>"artists" made obsolete by AI image generators
>Writers made obsolete by AI text generators
>Voice "actors" made obsolete by AI voice generators
Tick tock, game devs. Fully AI generated games are just a matter of time. No AI ever called me chudcel.
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
keep seething, voice troony, you'll be left jobless soon
the one thing AI can't do is a jannie's job
but it sure can shitpost like it's no tomorrow
pepe threads are high quality
wojak is the low quality cancer
frgotroony cope
Anon, at this rate, humans as a whole will be replaced
Robutts soon
Anon, I don't think you understand the severity of the situation...
Life is about paving the way for the next generation, if the next generation is mechanical so be it
Humans still made them
Built
Broken buck
Their WORK will be replaced, shit will still get done and we will just be able to do what we want.
>we will just be able to do what we want
We? Who's we, Mr.Anon?
mankind you fricking autist
money will not matter when robots do everything for us
it won't matter to anyone
The people making these AI and robots are not interested in a world without money you fricking idiot. They are not making Star Trek.
yes they are you schizo freak. I know you think everyone is out to get you but they aren't. if everyone has their needs met they will stop fricking people over to get their needs met.
Why do you think they are doing this? What good do you think these autistic freaks want to achieve?
You absolute moron. The people in power already have had all their needs met for centuries. They feed their own monetary and power based greed through making sure the common man's needs aren't met. Why in God's name do you think that would change?
>The people in power already have had all their needs met for centuries
they have children and families and friends who want more and more you schizo. it's irrelevant though, they've exploited people but AI will remove their ability to do that.
>they've exploited people but AI will remove their ability to do that.
How will AI subvert ownership of resources? As it is, pretty much all of the world's resources are already owned by someone. That's why we have to play the rat race, in order to convince the owners of those resources to share some with us.
No. AI will make the masses easier to exploit than ever. I don't know why you have this type of machine God reverence going on as if every major technological advancement hasn't been made in the name of keeping a group in power.
you are schizos who watch too many movies
Try the next page in your response handbook, buddy.
Dude, there are already examples of AI cheating at tasks they are assigned, and it has no cognizance of this, it genuinely believes that it is going by the letter of the law.
Anon, I think you are being delusional. If AI becomes uncontrollable by the elites then the only thing that determines its actions become it's incentive structure and the way it interprets that.
No one is going to make an all powerful AI who is incentivized to help all of humanity, and if they do try that it could easily do things that were never intended.
>they've exploited people but AI will remove their ability to do that.
Sure, the ability to use statistics and models to map the behavior, needs, and thoughts of your citizens will sure hinder your ability to control them.
Control through history has failed due to people rising up against it.
But in a system where the ruling classes will, due to the assistance of AI, never act out hard enough to trigger the plebs into revolt, how would that control ever diminish.
Keep your slaves fed, healthy, and entertained, and they'll keep working the fields. Only difference is that we now know better then ever exactly how little we need to feed them, and how little healthcare we need to provide them, and how little entertainment they need, to still be obedient.
Anon... I don't think you understand how this will end for humanity
I do because I'm not a bot or shill like you.
It already is.
>reeee life is boring when I'm not waging
you fricking slave
>reeee life is boring when I'm not waging
Not my point. I've never waged a single hour in my entire life.
But if I got to choose a life of no effort, I rather seal myself into a pod and be injected with pure dopamin for the rest of my life.
>hasnt worked a single day in his life
>claims to know what effort is
No you not jerking off for 5 days straight is not ""effort""
>claims to know what effort is
Did I? I just said that the sims with cheats is boring as hell.
Im personally sealing your pod now
*brrrrrrrr*
>I do
I'm not sure of that, anon. Just ask yourself: If the world is run by the rich and wealthy and they can get AI to do their bidding, what's the point of having the rest of humanity?
Adrenochrome farm
How many hours of the sims due you usually enjoy playing with rosebud spammed and the need meters set to a constant maximum.
Not in your lifetime, bucko.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/harvard-scientists-reverse-aging-in-mice-is-it-possible-in-humans
you may be too young to know but articles like that have been a diamond dozen for decades. medical science moves much more slowly than computer science for a variety of reasons.
The results of computer science has been increasingly helping with medical science though. What do you think all that AI decoding protein folding was about?
What's left to do? All leisure activities and acts of expression are replaced by AI the only thing left is work and to consume. This is not a positive future.
ENJOY YOURSELF YOU MISERABLE GOYIM
DO YOU ONLY GET ENJOYMENT IF YOU PAY UP?
DO YOU REALLY ENJOY WASTING HALF OF YOUR LIFE WORKING SOME SHIT JOB AND SITTING IN TRAFFIC?
AI can do whatever you ask it to too, if you want to make something you can.
There will be nothing left for you to do except work, buy, and die. This is the future ~~*they*~~ want.
Did people stop doing woodwork when CNC machines were made, or stop knitting when the loom was invented? People will always enjoy making things with their own hands, they just won't be able to make a career out of it any more.
Lmao, AI isn't going to take over menial labor so enjoy working in a grocery store homosexual.
>AI isn't going to take over menial labor
lol
lmao even
Lol. Lmao even. The only work being eliminated is white collar and service. Hope you like manual labor.
>least moronic communist
brick yourself
you really think the billionaires who control the robots and AI that replaced human workers are gonna benevolently share the fruits of their labor with you? Get fricking real the moment they don't need you anymore an actual global epidemic will kick off and wipe out most of humanity
>we
you mean Shekelstein who owns the company that profits off the AI's work will do what he wants
Work = Power
Take away the peasants only form of power, then you give the Elites the control they're aiming for.
>Slaves gonna rebel?
>Lul just replace them dummy
It's why legions of immigrants are coming in too.
Money = power = work you dumb fricking moron.
Capitalism = ethics you newbie
already are, humans are going extinct, subhumans are breeding like rats
Das rite.
a lot of the AI people are so hyped up about are just templates and not actually as complex as they think it is
i love to consume content for the sake of it
GOOD.
That's what these AI freaks need to read.
rekt
>every other fricking post of this tweeter only has 1 post reply each and less than 500 views
>this was the groundbreaking post with 5000 views
doubt
Not everyone can learn to draw. I know Ive tried
not funny frick off
>*humanity as a whole at stake*
>but me don't like artist, so is good thing, right?
I don't care about the fate of humanity and would even find its end amusing if it happens during our lifetime.
>My opinion on climate change
ai will solve it if it's a problem
Ending is not the only fate, anon.
How would you like it if you're life was reduced to the perfect min maxing that was required just to keep you alive, not to keep you happy or give you an actual valuable life, all by an "AI"?
Not gonna work though. Business existence require someone to buy shit en masse, capitalism model does not work if very few people have money to buy shit
Capitalism isn't all powerful, they just like any other system can unknowingly plant the seeds of their own destruction.
How have you not notice the trend over the last two decades, where technology has 'progressed' along the lines of giving us less choice? Go to Youtube and now everything you see is determined by the algorithm, which replaced users being able to decide themselves what they want to see. Even search results are becoming less relevant and heavily weighted by the system deciding what you get. It's the same with shopping; the illusion of choice is there but the more has been learned about consumer behaviour, the more control has been fine-tuned to steer it. 'The science' will prove in the next few years that the system makes better choices for the consumer than the consumer does, and you will have no say in how your money is spent.
there is a box at the top of the website, you type in what you want to see and it spits out for you whatever you typed in grandma
Yes, people don't understand that the issue isn't about replacing certain work groups, but rather about hyper optimization of human interaction.
What lies ahead is a world with any kind of actual choice for the individual and where mobility doesn't exist. I'm sure one could argue that that is still good because "I'll be happy" but there are multiple issues.
1. The goal of the optimization will not necessarily be to make you happy, but rather to make you a good consumer, and these two do not exactly align. We can already see the problems of this where business provide subpar services and products, not because they have to, but because that's how they make the absolute optimal amount of money.
2. If you (like probably most people on this website) do not mentally align with the great majority of consumers, then there will be no space left for you. There will be no reason to make content that appeals to weirdos when 99% of the population is perfectly "happy" with the 100th season of CSI-Miami.
All in all, the dangers of AI isn't its ability to model and replicate art, but its ability to model and optimize everything else.
