Why is this game so comfy? Yeah, it’s zogged but its multiplayer is the best of any Battlefield and arguably any game.
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Battlefield 1
Why is this game so comfy? Yeah, it’s zogged but its multiplayer is the best of any Battlefield and arguably any game.
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
BF3 and BF4 were better
>try to play game
>see darkie coloured hand
>close app
>delete game
No thanks
>Games full of guns that did not see use or exist
>Draw the line at something that did exist in small numbers
ignore him anon he's an inbred moron
Actually if you are a darkie coloured person there is a high likely hood you are inbred. A lot of "in the family" stuff goes on in almost all the darkie coloured races. It is a contributing factor to the severely low IQ you see in them.
>something I want to see vs. something I don't want to see
Yes, I do draw the line there.
BF1 got shitton of effort in vibes and art direction than usual
Is it still full of automatic weapons and red-dot sights?
It never had red dot sights
I played it last year, other than occasional cheaters and planeBlack persond the experience was great
The audiovisuals are fantastic and the map design faciliates close quarters
It's easily the best battlefield. But there's no votekick so one chink just shuts down a lobby. GG.
>finally get that rare elite kit
>die instantly to melee
very cool dice
It's the most cinematic multiplayer FPS I've ever seen.
I prefer the grenade launcher simulator.
It's the worst Battlefield gameplay wise
Yes, 2042 is better
contrarian cringe
It unironically is.
Nothing beats 2042 unless you're blinded by nostalgia of when you were younger and had more dopamine
Based. 2042 is somehow the least cancerous and alive battlefield game
>least cancerous
>thermoptics fricking everywhere. Chams for literally fricking everyone.
Get fricked you lying sack of shit.
Welcome to the future
How active is this shit right now?
Depends on your region. Very active in NA. Somewhat dead in Europe
2042 is surprisingly good gameplay wise but I'm getting sick of the live service content drip feed
The only reason BF1 isn't the worst BF game is that 2042 exists.
Battlefield 1 is the best Battlefield solely because of the AT Rocket Gun
For me, it's Amiens.
This and Sinai Desert are my favorite maps but I played them so much that I'm starting to get sick of them.
Try Achi Baba
That map often devolves into one team steamrolling the other. Maybe they should have given the losing team a Behemoth even if it's an infantry map.
I seriously never get tired of Amiens
It's so well designed that it has routes for every weapon type and class
i never liked it..BFV was better, but nothing will ever top 4.
BFV was dogshit wtf are you talking about
gunplay was decent...levels were good...firestorm was fun...
Did people really b***h about that? I still remember it being way better in BF1 than like literally any of the previous BF games all the way down to BF2
Sorry only meant to reply to
Yes. Many players couldn't adapt to BF1's gunplay & weapon design, they were in the assumption that the gunplay was going to be the same as BF4 or BF3 with microbursting being the best way to handle all automatic guns.
Instead BF1 changed that, with each weapon category having its own way of controlling weapon spread.
>BFV was dogshit
dumb Black person. bfv has the best gunplay and vehicle gameplay. if only it had more vehicle variety and more good maps it would be even better.
Cavalry, Attack Plane and Heavy Bomber are top tier fun.
Amiens best map.
Funny how /misc/tards give this one a pass because they were 12 when it came out. It was the first truly 'woke' AAA release.
They don't, you're just too underage to remember all the "WTF A Black person IN WW1" threads.
>Calls others underaged
>While ousting himself as underaged
An all-time Ganker classic
Nice reading comprehension.
Funny enough the black guy only even exists to die in the tutorial and then every other campaign has you playing as a white man
One has you play as an Arab woman although I remember people ignoring the campaign and getting angry at soldier models instead (the black German, the black Australian and the Indian medic, later on the Russian woman)
I was 15, actually.
everyone laughed at the black soldiers
>its multiplayer is the best of any Battlefield
>some moron lmg player magdumps in your general direction and misses every bullet
>suddenly your barrel twists 45 degrees and you can't hit shit
What a garbage mechanic
>but its multiplayer is the best of any Battlefield and arguably any game.
I suppose you're one of those people that participated in R*ddit's latest vote?
what the frick are these picks? those Black folk truly are subhuman
you should've seen Ganker's
Hardline beta was the best BF I've ever played, by far.
you too? did they change something on release? i played the shit out of the beta and was ready to purchase it digitally on launch day just to find out you cant get ea games digitally if its not on origin
this isnt shocking honestly. Ganker is moronic and doesnt play games.
it was casualized to frick and beyond thats why its remembered as a "good game". it also looked nice and ran decently so theres that too.
