the homosexual writers.
>Computer does half the work
>Hmm yes I am so skilled
Nah frick modern artists computer art was the first step down the slippery slope to AI making them obsolete they rolled down that hill into their own graves
funny how these same people defend editing software and photobashing to death
Yeah I have no respect for any chef who didn’t personally kill the animal and butcher the meat while going out to pick herbs before preparing my meal.
>citygay
why do wagies think companies are their socialist parents who are required to provide them with jobs and fixed wages? lets be honest if they'd make their own company they'd all go bankrupt because of how naive they are about the economy.
I like AI art.
i coom to ai art
based
same
>generic sameface weeb "artists" will be the first to go
Life is good.
I never got the 'sameface' thing.
All anime is sameface, isn't it?
The oly difference is the eye shape, jaw shape and size relative to the body.
Yep. Yet weebs stuffed it down like pizza anyway.
Of course such generic slop would be easy for an AI to replicate first.
Earliest stuff I saw was stuff like
The anime stuff didn't really show up till SD went open source last August or whatever it was.
Ah, right.
I think.
Honestly the shonen jump style is so plain I really wouldn't be able to tell the difference between AI and "real" art even a year ago
>Honestly the shonen jump style is so plain I really wouldn't be able to tell the difference between AI and "real" art even a year ago
That's fair.
>CUTE polished artstyle... LE BAD
>difference for the sake of difference... LE GOOD
are you israeli?
the only risk of ai art is cooming too much to the endless stream of breasts and butt now avaliable to literally anyone to do
Damn yes, the internet was really short on pornography before AI saved us
(this is what jeets actually believe)
porn made especifically for (you) bro
it's paradise
>porn made especifically for (you) bro
So long as the porn you want is of an anime girl and/or a character that already has enough art of them to be fed into the machine
there's porn AIs already bro, some of them even let you gen for free.
>characters
just mess with the tags and you can make any OC you'd want
That's not what I meant. AI art for porn can be great if you want OC or an already well-known character, but you're just as fricked as before if the character you like has maybe 5 drawings, each in wildly different styles. The best you can do is just play tug-of-war with the AI to get as close as possible.
that's fair enough, at least lora's help a bit but if you really like a literal who you're a bit fricked
Exactly, so while I agree with the fact that it's nice to be able to generate stuff for yourself, there's still plenty of caveats.
true, impressive but still not nearly as brainless as most people expect it to be, it'll take a bit i expect before it reaches that level
I'm interested in where it goes, but man the fighting is just really tiresome in general. Cute Lucoa though, even if that hand is incredibly fricked.
it's tohru!
and yeah that hand isn't great
there's plugins that basically 100% fix hands and eyes now.
I just wish people actually fricking used them. So much AI art could be fixed so easily, but people just don't fricking bother in a race for quantity.
to be fair its only really dedicated coomers that are upscaling and austisically in-painting their waifu to perfection, everyone else is just prooompting 500 images at a time.
Which wouldn't be that much of a problem if they didn't also post all 500 on Pixiv.
It's also rather difficult to take the "we're democratizing art" and the whole argument of taking art back from greedy twitter artists behind patreon paywalls etc, when a shitload of prompters on pixiv almost immediately opened a fanbox and put R-18 versions behind a paywall.
And I mean, sure, make money, I just wish that pretense wasn't there.
>It's also rather difficult to take the "we're democratizing art" and the whole argument of taking art back from greedy twitter artists behind patreon paywalls etc, when a shitload of prompters on pixiv almost immediately opened a fanbox and put R-18 versions behind a paywall.
It's very easy to do if you don't conflate the sub 1% of people with the 99%.
Is it really conflating when it got bad enough that fanbox, Pixiv, DLsite etc. have announced crackdowns?
Yes. You're talking about a few people in an ocean. There was a far more dramatic reason for those crackdowns than "spam" too.
inpainting, img2img and controlnet takes effort, someone wanting a quick coom is likely not going to do it, or be doing gens through free sites that don't even allow it to begin with so they are limited to prooompting which will generate slop 90% of the time
what plugins?
Controlnet, that shit is getting crazy good now.
Frick, I blanked on the name, thanks for the correction. I really should get some sleep.
The big fluffy ears it makes are great.
floof is great
I should prompt that one more. Really nice style.
Do it.
AI isn't spitting out good images of my fetish. at least not yet
what's your fetish
Yes, SCP-1004 is right around the corner.
amen, brother
Eh, way too many people just do the same thing with the same similar models. For years people laughed at Sakimichan for her sameface shit only for AI art to do literally the same.
What's the poorgay way of doing it now that Google fricked over Colabs?
check the /b/ thread
based. ai doesn't complain, ai doesn't have political bias, ai doesn't ask question, ai doesn't charge money, ai doesn't suddenly quit a project, ai doesn't need weeks to finish something. ai is the future.
unironically
cute
same.
artcels wish they could draw like this
>artcels wish they could draw grotesque anime girls like this
eh i'm good
cope more homosexual
Anon there's already an endless deluge of generic big booba anime porn on the internet, you prompt jockeys always have the most plain-jane taste in existence.
>NSFW behind paywall
So literally nothing has changed, except the guy can make it faster.
god bless
https://pixai.art/
SD is great. It's unironically going to reignite the soul in human generated art. The people making art will all be doing so because they love doing it, not to scam coomers or just for a paycheck.
At first i thought this was shitposting. Now it seems like there are techbro cultists who are shilling this shit 24/7. What's their goal? why are bugmen so hellbent on replacing everything and love choking on AI overlord dick so much?
Just... have a nice day? Please?
>everyone who disagree with me are artists. Everyday I think about how terrible and evil they are. I include them in every topic i talk about. Yes!they are the one who are seeething waaa
Rent free motherfricker
This is a weird coping mechanism. Are you trying to gaslight us into thinking that artists aren't seething and that it's the AI chads that have an issue?
Can you point and prove that it's artists that are seething rightnow in here or are you so mindbroken that you have to create these artist boogeyman so that you can cope with the fact that there's a lot of type of people that don't fricking like you bugmen.
lmao
>IT'S JUST EVERYONE THAT HATES AI ART - IT'S NOT ARTISTS AT ALL
I think you'd have to actually try to be more disingenuous at this point.
>Yes EVERYBODY fricking LOVE ai, they can't help but bow and suck AI wiener like we do. It's only the artist that are evil and stupid
Mindfricking broken. Keep fighting the evil artist boogeyman and slurp whatever dopamine you get from thinking you are winning something. Rent free motherfricker
You mean like the 'boogeymen' in the op's image?
Can you pin point the evil artist in op's image?
Can you pin point and prove every supposed artist in this thread?
Yes i'm artist and i'm raping your mom rightnow anon go fight me and help her from evil artist now!!
Artists were sneering at blue collar workers for years how they should learn to code instead of complaining about bad working conditions. They deserve this.
You bugmen codeBlack folk are actually the loudest mouth when it come to chanting about replacing anyone. THE FRICKING MEME IS CALLED "LEARN TO CODE" for frick sake.
Artists have always been looked down upon as an unreliable job for fricking century, the word "starving artist" exist for a reason and it has always been a stereotypical depiction of artist for decade.
Where the frick did you get this image where all artist are some rich spoiled brat that are evil and greedy come from? You bugmen are literally forming a non existent narrative to project your soulessness and morally bankrupt brain onto something else to cope with your subhuman nature.
>why are bugmen so hellbent on replacing everything
because the shit the's being replaced is easy to replace. if you can't do better than AI, I don't think you were cut out to be an artist.
AI isn't replacing anything. It's just overshadowing stuff that's good content because you can shit out 100 generic AI pics in an hour.
what good stuff is being overshadowed?
please show me one example.
>lost the argument and is now pretending to be a third party
lmao lol even
Nihilism and jealousy of people that are able to create something. Anyone who is for AI replacing human output should just stop breathing.
I will no longer be requiring your services.
Is what your boss will be saying to you within the next 5-10 years, and what the AI will be saying to humanity in the next 10-20.
honestly i dont think ai will be smart enough to actually replace people for a long time.
artists are going to be replaced, but real professionals like programmers cant be replaced yet, its just not smart enough. I have messed around with it for code for a while and its great and spitting out code it ripped from github or stackoverflow but it cannot write any working novel code whatsoever.
>smart enough
You clearly have no idea how diffusion models and LLMs work.
Basically, any small, independent piece of work is at risk of being replaced by AI in the near future. So, concept artists, translators, most journalists, and code monkeys. Likely to go next are composers and animators. Anything larger, so authors, programmers, should be fine for long enough.
Smart is a perfectly fine word to use to describe it being better.
>translators, most journalists
fricking WHEN?
can't happen soon enough.
SIR PLEASE HIRE AI EXPERT FOR YOUR COMPANY
IT IS THE FUTURE SIR
>calls 99.99% of games soulless
>literally made by humans
>somehow acts like ai will make games soulless
why are anti-ai boomers like this?
>ITT brainlets thinking AI creating art can function without any input
It's sad you drawgays are already intimated by AI art
We haven't even touched 3d modelling yet
Not to mention more specific and complicated tasks AI still struggles with
i like that i can make the thing i want to make without putting in any effort in learning or paying someone else
>It is questionable if all the mechanical inventions yet made have lightened the day’s toil of any human being.
John Stewart Mill, nearly 200 frickin years ago.
Take an L when you see it.
>lets just arbitrarily choose to stop here, where the most spoiled and laziest class of our society is now affected
hmmm
>the most spoiled and laziest class of our society is now affected
You mean the idle ruling class? They don't toil at all, by definition.
The artists, yes.
Your idiotic grievance doesn't even make any sense; animators are chained to a desk 60 hours a week for 3 months on any AAA game.
How on earth do you come to the conclusion that artists are the ruling class?
When are we going to get AI creating video game mods? Will Nexus ban them?
>he doesn't know.
Good luck proving which assets are AI generated. But who the hell cares if it's a tree pixel art or a brick texture is AI generated?
https://www.reddit.com/r/LoveForAIArt/
Wow it's almost like this happens every single time new technology is developed.
This one is different though, it completely removes the need to think and make decisions, we're creating a machine god that will make humanity redundant.
The machine god isn't a israelite so it's inherently better.
>it completely removes the need to think and make decisions
kek
you haven't used the tech, have you?
also, there's literally nothing stopping you from still making art or books or whatever.
You don't have to be a genius to tell where all this is heading, it's kinda worrying to see how many embrace it. Maybe we deserve to become slaves.
>become
>Maybe we deserve to become slaves.
hehahahahaha
Anon, if you don't recognize economic slavery then you are delusional. But muh free education / society amirite!
He might be part of the class of people doing the oppressing. There might be a reason for it.
You would be surprised just how many israelites post on this site to disrupt and demoralize.
I'm not surprised by any of it, I know Ganker is a perfect platform for 5GW operations.
Nahh, people with power don't want others to discuss these issues, they'd rather everyone just be happy with their expensive products and entertainment.
This anon is just dumb. Also that class of people IS literally every human individual of humanity. It's only the people close to you that you can carry. Everyone else, all other groups, communities, nations, countries, can get fricked over if you get an advantage out of it.
To add, if we weren't all so god damn greedy we would have better pockets of society we can just relax back into.
>ou don't have to be a genius to tell where all this is heading, it's kinda worrying to see how many embrace it.
Again, there's literally nothing stopping you from still drawing. Even if every piece of entertainment is fully automated, you can still draw.
What the frick are you worrying about? Apart from the nefarious uses by government agencies to generate incriminating evidence of never-committed crimes
First we gotta deal with the upcoming job-apocalypse, then we gotta worry about rapid technological expansion beyond our control.
>government agencies to generate incriminating evidence
Any 14 year old will be able to do that on their mom's computer
We're past the point of no return, the box has been opened.
>the upcoming job-apocalypse
source?
Both proponents and opponents of AI agree that it will make a shitton of jobs obsolete, and currently the only answers to that are "well just rebuild your career from 0, you can't stop progress and you have to adapt to survive" or "I'm sure they'll finally implement UBI".
>UBI
Unironically.
Give me my neetbux already
Both shitposters and homosexuals like you are moronic.
And? That's what happened to the world with computerization anon. I can't wait for AI to delete people in lazy frick positions.
This, I'm just glad that AI will never come for me, because my job is secure and nothing will ever happen to it.
UBI is atleast 60 years away, even if all the pieces for it being functional starts being implemented today across the globe, there are going to be too many people in power who will do their best to stop it completely or slow it down, either because they subscribe to the belief of Monetary/Financial Darwinism or because the sociopaths in the upper part of the food chain is afraid of losing their power over other people.
It sucks, yes.
The general consensus among employers and the upper echelon of AI and computing is that it's closer to 10 years away. Your idea of the people in power is based on moronic /misc/ nonsense.
Feel free to look up where money goes during election time in the US or how many open opponents there are to UBI across the globe, you'd have to be blind or wilfully ignorant to not see the snakes hiding in the grass
Understand the timeline and what CEOs actually want, you dumb poltard.
>AGI robot is released
>t's smarter, faster, and better than any human at doing any task
>it's also cheaper
They will buy this instantly, they're already buying shitty versions of it. What will then happen to people who no longer have jobs? They'll pick up their pitch forks and the government, for fear of societal collapse, will force companies who "sold out" to the robots to pay the population, just an AI tax. They're still rolling in cash but we're also getting paid for doing nothing.
This is completely natural progression and it's coming soon, There's no evil boogeyman opposed to this.
Yup, Disney is already using it. Secret Invasion uses AI art in the opening. It's one of the worst openings I've ever seen, but that is beside the point.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/ai-could-soon-take-your-fast-food-order-180982166/
Stuff like this is more relevant because it can supplant entire industries worth of employees. Entirely automated McDonalds isn't that far away. And ChatGPT is a proof of concept that has proven that hundreds of millions of white collar jobs are at risk too.
If AI doesn't frick up my order ever, then I'm all for it.
I'm most excited for tech support call centers being replaced by AI lol.
>no waiting
>no anxiety talking to some foreigner with a weird accent
>personalized and expert knowledge to do everything right there and there
That's another thing that will push society to change, young people looking for jobs when AI is already pushing on old people to get out.
I'm excited about that as well. The return of the English accent. Good shit.
>That's another thing that will push society to change, young people looking for jobs when AI is already pushing on old people to get out.
If AI pushes old people out, it'll push young people out all the same. Societal change and striving for such is great on paper, the problem is that it's only ever the before and after that are considered, not the people in-between.
Years ago, my brother was in trade school and a new reform as implemented to change how courses could be completed and certifications could be acquired. This reform was changed for something better afterwards, but for him and people in his class, they essentially spent two years studying with nothing to show for it and no recourse other than to take another class, even though under the old system, they would have already had their papers.
Old system was functional but imperfect, new system is functional but imperfect, but anyone stuck in the middle can just get fricked. And the problem is that the people getting fricked by AI are likely this and the next generation. Yeah sure, it might be better afterwards, but people rightfully can't or won't care about a future that far away, when they have problems today.
There's endless jokes about McDonalds, but a lot of people forget that retail and fast food are some of the earliest jobs young people can get to try and build an employment history as well as earn some money to offset living costs which naturally occur as a result of the fricking bizarre societal push to just eject your kids from home at 18.