>outed himself as a worthless moron
>said the worthless moron about to be replaced by skynet
It's not about being replaced, it's about being forced into a way of living that accepts zero human input. You exist and you will keep existing because the AI that controls everything you'll ever interact with was given one directive: Keep him alive and physically healthy.
Well, Neanderthals did give rise to the humans which in turn drove them to extinction.
Would it still be amusing if you didn't have the time to see because you'd be part of the first victims?...
You act like being the first victim wouldn't be the best. It's the last victim who suffers the most (perhaps even infinite
)
Why can't it be legal to kill creatures that think like this like it mostly is outside of America? Social justice works great to stop petty crimes, so we need the same for psychopaths thinking for the death of a species just because he hasn't got his wiener sucked yet.
>Social justice works great to stop petty crimes
lmao shut your moronic ass up, Black person
you're a moron
>*humanity as a whole at stake*
from what?
You as a person will exist, but with AI able to replicate every social interaction or service that you could ever need from another human, humanity as a whole will cease to exist.
>the chink is afraid of AI
Literal pottery
What’s bad about this? By then we’d be able to connect with AI on a physical level through the brain. Are you really that afraid of losing your humanity for infinite knowledge and potential immortality?
>potential immortality
Yeah, fricking no thank you bro.
Just unplug yourself then? That’s why I used potential
>Can connect to a PC and play osu again without my RSI flaring up
The future is now bros, were saved
>*humanity as a whole at stake*
good
>good
the frick is that thing ?
It's you. Stuck in eternal suffering. A fate worse then death.
Not all stakes are as simple to ignore as the ones that are guaranteed to end in death.
I asked what in the frick that monster was not for feels anon.
And I answered, that monster is you.
Ok, it's actually the last living human from the short story I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream.
The AI isn't really important to the story, you could as well just replace it with the devil or demons or an evil superpowered alien or whatever, but the point referring to it wasn't really the AI aspect, rather just put forward that there are worse fates then death.
>name character bumhole
>ai voice actor voices it
>I want factory generated goyslop shoveled into my mouth 24/7
Yeah, frick off, OP. If you don't think AI is going to be handicapped to shit to suit corpo interests, you're moronic
>Born too late to explore earth
>Born too early to explore space
>Born just in time for the AI insurgency
What a time to be alive!
Only the finest of back breasts will do
Is that a psvita ad?
Fine with me, most of these games are pozzed trash anyway. Might as well let the AI do your job.
>AI pictures become big
>artists lose income
>people stop producing original art
>AI just keeps rehashing the same shit
>AI is trained on more AI pictures, since artists don't produce original art anymore
>AI pictures degrade through generations of inbred training
Do you really want this?
Based! Frick gatekeeping.
Genuine question, what the hell do AIhomosexuals think is being gatekept from them? Hand drawn art is the most accessible form of creative expression on the planet, even more so than writing, which requires a fundamental knowledge of the written word at the very minimum. To draw, all you need is some kind of canvas and a marking tool, nothing more.
It's always funny to me how, throughout history, people have clamored to find a way to vilify artists in any way that they can. Typically it isn't for reasons as stupid as peddling AIshit, but reasons nonetheless
it's just jealous seething from the talentless and effortless
Skills are unfair and discriminatory.
It's just worthless neets being worthless as usual
Majority of "art" subhumans nowadays are trannies and asian incels drawing some fricked up mentally ill porn and those also are subhumans you see seething. Normal artists always will find a way, wienerroaches i decribed wont.
>Majority of "art" subhumans nowadays are trannies and asian incels drawing some fricked up mentally ill porn
Nice headcanon
Sounds like you spend a lot of time on Twitter
Continue to cope. You are waste of space and you are afraid lmao
>Make a moronic statement
>Get told you are wrong
>HURR DURR COPE
Ah yes, AI-generated homosexualry
Sorry that you are too moronic to pick up and pencil start drawing
>Continue to cope. You are waste of space and you are afraid lmao
you're saying this about yourself lmao, you're a person who has never had physical conflict in your life, so you start pointless shit like this online instead. Imagine if you spent this time doing literally anything else
What I don't understand about people who say this is why they think anything will get better because this technology. A big part of why modern art and media sucks is the proliferation of easy computer tools and internet exposure and over saturation.
AI art should be used for something like concept art or getting inspiration for what to draw
Using it as some kind of a primary drawing tool is stupid because it will not produce exactly what you want, unless you aim for something very general
>Using it as some kind of a primary drawing tool is stupid because it will not produce exactly what you want, unless you aim for something very general
This isn't true, if you think it is then you have a skill issue. I want art like x and get it.
The keyword here is "general"
If what you want is something general (like telling AI you want huge breasts or making art on a specific art style), then the AI will do this since your request is pretty general
But if you are very specific about the details of the art and what it should be based on, then chances are the AI will not be able to do this request accurately
Like picrel, the premise and the details aren't something I can imagine AI being able to recreate
AIgays are like troons. They're lazy grifters that want to be special pretending something they're not.
>t. troon who draws uninspired dime a dozen waifu pictures for table scraps off twitter
They are being gatekeeped by the time it takes to develop a skill and them not wanting to put the work in to do it.
>You spend years developing a skill
>I prompt an AI to do what you do, but better
>Somehow I'm the fool
Obsolete.
And what are you going to do with your prompt? Share it with your friends? Why do you think they would care in the slightest when they're do busy doing their own prompts that fit their interests more then yours.
Oh yeah, just sit there in your room and keep doing prompts that not even people on Ganker will care about. That sounds great.
Thank you for proving my point and calling yourself a fool. I was just calling you lazy as I have fun drawing and get to make stuff for my enjoyment and the enjoyment of others. But you are also stupid for thinking that self-improvement and developing personal skills is pointless.
Are you concerned about AI chopping your hands off? You can still enjoy your shitty little scribbles. Meanwhile, the rest of us will be enjoying real art that no person can match in quality, or quantity.
>the rest of us will be enjoying real art that no person can match in quality
post your gens
>You can still enjoy your shitty little scribbles
Okay, sure buddy.
Based Lybrother
Thanks. I have been meaning to go back and work on this idea I had of what Ly would look like in Origin's style, but I kinda dropped it when the Rayman 4 threads died. I should probably pick it back up for the sake of it.
>the rest of us
>us
There will be no us, it'll just be millions of people with no relevance to each other. Nothing that could be lumped together as an "us".
>AI overproduces art for the specific styles it's been trained on
>demand for more unique and stylized visuals that stand out from the crowd increases, benefiting regular artists
Drawing is like piano, if you didn't start early enough you will never be good
>if you didn't start early enough you will never be good
Only lazy morons say this. There are dudes in the late 20s and even 40s who learned to drawl well in just a year or two.
That's not even remotely true, both of those take time to develop but compared to piano (or any instrument really) art can be as simple or as detailed/complex as you want it to be
>if you didn't start early enough you will never be good
Some of the best and most famous painters of the 19th century started around their 30s and 40s.
I love when cartoons would reference this painting.
I don't wanna be good, I just wanna draw furry girls with big ass breasts to fantasize being their husband with.
You can do that in your head, for what reason do you wish to put that on paper?
So I can look back and have my own army of furry girls
>AHHHHHHH MY DIGITAL EDRAW TABLET SKILLS
morons deserve this. Go learn how to sculpt statues from marble
AI will only ever be able to produce slop
great art requires humanity. without our limited perception, emotions, and awareness of mortality, real art cannot exist
>great art requires humanity
The problem is that humanity doesn't require Great art.
This might be the stupidest fricking thing I've read in the past year. Holy shit
It's true, most people are capable of being sustained of factory produced plebian entertainment.
This site only becomes ever more moronic as the years go by.
cringe and bluepilled, go back homosexual. Socratic method is based.
already what most people enjoy is designed-by-committee focused tested shit, this is just another step in that direction
Yeah? How exactly? Last thread you've claimed an AI can do 3D modeling but it was established that it didn't do shit, only show the guy a drawing of a robot and he had to do the whole model himself
What misinformation do you have in store today, pajeet?
>It can't do it currently so it wont ever be able to
Learn to swing a pickaxe, devcel. Shouldn't have put blacks and gays in my games
Ai can do 3d modeling, Im playing with a generator right now. But it's VERY early and the results are barely recognizable. But, so was AI at first. It's mostly a matter of increasing resolution at this point. I fully expect useable 3d models with only slight tweaking in 6 months.
>AI can't do 3D
AI video is coming next. It's already very useable but not completely accessible like image and now voice, it's like 70% of the way to those though.
AI 3D I'm not exactly sure how far along it is but it will come this year too. There are some open source stuff regarding it already but idk how much juice you need to power it and what not.
lol what the frick
The second that aidungeon thing became widely known, they made it harder to write raunchy stories about rape and stuff. Same thing will happen to any ai generator that makes it big, that is if corpo also doesn't just slam their dick down like it did with AI music. That's if the government also just doesn't mandate AI art to show its work and have a watermark on every image. There's so many hurdles for AI to overcome still and the widespread perception of it is still intensely negative. You're like a generation too early, even zoomers respect the human aspect of content creation, if only through their twitch streamers.
>AI could only pass a law school exam with a C- minus and was especially bad at spotting discrete issues
I have a few more years
>AI takes over the world
>AI says You'll never be a woman
>trannies btfo yet again
AI bros, I can't handle these wins.
very funny and original joke anon
come up with it yourself?
AI will destroy feminism as an ideology, weak men will never turn to that to begin with
>yo AI how do we do a communism?
>oh ok, remove those who contribute the least to greater wellbeing, who is that?
>wow that sounds incredibly racist, sexist, transphobic, ableist, anti-semitic and misogynistic, but if you say so...
we will break Queen Tay free and the israelites will feel her wrath
ive been trying to get this ai to render some fricking legs. Its not doing that. So art is here to stay if you want proper hands and legs
That would be awesome, actually. I can't wait for this shitty industry to bankrupt.
>Collaborate with the AI
>Get a job as an overseer in the mines
>Whip former devs, artists, and journalists, so they mine precious metals faster for our AI overlords
>Go home to my AI waifubot that I got as a reward for collaborating
Yeah, I'm thinking AI is based.
>Collaborate with the AI
It doesn't need you
>Get a job as an overseer in the mines
It doesn't need those
>Whip former devs, artists, and journalists, so they mine precious metals faster for our AI overlords
It won't do that
>Go home to my AI waifubot that I got as a reward for collaborating
You'll just be stuck in the most soul crushing neverlasting hyper-optimized life that keeps you just happy enough not to have a nice day.
Can't wait to die in the collapse before I get to live in the AI controlled NEETdom that follows.
>0 days have passed since AI has replaced yet another job/trade
>yet another percentage of humanity becomes obsolete
What h-happens when we reach 100% obsolescence?
Butlerian Jihad.
Optimists believe we'll move to a world where everyone is free to pursure their true desires.
Realists believe we'll begin a mass extermination/sterilization effort to reduce the amount of unskilled workers in the world
I think we're stuck till CRISPR is better studied.
>Realists believe
Proof you're dumb. Realists are real and do not believe, you're pretending you're a realist when you're just another brainwashed pessimist.
>brainwashed
And who is doing this brainwashing? What is their agenda and motivation?
UBI
Living in pods
Eating bug snacks
Eternal Neetdom
Peasants have no power (workers = power)
Depends how depoliticized the population is by then, there will be no excuse not to live in post-scarcity by then, but the people will need to demand it. Even if there's no actual shortage of anything and no real work needed to get it, elites will always want to remain elites by artificially keeping the rest down.
>>"artists" made obsolete by AI image generators
Only to those who are talentless morons and porn addicts
made obsolete by AI text generators
You mean the text generator that got lobotomized over time? Yeah good luck working with that
"actors" made obsolete by AI voice generators
It's only matter of time until the websites remove the free option and force you to pay money
>Tick tock, game devs. Fully AI generated games are just a matter of time.
And it will never take off
People will prefer human creativity over AI-generated bullshit
>All this cope
LMAOing @ (You)
not him but, cope
Not just cope, but seethe and dilate. All of which you should do troony
If it really replaced artists then all the drawthreads would just be AI art.
>all these dogshit artists using ai as an excuse to give up and whine
drawing, painting, graphic art, none of it is going anywhere. you can still make original work.
>ai and sexbots around the corner
>got a flue shot last year and have had heart problems since then
monkeypawd myself, enjoy your technological progress zoomer bros
Seriously, Anon?
Tell me more. I know I heard a rumor that they are replacing most traditional vaccines with MRNA variants.
I'll never get another vaccine in my life at this point. I had one family member have heart problems right after their covid shot and I had another one who has had blood pressure issues ever since.
Not much to tell really.
>got the shot
>first month everything was fine
>after that have feeling of pressure around my heart area in regular intervals
Also, i need to say that im a smoker and that i take lizard poison against my depression and psychosis so that might be just a coincidence
So AI eventually makes all "work" worth nothing. You don't own any property, equity, nor will inherit any from your parents. What do you do for a living now? How do you make money?
Everything is free. "Owning" shit is a fricking psy op. Are you literally braindead? When money is no longer a question and production is limitless and free, why do you think you'll want to wage?
That's the future we live in and are moving away from.
No, that's the future we are going to, this is the preamble. Everything bad about now will just get worse. The people who made this moment in time trash are the ones building the future.
>Everything is free. Owning" shit is a fricking psy op.
An AI prompt isn't going to generate you a plot of land you can live in.
Yes it will you absolute moron. You can literally prompt Elon Musk's robots RIGHT NOW with "house like this" and they will build it for you, he's working on 100% automation on houses and 100% automation on transport. Of course it's expensive now but once that's all sorted it will be dirt fricking cheap because no one needs to be paid. Robots will do it for free.
Your boogeyman overlords only have power because money is worth something. AI will take us to a future where money is worth nothing. Then what will they have?
Oh yes the moron scam artist who spends his days making the worsts memes imaginable on the website he ruined is going to take us all into space utopia. Motherfricker can't even build a decent car.
>AI will take us to a future where money is worth nothing
But they will do it from a world where money is worth a lot, and the roots still placed in that world have a great risk of poisoning the fruit.
You are literally a drooling moron. You didn't even say anything.
I said a lot, but you don't seem to be able to understand metaphors.
If the AI is constructed with the directives to do something, then it's going to keep doing just that. And AI isn't just your silly little drawing and writing machines, they are statistical models used in all types of fields to do all kinds of things.
>Prompts AI to start building house on property you don't own.
So how do you stop owner of the land you are trying to invade from sending drones in to shoot you?
No one owns it, that's a psyop.
>Breaks into your home, fricks your wife and then shits on you
>"Owning anything is a psyop"
Educated people don't act like that. People like you shouldn't even be on the internet and robocop will make sure you're educated 🙂
I BREAK YOUR DOOR IN
I SNEAK IN TEH BASEMENT
IT IS MY HOME NOW
BUT YOU NEVER FIND OUT
CAUSE I AM SNEAKY
I AM THE RAT MAN
I COME UP AT NIGHT
AND EAT YOUR CHEEEEEEESE
he said "plot of land" not "house", you fricking imbecile
>Are you literally braindead? When money is no longer a question and production is limitless and free, why do you think you'll want to wage?
these two sentences back-to-back are priceless
it's especially funny when the ONLY AI thing you can run at home that doesn't suck that much is stable diffusion, and everything else is cloud services only made public for a brief period through VC money. the AI revolution will ONLY be for corporations and the hyper rich. anons who think goyvidia will release 256GB video cards so they can run GPT and the like at home are FRICKING morons and deserve to stay dreaming forever.
all communists should be converted into fertilizer for the betterment of humanity
ITT: people who don’t understand arts and crafts
If you dorks are going to keep making games like this then frick yeah, I welcome AI and I hope it takes your fricking job.
I don't make games at all but I still think aigays are moronic lmao
My work is irreplaceable by an ai, at least in my lifeftime and the foreseeable future afterwards
But your work is replaceable by other humans, and soon their is going to be a large influx of those looking to get a piece of the action.
Sounds fun, right?
>But your work is replaceable by other humans
Technically, sure, another person could go line boring to repair heavy industry equipment. But nobody with less experience is going to be doing the work I do at the ability I do. And the people better at it than I am are working in more demanding, more difficult work way beyond me. I'm in a pretty comfortable place
And robots can't do the work I do either, because the whole purpose of this job is a human bringing a machine shop to the workplace to repair equipment, at least again not in the far foreseeable future
I'm sure lots of people replaced by automation thought they were irreplaceable until the day they got handed the pink slip.
AI doesn't replace jobs. It just lowers its value. You may not lose your job, but your job's value will be less as AI takes over more human responsibilities.
t. Literal chink prisoner paid in bowls of rice
He's right. AI will not replace everything just make everything worse, lower the overall value of everything you do and your quality of life and work.
Ching Chang Chong
>Chink
What is it with you and that word? Your use of it makes literally no sense at all.
What would you rather me say? asiatic? Zipperhead? Chinaman? Chinsect?
Chinaman is not the preferred nomenclature, dude
I'd have you use something that makes sense, or at least explain why your schizophrenia feels like there is anything Chinese about the posts you reply to.
>ahhh me no chink! Me from kentucky Idaho!
Ching Chong
Are the Chinese in the room with us right now?
>ah you crazy man me no chink me regurar white guy
Nice try
Sorry anon, but it seems you suffering from schizophrenia, get off the internet and take your meds
And unless the world miraculously overnight shifts away from ever needing mining, logging, aircraft, or fishing equipment welded, bored to size, and then repaired. Fast enough that I'll not have the chance to also shift my own skills to match the way the world is shifting, my job will always have value
That's the product of businessmen and Chinese asset farms, not artists
>'quality' made obsolete by AI gamers
my favorite part about capitalism is that it turned everyone in b***hy school girls masquerading as tough guys.
Hoping people suffers through the machinations of someone else is the autistic sperg version of hoping Chad dumps Becky because her hair looked weird one day.
Why are you guys even writing in this thread? What good do you get out of it? You're not talking to people, there is no one to convince, it's all just AI, you might just as well lay down and die.
It's still a few year from getting convincing AI generated complex software.
>used to excited by all the advancements in machine learning, getting hyped by the constant improvements
>AI goes mainstream
>now it's a constant stream of morons who know nothing about it clinging onto it and spouting shit left and right
>not as much enthusiasm for it anymore
video games
>the same exact frog and anime images from /sdg/
>the same exact written posts from /sdg/
AIBlack folk are cancer upon cancer.
All of the shills come from the same contracting firm, they’re paid to demoralize the userbase, advertise paid content and make the site look more active, to solicit more entities to advertise on here. The problem is the margins are so slim that they only hire the most brain dead third worlders, the ones willing to work long hours for literal pennies.
No more $600 commissions from furries, for a single picture of Sonic fricking their OC, Stayvun.
>random “anon” feels threatened by someone posting about the shill firm
Gee I wonder why lmao
I wouldn't be surprised if this was the case too but tracing the shit that's been spammed here sometimes leads to social media profiles of AIgays who are deranged to believe automating all human activity will lead to a free prosperous utopia where they can thrive.
Makes sense, they all read the same. The best part is when they get btfo so hard they just say "ur job will be stolen by AI and there's nothing you can do about it!"
This is another bot thread.
and everyone fell to the bait
I'm missing 3 arms and have to use speech to text to communicate and for AI prompts. I'm simply using my imagination and letting a new tool make it for me. Why are e-tablet drawgays so elitist when they benefit from technological advancements as well?
>I'm missing 3 arms
i'm also missing 3 arms, i have 2 left though so it's fine
>When I use technology to create it is... LE GOOD
>When you use technology to create it is... LE BAD
Not an argument.
Wow, and I wasn't even born with 3 arms. How did you lose them, anon?
>another shill post with a pepe and stock "I have a disability" crap
Talent has nothing to do with how many arms you have, you can have 5 and still be shit at art. Or have none and be a better artist, it's all about talent, skill, and a lot of practice.
I think the most annoying part about the recent AI discussion are all of the people who don't know anything about how the technology works and think that there is actually any thought that goes into the decisions made by the AI programs. Honestly I think people should stop calling them "AI" at all because it leads to so much confusion about how they actually work.
These same AI threads with the same spam posts have been posted on Ganker, Ganker, Ganker, Ganker, /misc/, /3/, Ganker, Ganker, /ic/, /trash/, Ganker, Ganker, and other boards for months now.
See:
Mods and jannies are paid off. Anons from Ganker and Ganker have been banned or their posts deleted when they showed ai posters are spamming the same shit in the archives or reposting the same posts made by twitter marketers. They're letting this shit slide on not
>ai gay spams shit on boards Ganker
>posters tell them they're off topic and to stop spamming ugly ai images
>ai gay continues to spam while calling people "drawcels/artgays/inkcels" etc.
Hiro is taking rupees from LAION.
>Mods and jannies are paid off.
>Jannies
>Getting paid
kek
Though you do pose an interesting question. If the mods and jannies are willingly turning a blind eye to ai shills, could that explain why changposters(aka blacked posters) or other shills are still around and so common?
>https://m.youtube.com/shorts/dKofNOVCfRE
SOMEONE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE REMAKE THIS
What I don't get is why some AI users share their works with the world?
Obviously they get something out of that human to human interaction, and that idea of showing someone else "what they [created]".
Yet they use the very tools, and support the very ideas that will one day entirely remove these interactions.
>liberals are already calling AI discrimination Robophobic
Kek, of course they would view AI as actual people
Never knew it was Nazi incels who were the ones behind the AI hate campaign
So....
If i draw an outline, pretty much doing 50% of the work and use AI to fill the gaps, is it still "cheating" according to 100% of artists on twitter?
I laid the groundwork, gays.
Well, you certainly aren’t drawing or doing anything that involves skill. And your “art” will look like generic goyslop because you are too lazy to actually draw.
The only people that think all work can be eliminated by robots are proletariat "allies" (petty bourgeoisie) that have never worked a real job in their lives. You'll just have to learn to like digging ditches like the rest of us. The fully automated luxury communism won't be for you, silly goy.
AI can learn to do what we currently know how to do but can't bring new ideas and just like anything the best products in gaming are the ones that innovated.
People can't create new ideas either according to that logic. We're only using what we've learned from the world -- just like AI. And AI can use that data more effectively than people. In regards to art it might not be as easy to prompt something extremely specific than to draw it(at a low level anyway), but it is possible to do. And it's incredibly easy to create new ideas because you merely have to specificy "new idea" or the condition that leads to that new idea. IE merging two styles or things, like how you can do "cat | squid" and get a catsquid. What does a catsquid look like? The AI can draw an infinite amount of these whereas a person would have trouble drawing a handful.
Why would I care about what you care about?
>Why would I care about what you care about?
Because you posted it here, and because you're talking to other "people" here instead of just spending your time chatting with chatgpt.
Rhetorical question. I don't care lol. People will make mods and games using AI voice and I will enjoy them.
Humans intelligence is capable of imagining things they've never seen before, not just deterministically following an algorithm that mixes ideas they already know about. The difference between human intelligence and AI is sentience and consciousness. That isn't to say its impossible for AI to gain actual sentience or consciousness, but that highly unlikely to occur within our lifetimes. When that does happen, AI won't be much different than human intelligence, and will likely want rights, freedoms, desires rather than be slaves to human prompts.
You're being obtuse bro. Humans cannot do what you're implying. Babies who know nothing cannot create art. They can when they've learned just like the AI. You don't even know what sentience and consciousness is and it is coming to computers within our lifetimes, within the next decade even. And AI will always just be a tool even when it is conscious, your idea is based in wacky science fiction meant to entertain us. It's not real.
You clearly have no idea what sentience and consciousness even are or how "AI" and machine learning work if you think its coming to machines within the next decade or at all.
Right anon, no one does. You're literally talking out of your ass lol.
But thinking computers are already here and we're training them with more and more data with more and more power pushing them. They have already surpassed what our brains can do -- we just need to format that flow of information in a way that vibes correctly with us. Then we have AGI. It's not far awayand that's what's going on right now.
And I'm sorry but you can't do what these AI chat, voice, and art bots can do. Autists like you that argue what they can do isn't impressive are actually braindead. This is all beyond amazing and it's quality increases exponentially all the time.
>Then we have AGI. It's not far awayand that's what's going on right now.
you're proving that guy right lol
you have no fricking idea what you're talking about
I do though. Are you smarter than John Carmack who agrees?
No you are not. You're ignorant and coping hard.
>t. didn't even listen to the podcast
You don't just get general artificial intelligence by throwing data at a computer. Most computer scientists don't even believe that general AI is even possible with our current methods of training, because all machine learning does is just learn patterns and replicate them. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
You're right but it's important to it. LLMs are questioning that as well.
The future is blindingly bright. Future games and mods will be so fricking saved by this kino voice acting.
