Is it me or does Starfield look like a more boring verison of Fallout 4? Futuristic space games these days just look and feel so dead and barren. Bethesda chose the worst time to release a space themed game in a time where No Man's Sky, Outer Worlds, and hundreds of other space games already exist. This maybe would've been cool ten years ago, but now it's just the next slop space game with a Bethesda sticker on it.
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Skyrim looks much more immersive
At least Skyrim gave the illusion of gameplay.
>Old = good contraritroonism already preemptively starting with Skyrim
Cringe and troonypilled
Skyrim isn’t old dipshit
It's over 10 years old moron, it's pretty old.
Sonygays are panicking cus the initial reviews are looking good kek
I hope they sell Fallout ip and start making Elder Scrolls now
its nice to see that normalgays have finally stopped buying into todd's lies. all my normalgay friends who thought fallout 4 would be game of the decade are not saying a word about this game. that probably means it'll end up being good too kek
> 30 fps max
> 18 fps avg
Microbots not like this
On the surface, Starfield seems like the kind of game that was made directly for me. But as a Bethesda title I have a really hard time being excited about it. Skyrim, Fallout 4, and Fallout 76 have progressively chipped away at any interest I might have in their video games
Likewise, every time they reveal something about this game it feels like it was made for me. The guns look cool, the gunplay looks enjoyable, the ship designer looks amazing. Everything looks like something I'm going to adore. But there's always that little niggle in the back of my head, saying it might not be fun. That's what's kept me from actually getting hype for the game, despite getting the Premium Edition for the early access. I have hit that sweet spot between blind excitement and bitter worry, I guess, which I need to maintain by avoiding spoilers or leaked gameplay.
Nah Starfield seems like a much better, more massive Cyberpunk set in Space
We need more RPG shooters on the market. Hopefully this causes developers to make more
HAVE HOPE.
It's a space game
No matter how casual or hardcore it is, you have to be fundamentally a little bit autistic to enjoy these games.
Most people wouldn't understand the thrill of space trucking and even smuggling goods
This, like who the frick would get excited about spending 15 minutes to get to a planet, spending hours exploring the planet and gathering materials only to encounter the occasional space bandit camp, then rinse and repeat? I don't care how different each planet is, the shit will get old fast. Skyrim and Fallout worked not because of how big their maps were, but because the content and storytelling contained within those spaces, and people still had fun and continue to have fun to this day. It's the reason Todd sold so many copies over and over again.
>like who the frick would get excited about spending 15 minutes to get to a planet, spending hours exploring the planet and gathering materials only to encounter the occasional space bandit camp, then rinse and repeat?
Red Dead Redemption 2 did this and it's one of the most critically-acclaimed games of all time, beloved by normies and grogs alike. Turns out normies like to walk around pretty worlds and get into scuffles between resource-gathering. That kind of gameplay tickles our hunter-gatherer instincts, like Minecraft.
RDR2 worked because it had tons of quality content squeezed onto a limited map size combined with a good story. It also wasn't overly complex like Starfield looks to be. The amount of shit in Starfield makes Fallout seem like a kids game in comparison. I also hate numbers, blocky geometry, and bland scenery, which is what Starfield is all about. I despise math.
I could try to offer you a platitude about the diversity of Human experience, and how your interests for a video game are every bit as valid as mine or another anon, but this is Ganker so I'm just going to call you a homosexual and tell you to get fricked.
>I despise math.
only 42% of rdr2 players completed the 2nd chapter, and this is the autist PC players
so it'll sell, normies will talk about how much they like it for the 2 hours they played, it'll win awards, but its still shit.
Bethesda games get better with age. Their games get over hyped, by the time you play it, it feels underwhelming. That feeling of disappointment slowly goes away with time and eventually you will find a new interest in the game. Skyrim felt like a let down in release, but now the game is older, I appreciate it more than I did at launch because I have a more realistic view on it.
K I N O cover
Starfield is looking like it has way more in common with Skyrim than Fallout tbh. Its skyrim in space with guns, the main quest is literally unlocking space magic like the dragonborn.
SNOYSHITS SEETHINGS.
>more boring verison of Fallout 4
It's the other way around BGS's fallout setting was always shit. We will finally get a proper expanse-esque space sandbox to mod.
Looks good to me
>Is it me or does Starfield look like a more boring verison of Fallout 4?
>try and find gameplay videos
>it's all generic FPS combat and cinematic shots
Have you played any fallout games, its like that with some space fighting added
>Have you played any fallout games
I have not.
I see
What I was getting at is I just wanted to see walking around in the world but everything is cinematic shit.
What about Elder scrolls, Oblivion? Skyrim?
You seen this ? https://youtu.be/uMOPoAq5vIA
I played elder scrolls and no I didn't see that video but the exploration looks good. I just wanted a game play video without some homosexual content creator shilling hello fresh and some obvious dev video pushed out to make the game look good. I guess I'll wait for release and watch some stream before pir...buying it.
i getchu but heres the thing, its not actually out yet so thats pretty much all we got
>its not supposed to be fun
the older I get, the more I loathe open world procedurally generated games. there's going to be large chunks of starfields gameplay where you explore barren worlds to collect resources to explore more barren empty worlds with 1 tiny outpost on it. I would rather developers create smaller handcrafted maps stuffed with worthwhile content vs massive maps/ hundreds of planets with barely anything worth doing or seeing.
>need some resource
>only spawns on this planet at X time
I hate this shit so fricking much it's unreal and you know there's going to be a ton of it.
This reminds me of the
>fallout 3 is oblivion with guns
Are you able to build colonies on planets and have people living there and such? That was my favorite thing to do in modded Starbound.
?t=2211