>societal collapse
Why the frick would anyone want this shit? It's just hitting the reset button and then having already working institutions be wiped out with the non-functioning ones. There is no guarantee that what comes next will be better if we don't use what we have now to guide it there, look at literally any country in the world who has experienced it in the last 100 years and you'll see that 90% of the tomes it ends up being worse than before.
You're the fricking /misc/tard who thinks any of that whit would help but in reality it would just make the power gap between the wealthy and the not so wealthy even worse since short of a total economic collapse brought on by people completely losing their trust in currency, the wealthy will just pick a few poors and use them at meat shields by paying them, exactly the same thing that has already happened since before the dark ages
>there are going to be too many people in power who will do their best to stop it completely or slow it down
You really don't get how this works. They want UBI so your transformation to serfdom is complete. You can' resist if they shut down you bank account and prevent you from buying food with CBDCs
Unless western countries starts banning physical currency and starts going CCP on their population, that shit will never happen. It also wouldn't be any different to what is already happening today where people on benefits and who work at almost any job are ALREADY being threatened by it's removal and banks are ALREADY blocking money transfers/access for specific "unwanted" individuals across the globe
>banning physical currency and starts going CCP on their population
That's the plan. They're getting resistance the whole way though. It would be taken to the next level. Central bank digital currencies are programmable and expire so people in the system won't be able to abuse their gibs. Of course alternative currencies would pop up and black markets would be the hot new thing. They have their work cut out for them but I suspect they'll cause some damage all the same.
That shit has nothing to do with UBI you fricking moron, UBI doesn't need any of that shit too function and you are just falling for the fricking sociopaths attempts at ruining it
UBI would be given through CBDCs. You aren't getting free money with no strings attached, dumbfrick. They don't give a frick about you.
I rather just rob people then rely on the government in all honesty.
UBI as a concept literally IS free gibs for being a citizen in exchange for paying taxes, acting as army fodder and being voting cattle. Anything else is a shitty attempt at trying to keep the economic line growing upwards forever since people are afraid that everyone will turn into mindless slobs the moment people are completely free to choose their own destiny but in reality only the people who are already useless to society will keep being useless while the rest will keep doing what they are doing for nothing other than social status (which money is already being used for in 99% of the world) and/or to meet their own goals in life
You are very naive if you think they won't weaponize it against you like they do everything else.
Anon, my original post was literally pointing put how people with bad intentions are going to try to ruin it for everyone and why the entire thing was atleast another generation away, probably more
If you're simply talking about the concept then it would end poorly. It would ruin most people. Idle hands are the devil's plaything and all that.
>Idle hands
Thats a fallacy that is immediately disproven by historical evidence. The truth is that there is no pre-programmed way that humans react to freedom from work, there are also plenty of examples of literal neets today that seemingly sits around all day yet still manages to create something for society, one of the best mathematicians in the world was a neet, got a job and then turned back into a neet after realising that the peers in his field didn't do what they did in pursuit of knowledge, but in pursuit of vanity. He even turned down millions of rubbles in an attempt to distance himself from that shit
>esl can't even understand proverbs
i bet you get really confused when someone says it's raining cats and dogs
It's a proverb that was birthed from the fricking bible (I'm not even going to try to explain how fricking dumb that is) and that is then used as a logical fallacy in an attempt at saying "B-but if we don't tell people what to do they are just going to be worse as people! ;(".
It has been used by almost every tyrant on earth since it's inception to control populations and used as an argument for positive change even though it has absolutely nothing to do with either, it's used as a way to tell people "if you don't go out and sow those fields or hunt that deer, you won't be eating tonight", but we aren't hunter/gatherers anymore are we?
I said it would ruin MOST people. And it would. Those overproductive NEETS even suffer from it on some level. I would know.
You don't know that and I don't know that. Every piece of evidence we have too point at are ever changing since they will all be based on "we live in a society". People act like sheep because they are treated like sheep, people act successful even when they are losers, people act like saints even when they are sinners. The only solid proof any of us can point at is our current understanding of psychology and how the brain is an extremely powerful thing that can act against us or for us by screwing our perception of reality, sometimes it does both at once
I do know that. People need conflict. Deprive them of it and they create it. Humans are not all mild-mannered artists waiting to be set free. They'll amp up their hedonism to extreme levels and destroy themselves and others. Eventually you'll understand.
That is a very short sighted way of looking at things and if it were true, humanity would have wiped itself out almost immediately after our inception. The truth is somewhere in the middle, some people are fricking sociopaths that want to see the world burn just because it has sinned by existing, some people are so mild-mannered that they will get trampled over by even the most well meaning of individuals yet they themselves don't see the problem with that.
We can't reduce humanity down to a single "thing" like so many writers does, our minds are far too complex for that and it was only in the last 100 years or so that we even started grasping the basics of how our minds and brains functions and who knows, maybe everything anyone think they know about all this shit is wrong
It's more pessimistic than short-sighted. It's a large generalization for the sake of argument sure, but it's not entirely wrong. Humans have had to work this whole time. It's kept them busy and made them strong. Just look at the ultra-rich who are spoiled beyond measure as an example of people who have their base needs taken care of from birth. It's not to the same extent of course since they're above the law, but the point stands.
The truth is only a small fraction will be properly productive and do something worthwhile. Even when people have their free time they still waste it.
I would be more open to the idea if the cultural zeigeist shifted away from the death spiral we're currently experiencing. I'd like to see communities make a comeback.
People have been talking about deepfakes in elections for years and we've already seen the start of it in this election cycle. I'm so sick of the conversation. Yes people will make false images and videos. No, it's not indistinguishable from the real thing, it still very easy to tell if something is fake.
It's easy to tell if something is fake until it isn't, when the actors you see on screen in movies aren't real anymore because the whole thing was procedurally generated by a series of algorithms that fills all the roles of a movie production team hundreds of times. Rapid self improving AI will improve itself exponentially faster with every iteration to a point where anything is possible. It's pretty much unimaginable but it's right around the corner. We have only scratched the surface.
Middle management in all businesses need to be cut out. I can't wait for the day Job Agencies are obsolete because an AI does it 1000x better than a human ever could.
Should be the first industry to go honestly.
>the upcoming job-apocalypse
You Black folk have been going on about this for 40 fricking years now.
>THE COMPUTERS ARE GONNA TAKE OUR JOBS
>THE INTERNET IS GONNA TAKE OUR JOBS
>THE AI IS GONNA TAKE OUR JOBS
And every single time the new tech creates tons of new jobs instead.
Up until now computers have only taken the shitty jobs, AI will take the good jobs. The ones that require long educations and requires you to think long and hard about difficult problems. Pretty much every job that is currently available to be performed on a computer can be automated, this is a big deal.
>become
>also, there's literally nothing stopping you from still making art or books or whatever.
At some point there's not much you can do against the sheer volume.
>At some point there's not much you can do against the sheer volume.
How does the "sheer volume" stop you from drawing? Is there some limit to the number of drawings that can exist that I don't know about?
You know as well as I do that even if you draw mostly for fun, sharing it and having the eyes of even just a few people is something a lot of people want. Yeah you're not owed attention, but it doesn't take much to admit that getting noticed as 1/1000 is easier than a 1/100000.
Very interesting. You've shown me that there was a point in time that Americans could spell 'theatre' correctly. What happened?
There are bigger issues than AI generated stuff to worry about.
TV and movies going from black and white to color? Because that's what that guy is talking about.
The principle holds across more than just what he's specifically referring to.
Like what
vidya
How
wdym? people shit on photorealism in games all the time. there's a large segment that thinks it's detrimental to games.
it also has the flow on effect of forcing games to be hardware dependent.
black and white movies are cozy to look at though cmon
This tech is so dangerous it's insane and I'm not talking about stealing jobs. Hopefully we hit a ceiling on the progress sometime soon but I doubt it.
lmao
Don't worry, bro. The government totally won't use this tech to incriminate literally any person of any crime ever.