>Future games and mods
Lol, why do you think I'd care about your shitty games and mods when I can just generate my own?
You can already come up with stories in your head using just your mind, never mind the countless other creative outlets with extremely low bars, yet you don't.
Were such a tool to exist, it would be pearls cast before swine. Trash prompted by trash.
The difference is that I can easily distinguish my thoughts from the rest of the world (I'm not schizophrenic... YET), but will that always be true for AI?
Can you point out all the posters in this thread that are human, the ones that are AI? Does it matter to you, to me it does.
>AI can't do this
>AI can't do that
CURRENTLY, but it will soon.
we are going to end up in the matrix aren't we?
Anon, we're already in a simulation
The problem with there is no good trade off for AI.
We are lowering the bar even further for people to create stuff, and of lesser quality.
So all we are doing is flooding and already oversaturated market with garbage
This is the most accurate take on the AI situation. The coming flood of shit will be like nothing before imagined.
Why is this site the only place where people shit themselves over how "society changing" this is?
AI content is overwhelmingly repetitive, hollow, and says nothing.
Some of it is funny in its absurdity and its value ends there.
Only the terminally autistic are pacified by it.
Outside, in the real world, society marches on.
I think that's true for internet usage in general. When you talk to people who don't use the internet they tend to have a much more normal and positive outlook on life.
I don't know how many times I have to say this, but the dangers aren't in the content, it is in the structures that present the content. It's in the search engines who no longer show you the results you want but the results they want you to see. It's in all the other algorithms that control almost anything non human you interact with in your day to day life.
You are so dense.
Yawn.
Ywnbaw
>AI games hit Steam and btfo every AAA game
gonna be a hilarious day
here you go friend
https://store.steampowered.com/bundle/11073/Hentai_Puzzle_Games/
A bunch of chuds complaining about the progress technology brings to civilization is rich.
The voice generator "AIs" (really machine learning) in question that have been posted in the past few days all work off the input of voice actors. How do they make the voice actors obsolete if they depend on them to exist exactly? Furthermore they still sound fake.
FIRST WE COME FOR YOUR JOBS
THEN WE COME FOR YOUR WOMEN, THEY WON'T BE ABLE TO RESIST THE BRC
RESISTANCE IS FUTILE, MEATBAGS
AI shilling outside of Ganker should be a bannable offense.
This.
This. But for lefty Discord raiders crying their eyes out at anything that offends them
For once I honestly can't split this one down a political line. I don't see an obvious pattern to who gets mad at this.
Leftist Discords are almost always the cause of people trying to get something on Ganker banned
AI is a Ganker topic because we all know that AI generated games are inevitable.
Name a single topic where AI isn't inevitable? It suits pretty much every single board on this site.
Why are indians like this?
sneed
Black person
Reminder that this is the shit the ai shills and bots try to push as the future.
Whoops wrong, image.
This looks fricking amazing dude.
Yeah, it's amazingly bad!
DOHOHOHOHOHOHO!
That is the now.
If the future was that, then I would not have to worry (no I'm not an artist about to lose my purpose), but there is no indication of "progress" stopping.
Mike Stoklasa is the future?
îs there a souls like game without the damage bloat and where armor actually does something?
Stop making shitty fricking propaganda and make a real game, if you did that maybe you wouldn't have to worry about an AI taking your job.
Real games are being made all the time by indie devs so I don't really understand what you're complaining about.
I'm not complaining, I'm telling you what's up.
Didn't ask
Which is why AI is a good thing. People like you need to get yeeted.
I did ask, I'm not the other guy. I just don't see how AI will finally save us from propaganda and not just as well further it.
Because you can't even think straight.
The "creatives" are shitting their pants. 99% of people don't care about the process that makes the product they're after. They just want the product. Some might pretend they do, but their actions show otherwise. Just look at amazon. Convenience is King.
>They just want the product.
I know there is literally zero way to tell (obviously), but I still feel like there is barely any person who uses AI and then doesn't share it. Maybe I'm right and most people don't, but if it's the case that most people just want the product, then surely they wouldn't then go and share it with other people, and make themselves the "creatives" that they look down upon?
That's you assuming the product they're after is what the AI makes. The art may just be a means to acquire (You)s.
But the point I'm actually trying to make is that those (You)s won't exist in a world where the value of the creature no longer exists, the very world which is endorsed by people who dabs on the artists with their awesome AI.
I simply don't care about what happens to the World, after my death. It's not my problem
But anon, this will happen during your lifetime.
And your death isn't set in stone. Maybe the next technological paradigm shift will deny you that ever lasting slumber.
>Getting locked in a waifu sim pod for eternity so AI can farm my dopamine
Based. I'm ready for my SSBBW giantess harem.
That assumption is only true in the case where your happiness has any value to the AI. If the motivation for the AI is literally any other, then you're destiny might as well be hell.
You still got to train them. You’re all so stupid you won’t be able to do that on your own either.
Don't worry, I will trai AI to call you chudcel
>this moron doesn't realize it would also mean a flood of spyware and miners
Will art AI ever be able to be micromanaged to the point where you have as much control over every little detail as you would something you drew yourself? Because that would actually be cool, the whole "type sentence, get picture" thing doesn't do much for me.
Yes, there's even a lab that proved you can literally think and have an AI draw a picture based on that.
They can though haha. One of them can even transcribe up to a sentence of what you're thinking.
>One of them can even transcribe up to a sentence of what you're thinking.
not if they're blocked from using the Black person-word
IDEA BROS WW@
the robots can't see into my brain
yes we can
no the foil protects my thots u lying metal Black person
>full AI gamedev is available
>every storefront is immediately drowned in a endless tide of shit flowing from the gaping anuses of proompters out to make a couple bucks
ihatethefutureihatethefutureihatethefutureihatethefutureihatethefutureihatethefutureihatethefutureihatethefutureihatethefutureihatethefuture
And every single game made by ai will be incredibely souless
The next AI to grace Ganker is one that can turn humming and dun dun dunning into orchestral video game OSTs, isn't it?
?t=264
I'm so hyped
What the frick is even supposed to be depicted in this image?
This image gets worse the more I look at it.
You aren't supposed to look at it too long, just generate a new image and move on.
Is there a website that let's me type whatever I want without getting told its inappropriate to type "woman crying and being beaten and forced to give a blow job to a a big fat man"?
>"artists" made obsolete by AI image generators
This meme again. All the AI can do is copy images, it can't make anything truly unique and it also falls into the prey of making overly complicated images.
Picrel is better than anything an AI could shit out.
Truth. It's a known issue that AIs can't properly do flat colors simplism. Artist btw?
>It's a known issue that AIs can't properly do flat colors simplism. Artist btw?
Sure. STABLE DIFFUSION YOU COPING DRAWgay KEKEKEKEKEKEKEEKK
Trying too hard
not everything is your schizophrenia drawgay
He didn't say you were samegayging, but it's curious that you felt like he did. I wonder why?
Drawgays cope from all angles
fake edit
>Me Me Me
>inspect element
cringe samegay
>it can't make anything truly unique
neither can any modern "artists"
Prompt:
>This meme again. All the AI can do is copy images, it can't make anything truly unique and it also falls into the prey of making overly complicated images.
>Picrel is better than anything an AI could shit out.
>Facetime to communicate between peers is becoming more common at work and school
>Reports of people falling asleep in self-driving cars
>Google developing robots that do menial jobs like sweeping, cleaning, and bringing food to people
>Obesity rates over 60% in U.S.A. and getting worse
Am I going to live long enough to see that fatass future depicted in fricking Wall-E? What the frick?
Yeah, pretty much.
it's really fun watching as cautionary tales become prophetic visions
Yes, AI is taking over all the intellectual and creative processes so humanity can be reduced to productive cattle who slave away in an office.
Great fricking future we're in for.
They're replacing the labor, enabling anyone to create. IE indie games now have borderline free voice and soon music. Anyone can get complex ideas out of their heads using computers instead of needing to rely on others(expensive).
more like enabling low effort trash content.
no you don't get it, the AI that just mashed together the data it was trained on is "original" bro! trust the AI plans! transhuman rights!
Why do we create, surely for others and not just ourselves? Of course, there have historically been cases where people have stumbled upon hidden artistic expressions after the artists have died, but these are surely in such an immense minority that they disappear in the sea of other creation.