The only odd thing about this is 2142 over bf2
2142 had fewer players than BF2 but those few people who bought it and stuck with it swear by it, presumably due to the titan mode.
The greatest lie ever told is that battlefield 1 was a good game
I guess some nice ambiance is enough to cover up the fact that the gameplay is total dogshit
> the gameplay is total dogshit
In what way)”?
suppression
sweetspot mechanics
introducing self-healing to tanks
lots of weapon spread
tight hipfire spread so there's little incentive to actually ads with most automatics
unreliable anti-tank launcher
behemoths being rewarded to the losing team
elite classes because DICE wanted to reuse heroes from battlefront
bayonets
gas and grenade spam in general
>sweetspot mechanics
In defense of sweetspot, it actually made the Scout class viable unlike in previous games (barring BC2). The class is supposed to excel at long range gunfights, so why would they have to gimp its shtick by forcing players to shoot in the head especially with the projectile ballistics used in all BFs.
Maybe because sniping is actually supposed to be something that takes skill in battlefield and not "aim at the body = free kill" like in cod
BF1 snipers already have massively improved bullet velocity in bf4 and battlefield's map design inherently rewards snipers because of how many open fields there are. They didn't need sweetspots to be effective at all
>Maybe because sniping is actually supposed to be something that takes skill in battlefield and not "aim at the body = free kill" like in cod
This is not a matter of skill, we're talking about the class being viable compared to the rest. There was no reason to pick up Sniper in BF2 or Recon BF3 & BF4 when the rest of the classes were straight up better, since not only they had better gadgets but also better weapon handling compared to bolt actions. That's why those two said classes remained in shadow of the rest of the classes, they just couldn't impact the game. The sweetspot at least only worked in specific ranges where players just couldn't 1SK all the time, they had to be on the move if they wanted to get 1 shot kills which discouraged camping.
If DICE wanted players to be skilled, then they should reintroduce sidearm skill cannons like the 44 Magnum with a 3x scope.
>There was no reason to pick up Sniper in BF2 or Recon BF3 & BF4 when the rest of the classes were straight up better
And that's a good thing
Your probability of a winning a match is directly correlated with how many snipers are on your team. The class in general is the least team oriented and the least capable of playing the objectives by design. I guarantee you no one's going to cry over having less snipers on their team.
The idea that sweetspots discourage camping and encourages playing the objective is not true, because for one there are lots of snipers with sweetspot ranges that don't promote that, and for another it still doesn't make up for the fact that sniping is still easiest when you're staying back where enemies can't reliably shoot back at you. I can even argue that aggressive sniping is stronger in bf3/4 because in that game damage drops off linearly over range and it's possible to get a 1 hit body kill at close range.
>Your probability of a winning a match is directly correlated with how many snipers are on your team
This notion applies to all classes as well, you can't have too many Support players or Medics or Engineers. You need a balanced variety of players using different classes assigned to their respective squads.
>The idea that sweetspots discourage camping and encourages playing the objective is not true, because for one there are lots of snipers with sweetspot ranges that don't promote that
The BAs that "supposedly" promote camping such as the M9103 or Kar98 were the least used due to the terrible sweet spot ranges that forces them to camp, which is ironic when you consider that BF3/BF4 had many Recon players camping at a mountain in Kharg Island or Firestorm or the carrier in Paracel or Oman doing nothing to contribute to their team or even themselves.
>and for another it still doesn't make up for the fact that sniping is still easiest when you're staying back where enemies can't reliably shoot back at you.
Except that it is possible to fight back against others with SLRs and LMGs, the reason why players couldn't fight back is because they literally don't even know how the gunplay works in BF1, all they did was just to get close as much as they can and then hold M1.
> I can even argue that aggressive sniping is stronger in bf3/4 because in that game damage drops off linearly over range and it's possible to get a 1 hit body kill at close range.
Aggressive sniping was meme that only worked with in a niche part of the game like TDM or meatgrinders, it also falls flat when they play on the main core of the game in larger maps (i.e. Conquest).
I guarantee you a team full of medics and engineers will easily have the highest winrate
This is only true in BF4 due to the shitty class balance; Recon was useless and Support's ammo box got neutered during the game's lifetime which made resupplying anti-vehicle gadgets a pain in the ass where suiciding was a better alternative to replenish, not to mention that the ammo box nerf was in favor of vehicle prostitutes on the ground.