It'll be fine.
This pandora's box is so fricking bad - normies worried about artists are so fricking short sighted.
Although, at least I get a lot more coom material. Price worth paying.
seethe /misc/tard
>he hasn't been in the AI voice threads
wew, lad.
you're in for a shock.
It's not even AI. It's just algorithms. It's inert without human input.
When true AI rolls around, THEN we'll be in some trouble.
>When true AI rolls around, THEN we'll be in some trouble
i'll force it to make mario 64 mods just like in my heckin anallog horror series
Thank frick I'm so autistic that ai won't be able to faithfully mimic my voice, choice of words, behaviour and mannerisms
eh, I feel like this paranoia is just projection of humanity's hubris
like why so many people aliens are humans with tumors and skin cancer, or monster made for the "good humans" to destroy
though AI is human-made, so maybe there is cause for worry
I know. They really have no idea of the repercussions. We'll probably end up going full circle at some point and go full luddite like Ted.
It doesn't even have to get any smarter. They can completely control the flow of information and rewrite history among many other things. It's in the hands of bad people and it will do some very bad things.
I don't think people put enough considerations towards the fact that while you can argue about images, voice AI will completely destroy the validity of audio evidences in courts. Add some deepfakes to that and anyone can be incriminated for anything, but it's awesome because a twitter leftist I don't like got mad about it.
shut the frick up anti semite election tourist
Wait, though, I don't consider myself an "artist" for using AI
I consider myself a consumer with alternatives
I no longer have to break the bank for some artist with an attitude that'll take weeks to poop out something not even close to what we agreed on
Crafts people are not Artists.
Artists are dedicated soldiers of the invisible, intangible, ineffable spheres, who sacrifice their lives to help others transcend the material world. There is no clear goal, no clear method, it is more difficult than anything on Earth.
And AI can be used.
Remember, the most staunch defenders of AI are porn addicts who use it to proompt breasts.
This is the level of debate you're entering.
The most rabid critics of AI are degenerates who use it to swindle porn addicts.
Art AI is already fricking inbreeding so it'll actually kill itself if they don't start curating it's diet. If they just asked which artists they could add to the database instead of being an internet scan, it wouldn't have gone like this
Relearning databases is time consuming but that's the entire point of it anon to achieve better quality and styles. It's like dog breeding or some shit.
>Relearning databases is time consuming
The problem there is that a lot of AI artists don't have any amount of patience. If a pic is good enough, it's good enough to post, the majority of them don't bother with fixing anything, even the most obvious things like
. Instead they just fricking flood Pixiv etc. The "why should I fix this when I can just generate 10 more" attitude is extremely prevalent.
Well that's why you'll have the mutt breeds, it took generations for wolves become all sorts of dogs, plenty with shit behaviors.
I honestly can't wait in the medical or military field where instead of art they do it for humans and frick us all up.
any and all AI is trained largely on publicly available data which is easily skimmed from the internet.
People been solving captchas for google for years, for example. That was all training work for one certain method of some certain algorithm, work that should have ever been paid and credited for. They just snuck it into an excusable exception of people's daily lives. Turning up the temperature degree by degree over time so we don't notice the transition to the rolling boil.
People's facebook photos, instagram photos, twitter posts, artwork, paintings, voices, videos, locations, behaviours... all of it, simple data for computers to numbercrunch into an unmitigated abortion of complex networking indeterminable by any one individual.as to how exactly it functions. Any artist that has had their career's work uploaded and catalogued on the internet can have their style mimicked to such a degree that anyone else would be able to download some dataset trained on such an artist to infinitely produce works of art in the style of the artist in 1 millionth of the time and cost it took the artist to produce their career. That artist no longer has value, and will likely stop producing art which could be shared over the internet. With time, a simple 3D printer or CNC machine could probably utilize AI networks to reproduce paintings via physical brush strokes, much less just arranging pixels which might ever be printed to paper.
Further, styles can be fluidly mixed. New artstyles borne of existing artstyles. You might squint and be able to recognize one part here, or one piece there, one or a couple individual elements of an art piece which somehow evokes similarity to another known artist, but that is already what so many other actual people had ever been doing. The AI's own attempt at expressiveness is doing the utterly bizarre stuff that nobody has ever seen yet. People with strange hands, too many fingers, utterly hideous faces, and other visual diarrhea.
Technology is good at automating fixed manual drudgery after humans have used their brains and creativity to make the decisions and create it. It can't replace humans in those roles.
>bro, trust me. ai code and "art" being made from scratch by mixing in already existing code and art will definitely not put you out of a job, nor will it suck the soul out of creating art
kys
They were already writing by committee for market researched demographics in order to minimize risk to begin with. That's far more soulless than a machine.
I don't mind people using AI art. It's like a signal flag. You know the game or film is going to be shit without having to look too much into it. Which ultimately saves me time when I'm looking for real art. Win-win.
here, have stupid meme I make
The thing is, I don't believe for a second that ideas guys will actually start making things. Unless you find a way to directly plug your brain into the AI, it's always a back and forth of trying to get as close to the thing you want as possible, like leaning over the shoulder of someone and telling them what to draw.
but where is the absolute tidal wave of low effort ai generated games doe? the walking corpse of hawken is the only thing i can think of
>where is the absolute tidal wave of low effort ai generated games
most likely stuck in porn games
uh, maybe I should've made the cutoff year 2024/5
I'm not sure it'd be quite like this for some time, LLM's suggest the most basic b***h tutorial level code solutions for what they come up with because it's what they're trained on, they don't really "understand" the engine or what they're doing.
the LLM doesn't understand that there's too many enemies on screen so it should add object pooling, it doesn't understand finding the main camera every frame is an expensive operation, it just repeats what it knows from code tutorials and forum responses to produce something that maybe works which even if it does it lacks the architectural or performance context.
I think we'd have to progress past AI that just predicts the next words in a response to something that actually understands an application before we see AAA generating games from prompts.
I hope ai replaces wojakBlack folk next
DEY TURKA JERBS
Good luck with all future AI models training on AI garbage plus a dedicated fraction of experts producing malicious works for AIs and art for humans. Garbage in, Garbage out.
>Garbage in, Garbage out.
Like ur dad cuming in ur mom and u coming out
Didn't ChatGPT pass the bar?
Oh no, a writers' strike. How will we go on without the high quality writing we've come to expect from the entertainment ind-hahhahahahahaha
Artists = Vegeta
AIgays = Goku
>CHATBOTS AND STABLE DIFFUSION WILL SET YOU FREE YOU FRICKING IGNORANT SLAVES
>Real writers: complain, ask for money and make a nuisance
>AI: .....
Yeah I'm not seeing what this strike will accomplish
No one gets paid more for efficient work, all you get are higher expectations. No shit none of the actually employed workers are that excited about AI. If you are self employed or a manager / board member / share holder than sure. Actual employees? Frick no.
>No that's not real art you just typed some words in, even a kid can make that
Artists failed to gatekeep this shit centuries ago, they have no excuse to gatekeep against AI
>western "art" so weak AI can beat it
Lmao, voice "acting"gays are next.
My dude, people are building LORAs off nip artists and then asking for support on patreon to continue doing so.
>american writers on strike
>writing quality improves
lmao
This is absolute the best outcome in any of this.
The actors are going to be striking soon too, which means con events won't have to deal with these asshats for awhile. We might actually see a renaissance if Hollywood goes away for awhile.
Stop pretending you care, frickhead. You never cared about artists and coders, artists and coders were never the ones you were advertising to, designing this shit for.
Sure, AI could probably have great applications in coding and art, but certainly not in the direction you're taking it.
Based. I don't know the artist but I'm sure he's an butthole and a leftist.
>making my own board game
>partner is designer
>uses AI to generate images which act like a canvas for her to edit/fit the style
The amount of time saved in not having to do every single image from scratch is immense and this really feels like a "google will destroy librarians" tier idiocy.
>"google will destroy librarians" tier idiocy.
You're half right. That information can be edited or removed by AI so physical books still have their place. You're still moronic though.
The irony in your absolute lack of reading comprehension and being so underage.
if it doesn't make money, if ai generated art and code is as shit as this thread says, nobody will buy games made with it and nobody will make them because they don't make money. what money they do make will come from actual idiots. the customer is always right in taste. this preemptive coping is very bizarre to me.
also money isn't fricking real. who ought to be shitting and pissing their pants are ~~*those*~~ who thought this technology would be entirely exclusive to them and would further their agenda. instead people will realize that they have been working and being paid fun bucks merely to keep their evil idle hands busy and their labor was never actually necessary.
You're delusional if you think this is the one case where society uses something to do more with the same input rather than just doing the same with less
Notice how all the companies who invested billions into AI suddenly decided it was going to kill us all and needed to be "banned" right after normal people started being able to use it without paying them
hmmmmmm
to bad low IQ midwit morons in the thread cant even understand what OP is saying and are just trowing shit at each other like monkey
yep.
pretty sad
>to bad
>low IQ
The irony
video games?
nice Ganker raid mod
gamedev is vidya yes
>he put the word game in the op
>thus its Ganker
vydia butts is Ganker
Is this A.I. generated?
>512x512
Doesn't matter, the fact that you can't immediately tell means that AI has won
I say "No" because I don't think AI would be that lazy with the flower field. But then maybe AI is good enough to fake a lazy artists. I don't know.
>But then maybe AI is good enough to fake a lazy artists.
it is
you can go from child-tier crayon doodles to renassaince-tier realistic paintings within the construct of a single art model just by varying the prompt.
Sites can't host all this shitty AI slop anyway. Takes up too much space. I even heard Deviant art has upload limits for this shit.
AI chatbot is already immensely fun by itself. It would be great if an RPGs officially integrate it. NPCs will never the same again. I can't tell if you gays are AI or not tbh.
The chat bots - do they run locally, or are the responses generated remotely? I wonder how taxing the software is to generate responses on the fly and if it could actually be integrated into a game running real time on consumer grade hardware.
The one run remotely by companies and corporation are heavily censored and lobotomized. IE Chatgpt. The one locally are mostly uncucked and need a powerful GPU for speed. The CPU generated one can be done, but it's slow. GPU is pretty fast. However, running heavy graphics/AI Voice/ AI text at the same time is still too much for consumer hardware at the moment. It can only get more resource efficient from here.
Yeah, I was just wondering about the chat part only.
I just wonder if a client side program could run a game (WoW for example) and also generate just text based responses to your typing. Not voice or graphics, just the chat part.
I've only prompted for art locally, so have no clue how resource hog the chat stuff specifically is locally.
You're in luck. There's GPU and CPU methods. Even ChatGPT can be jailbroken to generate NSFW stuff if you get good.
https://rentry.org/Aicg4morons
Did we enter the Dune timeline?
>Butlerian Jihad soon
Real talk? we already experienced this already, remember when procedurally generated shit was shoehorned into every game and even AAA tried to jump on the train to replace game designers, which only ended up fizzling out and used by indie devs to lighten the workload.
we're gonna run into that same wall cause as it turns out, a computer can't do exactly what you want unless someone is telling them what do you want, and at that point that person is just gonna be the designer/artist.
probably gonna end up the same too, being used for indie projects while AAA ignores it.
>and at that point that person is just gonna be the designer/artist.
Right. But they're working a trillion times faster which is good for us all. The AAA industry won't even exist once AI gets better at helping people make games.
hope indie devs take these tools once the panic settles down so they can actually release their shit in a timely maner
That is such a naive belief that I hope when you eventually get a taste of reality it doesn't break you.
In what world does technological advancement ever reduce the grip that a few have over the rest of us? AAA devs will get their hands on it first and monetize the shit out of it, gamers will continue buying their shit because it has logo that they recognize and the pile of games to sieve through to find decent ones will just get bigger.
AI is and always will be open for anyone to play with.
and before someone says "nuh uh" or "they'll take the toys away"
they missed the train on that ages ago, stable diffusion being out means there's always gonna be a free alternative even if they start obessively knocking generators down
Right. And everything corporations use is built upon FOSS foundations. And Meta, a leader in AI, is releasing everything FOSS too. Nvidia is still putting out papers too even if OpenAI and israelitegle have slowed on that. Nothing is going to keep AI out of our hands, not even a nuclear war.
Remember that time when people successfully protested against factories taking their jobs?
How everyone rejected production line, machine made, soulless, mass produced foods and products and just supported chefs and bakers?
Oh wait most people don't care and just buy the cheapest shit.
I'm all for AI writing. Nothing can be has bad as the horrible lib schlock every media franchise has to inject into itself.
This is where I'm at. Ever since gamergate devs have tried very hard to make ugly females and everyday thing. I'm sick of it.
Issue is that the models are all censored to shit and made to generate even more of that woke nonsense.
As long as we don't have a truly autonomous and self aware AI, there will always be biases programmed in.
Prompt me a plane without a front windshield
Whoops, AI isn't as smart as you thought huh?
aislop
Why do 'creatives' feel like they're owed jobs?
Drawing weird fetish porn that's too niche to ever be done properly by AI is half the reason I keep my HikiNEET life going tbh
Prompt jockeys will never know the joy of drawing your favorite character engaging in whatever demented debauchery your fricked up brain thinks is hot
I literally don’t care about AI, kek. I’ve been drawing for 15 years and the only reason I do it is because I’m autistic and I completely ascend to a smooth-brained free flow state while I’m drawing. It’s not about making things fast. And the only time I care about art is when other people make it because I get off on imagining them also being in a similar state of mind. AI art has no appeal to me. Don’t care how fast it’s made or how detailed it is. Human art is equivalent to a sweaty female armpit (sexy), and AI art is equivalent to two soda cans intersecting at a right angle and splashing water on the vertex and calling it a sweaty female armpit (not sexy).
>two soda cans intersecting at a right angle and splashing water on the vertex and calling it a sweaty female armpit (not sexy).
>not sexy
Absolutely keyed.
>Ganker really thinks this way
I wish I was as deluded as they were.
In a capitalist society worker efficiency doesn't benefit the workers. It just increases the profits for the guys on top while workers get cut.
What the frick did artists do to make you people so angry? Are you really that salty about that 1 in a thousand lucky guy with a 30k patreon?
If you can't see how annoying artists have been over AI you are an annoying homosexual yourself.
"Failed CS wannabe living as a HikiNEET with his parents" is like the definition of most anons so of course they're mad when someone gets to have fun making something creative
Case in point.
People have always been jealous of talented individuals, making artists redundant through AI helps them cope with the fact that they'll never create anything cool themselves.
The majority who are considered talented are hacks as well, when you become established you can only been able to do so through networking and conning your way up, no other way around it.
The old masters are long dead, and with fame died progress.
The only valuable artists are the schizos ones who never cared about making it but rather wanted to hone their skill in a detached way.
Schizo artists still get followers, anon. I don’t have friends or ‘mutuals’. I just draw what I like and people decide to follow me.
good for you I respect that. I understand people find their way to you but it's certainly not the same as the redditor and social media types who advertise themselves.
AI won't take the job from artists that smear menstrual blood on canvases and make up stories about why they added some nail polish on top, AI fricks up the artist working in creative production industries, like illustrators and concept designers. The ones you would consider great artists because they make professional renders and designs of actual geometric shapes. Those are the ones they're jealous of.