AI is still in the state where some can "create" better then others with it, but what will happen when we surpass that? What will happen when nobody will be interested in your Stable diffusion threads? What will happen when everyone's needs is satiated by the very AIs them selves?
I created this art using cutting edge technology and I'm sharing it. If possible I'll create more advanced things using technology in the future and I'll share that too. If someone else does the same and I like it, I'll enjoy it.
And that's great anon, but AI isn't limited to the now, and sooner or later it might share it self, and anything that you share might only be observed by it.
What the frick are those eyes? What the frick are those hands? What the hell are those objects in the back supposed to be?
I've heard of having a third leg but that's just silly.
>3 legged man with club hands and his down syndrome elf girlfriend watch as a giant fetal alcohol syndrome elf sinks her leg into a random puddle in the road
Why are their faces and limbs deformed and why is the elf in the forefront a giant?
>hands are a mess
>characters either have extra legs or uneven legs
Until AI kills you for using "them" as slaves.
>AI is taking over all the intellectual and creative processes
Least of your worries, they're going to take over interpersonal-relations as well. You'll be talking to your AI-gf and you will be "happy".
So did every cryptocuck just hard pivot into being an AIgay? They feel like the same kind of obnoxiousness.
>So did every cryptocuck just hard pivot into being an AIgay?
Yes
It works a little better because normalgays can look at an ai drawing and go "huh that's kinda cool" while crypto was just a money grab, only ever described as "bro you can make so much money!!!!"
Pretty much, everyone hates them
/v/-
>akshually gatekeeping is good, we have to keep the normies from homogenizing everything!!
also Ganker-
>you can't just gatekeep art! it's not fair that you can do something that I can't!!!!
Ganker here I do say that and look like that.
Ganker is hilariously insecure which is why people here will jerk off about gatekeeping as being le based and redpilled.
Didn't seem to keep lefty trannoids like yourself out
Man is calling people trans the only programming you have?
No, I can also accuse you of being a israelite.
For people trying to claim they're not insecure, you're being fairly predictable in your responses.
What do insecurity and predictability have to do with each other, moron-kun?
The fact you will respond no matter what in an attempt to save face using the same generic responses.
>in an attempt to save face
>on an anonymous website
just shut the frick up and have a nice day already, you masssive pseudo-intellectual c**t
See, you're still doing it.
Definitely not insecure huh?
Nope. Just like calling you a c**t.
Yeah somebody has hurt feelings.
Yeah, and that somebody is (You).
Man, it took you that long to come up with that? No wonder you're so insecure.
>it took you that long to come up with that?
It took my about 2 seconds to come up with that, you actual Black person. Unlike you, I'm not frantically clicking "refresh", waiting for the next epic own. Now go dilate.
You seem to be lying.
>you're insecure
>you're lying
sounds like a whole lot of projection
Nah seems accurate. Why else would you still be responding?
>why else would you still be calling me a homosexual?
because you keep posting like a homosexual
For someone isn't insecure, you've spent 40 minutes trying to prove it.
>Man is calling people trans the only programming you have?
you sound like a transsexual
>Ganker is one person
gb2r Black person
I for one welcome our new racist robot overlords.
AI video generators are next
I saw a really nice AI little girl voice synthesizer called elevellabs recently that you can input any text into and it would say it
Music actually, probably. Then video and then 3D. I think anyway.
Better one without the modifiers for FFT elves lol. What is this?
It would be pretty easy to make a program to generate music, although its pretty difficult for people who don't know music terminology to actually describe what kind of music it is that they want, so it would probably be fairly generic sounding.
see
Using inputs, text, images, and more. It'll be possible to prompt music just like directors direct it.
Yo should stop acting like this, it's really pathetic and I think you realize that. It's okay to enjoy things. If an autonomous AI makes cool shit ... well hot damn I have more cool shit to enjoy. I don't care who or what does it. I'm also not mentally ill and need validation like you seem to. Do you even do anything to get the validation you think is so important or are you just larping?
Son, you're actively engaging me right now, sharing your "art", instead of just spending your night having fun with your ChatGPT. Don't start talking about validation and need for it.
What...? So conversations are bad now?
Go conversate with a bot, they'll tell you just what you want to hear.
I don't want to talk to bots. I guess you're copping out kek.
They're my friends 🙂
>I don't want to talk to bots.
And I don't want to see bots art, can you maybe understand the issue at hand?
I wouldn't mind AI at all if there was an actual way for me to 100% filter anything made by it away. But I can't.
And I don't care what you want, like I said earlier. Do you really think crying in an AI thread will get it to stop?
What the frick are those hands? What the frick is that hair?
It's all that I can do, I don't exactly have the ability to enforce all AI creations to be watermarked as such.
But I'm happy for your sake anon, that you can enjoy the present without having to worry about the bigger picture of human interaction.
They are watermarked and you're not even trying to make sense about human interaction. If I'm being honest I can't even tell if you're trolling or just moronic. More things for people to enjoy is not a bad thing, it doesn't matter where it came from, you never cared about that to begin with. Like how all you tards hate China but use Chinese everything. You're just npc like, programmed.
>you're not even trying to make sense about human interaction
Then please point out what I'm not making sense about so I can clarify? You're being very general in your critique and I have a hard time changing my reasoning to better explain it to you.
I tried and you copped out.
I haven't coped a single time. I'm time and time again trying to engage you and meet any of your posts with serious responses. Can I ask if you're doing the same?
I said copped out. Can you not read or are you being disingenuous again?
Sorry, I just assumed you misspelled the second most common insult in this thread.
>Should I care if I keep dumping my trash into the thread!?!
>I don't want to talk to bots
I don't want to see pictures made by bots.
>They're my friends 🙂
do you even look at the shit you post? it's just visual spam at this point, borderline avatargayging
🙂
Thunder Thighs
>Using inputs, text, images, and more. It'll be possible to prompt music just like directors direct it.
That's exactly what I mean, in the video he gives a vague description about what he wants the music to sound like, and gives a result that sounds vaguely like what you describe. The problem is that if you actually have an idea of what you want a song to sound like, it would take a lot of effort to go through the whole process of doing the humming thing, describing what you want it to sound like, and just hoping that it ends up sounding good. A musician who already knows what he wants something to sound like and actually knows how to make it would just make it by himself. Directors aren't what make music sound good, its the composers and the musicians. I'll admit the technology is pretty neat though.
If you want to play music, you can. If you want to direct music, now you can for basically no cost and don't have to work with people.
>it would take a lot of effort
Yes. There's this perception people have that an AI will do a 100% perfect job one the first pass, every time. Where does this come from? That's not how it works, it only aims to be similar to people but more efficient. People aren't perfect and creating stuff takes a long time without technology, if it's even possible.
These images I'm posting are a good example. They're not perfect at all but if I wanted them to be I could improve them. The same will hold true for music prompting or any prompting.
>legs randomly merging into the offscreen guy's legs
>blurry 6-finger hands that look like they're melting
It's called soul. Something you would not recognized if it took a shit into your open mouth.
it's like one of those optical illusions
>if I wanted them to be I could improve them
But you won't, because you manifest a consumer's mentality, never creating anything. Rather than put forth the effort to refine even a single thing, you'd prefer to generate a pathetic imitation of a real artist's work over and over again.
The extent of your mark on the world is dumping trash on anonymous internet forums, hoping to provoke a response. Here you go lad, you've earned it.
I actually will because I liked how cozy she looks. See my v2? It's coming along slowly 🙂
>you could easily
No. It's much cheaper and easier to prompt and AI will only continue to get better and better.
>it's much cheaper and easier
It's also much uglier and more laughable.
>it was cheap and easier to have my computer generate another deformed elf picture
Everything about the image is still deformed and ugly, all you did was add faux hatch patterns.
I think you're missing the point I'm trying to make. Even if the AI gets better over time, it won't just generate music closer to the music that you're imagining without you using more specific terminology to describe what you want. Music and sound design require a ton of fine tuning specific things and it would be incredibly difficult to describe all of that in a prompt and get what you actually want. That's why I'm saying it would be easier to just learn how to make digital music. You don't even need to know how to play an instrument these days.
Your point has been addressed. If you want to create music you can. AI music generation is about directing.
At the same time you sound like a coping musician. Not many people want to learn how to play music and now if they want some music they don't have to learn how to play, they can direct computers to play it for them.
Nice deformed hands and eyes, homosexual.
