>comics suck
>cartoons suck
>toys suck
>live-action sucks
>video games suck
I hate this costumed creep in every iteration!
>comics suck. >cartoons suck. >toys suck. >live-action sucks. >video games suck
>comics suck
>cartoons suck
>toys suck
>live-action sucks
>video games suck
I hate this costumed creep in every iteration!
Probably bait - in which case here is your (You) - though I myself dislike how much DC relies on him and shoehorns him into stuff.
Batman's mighty back of Justice is starting to feel sour.
Just like Spider-Man's.
sore*
Spiderman is a good character, because Peter is a good character.
Batman is a bad character because Bruce is a bad character.
Simple as
They're both good characters and they've both had to carry their respective fandoms for a long time now.
No,
see
>Peter is a good character.
top kek
Old bruce was a great character after No Man's Land he turned into the turbo edgelord mascot we know today.
In which comics? The original golden age were shit.
It's always either an butthole or bland.
All were pretty kino if you're not a troony.
>no argument
>only adhominem
Typical batwanker
The Arkham games and Nolan films were kino, same with Burtons 89 movie.
Kinda gotta agree with you on everything else
The comics are kino, too. What sort of homosexual hates Year One? lmao
OP sucks wiener
t. sucks Bat wiener
That’s why you should read.
Media consumption is a plague that makes people dumber and lazier.
>plotarmored af
>makes everyone around him job
>wanked af
>has no life outside of capeshitting
>either an butthole or wet paperbag
>will protect his mass murdering husbando
>has child soliders
>pedo homosexual
>has no life outside of capeshitting
he's a playboy who fricks models on the reg
No, wer'e told that he's like that and it's briefly shown. Peter and Clark have life, not workaholic boring Bruce.
>it's briefly shown
the comics are bout fighting crime, not about his personal life. thus only the vigilante stuff is shown.
Batwanker please, again Peter and Clark have personal life because they have more rounded characters and there's actually a point to their secret identity. Heck, even the Phantom who is full time superhero has more life than Batsy.
>getting cucked by Black folk is muh personal life
lmao alright
>hurr derr Black folk
You batwanker know Peter has longer existence than the woke trend. Don't worry Abrams will fix your Batman too:^)
There's nothing wrong with Batman. He's a vigilante who fricks models when he wants. Not a Black person-cucked science redditor.
Again see
and we all know it's just cover up to having sex with Joker and the Robins.
Meant see
>having sex with Joker and the Robins.
That's your latent homosexuality being projected onto a fictional character. Go see a shrink.
Why else would he protect the Joker and how else you would explain Tim coming out of the closet?
>why would he protect a human being if not for sex?!
see, you have issues.
>how else you would explain Tim coming out of the closet?
woke agenda affecting DC atm
Again why he protects the mass murdering psychopatch? You haven't answered my question. Don't you think it's suspicious to let an 8 year live alone with you and letting him be child soldier who runs around in underwear?
>Again why he protects the mass murdering psychopatch? You haven't answered my question.
Batman is fundamentally a humanist. That's been part of his character for decades. Why would he not protect a mentally ill person considering the worldview he has on justice?
>Don't you think it's suspicious to let an 8 year live alone with you and letting him be child soldier who runs around in underwear?
1) Your dirty mind is showing. There's nothing wrong with this.
2) Robin was meant to be a stand-in for the young readers, fighting crime against their hero, Batman.
3) He's only a homosexual in the newest version, not in any of the last iterations. This is due to wokeism.
>it's humanist to protect mass murder
>Joker is just le mentally ill it ok if he go out prison again anf killing hundreds of people every time!
Holy Batwanker cope!
>Your dirty mind is showing
Doesn't know the sad truth about child soldiers irl, ignores that Bathomosexual let them get tortured and killed.
>Robin was meant to be a stand-in for the young readers
Yeah, Robin isn't even half as popular as Batman despite suppsed to be an essential part.
>He's only a homosexual in the newest version
Nah, he is homosexual in most iterations, he wouldn't get married and rather live with young boys than a woman.
>Holy Batwanker cope!
Not everyone has the same worldview and ideology as you. Crazy, right?
>Doesn't know the sad truth about child soldiers irl, ignores that Bathomosexual let them get tortured and killed.
You're comparing real life with a comic and then making a conjecture about something non-existent.
>Yeah, Robin isn't even half as popular as Batman despite suppsed to be an essential part.
?
>Nah, he is homosexual in most iterations, he wouldn't get married and rather live with young boys than a woman.
More projection. Ideology is a b***h.
>same worldview and ideology
Batwanker is moral relativist...of course.
>You're comparing real life with a comic
Yes, because the Robins suffer the same things as irl child soldiers.
>?
Meaning the excuse for Robins existence is bullshit, detective.