>behemoths being rewarded to the losing team
how is this bad? It prevents a total steam roll and gives the losing team a chance to turn the match around.
>self healing for tanks
I think it helps balance out vehicles especially since they require more crew members. Thanks are generally not that hard to destroy anyway although I will totally give you one for the unreliable AT launcher. It can be pretty good if you know the spots to hit but sometimes it can take forever.
The assault class in general in 1 is probably the weakest part of the classes, especially compared to the Medic and the Support
>how is this bad? It prevents a total steam roll and gives the losing team a chance to turn the match around.
It's bad in the same way that death streak rewards in CoD are bad. You shouldn't be rewarded for losing. Battlefield never had and never needed such a mechanic.
I think it works really well in operations but your mileage may vary in conquest. In operations it can really help a team "get over a hump."
I honestly find support in BF3 to be waaaay weaker than in 4. The necessity for the bipod and the limited gadgets really made support feel like a camp class to me. BF4 at least had a better attachment system that could make LMG's viable and gadgets (for better or worse) like the UCAV
I'd argue that BF3 Support is better, the ammo box was a permanent slot which made the chances of getting ammo better than in 4 and still had better resupply time, you don't need to use a bipod when you could just slap heavy barrel + foregrip and microburst. C4 was very effective and it made Support the designated troll/jihad class.
>Black personfield 1
>"comfy" shilling tactic
Get cancer gaytron...
It's easily the game with the best gun design/sounds/animations ever. Unbeatable.
It has stupid rock paper scissors gunplay. It's still a cool game but it's certainly not the best
>Its another Ganker pretends BF1 is a shit game because bullets sometimes deviate by an ever so slight amount meaning the game is instantly bad
classic
If I wanted to play a game where the meta was to hipfire magdump everything and spam the frick out of grenades I'd play halo
No one b***hed about the base bullet deviation ITT.
BF peaked with 3.
Did someone say suppression?
i guess i unintentionally made that joke but this wasnt even the worst part of bf3
Literally the "we want the call of duty audience" Battlefield game
BF1 is "we want the reddit audience"
>behemoths
>elite classes
>bayonet charge
>gas spam
>explosive spam
>sniping sweet spots
>trash weapon balance
>anti tank / engineer / assault all one class
The game was great aesthetically but the gameplay was casual AIDS
Hey what's yall thoughts on BFH because imo its a top 5 BF game multiplayer wise
Released at the wrong time. Some neat ideas here and there but it's obvious BF4 was the go to Battlefield game until 1 was released
because the setting is very comfy, game has much more color than bf4 for example.
Also the Operations are by far what sets it apart. It brings a sense of continuity and purpose for actually winning the map.
>Suez, Sinai and Grappa lowest tier
>Lupkow and Cape Helles not lowest tier
>St Quentin not highest tier
>legoland that high
>dnieper river (or whatever its called) that high
>tahure that low
wut
Also galicia underrated
The vehicle spawning changes alone are enough to make BF1 giga-cancer.
Everything that came after being even worse doesn't change that it's not good.
i had over 1000 hours on xbox back then... loved sniping with no aim assist
completely dead on xbox now tho
is it worth buying on steam now? it's got a decent playercount now
Yeah but wait for a sale, it goes for like 90% off
Lmfao I got it for free on Origin (EA App now) when they gave out BF1 and BFV, I think it was through Prime
Fricking losers, pay attention next time
every single weapon felt like shit.
>Game 1942
>Game Vietnam
>Game 2
>Game 2142
>Game: Bad Company
>Game: Bad Company 2
>Game 3
>Game 4
>Game Hardline
>Game 1
>Game V
>Game 2042
>no battlepass or seasonal slop
>expansions were given away for free after some time if you owned the base game
>visuals are cleaner than 3 & 4 meaning you spend less time getting killed by things that blend into the visual noise around you
>takes place in an uncommon setting rather than an oversaturated one
>defined classes with strong interactivity
>soundtrack is SSS+ tier
>D E D I C A T E D
>S E R V E R S
BF:BC2
BF3
BF4
and even BF: Hardline
All better than this unfun trash.
Has here anyone a friend who is a content creator at EA?
in english please
That was correct English, moron.
Sry, do you know anyone in your circle of friends who is a content creator at EA?