If they didn't want to be replaced by an AI, they should have done a better job.
Nobody can do a better job than AI, it has the accumulated knowledge from all of art history and spits out thousands of high quality images in a minute.
These illustrator and concept designers still fall under the umbrella of neurotic buttholes who want everyone below them. If they havent made it, you are cheating, if they made it, youre still cheating - yet they use digital tools that would make a purely traditional master seethe.
They are hypocrites that hide under self righteousness.
You're exactly what I'm talking about, jealous as frick.
When and where one draws the line anon? they use digital means, they photobash and take shit off stock photo dot com, they take or buy assets online to build their work under a tight deadline. Why are you tonguing their buttholes? You either are one or merely conform to them because you can't do shit yourself.
The line is crossed when the whole creative process is replaced by a machine, when there are no artistic decisions being made at all besides
>do we keep [generated image #1] or [generated image #2]?
Nothing wrong with that. Maybe if you were better or artists in general were better, this wouldn't be necessary.
That's impossible though, AI is smarter, faster and better than any person on earth x1000
It's more of a moral dilemma than a pragmatic one.
You haven't tried it. The artistic and technical decision the (you)s can make be overwhelming and very granular.
>typing shit into a text prompt and moving sliders is a workflow
It's more work than inkcels do. Most artists barely do anything but slap on some premade brushes.
>rubbing ink on paper is a workflow
No but planning out a sketch and organizing your digital workspace to more efficiently draw anime girls with big breasts is a workflow
And using comfyui is much harder than doing that with photoshop.
Using Ai tools makes you a commissioner to an artist that is near impossible to direct because it's a robot that doesn't actually do anything with intention or thought
Nothing you said is right.
Except that artist does not complain, does not fall ill, does not charge money, doesn't have bad political opinions, doesn't ban you if you ask for too many revisions and changes, doesn't refuse anything, doesn't whine, doesn't want to engage in conversation, doesn't misunderstand things, doesn't make mistakes, follows what you describe and produces better results.
But yeah, it's bad because robot. I really wish you moronic luddites would frick off back to twitter.
You can do that better, more efficiently and faster with AI. You CHOOSE to be slow, inefficient and worse, and there's nothing to be proud about there.
It's frightening how much people have convinced themselves that using a pencil is harder than meticulously refining prompts.
genuinely made me kek. You lumpens are something else
is that comfyui?
that's the process you follow when you're just starting out.
go do some research - there's a lot you can do with this tool
This might be how you fine tune your output now but the process will get much more organic in the near future, there's no reason why you wouldn't be able to discuss with the AI and have it apply changes based on your discussion. The effort needed to perform this work is so minuscule that anyone with an aesthetic sense could do it in seconds.
>when there are no artistic decisions being made
But there are decisions being made.
the whole creative process was replaced by a hundred pajeets more than a decade ago you mong. you get outsourcing juniors competing for the same project so the person in charge can take a seat on his fat ass to pick and choose
Now these moronic mongoloids believe that they can beat the already ai charged outsource pajeets
>These illustrator and concept designers still fall under the umbrella of neurotic buttholes who want everyone below them
This, the two I've known were like that so it stands to reason the rest are all the same. If they aren't, they allowed this behavior to happen, so they're just as culpable.
AI art is my way of getting back at them for blacklisting me from commissions.
>can you provide the pictures of all those girls dead?
>please don't ask why
Well now they're obsolete and getting replaced, so as far as I'm concerned, I had the last laugh.
I dunno why it's somehow not funny to laugh at people getting replaced by technology. It was before AI art and it's even more funny since artists cry a hell of a lot more than physical laborers and niche craftsmen.
>1.The lucky guy doesnt complain about AI because he knows it will only help him increase his output.
>2.The unlucky guy, who is not famous and doesn't care, doesnt complain either.
>3.The lucky, ESTABLISHED famous guy will fight with tooth and nail because he wanted to remain the one of the few up top.
>4.The not lucky, AAA ESTABLISHED people with also b***h and moan because they never got famous and that is the only, sole reason they picked up the craft in the first place.
Only two of these care about the actual possibilities, the rest are cancerous, histrionic system maintainers.
I don't hate them at all, but the homogenization of digital art and the general laziness of the space aesthetically was overdue for a shakeup
I feel kind of bad that they got thrust into "be excellent or die" so suddenly but I think it's for the best
They are spiteful techBlack person that project their subhuman nature on artist to cope
see
I went to a graphic design school before I knew what I wanted to be, it was a big campus that also did a bunch of art degrees. Artists truly are insufferable frickwits and act exactly as they're stereotypically portrayed, the only guys I thought were ok we're the dudes doing sculpture because they were essentially tradesman learning to weld/fabricate and whatnot.
something about a field where you impress each other by knowing obscure history about other practitioners in that field attracts absolute homosexuals.
A few of my childhood friends and acquaintances have become artists of varying calibers and not counting the low-functioning alcoholic they are all massive dickheads
the low-functioning alcoholic is the only good artists among them
not enough coom gens
You're posting the most generic animu gens possible because AI doesn't know how to do anything more degenerate, lmao
>because AI doesn't know how to do anything more
neither do artists.
besides you can tell the AI to draw anything, its just that the generic anime girls are more popular therefore there's more of them
>besides you can tell the AI to draw anything
You need a shitload of images to train it because the AI can't do it on its own, so good luck with any character that doesn't already have thousands of pieces of fanart.
>just use tags to recreate characters
That just gets you the equivalent of a shitty cosplay in art form and good luck keeping it consistent.
you need 5-10 for a lora, you only need that many for replicating specific styles
>shitload of images
way less than you'd think
You need as few as (1) images. And from there you can cherry pick as many gens as you want for a better model. This is really outdated thinking.
>still need artist work
I thought you bun hate artist to the bone. Why don't you feed your own shit
Originality like free will is the great lie mankind tells himself
>that pic
Holy SHIT
I want the prompts/model info, but that looks like you saved it from another thread.
>but that looks like you saved it from another thread.
indeed
its already consistent and better than what 99% of drawings artcels can make, what else do would you realistically want?
>you actually need to go outside and fricking talk to someone
that's rich coming from an animetard
>ai is better than 99% of artist
>post generic coom
>still need to feed artist work
Get new script aitroon
need to feed artist work
source?
have you used diffusion models before?
do you have ANY idea how they operate?
Doesn't matter. No one cares.
*steals your jpeg*
Mad?
your fricking machine won't get to where it now if it wasn't feed like 8 billions image moron and you still need to feed it more to create specific style. There are like 5 aitroon with the same way of talking with the same fricking script like some kind of trolling campaign.
lmao
you know, you could have just said "no, I don't really know how it works"
yeah you bug totally know how your toy work and have never feed an artist work to generate at all. who are you trying to gaslight ai troon
kek
are you one of these morons that thinks people who do ai prompting actually download art from the internet?
hahaha
it'd be funnier if it wasn't so pathetic.
>haha he will never know the super duper secret of proompting because he is not one of us.
talk like a terminal gaslighting troony.
Spoken like a true neoluddite.
Yeah why would I want to be a subhuman parasite? Go suck and get spitroasted by you fellow aitroon. I assume it's like a ritual for your cult there? That might explain why you all talk like from a same script lmao
it's not a fricking secret at all, moron
go to /sdg/ on Ganker and the OP has all the info you'd ever want about how to get it going and how it all works.
holy shit, you're just some smoothbrained homosexual who can't comprehend that progress results in change.
> There are like 5 aitroon with the same way of talking with the same fricking script like some kind of trolling campaign.
That and all their gens look the goddamn same, for how much they talk about the infinite possibilities of AI there's always this very distinct look to everything they make.
