bruh look at dis dood

Are you a fricking moronic Black person? There's nothing unreadable about that code lmfao.

It's not hard to understand, and the variables are named clearly. It's literally just ands and ors.

Are you asking a hypothetical, or is that an actual bug in the game that you've experienced?

Also, there's just not enough code for me to answer that question. I guess I'm assuming that if "bool continue" stays false that would be game over, but it looks like that statement might be somewhere beneath the code we see. There must be a condition below all that that fails to set bool continue back to true. I'm not even sure if that's what he's doing, but there's only one if statement in the pic really.

Should be quick to figure out if you were the one who made it. Literally a string of a few ands or statements. If it was like 500 of them, I'd say it was unreadable.

> Should be quick to figure out if you were the one who made it.
Now you exposed yourself.

>if you were the one who made it
This is a common error
"Oh I've written this code I'll be fine". Then you look at it 3 months later and have no fricking idea what anything is

>Should be quick to figure out if you were the one who made it.

You're admitting that it's unreadable.

>only 4 lines
>picture has a single if condition spread over 30+ lines
You are so fricking dumb it’s borderline trolling at this point. Just stop commenting dude you very clearly are out of your depth, multiple people are explaining why this is shit code. Literal Reddit moment

He's so fricking stupid. It's 4 lines of code. A line of code ends with a semicolon usually. Doesn't matter if it's 5 pages long. And if statement is a single line of code, no matter if it take 50 lines to fill it up

>I work as a software engineer.
No you don't lol.

The compiler will break each individual evaluation into like 4 instructions

kek, he means actual lines of logic as the compiler will see it

Frick you're moronic

He's so fricking stupid. It's 4 lines of code. A line of code ends with a semicolon usually. Doesn't matter if it's 5 pages long. And if statement is a single line of code, no matter if it take 50 lines to fill it up

Oh my god you fricking arm chair morons.

Look at the left side. If he had lines or code enabled, they would be increasing.

No one cares if this is actually one 5000 character line. Most IDEs break around 80 characters into a new line. It’s unreadable garbage and the fact that it’s “4 lines” and had to be split over 30+ makes that abundantly clear. If your code contains lines that god damn long you can’t reasonable parse out the logic mentally.

You are all fricking braindead larpers. Go back to waging.

Everyone else understood what he meant by "it's just 4 lines" even though we can all see the line count of the text editor
Might wanna reflect on that

I have a CS degree, write code everyday. Make a lot of money doing it. Cope n seethe.

No reasonable person thinks from the perspective of a compiler when talking about readability. To a human trying to understand that code, it’s not “4 lines”. I understood its “technically” 4 lines but literally who fricking cares. You homosexuals are just out of your depth, arguing over semantics like what makes a line a line because you dug yourselves holes and want to save face. Again, if a single line has to split into 30 to be readable, it’s garbage code. Simple as.

Yes, I'm sure you do, anon.

>"it's just 4 lines of code"
>fair enough, he's just talking about the statements
>REEEEEEEEEEE IT'S MORE LIKE 30+ ARE YOU BLIND CAN YOU NOT SEE THE TEXT EDITOR????
Thanks for conceding.

See

kek, he means actual lines of logic as the compiler will see it

But since you're too stupid to come up with new posts now, this discussion ends here. You made a mistake and got mad about it. Keep seething

Nah, you're wrong. It's 4 lines of code. And this all started cuz that dumb Black person told me to answer a question about the game based off of 4 lines of code. In terms of game logic, only 4 things happen here, because there's only 4 lines of code

It's not. It's just you (or whoever) was like "well tell me why this this and this happens then" and it's like, well there's only 4 lines of code so there's no way to know that without seeing the rest of the program lol.

Damn dude good one

Boolean expression is still one line of code

4 lines of code to the programmer. 4 things happen in this picture. I don't give a frick what the compiler does. This is supposed to be human readable, and it is. 4 things are happening.

I don't give a frick what you were talking about, I was talking about that picture being objectively 4 lines of code you dumb Black person. If you can't see that, you're moronic, and failed your first programming class.

You're a shit eating Black person homosexual and I don't even know what the frick you're talking about, because we're talking about actual lines of code. See my breakdown above if you are still a dumb Black person and want to know which 4 things are happening here, and why we can't deducde much from 4 lines of code you dumb Black person.

4 lines of code. moron.

I see where the argument comes from
Yes, technically you are correct

>1. If statement (evaluate this boolean statement as either true or false)
Explain this one in more detail though, when EXACTLY do we go into the if block

If statements are always run no matter. This shit will run every loop.

That requires evaluating the boolean expression it's all their. They're paired by ands ors. The ands have both evaluate to 1 to count as a 1. Anything separated by an or can trigger this statement to run. It would be slightly more readable if he put parenthesis around the paired and statements, so we knew they were together. If he did that, it would be a really simple series of or statements. Any one can trigger this loop.

Multiple different game states can trigger the block you dumb Black person, there are several "or" statements in there. It's all there. It's readable. I don't need to tell you because it's right there. Count the "ors", that's how many different game states can trigger that block.

Do you know what an or statement is? This symbol "||" is an or statement. It breaks the logic up. Everytime you see that symbol, it's a different statement that can trigger the block. Here, I'll do the first one. "If the yandere is armed, and the equipped weapon is suspicious" then the whole statement is true. Now repeat that for every statement broken up by an "or" (||)

1. If statement (evaluate this boolean statement as either true or false)
2. Set continue to false if last statement was true.
3. Evaluate this boolean statement (looks like he's checking if the player moved a certain amount)
4. Set continue to true. If last statement was true.

4 line of code.

kek this Black person thinks "senior software engineer" is gonna make him seem an authority
For anyone who doesn't work in software engineering: You automatically become a senior if you've worked a few years. Senior positions require 3 years of experience and that's it

You would say "this statement is too complex", "why are we doing it this way?" , "Can you evaluate this differently or handle it another way?" Not. "It's too many lines of code REEEEEEEE"

Yeah, "30 lines of conditional statements"

I see where the argument comes from
Yes, technically you are correct

>1. If statement (evaluate this boolean statement as either true or false)
Explain this one in more detail though, when EXACTLY do we go into the if block

this.
furthermore what the compiler executes is entirely irrelevant. compilers do all kinds of optimization & what might be dozens of lines of source code could be rearranged into just a few instructions by a compiler.

when people say "lines of code" they're referring to the perspective of a programmer, or someone reading the code. not the compiler.

Frick you're moronic

Variables names stated clearly. Single line for each boolean statement. Simple ands and ors. Yep you're moronic.

Don't get mad, anon. You're right and anon is either a troll or someone who hasn't worked on a serious project in his life
Either way, not worth your time

More complex does not equal less readable.

Most game loops do still have some form of check every environment variable every frame. Most multiplayer games still use a tick rate, which is just the rate at which the game environment is updates. It's checking a bunch of shit like player locations, ammunition counts, health status, locations of items, who's alive and who's dead. You just don't see that code because it's not open source.

It would be more complex but that doesn’t mean it’s less readable. This code would instead be nicely separated into event handlers, would which make it immediately clear what is happening and why it is firing, if done right. I disagree entirely that it would make it harder to understand, understanding what the application as a whole is doing would be far easier to grasp.

Nah, I've never written a conditional statement this big, but they can get complex, and you should still be able to evaluate them. There are troll classes in college where you evaluate long boolean statements like this

Well, that could make things go slower in a big game, but I don't even know what the frick this game is. It's just a game loop, but it looks like he is checking if shit happened in other functions every frame, which works, but is maybe slow. It handles the events if they happened. But if shit didn't happen, it's wasteful.

>there
Stopped reading. Not interested in a brainlet's opinion

OOP is used literally everywhere. I can easily believe something like this happening in isolated cases in different institutions, but the entire field? You better provide some some damn good arguments to convince me.

>At the bottom of the divide you have code monkey pajeets and unemployable trannies coding emulators.
Bellow that you have Ganker neets who write daily fizzbuzz, but never worked on a single actual project or made anything productive in their entire lives.

>worked better
For what it was supposed to do, yes. But it also introduced problems that didn't exist in sql databases. Which is why bigger databases use multiple paradigms.

OOP is a good thing for projects with multiple people working on it, and when it might need to be modified later.
If your project is fairly basic and you do it on your own sticking to OOP principles will create more necessary work with little benefits.

No way most modern engines aren't using oop now. Isn't unreal still c++?

Unity is alright. The performance is kind of shit because it uses C# most likely though. I think Kerbal ran on unity and it ran really freaking slow when you started modding it. Like, really really slow lol.

Yeah, it worked for Kerbal until you turn the mods up to 10 and you're stiting on the load screen for an hour, getting 5 fps

what's the alternative if not OOP?
functional programming? lmao

and don't try to come with ECS, it's literally OOP

Oh, I see. However, we literally are not allowed to use an MQ for this. If I were to suggest using the cloud managed one, I would be told that we need to be cloud agnostic. If I suggested self-hosting one, I’d have to go through the fricking "council," and they literally say that using anything but Java is too difficult. Also our Kubernetes cluster is the most malformed creature I’ve ever seen, an absolute travesty, so I donMt feel comfortable even trying it. Somehow they managed to outright kill the cluster just trying to install Prometheus, so we aren’t allowed to use that either, even in the Java services, despite that being a completely different thing. These people are scared of anything but the 3 tools they self-taught 5 years ago, yet they get the final say. Shit.

Because the point is that its fine.
Everybody here debating knows exactly what the code is doing
Everybody knows what is being checked
This is literally an argument about presentation so has no actual technical merit.
Its fine.

ahhhh i understand you now!
thanks for the words of encouragement!