>No refute, no argument, only adhominem
This is your brain on Batwank.
>Batwanker is moral relativist...of course.
I was referring to Batman.
>Yes, because the Robins suffer the same things as irl child soldiers.
In your mind, maybe. The real world is the real world, the comics world is the comics world.
>Meaning the excuse for Robins existence is bullshit, detective.
I don't get it. Robin is not more popular than Batman, yes. What of it?
>This is your brain on Batwank.
"They're homosexuals because... they just are, okay?!" Terrific argument, pal.
>I was referring to Batman.
Sure goal posting homosexual. It just proves that Batman e is immoral little piece of shit despite his claims not to.
>In your mind,
Batwanker, again Robins get tortured and killed just like irl child soldiers, why would the sexual abuse will be absent?!
>Robin is not more popular than Batman
That's not the point, the point he is way below Batman popularity despite suppsing to be an essential part which means he is pointless and doesn't live up to its purpose.
>Terrific argument
Black person you didn't have argument to begin with and conveniently didn't qoute my mention of your lack of argument.
>Sure goal posting homosexual. It just proves that Batman e is immoral little piece of shit despite his claims not to.
Again, the fact that your worldview clashes with Batman doesn't prove anything. Killing people is wrong in many moral systems, including Batman's. Punishment via incarceration is not unusual for murderers.
>Batwanker, again Robins get tortured and killed just like irl child soldiers, why would the sexual abuse will be absent?!
Why would there be? This is a fallacy. The fact that something happened to X people in real life doesn't mean that the exact same things happen in fiction.
>That's not the point, the point he is way below Batman popularity despite suppsing to be an essential part which means he is pointless and doesn't live up to its purpose.
I don't understand your nonsense opinion. The entire thing is pointless. Superheroes are pointless.
>Black person you didn't have argument to begin with and conveniently didn't qoute my mention of your lack of argument.
More projection coming from the moron who says they're homosexuals because they just are. When will you learn that projection and conjecture do not equate proof?
>your worldview
>N..no I'm not the moral relativist, it was le Batman!
>Killing people is always wrong!
Dumnbass
>in many moral systems
So now you use irl, b***h? Many asystems are bad and currput. There is place for death penalty. However if take your irl comparison, yeah there are no mass murderes who endlessy escapes from prisoons and kill hundereds of people each time.
>Why would there be?
because you can't partially mimic real life entiirely and ignore the rest of it.
>the fact that something happened to X people in real life
He says it as he used it to justify his first argument lmao
>The entire thing is pointless. Superheroes are pointles
>resorts to the dumbest strawman
Batman is popular and get often used, yet his robins aren't because they're pointless.
>More projection
Mor adhominem, no argument.
I guess you truly have to be moron to like such a shitty dumb character.
>because you can't partially mimic real life entiirely and ignore the rest of it.
You actually can. What moronic nonsense is this? lmao
No, if you try to go fully realistic in certain aspect such as the Robins getting tortured and killed, then you should go through the whole of it instead of halfassing it and it's safe to assume the full impact of it.
>It is a subjective statement which doesn't match the consensus
t. would follow Hitler' orders and support the current thing
>No, if you try to go fully realistic in certain aspect such as the Robins getting tortured and killed, then you should go through the whole of it instead of halfassing it and it's safe to assume the full impact of it.
Not necessarily. Correlation does not imply causation.
>causation
moron, we don't argue about the causes, we talk about phenomenon. And you can't partially copy a phenomenon and ignore the rest of it. If the stakes of getting tortured and killed are there , then so should be the rest as they're part of it.
Both are bad, moral relativist.
"He was sexually abused because he was a child soldier as all child soldiers are raped." literally a logical fallacy. You are completely moronic.
>If the stakes of getting tortured and killed are there , then so should be the rest as they're part of it.
lmao here you give room for it not actually happening, you utter Black person. why would batman rape a child? fricking moron.
>"He was sexually abused because he was a child soldier as all child soldiers are raped."
Yes, why else live with a child soldier? just to get him beat up?
>why would batman rape a child?
>live alone with 8 year old boy and letting him be child soldier who runs around in underwear
>he wouldn't get married and rather live with young boys than a woman
Both those facts, are in favor of the logical conculsion.
>You are completely moronic.
>he says as his other arguments fell apart
>Yes, why else live with a child soldier? just to get him beat up?
He saved an orphan and decided to make a pupil out of him. Considering Gotham's orphanage situation and poverty, doesn't seem like a bad choice. Not everyone is a perverted pedophile like you.
>Both those facts, are in favor of the logical conculsion.
Not necessarily. Again, pushing for your pedophilic conjectures is not proof but projection.
>He saved an orphan
Yeah, to make him a child soldier, how benevolent!
>Not necessarily
Yes, they're. That's litreally what happens in his stupid stories.