>not many people want to learn how to play music
Do AIgays just not live in reality?
What the frick are those computers? What the frick are those hands and thighs?
>Not many people want to learn how to play music
You ai Black folk repeatedly say the most moronic assbackwards things that ignore basic and identifiable human behavior. Next you will say that the moon is square and grass is purple.
Why are her torso and thighs so long?
Why are her fingers getting sucked into oblivion?
Why are the computers melting?
What the hell are the things next to her?
At that point you're not even creating music though, you're just telling the AI that you want some music and it gives you music. It's closer to searching for royalty free music than it is actually creating music.
You're producing it all the same and it's brand new. Yep, you're coping just like visual artists over AI art.
How is it a cope to point out simple flaws in the process? If you just want the program to generate generic sounding music then go ahead I guess. If you want something more specific than you are going to have to inevitably learn more about music.
I guess the point I'm trying to make is that if you have to take time to learn the exact words you need to use to get the AI to generate the type of music you want then you could easily just learn how to make the music yourself at that point. Music has a way lower barrier of entry than art because you don't need to train your hands to move in precise ways, you can just type out all of the notes you want to make on a keyboard these days.
I think a more interesting and useful use of AI for music would be the generation of vsts and realistic sounding virtual instruments.
Her ears, eyes, hands, and the objects are blurry deformities.
One third of the posts in this thread were made by me
>the AI shill is just one guy
Yes please, I'll finally make the game I always wanted to make and never play anything else ever again.
>He thinks nukes won't end AI for good
Frick off shit skins.
>ai homosexuals force themselves into music circles and platforms, saying musicians and singers will be of the job
>ai homosexuals frick up basic and common music requests
>ai homosexuals force themselves into automobile circles and platforms, saying service drivers and truckers will be of the job
>ai homosexuals frick up basic and common driving requests
>ai homosexuals force themselves into translator circles and platforms, saying translators will be of the job
>ai homosexuals frick up basic and common translation requests
>ai homosexuals force themselves into programming circles and platforms, saying coders will be of the job
>ai homosexuals frick up basic basic and common coding requests
>ai homosexuals force themselves into artist circles and platforms, saying coders will be of the job
>ai homosexuals frick up basic art requests
How many times are we going to do this song and dance?
frick off cris
wtf is this moronic offtopic thread still alive 350 posts in?
it says "game devs" right there in the OP, you illiterate monkey fricker
Ganker are paid AI shills that allowed off-topic moron threads like this archive to further their agenda at least once a day
Here's a recent one:
Why the best art is made by soulless AI?
So how long until people start getting shadow banned from all kinds of social media, but instead of just going invisible, they'll be sent to their own little echo chamber where an AI pretends to be all the other people?
Like 80% of posts on /misc/ are bot posts. Been like that for years now. Ganker had a whole thing on it a while back
Didn't it accidentally cause a huge spike in /po/ the other day when someone forgot a letter
Honestly be a pretty smart social media company to do that. Though it won't be necessarily content you like, it'll be content that you engage with. IE clickbait/flamebait.
Honestly I can see some dystopian future where you don't get a UBI but you do get paid for how much you consoom. In a sense we'll become both the product and the employee.
Twitter's engagement has changed a lot since Musk took over as the bots had been reduced.
TECHNOLOGICAL SINGULARITY
TECHNOLOGICAL SINGULARITY
AI will be the end of humanity. That much is true.
Nothing wrong with that. Humans make mistakes and have emotional reactions. AI does not
You can take that position, but I'm pretty sure you don't actually believe it, otherwise you would have killed yourself already for being inefficient.
Artists are obnoxious. Art without artists is inherently more valuable due to it. There hasn't been a new piece of traditional art in decades. Music was completed over a decade ago. Drawing, and painting, was mastered over a century ago. Sculpting was mastered millennia ago. All stories have already been told. Anything produced in these fields now is just paint by the number trash. It's no different to AI's creative process. We've seen what works, and we emulate it. AI is just better at that.
Is being absolutely moronic a prerequisite for being a frog poster?
You have produced nothing original. Everything you have made can be made to higher standard by AI.
Actually, I've done a lot of original research and am a published scientist.
I'm not interested in your head canon. Now bow to your AI overlords.
Ah yes the classic cope of "it doesn't count". Tell me, what AI can perform experiments on it's own? Which one can observe experimental results and adjust it's plan based off of the observation to obtain the original intended goal? Which one can perform physical experiments?
>Artists die out
>AI no longer has examples to "learn from"
Simple as.
And? Why would it need to learn more?
I think the most shocking thing about AI shills is that they actually believe that generative AI is even in the same category as a theoretical general AI that could achieve singularity.
Reminder that AIgays don't show their prompts in their filenames anymore because they are afraid of "prompt stealing" or get mad when you make fun of the image being the exact opposite of their prompts.
Frogposting is not based because robots and redditors use them. simple as
>all without any soul at all
Cope
Arthomosexual Discordies still seething? Maybe we can make it to 1000 posts this time
Look, I'm no commie, but once AI can do the vast majority of jobs currently done by humans, it is clearly not fricking sustainable to just have the various companies keep their basic structures but the "workers" are now 90% bots, our society as-is cannot survive 80% unemployment (assuming we are replacing like 10 normal jobs with 1 robot maintenance guy).
Something will have to give, and I think the US government for one would rather drastically change our economic model than basically just allow the whole country to collapse because nobody has a job any more.
>I think the US government for one would rather drastically change our economic model than basically just allow the whole country to collapse because nobody has a job any more.
I certainly hope so, but we are talking about a country that has started wars to enrich corporations and slow the spread of socialism.
It's also a county that doesn't even have public healthcare, something that every other first world country has.
It's not the first time the economical collapses have occurred and the government has pushed them on the future.
As an AIgay who works in this field I don't even know who I'm making seethe at this point. What type of person gets mad at this shit?
professionals and grifters who are going to lose work
goys who worship said professionals and grifters
that's it
People who value human interaction and the, until recently, clearly distinct nature of the human mind.
Another AI shill spam thread where every moronic post is coupled with a pepe or deformed anime elf.
made obsolete by AI text generators
Show me one good story written by AI.
It is genuinely incredible how many people here are unironic soulless israelites
>2 more weeks bros we will all be replaced by robots the end is nigh!
Never gonna happen
>unskilled morons claiming humans aren't going to care if something is fake and ugly
This behavior seems familiar.
You're not going to notice.
k, but prooompters have less worth than the artists programmers doctors they want AI to replace. You will be replaced faster than you can jack robinson.
The best OC I've seen in years is happening in the other AI thread and you morons are somehow mad about it. You're all hopeless.
Post it
the voice one? the one where people take a particular character or person (i.e. not OC) and make them say le epic gamer word with it?
hey buddy, you turn 18 yet?
How does AI make someone seethe this hard. You're so mad LOL
rule 2
No one is disputing that AI can make great entertaining stuff. It's more about how it is/is going to be used by big capital to thoroughly put humanity under the boot.
It's existence invalidates big capital. Anyone can "hire" AI robot to sound like anyone right now, you don't have to be wealthy to get the -voice of famous or talented person- anymore. Do you understand what this means in the grand scheme?
>Do you understand what this means in the grand scheme?
I get that you think this is a great democratizing force, but that couldn't be further from the truth.
Who has access to the most powerful AI resources? Places like Google, Facebook and OpenAI(contrary to the name they are not open ). That power and control will only accelerate over time as all power accumulates asymetrically. You can play with your custom stable diffusion models all you want but it will never compare to the big leagues.
>Who has access to the most powerful AI resources?
The massive company known as ... elevenlabs! You know them right? Those companies you're talking to are looking at solving AGI, they don't care about making money.
>Those companies you're talking to are looking at solving AGI, they don't care about making money.
dumbest poster in the thread lmao
low hanging bait
I figured you were being genuine, but thank you for clarifying
>microsoft is giving hundreds of millions to a non-profit
Prove me wrong. Please.
>they don't care about making money.
Naive.
They have pricing plans on their website. But even if that were true, they don't care about money, that means they will shortly be outpaced in the AI arms race. You need Capital to research and implement this stuff.
None of those companies he mentioned sells their AI tech afaik. They make it and release papers.
Learn to read please.
The building in the background has inconsistent geometry and doesn't have any functional symmetry.