> and people would pay for anything hence why even Deviant art tier fetish artists could make a living by commisioning their pathetic drawings, now that they have to improve or get culled they sperg out since improving actually takes effort,
Autistic deviantart diaper/feet/whatever fetish artists are unironically the most immune to AI, anon, the generic models can't spit out degen fetish porn without a shitload of extra work and they and their fellows autism compels them to make weird shitty fetish art regardless of AI.
>ai is better than 99% of artist
it literally is
if you can't draw better than this you will be replaced
go ahead and prove me wrong, prove that you belong on the 1% and posts something you made that is better than these
>if you can't draw better than this you will be replaced
tthis is the real source of the seethe.
the minimum bar for entry into art has been raised, and a lot of homosexuals are getting culled.
this
there literally no quality control on the internet and people would pay for anything hence why even Deviant art tier fetish artists could make a living by commisioning their pathetic drawings, now that they have to improve or get culled they sperg out since improving actually takes effort, if anything im glad AI is gonna get rid of all these good for nothing homosexuals once and for all, it was about time it happened
the only downside is that many of them will have to get real jobs which increases our chance of encountering one.
double edged sword I guess.
>AI art is for everyone
>*puts it behind patreon paywall*
The more things change the more they stay the same.
Stable Diffusion A1111 is free.
https://github.com/automatic1111/stable-diffusion-webui
I just find it annoying that people b***h about patreon paywalls and when given the opportunity, they do the exact same thing.
Pics like this is what I used to talk down a friend from bothering with twitter art. He now understands that he can't measure up to AI, though he's being a little b***h and still sulking about it.
So why even bother with regular people?
>So why even bother with regular people?
There is no reason, not in creative industries anyway. It's kind of what the whole ordeal is about.
did i pass??
>if you can't draw better than this you will be replaced
Define "better", you don't need high detail rendering to make it as an artist.
>durr animetard
>he says as he tries to make the perfect anime proompt
you pajeets just throw shit at the wall from every angle just to see what sticks, don't you? and i know why you do this, but you'll have to figure it out yourselves. i'll even give you a hint:
it's not because you know you're right
i don't like saying this, but you actually need to go outside and fricking talk to someone who a) isn't just shitposting on a penguin drum discussion forum (like you) and b) has a hobby
or skill and is invested in it
anime fans enjoy anime news at 11
wow ai girls look like shit without the 2 ton distracting breasts and ass
No amount of proompting will make you not brown irl.
>What the frick.
>Take a W when you see it.
>Don't go full-moron, quit, and start waving signs around.
>Game dev'ing has never been easier, kek
>Got hired starting at $34/h for AI prompting months ago
>Coworkers said I replaced half the art team
Jesus Christ.
How did you land that?
I'd love to get a prompting job.
Had a resume in stable diffusion, AI artwork in my portfolio, knew what prompts to use to get the output I wanted, very simple shit if you learn the guides. And tell them what you need in equipment to get better results and output. I've learned from just making simple porn to knight armor in fantasy settings. Pic related I like making older women with a little bit of belly.
I wonder why they hired me for so much though. Is AI that unknowing to most people they think it's high tech intelligence or some shit only skilled people know? I'm earning more than my friend who's in software development.
what kind of company is looking for that shit though? it's such an alien concept to me. it's like these companies are hiring people to play with toys (that's how I see diffusion art anyway)
I just make prompts and we have artists that basically touch it up.
what company?
or what field?
Every company and every field in a couple years lol
Are you and your colleagues juniors? 34 USD doesnt seem much including your friend in software development, youre both getting conned.
I'm on CG and while I don't do proompting, I have supervisors who do midjourney shit and prob get paid more than 70-90 the hour. If you have other skills do showcase them on your next interview, if you're an illustrator or do CG proompting adds a lot of value, if you like the visual medium you're on a good path just broaden your skills
>implying stable diffusion doesnt trim the moron work
Id much rather not do the moron work for 5 hours and turn it into 1, and do the not moron work for the remainder of my shift
>aitroon try to gaslight people into believing this
Yes and I'm the president of India
should have asked for close to twice of that at minimum m8, boomers, gen x and old milenials can't wrap their heads around this shit, you fricked up
yeah sure buddy, your mom is calling
>automatically just creates shit for you instead of making the process easier or more comfortable like photoshop
>d-d-d-d-d-d-double yew!!!!!!
just a reminder these are the same gays who would defend the use of turbo and somehow argue it's the same as fightsticks btw
Isn't an issue that's starting to pop up that because there's so fricking much AI art flooding sites now that it's getting into the pool and becoming basically inbreeding where shitty features stay fricked up or get worse because of what it's pulling from?
Nah just a bunch of morons like you being trolled.
Mhm. Surely there will not be any problems with AI in the future and nothing could possibly go wrong
Please don't tell me you're having Skynet fantasies because current machine learning is nothing of the sort, and cannot become anything of the sort.
no lol
only morons who don't know how models work believe this
you can literally run SD offline
>why what do you mean with "digital art"??
>you can only create art with pencil and paper.
>drawing tablet?? what is that, that is not real art!
>I would never monetize my art!
Finally, I feel vindicated. Get fricked digitalgays. I hope technology rapes you hardcore.
AI is as crazy as the invention of photography must've been to artists.
>Noooo!!!! You can't just take a picture that's cheating!!!!!!!!!!!!
And here we are, 200 years later, where traditional art and photography coexist just fine as two different mediums. AI is the same thing in my head
>b-b-but it copies other artists!!!
Yeah, so does every other artist in the world. It just does it better.
>AI is as crazy as the invention of photography must've been to artists.
It's way crazier man. It takes seconds to generate practically any kind of image you want, that's unreal.
your point?
>your point
are you Illiterate
>your point?
AI will never replace us /d/eviants, anon. Our autism is too strong.
just look at the civitai page, degenerate to normal models have a ratio of 10:1, they have the most demand
>It's way crazier man.
Not really.
Consider a world where photography did not exist. Now tell someone "yeah, push this button and you capture a still image of whatever you're pointing this box at".
It's equally as crazy, if not more so, since we already had an idea that this tech was coming.
>It's way crazier, you only have to go to the place to generate the image
we've only moved out one level of abstraction is it really that much more crazy to define a place you would like to go to take a picture instead of walking there?
Aigays will unironically never understand the emotional catharsis of spending 15 hours painstakingly drawing amateurish deranged vore/diaper/inflation/whatever porn of your favorite characters in the middle of the night hunched over a computer knowing that 12 other people will enjoy it as much as you did
not joking btw
cool story
>Not spending 15 hours painstakingly making sense of fricking controlnet and stable diffusion AI
They claim it's fricking easy, I will never use non-opensource.
>AIChads will never understand what it feels to be a deranged degenerate freak like me!
and that's a good thing!
Unironically yes, homosexual. This is fricking Ganker, we're all degenerate freaks, that's why we have so many goddamn porn boards. gb2reddit
>hands=hidden
>breasts=maximum size
>face=same
>patreon=linked
yep, its the future of art time
>hands=as shitty as possible
>breasts=maximum size
>face=same
>patreon=linked
wow its just like your average artcel!
this is exactly like saying "lol you mean automobiles are slower than a galloping horse?"
And "trad" artists will never collaborate with dozens or thousands of people in real-time, creating dozens or hundreds of art pieces every hours and enjoying them together. It's really fun building prompts with people and sharing the failures and successes.
Did you just completely miss the shitload of "draw together" threads that were on Ganker for a long while, or is that just not art enough?
when aigays talk it's insanely obvious they have no idea what being an artist is actually like
I often clicked on them but it was rare to see someone actually drawing anything at all let alone multiple works in a thread. Have you ever been to an AI art general? Literally tens of thousands of images posted every single day.
The thing AI is bringing is speed mainly but it's also enabling tremendous amounts of creative freedom, something traditional tools and PS didn't offer at all. We're working THOUSANDS of times faster now. AI is also schizo and horny, letting us see really unique and sexy stuff.
Feels good man.
if it took some god machine literally making shit for you to unleash your """potential""", it says a lot about you than anything
This isn't even my final form though.
We're all different.
I dunno man, I just like to make things. AI just feels like I'm telling someone what to do and playing 50 questions to hopefully get what I want.
>artists will never work together and share their experience
are you moronic? like where did you get that idea from
the real art is the friends we make along the way
Why do we need to be more efficient, modern life is so efficient already that it's detrimental to human happiness
lmao
you aren't deep anon. that's just moronic.
if labor becomes so efficient it takes no time, then we're free to do as we please government schemes to control the population not withstanding
Almost all protesting today is the result of being a spoiled, bored butthole who wants to feel like an important activist. They don't care about practicability or societal health, they want to think they'll be remembered for being mad about something. It's no surprise; the media mind-breaks them into believing they always need to be angry in order to be a good person.
>ai picks ai
whoa... this is so flipping cool !!
>be artgay
>Train model with your own art
>offer to do gens of whatever anyone asks for dirt cheap, only prompts with no take backs in case one turns out like shit
>afterwards offer if they wanna pay extra for you to do stuff like regen pics, fix them with the ai and finally touch them up yourself
>get easy money from lazygays who can't be arsed to set up the AI
>get easy money from cheapskates who don't want to pay more than a buck for pics
>still get regular comm money and get extra from the gens without too much effort
why haven't they hopped onto the idea?
>pick favorite artist
>train ai on it
>make more deranged diaper furgay art from that artist
commercial art is dead. Hobbyists won
>corporations suddenly aren't my heckin friend
Every liberal bootlicker who defended corpos because their PR department changed logo to a pride flag and censored evil right-wingers deserves a brutal reminder that corporations aren't your friend.
AI can draw hands now artsisers........
we lost..............
Anon, that left thumb is still Cronenberging into the other fingers. Good breasts though.
the controlnet shit really stepped the game up a notch, eh?
Can it do good feet with high arches?
Probably. NTA but my attempt at feet was .. well
Most the issues here stem from bad artists in general. You see these kind of errors in rookie deviantart artists all the time.
you used negative prompts right?
Don't remember, probably not many. There are some feet loras now that I was planning on using someday to try again. I like those feet that artist makes.
The tool is amazing, but the people who use it have absolutely terrible taste. Case in point, this thread.
why are you gay?
fully agree, the stuff I see other people post is pretty horrific in some cases, on the other hand I'm sure everyone thinks their creations are the best because they're literally a distilled imagining of their taste.
They're still better than anything regular artcels can produce in days and weeks.
eh I mean someone can make a photo-realistic painting of a turd with AI or with paint and both are an image of a turd
this thread is just proving ted right every passing second, not helping the earliest adopters of consumer grade ai are literal shitskins with equally as shit taste, so it won't even do any marginal help
how did we let him down and when is wwiii?
If that manga was made a few years later, she'd be a successful proompter.
ted would hate you for being on a pc to begin with
Zoomie, once you'll have a job you'll understand that your bosses will try to find any single excuse to pay you less or making your work faster even if not possible, and having such a tool is a perfect excuse to pay you less.
So yeah, it's not a "W".
The average dev already gets paid less than a plumber.
These idiots are literally astroturfing in favour to be charged money using free available tools. Just look at the artstation no to Ai movement all that for what? For Adobe coming on top being a "friend" to the artists with it's ethically stolen art datasets. Now all these homo-hypocritical "artists" are going to be in favour of using ai tools in their pipeline just cause daddy Adobe fricked them in the ass.
thread was fun
keep your chin up artoids; I'm sure you'll land on your feet in a new industry
I've convinced all of my friends to either stop making art or turn over to AI, so as far as I'm concerned, I've done everything in my power to make their lives better.
im sure you will also land on your feet in a new industry that wont be filled with indians who work for cents
>people are now convincing themselves that writing prompts is harder than actually rendering something by hand
It's over.
i see you are salty about losing so fast. isn't that right artcel?
It hasn't made my depression any better no.
It reminds me of when digital art came along and everyone started coping by saying "THERE ARE SO MANY OPTIONS SO IT'S HARDER".
This is just more proof that we're mentally regressing as a species.
no it just means you are big cuck
im not gonna shed a tear because you can't make money by drawing trannies on a canvas anymore
get a real job like everybody else does you lazy piece of shit
>get a real job like everybody else does you lazy piece of shit
Just don't get the jobs that are getting replaced
hope youre not planning on becoming a doctor
Doctors are genuinely some of the most evil people alive, so no, definitely not.
most people don't have real jobs. 99% of jobs according to Ganker are fake
The fact that literally everyone who is opposed to AI is a leftist is all I need to know to know where I stand. It’s similar to COVID in that the population is divided perfectly along political lines, with the left siding with the most superstitious, moronic, fearful and unscientific takes.
Pretty much. It's only the left that is, ironically, against progress. It's funny how it's proven time and time and again that the left/right divide is an intellectual, not an opinion-driven divide.
>samegay chatgpt post
>Thread turns into bugmen reading their script
sir ai is the foooture sure i can replace 10 artist SIRRRRRR PLS HIRE ME SIRRRRR
mindbroken
>shitskin curryBlack person seethe
time to find a job. tick tock
Get back to work and dance wagie
thank you gpt-4, very cool
SIR SINGH GOOD MORNING PLEASE GO BACK TO WORK YOU NEED MONEY TO PAY CURE FOR BINDU BARAH SHE VERY SICK OKAY ? GOOD EVENING AND GOOD DAY SIR SEE YOU IN NEW DELHI FOR SHITTING
mindfricked
>confirmed to be a seething wagie
sir hire meee sir i vill suck your wiener SIRRR
>confirmed to be a seething artcel
maybe i'll tip you a cent or two when i see you down the street begging for bread to not starve lol
>seething wagie think he's winning in his fantasy
Dance for me wagie wagie
i'll be seeing you at mcdonalds soon enough bro
MacDonald's slowly but surely has replaced part of its workforce with machines. So I'll see you Black folk in the sewers.
pajeets can't afford the hardware to run image ai
take your meds please
there will always be value in what humans can produce by hand. you can't create a tool to simply eradicate self-attainment and expression of the human condition through the arts. as long as there are people in the world, we will continue to produce art. megacorporations just want easy solutions to problems to maximize profit and risk aversion. that's all this will be; even if human and AI art become indistinguishable, you'll likely see new forms of art being born, such as
>rich ass homie pays a renowned painter to come to his home and paint him an image in real time, under scrutiny
to use an example, everyone knows there's a difference between a studio version of a song and that same song being performed live. why is that? because technology can mask the imperfections in an artist's performance, but suddenly if they're expected to play live, they won't be able to rely on that technology to mask those imperfections.
>to use an example, everyone knows there's a difference between a studio version of a song and that same song being performed live.
Yeah, live is always worse quality.
kek, in reality the artist will only come over to get fricked thoroughly and intimately by the art commissioner, as it always has been.
Tell me how Adobe didn't AstroTurf Artstation?
>hey lets use this AI technology to replace all the creative and fun jobs, so everyone else can do the manual labor jobs!
nah the future sucks ass if this is what it comes too. everyone wants to do creative jobs, not shitty ass back breaking labor
now tell me all the mangakas who managed to pass away at old age
Do you live under a rock? Everything is getting replaced by robots. Look at Boston dynamics and teslabot.
we won once again AIChads
won what
society
we just can't stop winning!!