You didn't I just argued from your dumb immoral prespective. If all moral codes are equale, than there's no moral and non of them matter.
So you think murder of mentally ill people is moral and you believe in God? What God would that be?
Joker actions cannot be excused by being mentally ill and he keeps escaping prison and mureder thousands, so it's justified.
>trying to spin the discussion
Won't work for you immoral batwanker.
Batman is coming from a place of justice, not revenge. Under this paradigm, he doesn't kill. Much less a mentally ill person. Killing of this kind is immoral under humanism, Christianity, and Batman's worldview.
>t. would follow Hitler' orders and support the current thing
We live in a troony establishment, that's the current thing.
>Again why he protects the mass murdering psychopatch?
Because he believes in "the system" of justice. Even if it's corrupted to laughable extremes. Batman doesn't kill due to it setting a bad example for the rest of society, his original intent was to spread fear among criminals and give hope to the powerless.
>Even if it's corrupted to laughable extremes
>muh intent vs results
Yes I'm sure that matters more than people life, just admit that Batman is immoral shit and batwankers like Batman would never let Joker die as he deserves.
>mfw Superman has death penalty in his universe
Superman superior
Why do you assume Batman should have the same moral code as you?
>muh moral relativism is good!
Batwankers can't admit their hero is immoral.
>immoral.
What decides morality in the "worst city in America"?
Gotham is one of the most corrupted and crime ridden places in the DC Universe. So your argument is; "Batman is bad cuz he didn't kill clown". How's that immoral?
>What decides morality
t. moral relativist
>Gotham is one of the most corrupted
Which is why he should kill the Joker instead of hoping the authorities, that's why he is fricking vigilante in the first place.
>no I'm just gonna play with muh costume and gadagets and have no real stakes.
Batman is narcissistic immoral butthole.
>Batman is bad cuz he didn't kill clown
YES
Prove morality is objective. I'll wait.
If morality isn't obejctive, than everything can be justified you postmodernist subhuman.
>everything can be justified
This is correct. Everything can be literally justified depending on each person's own moral code.
But it's not moral, postmodernist subhuman. Your own code means nothing if it doesn'y align with true morality.
Moral simply means "what is considered right behavior", which is something completely subjective. Question: Do you believe in God?
>completely subjective.
If anything subjective inculding morailty then nothing can be right or wrong , which means your attempt to argue with me otherwise that Batman is moral is also pointless.
Checkmate moron batwanker:^)
>If anything subjective inculding morailty then nothing can be right or wrong , which means your attempt to argue with me otherwise that Batman is moral is also pointless.
I never said he was moral. Nice job at dodging the question, coward.
>I never said he was moral.
Black person you argued he has le moral code and tried to excuse his immoral action.
>dodging the question
It's goalposting and I'm not falling for it.
Morality cannot be objective in a world without God.
I believe in God, there you have it heathen. But you can't argue for anything.
>Black person you argued he has le moral code and tried to excuse his immoral action.
I said he had his own moral code, which is true. What you view as moral/immoral is not the same as what he views as moral/immoral. Morality is subjective.
Again moron, his moral code worthshit since all moral codes clashes with each other and non matter more the other.
>Morality is subjective
Which bring us back to
You keep arguing in circles, bye bye immoral moron.
>all moral codes clashes with each other and non matter more the other.
I like the way you are now echoing my own arguments. You're now a moral relativist as you were always. Your dislike of Batman comes from elsewhere but considering your past arguments, it might be homosexual resent.
>NO U!
Pathetic
It's not a "no u" at all lmao but it's nice knowing I changed the way you think 😀
>moral codes clashes with each other
kek
>If morality isn't obejctive, than everything can be justified
Yeah, that's how it works on an individual level.
>Peter
lame nerd who love muh science and is cucked by Black folk.
Seething Batwankers can't admit Bruce is not even real character, but plot that's barely there.
You have low standards if you think Peter is a good character.
>b.but Peter sucks! Mmm ok
Seething Batwanker can't argue in favor of his beloved flat character:^)
WRONG
WRONG
Late 30s Golden Age Batman comics where he fights random monsters and chinamen and kills and uses guns are awesome
40s Golden Age comics where he’s a smiling paternal figure to Robin and constantly drops puns and quips as he fights are awesome
Early Silver Age comics where he fights weird aliens and hangs out with Kathy and Betty Kane are awesome
New Look/yellow oval era Batman comics are awesome
The Adam West show is awesome
Late 60s Batman comics influenced by the Adam West show are awesome
The Batmanga is awesome
The Adventures of Batman/The New Adventures of Batman are awesome
The Scooby Doo crossovers are awesome
Bronze Age comics, with Englehart/Rogers and Neal Adams and Denny O’Neil and more, where Batman lived in a penthouse in Gotham are awesome
The Frank Miller comics of the 80s are awesome
The Killing Joke is awesome
Arkham Asylum: A Serious House on Serious Earth is awesome
Modern Age Batman is awesome
The Burton movies are awesome
Batman: The Animated Series and The New Batman Adventures are awesome
The Schumacher movies are awesome
Batman Beyond is awesome
The Batman (2004) is awesome
The Nolan movies are awesome
Batman: The Brave and the Bold is awesome
The Arkham games are awesome
New 52 Batman is awesome
Beware The Batman is awesome
Ben Affleck Batman is awesome
Rebirth Batman is awesome
Lego Batman is awesome
Joker (2019) is awesome
The Batman (2022) is awesome
All elseworlds are awesome
All omissions are unintentional
Thank you Batman, for being a great franchise
>Golden Age Batman comics
Absolute trash, poorly drawn and written.
atman murder someone each issue meanwhile having boringass plot and zero detective work. Golden Age Superman and Shazem were way better than this pile shit, heck even the mundane actual detective stories in that anthology was better.
>video games suck
the Arkham Series was great
wtf that level of facial detail is incredible. is this in-game footage?
yes
suck
Yes.
suck
No.
>>toys suck
No?
>>live-action sucks
live-action MCU and DC movies/tv shows suck, yes.
games suck
only the shit fps and action ones you play, but otherwise, no.
suck
>Yes.
>t. seething frogposter with a shit opinion
Sorry not sorry I told the truth
Your told an opinion.
He is right, bathomosexual.
You echoed his contrarian opinion. Yet Batman has more critically acclaimed comics than any superhero. By consensus both of you are wrong.
His opinion is right.
>muh popuarlity
>muh consensus
Another relativist batwanker
I'm objectively correct.
You homos are objectively wrong.
Seethe cope dilate.
>objectively correct.
Prove it b***h, prove how the bat comics are good, and not just muh popuarlity.
>homos
That's Batman.
>Seethe cope dilate
That's what you doing right now.
Popularity =/= critical acclaim. I'm not even wasting my time with a nignog who doesn't even know these concepts.
You are yet to prove morality is objective.
>critical acclaim
That's opinion bro, and you said it objective, and you failed to prove it.
>thinks morality is subjective while at the same time batman comics being good is objective
Are batwankers similar more to the clown?
>That's opinion bro, and you said it objective, and you failed to prove it.
It's not an opinion. It's a consensus.
>Are batwankers similar more to the clown?
I never said that was objective. I said there was a critical consensus.
>It's a consensus
>I never said that was objective
>I'm objectively correct
t. NPC and a liar
How is it an opinion when it can be proven true?
It is a subjective statement which doesn't match the consensus. It cannot be proven true.
the porn is great, though
Today we learned that Batwankers are braindead moral relativists who at the same breath claiming Bathomosexual is a good superhero.
Reminder that Batman canonically:
>Defeated Bizzaro
>Defeated Darkseid
>Made Carnage his b***h
>Punches harder than Daredevil
>Is the second smartest man on the planet
>Is cooler than every other superhero
Bizzaro
Darkseid
>>Made Carnage his b***h
harder than Daredevil
Aka heavily wanked and plotarmored and make others job.
>>Is the second smartest man on the planet
Also wanked, but also usually written by morons so doesn't hold up anyway.
>>Is cooler than every other superhero
More like the most overrated one.
>Wankwankwankwank
Maybe your pet character just sucks. Ever think about that?
If Captain Boomerang can frickin' tag the Flash don't be surprised when the Batchad plants a haymaker on Thawne.
Litreally is batwanker, that's the only character lazy DC keep pushing.
Batgay is the definition of wank.
>If Captain Boomerang can frickin' tag the Flash
That's also moronic, but doesn't happen as often with Batsy.
>but doesn't happen as often with Batsy.
t. doesn't read Flash comics
If Lex Luthor can use kryptonite to frick up Superman, what's really stopping Batman from doing the same?
If Wonder Woman can get KO'd by a goddamned talking egg, she's not gonna be a problem for the Batchad.
GL is basically a glass cannon, Aquaman was originally just peak human on land, only super strong under the sea. Only character I agree is a bit wanky to have Batman defeat is Martian Manhunter, but they're bros.
You talk about muh Batwank but forget that Superman used to only be able to leap a building in a single bound, Aquaman used to get fricked up by Black Manta, Wonder Woman could die if she got shot, Green Lantern could get taken out by punks wearing yellow. Meanwhile Batman was always a Vivtruvian ideal, always super smart, always David battling the Goliath. He hasn't really changed that much. Batman's not the guy with the wanking power level problem, it's everybody else.
Ben Affleck's Batman is the only Batman I can't stand
Really?