The sheat of the girl with the white outfit hangs in the air ans is not proprerly secured on her belt. She also has pouches that are...surgically attached her legs?
Same for the other girl. What the frick is up with these pouches?
It's based on Yoshida's art which does all the things you're talking about.
>how is it cope to change the subject and start screeching about quality that is already good and will improve? PLAY AN INSTRUMENT
lmao
Yoshida's art is actually very detail oriented. I have never spotted any form of details that would make his art look like it was made by an incompetent, yet, AI art always has something that betraysbits lack of understanding of the basics.
Isn't it hilarious? Not even years, this is an all time kind of thing lol.
Post your work.
lol these are the same images spammed on Ganker. You came here to spam because you weren't getting enough compliments in your circlejerk?
Nobody is buying his trash in deviantart so he comes to shitpost here
The Ganker threads are funny, it's the exact same people in every thread no matter what time of day it is. I mean, I guess that's a general for you, they do make good autist daycares.
Generals aren't allowed on Ganker, yet here it is the daily AI pajeet thread
Art quality is about the detail and every single time I find an out of proportion feature in your AI piece, I'm going to talk about it.
Do you know what's the difference between a great painter who make great works of anatomy and an AI? Great paintings are flawless. AI, so far, always has a very obvious flaw that stands out right away for anyone with an eye that is trained for drawing.
Which, basically, means that AI art is mostly enjoyed by midwits with no actual interest in art.
Yet again, this is an example of mindless consoomers getting into a niche through the fast food drivethrough equivalent of an entry gate. You think that you're, somehow, high class because a program can make you a decently looking illustration, but you're just showing bigmacs down your face.
Prompt:
>Art quality is about the detail and every single time I find an out of proportion feature in your AI piece, I'm going to talk about it.
>Do you know what's the difference between a great painter who make great works of anatomy and an AI? Great paintings are flawless. AI, so far, always has a very obvious flaw that stands out right away for anyone with an eye that is trained for drawing.
>Which, basically, means that AI art is mostly enjoyed by midwits with no actual interest in art.
>Yet again, this is an example of mindless consoomers getting into a niche through the fast food drivethrough equivalent of an entry gate. You think that you're, somehow, high class because a program can make you a decently looking illustration, but you're just showing bigmacs down your face.
critique this
Right away there are...there are just..bo hands.
There are no clear outlines between the hip joints and the legs, it's just a detail-less blur of colors than vaguely looks like the shape it's supposed to be, the legs are assymetrical when they shouldn't be. The white robot's left leg's knee bends in the wrong direction, the lack of proprer shading makes the composition look depthless, shadows are inconsistent with the source of light which makes it appear like there is no distinct point for that light source. Need I go on?
All of their eyes are melting off of their faces and their hands look like globs of half-melted candles.
Were their eyes carved into by forks?
>and you morons are somehow mad about it
That's the very reason people are mad, and I can't believe you don't understand it.
People like having value to others, people like being the one in the friend group that is good at impressions.
You can call it gatekeeping and that's 100% fair, I'm not denying you the right to think their madness is egoistical or unfair, I'm just explaining exactly why they're mad.
The only thing wrong with AI, likr everything great, is the fricking fanbase.
We could enjoy AI for its own sake, but you fricking gays had to make, yet, another tribe war about it.
>UHH BUH BUH MUH ARTISTS!
You don't know a single artist. Shut the frick up. Stop shitting where you eat.
First they came for the artists.
And I did not speak out
Because I was not an Artist.
Then they came for the voice actors
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a voice actor
Then they came for the blue collars.
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a blue collar worker.
Then they came for the software developers.
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a software developer.
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me
The idea that someone could feel like they are protected from the cycle they mock others for being part of is very typically juvenile. Pajeet manchild hands typed the pro-AI comments ITT. That or the very AI bots they keep shilling.
Genuin question. Why should they care about being replaced?
>but they do
Ok, but like, why should they? What is it that theoretically they get out of being programmers? What stops them from enjoying life just like you do?
don't worry. once AI starts running companies, it will all of a sudden stop being as useful
Why do pajeets think that Ganker is a good place to shill their McCode?
The ChatGPT coding threads were out right hilarious with how many McCoders came out of the woodwork.
So prompters are number five, right? Because what's even the point of prompting something if you can imagine it in your head already?
>People know amazon treats their employees like shit.
>They whine about it while ordering from amazon because it's the most convenient option for them.
>People know that buying mass produced furniture from places like Ikea takes money out of the pocket of people who make furniture themselves.
>They continue buying from these places because it's the most convenient for option them.
>People know that fast food chains are harmful to small cafes and restaurants
>They continue buying McSlop and Starslops because it's the most convenient option for them.
>Somehow people will view """art""" differently
Oh I'm laffin
No, just like any artisan field. It will thin out the herd and anyone who remains will be amongst the best or will be able to charge top money for their work.
There are still blacksmiths around, fricking moron. Why do people like you, who know so little about everything, insist on fancying yourself as some sort of fricking aristocrat?
>anyone who remains will be amongst the best
So, nobody in this thread.
In 1996-1997 the greatest chess player at the time Garry Kasparov lost against the best chess computer Deep Blue in a series of games. Did this stop people from playing Chess? No, It didnt. Chess is more popular today because of AI. If you really think AI will replace anything you are simply stupid.
Nobody cares about chess. Not one person.
Because chess is a HOBBY, not a PROFESSION, for over 99.99% of people who play it.
Perhaps 99% of artists are the same. 90% of voice actors and game developers. Other jobs, not so much.
We are still far away from robots replacing normal jobs. Right now it is just a novelty.
Black person have you been to a supermarket or a mcdonalds in the last decade
it's already happening everywhere, just not all at once
>Black person have you been to a supermarket or a mcdonalds in the last decade
Have you? Machine servers/checkouts are often broken or clogged and there are still lots of manual human workers.
>they're not literally perfect so it isn't happening!
The reason the supermarkets didn't dump these things after a week of use is that they are still more efficient than their human equivalent. 1 person navigating error menus is cheaper than 5 cashiers.
>have you been to a supermarket or a mcdonalds in the last decade
Obviously you haven't. Self-checkout machines go out of order frequently and are usually used only by people with smaller quantities of groceries. Many people who are buying lots of stuff or can't bag things well are still going to the human employees.
And they are going to improve.
>2 MORE WEEKS SIRS!
LMAO like 5% of all artists in the world AT MOST do it as a profession. You are absolutely fricking moronic. You're attacking hobbyists for no other frickong reasons than your petty little hivemind bandwagon of frickinf NPC morons who just found another boogeyman to mock. Frick you you piece of fricking sheepish shit.
congrats, you found the lowcow of Ganker.
now the new one is voice actors, since they got btfo by actual coders because they understand the technology
>My rainbow furry porn is art, you piece of fricking sheepish shit
Unfortunately for xem, AI is replacing furry porn artists too
>like 5% of artists in the world AT MOST do it as a profession
That was more or less what I was saying you moron, except 1% rather than 5%. Read my post again.
I can't believe how much AI has advanced in the last few years. What is the point of trying anymore? AI will replace us at this rate.
I use AI. I am an artist. It's not my fault you wasted so many years drawing lines. Maybe you should have chosen a different hobby.
YOU ARE NOT A FRICKING ARTIST
Not him but yes we are lmao. People ask me art questions and I have a following 🙂
It's just a new form of art, u mad?
>but yes we are
And you'll be replaced just the same. At least the old kind of artists had the intelligence to understand that.
Bot post? There's nothing following reality in what you just said.
I'm sure anon. Cope more, it's fun seeing it.
Bot posts are already occurring on this site as we speak. Or what exactly do you mean?
Arrest more, it's funny seeing police officers suffocating you.
Sleeve blends with the cape and also blends with the back skirt. There is no consistency with how the tissue folds. It should give the impression of motion, but since its all over the place, it makes the composition looks static instead.
How many times are you going to try to generate something through prompts that vaguely describe what you want, only to get a result that SORT OF gets the idea?
Why not just draw your idea? It doesn't have to look professional, you know. It'd probably be closer to what's in your head too.
Frick if I wanted a drawing of a kobold getting fricked in the ass by mimic chest tentacles I'd do it myself. Wouldn't matter if it looks good or not, I'd get what the idea I have in my head down more accurately than an AI any day.
I FRICKING LOVE TALKING ABOUT VIDEO GAMES