behold, perfection. this game has not aged even slightly. it plays better than ever and it will never be topped.

behold, perfection. this game has not aged even slightly. it plays better than ever and it will never be topped.

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    You can't learn the high levels spells without grinding like a madman, also the screen doesn't center while exploring.
    The first one was better.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      ew no way, first one has inferior cliche story and characters by comparison. sequel has better music, longer and more interesting and original story. way better battles and boss characters throughout, continual surprises. the first game is great too but the second upped the ante and made an even better game. the highest spells take defeating stronger enemies in the last leg. the problem with centering the screen is an emulation bug. the sega genesis cartridge or sega genesis collection on ps3/4 have no issues.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >You can't learn the high levels spells without grinding like a madman
      Good, that's the way magic should be.

      >also the screen doesn't center while exploring
      Seems like a you problem.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Good, that's the way magic should be.
        Videogames should be fun, not a job.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Sounds like a you problem. I'm having fun.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            > I'm having fun.

            Because you're an autist, that's why. Normal people do not like grind.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >The first one was better.
      I wonder why people here keep parroting this moronic opinion for no reason. 2 has improved in literally every aspect.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        The writing and unit variety are worse. Fewer interesting gimmicks, too.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          There's barely any writing in 1, the game overall felt bleak and generic, I don't even remember what is it about. 2 has a cool intro that I still remember to this day.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            >2 has a cool intro
            And that's all it has.

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like the Japanese version of one with an emulator's fast forward button more.

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I prefer Langrisser.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      They play completely different, Langrisser has no world to explore the game in, just battle after battle.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        There is nothing to explore in SF anyway, waste of time.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          true. you only do it to unlock more useless characters or more useful items.

          the plot is also more generic than Langrissers.

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The first has better tone and story

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      the first game is a dark vs light basic star wars ripoff. the second is much more its own tale with unpredictable turns.

      I prefer 1 for its art, music, towns, and pacing, but I'm happy you like 2 anon

      every king in the first game you encounter in a town is identical. the second game has unique art for every character and more intricate town designs. music quality is excellent for both games

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >the second game has unique art for every character and more intricate town designs
        Not for battle sprites though, SF1 had far, far better sprites in battle.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          not really, they are almost identical. here’s 2

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            here’s 1.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            lol screwed that up, pic related is 2. the first pic is shining force cd. they all look almost identical

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              here’s 1.

              not really, they are almost identical. here’s 2

              it's more of a "doom / doom 2" sort of situation

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        The first king you meet in SF1 is different, so your statement is not entirely true. I prefer the unique town variety and Yoshitaka Tamaki's excellent character design in 1 by a large margin. Not that 2 is bad at all, I just don't prefer it.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      I prefer the first one as well. SF2 is great too but I like the setting and characters more in SF1, as well as SF CD.
      Though I will say, SF2 has less tedious battles. Some of the terrain in both SF1 and SF CD is a literal slog. Luckily it never bothered me too much because the music is very enjoyable to listen to.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's also the only good Shining Force game. 1's a bit charming and 3 had a few good maps (across three fricking campaigns), but 2's the only one I'd ever consider replaying.

      Yeah, but that's not saying much.

      No, PERFECTION is Golden Sun and The Lost Age, as they're historically accurate to our own past.
      Which begs the question: Camelot was absolutely awesome at SRPGs and JRPGs. Why were they wasted so much on Nintendo sports games?
      They could have given Square and Atlus a run for their money.

      >Camelot was absolutely awesome at SRPGs and JRPGs.
      Not really. Shining in the Darkness was okay, but that was Climax. SF1 is cute and has good ideas, but it's a shit SRPG. CD and Final Conflict are dogshit. 3 is a sprawling mess of a game. Holy Ark is a lesser SitD. Golden Sun 1 and DD are pretty terrible unless you're deeply nostalgic for them.

      Their sports RPGs were their best games by far. SF2 &GSTLA are pretty good but over hyped.

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I prefer 1 for its art, music, towns, and pacing, but I'm happy you like 2 anon

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    “Strategy” game where the only necessary strategy is to take baby steps so that enemies approach your entire army one by one so you can kill them easily. Never played the first one, but I’m assuming it has the same problem. I like being able to explore the world like in a normal RPG though.

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Sega won in the JRPG arena.

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    weird thing is i never played 2
    i really really really loved 1 though and everyone tells me 2 is better
    i keep meaning to do it
    shill me on it? need to move it up my backlog

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      it's just fun. breezy, brisk plot that doesn't take itself too seriously. amazing soundtrack. maps are more focused than sf1. fun characters.

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >this slow old JRPG is the greatest vidya ever made

  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    No, PERFECTION is Golden Sun and The Lost Age, as they're historically accurate to our own past.
    Which begs the question: Camelot was absolutely awesome at SRPGs and JRPGs. Why were they wasted so much on Nintendo sports games?
    They could have given Square and Atlus a run for their money.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Golden Sun
      >Perfection
      fricking lol, delusional.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >wasted so much on nintendo sports games
      Those were actually pretty good though, and I normally don't like tennis/golf games at all.
      Now if only they made a Hockey game in that style. Or maybe they did, I dunno, my main focus was always on PC gaming for a very long time.

  11. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Langrisser 2 with englandish patch.

  12. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I feel sorry for the people who were filtered by Golden sun, such an amazing game. Had it been released for the N64 people would talk gold about it now.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Criticism = Filtered
      Definitely not cope.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        “It hurts my tummy” is not criticism.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Nonsensical metaphor instead of actually addressing criticism.
          DEFINITELY not cope.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Had it been released for the N64 people would talk gold about it now.
      That's true, but it doesn't make the game any good. It just means that n64 fanboys are annoying.

  13. 3 months ago
    Anonymous
  14. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    i used to think the cutscenes were cool but now i just want them to stop

  15. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I agree, honestly. I played a Fire Emblem once and its absolutely sucks compared to this.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, Shining Force is much easier.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *